# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Gas

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Gas", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Ethereum Sets Three Core Priorities for 2026 Protocol Development

Ethereum has outlined its three core priorities for 2026 protocol development: scaling throughput, improving usability, and strengthening core security and resilience. This follows a productive 2025, which saw the Pectra and Fusaka upgrades. Pectra enabled smart contract-like features for regular wallets, while Fusaka introduced PeerDAS to increase data capacity. The major 2026 upgrades, Glamsterdam and Hegota, aim to process transactions in parallel, raise gas limits, expand data capacity for Layer-2s, and prepare for future security challenges like post-quantum threats. Meanwhile, ETH's price is down 2.6% in 24 hours, trading at $1,969.68.

TheNewsCrypto02/19 10:14

Ethereum Sets Three Core Priorities for 2026 Protocol Development

TheNewsCrypto02/19 10:14

ENSv2 Stays on Ethereum Mainnet, Drops Namechain Plan

In a strategic shift, the Ethereum Name Service (ENS) has announced that its next-generation protocol, ENSv2, will remain on the Ethereum Layer-1 mainnet, abandoning previous plans to build its own Layer-2 network called Namechain. The decision, shared by ENS co-founder Nick Johnson, is due to Ethereum's rapid scaling progress, which has already led to a 99% reduction in ENS registration gas costs over the past year. Johnson emphasized that staying on L1 aligns ENS with Ethereum's strong infrastructure guarantees and ensures faster, smoother performance for users. ENSv2 will still introduce upgrades such as hierarchical registries and expanded multi-chain support. Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin endorsed the move, stating that ENS is a critical on-chain asset and semi-financial application that belongs on Ethereum L1. The broader development roadmap for ENS remains unchanged.

TheNewsCrypto02/07 07:52

ENSv2 Stays on Ethereum Mainnet, Drops Namechain Plan

TheNewsCrypto02/07 07:52

Did Vitalik Buterin Just Kill Ethereum Layer-2s? Here’s What He Said

Vitalik Buterin is reframing the narrative around Ethereum's layer-2s, arguing that the original vision of L2s as "branded shards" primarily for scaling no longer fits current realities. With low L1 fees and an expected gas limit increase in 2026, he states Ethereum is scaling on its own, reducing the need for L2s solely for capacity. Buterin highlights that many L2s are slow to reach "stage 2" decentralization and some may never intend to, due to technical challenges or regulatory requirements that demand ultimate control. He proposes a spectrum model where L2s offer varying levels of security and trust, rather than uniformly claiming to "scale Ethereum." Buterin advises L2 teams to differentiate through features like specialized execution, privacy, or ultra-low latency, rather than scaling alone. He emphasizes the importance of "stage 1" security for handling ETH or Ethereum-based assets and advocates for a native ZK-EVM precompile to simplify trustless interoperability and synchronous composability. Buterin concludes that while some chains will remain trust-dependent, the focus should be on clear user guarantees and base-layer strength, shifting competition from scaling to proving credible offerings.

bitcoinist02/05 07:13

Did Vitalik Buterin Just Kill Ethereum Layer-2s? Here’s What He Said

bitcoinist02/05 07:13

Five Years Later, Vitalik Overturns the Future He Set for Ethereum

Five years after championing Layer 2 (L2) scaling as Ethereum's future, Vitalik Buterin has dramatically reversed his position, declaring that L2s have largely failed to fulfill their original vision of "branded sharding." In a pivotal post, he argued that most L2 solutions remain highly centralized, reliant on multi-signature bridges and sequencers, and thus are not truly extending Ethereum's security or decentralization. The initial push for L2s was a survival response to Ethereum's cripplingly high fees and congestion during the 2021 DeFi and NFT boom, when competitors like Solana gained traction. However, despite massive venture funding—with projects like Arbitrum, Optimism, and Starknet raising billions—progress toward full decentralization (Stage 2) has been slow. Many operate more like centralized databases, prioritizing control and regulatory compliance over Ethereum's core values. Meanwhile, Ethereum itself has scaled significantly. Through upgrades like EIP-4844 and increased gas limits, L1 transaction fees have plummeted by over 99%, often costing just cents. This reduces L2's cost advantage and exposes their drawbacks: bridge vulnerabilities, fragmented liquidity, and complex user experiences. Vitalik now urges L2s to pivot from mere scaling to providing unique functional value—like privacy, ultra-fast finality, or application-specific optimizations—that L1 cannot easily offer. He reframes L2s as a spectrum of specialized "plugins" rather than essential scaling layers. This shift signals a market consolidation where only L2s with genuine utility and decentralization will survive, ending an era of inflated valuations and "ghost chain" projects. Ethereum is reclaiming its sovereignty by becoming scalable on its own terms.

marsbit02/04 05:52

Five Years Later, Vitalik Overturns the Future He Set for Ethereum

marsbit02/04 05:52

Ethereum Anomaly: Full Activity, Dirt-Cheap Fees—What's the Catch Behind It?

