# Сопутствующие статьи по теме DeFi

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "DeFi", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Supported by 20+ Institutions: How Does Sui's New Primitive Hashi Rewrite the Rules of Bitcoin Financial Trust?

Sui has introduced Hashi, a new decentralized Bitcoin (BTC)抵押原语 (primitive) designed to enable trust-minimized and secure use of native BTC in DeFi on the Sui blockchain, backed by over 20 major institutions. Hashi allows users to抵押 Bitcoin without transferring custody to centralized entities. BTC remains on the Bitcoin network in a dedicated address, while a抵押凭证 is generated on Sui. This凭证, representing the locked BTC, can be used in Sui's smart contracts for lending, borrowing, and other DeFi activities. The system relies on Sui validators for security, with a Guardian Layer for additional protection against risks like validator collusion. Key to Hashi is its role as a "primitive