Ethereum is experiencing a paradoxical surge in network activity, with daily transactions reaching a record 2.9 million and active addresses doubling, all while maintaining extremely low transaction fees of $0.1-$0.2. This follows major network upgrades like Pectra, Fusaka, and a subsequent blob parameter fork, which significantly increased data capacity and reduced costs. However, security researchers warn this record activity is not driven by organic growth but is largely fueled by industrial-scale "address poisoning" scams. Attackers exploit the low fees to send millions of micro-transactions (dusting) to new wallets, creating fake addresses that mimic a victim's real one in their transaction history. The goal is to trick users into accidentally sending funds to the fraudulent address. Analysis shows that 67% of new addresses received their first transaction as a sub-$1 stablecoin transfer from these poisoning contracts. Despite a success rate of only about 0.01%, the scheme is economically viable due to the low cost of transactions, with identified victims losing around $740,000. This artificial activity inflates on-chain metrics, masking a darker reality where low fees enable large-scale fraud disguised as legitimate adoption.

比推01/22 14:55

Ethereum Anomaly: Full Activity, Dirt-Cheap Fees—What's the Catch Behind It?

比推01/22 14:55

Behind Gas's 80% Plunge: Why Focusing on Work Became a Reason to Sell?

Recent discussions have been dominated by BAGS, a Solana-based token launch and trading platform built on Meteora. The project gained significant attention after veteran engineer Steve Yegge—formerly of Amazon and Google—shared his experience of unexpectedly receiving funds through the platform, shifting his initial skepticism to support. BAGS allows creators to receive a 1% transaction royalty on tokens, enabling passive income even without holding or issuing tokens. It also includes a profit-sharing mechanism for top token holders and integrates social features with token ownership. Two major meme tokens in the BAGS ecosystem are RALPH, a tribute to an AI-assisted coding method, and Gas, linked to Yegge’s AI coding coordinator project Gas Town. Gas notably routed 99% of its $270k in transaction fees back to Yegge. However, when Yegge recently announced he would focus on development rather than community engagement, the token’s market cap plummeted over 80%. This reaction highlights a core tension in Web3: the conflict between rapid speculative trading and the slow, focused work required for genuine technical development. While BAGS presents an innovative model for creator monetization, it also reveals a market preference for hype over substance. The incident underscores the need for greater alignment between long-term building and crypto market dynamics.

marsbit01/19 07:11

Behind Gas's 80% Plunge: Why Focusing on Work Became a Reason to Sell?

marsbit01/19 07:11

Interactive Tutorial | Seize the Last Chance to Earn Points Before ETHGas Token Launch

ETHGas, a DeFi project focused on solving Ethereum's high gas fees and network congestion, has announced that the snapshot for its GWEI token airdrop will occur on January 19 at 8:00 AM Beijing Time. The project, which raised $12 million in a seed round led by Polychain Capital, aims to make Ethereum transactions faster and cheaper through partnerships with major protocols. The total supply of GWEI tokens is 10 billion, allocated to ecosystem, investors, team, community, foundation, and advisors. Users can earn Beans points by completing social and referral tasks on the platform. Discord interaction points will also be converted to Beans, with a snapshot on January 15. A step-by-step guide is provided: users need to bind their X account and Web3 wallet on the ETHGas website, generate a Gas Report, and complete tasks to accumulate points before the snapshot. Existing users are advised to renew their Gas ID to ensure eligibility.

Odaily星球日报01/14 03:09

Interactive Tutorial | Seize the Last Chance to Earn Points Before ETHGas Token Launch

Odaily星球日报01/14 03:09

Why is Ethereum Urgently Needing ZK-ification?

The article discusses the urgent need for Ethereum to adopt zero-knowledge (ZK) technology as a core narrative for its future development. While Ethereum previously focused on ICOs, DeFi, and being a global financial settlement layer, it now lacks a compelling new narrative. ZK technology is highlighted as a critical solution, with Ethereum being the blockchain most invested in its development. ZK-EVM has reached the Alpha stage, a milestone celebrated by Vitalik Buterin. The primary motivation for ZK integration is to maintain Ethereum’s decentralization while improving scalability. Currently, increasing the Gas limit boosts TPS but raises node operation costs, potentially centralizing the network. ZK proofs allow nodes to verify transactions efficiently without expensive hardware upgrades, similar to automated exam grading versus manual checking. ZK itself doesn’t directly increase TPS but enables future Gas limit hikes with minimal node cost increases. The recent Fusaka upgrade, including PeerDAS, advances this goal. A ZK-powered Ethereum could achieve over 1000 TPS, strengthening its narrative. The article also addresses the role of third-party ZK teams (e.g., Polygon, Scroll, ZKsync, Taiko), which remain crucial for innovation and testing different ZK-EVM types (Type 1 to 4). ZK-VMs, like Brevis, are noted for higher performance and diversity, as they aren’t constrained by EVM compatibility. While ZK L1 may attract some L2 users, it also benefits L2s by reducing costs and improving foundational infrastructure. In summary, Ethereum’s ZK transformation, after years of development, is entering a critical phase, driven by collaborative efforts between Ethereum and external ZK projects.

marsbit01/13 00:37

Why is Ethereum Urgently Needing ZK-ification?

marsbit01/13 00:37

ETH Staking Data Reversal: Exits Zeroed Out VS Entries Surge by 1.3 Million, When to Buy the Dip?

ETH Staking Data Reverses: Exit Queue Clears vs. 1.3 Million ETH Entering—Time to Buy the Dip? On January 7, the Ethereum proof-of-stake exit queue fully cleared, indicating that months of withdrawal pressure have been digested with no new large-scale redemption requests observed. Meanwhile, the staking entry queue surged significantly, with approximately 1.3044 million ETH waiting to enter, a wait time of about 22 days and 15 hours. This marks a complete reversal from mid-September 2023, when 2.66 million ETH exited staking amid high price levels (~$4700), followed by a 34% price drop to around $3100 over the next three and a half months. The staking queue is often seen as a sentiment indicator, but not a direct price signal. The recent surge in entries is largely driven by a single large institution, BitMine, which staked about 771,000 ETH (18.6% of its holdings) in two weeks. This suggests the trend reflects institutional asset reallocation rather than broad market bullishness or immediate buying pressure. Beyond staking, Ethereum fundamentals show signs of improvement: Q4 2024 saw a record 8.7 million smart contracts deployed, stablecoin transfer volume on Ethereum exceeded $8 trillion, and gas fees hit all-time lows. Exchange balances of ETH are near historic lows (12.7 million, down over 25% since August 2025), indicating reduced selling pressure. Additionally, Ethereum’s TVL dominates 59% of the crypto market, while its market cap is only 14%, suggesting potential undervaluation compared to chains like Solana and BNB Chain. In summary, while the staking shift alone isn’t a definitive price catalyst, it aligns with broader fundamental improvements—developer activity, stablecoin usage, low fees, and reduced exchange supply—pointing to a recovery in Ethereum’s structural stability post-correction.

marsbit01/07 11:17

ETH Staking Data Reversal: Exits Zeroed Out VS Entries Surge by 1.3 Million, When to Buy the Dip?

marsbit01/07 11:17

Ethereum Block Space Futures Market ETHGas Aims to Become a Real-Time Execution Layer?

Ethereum block space futures market ETHGas has raised $12 million in a funding round led by Polychain Capital, with participation from several other investors. The platform aims to address Ethereum's gas fee volatility by allowing users to lock in future gas costs through futures contracts, making expenses predictable for DApps and L2 solutions. A key feature is its Blockspace auction market, where validators and block builders can auction space in upcoming blocks, ensuring transaction inclusion and execution efficiency. ETHGas ultimately envisions a "Real-Time Ethereum" by guaranteeing transaction execution in subsequent blocks. However, challenges include potential increased costs for retail users due to institutional dominance in auctions, and risks of market manipulation through futures trading. The platform plans to mitigate these issues to avoid undermining its core goals.

marsbit01/03 01:47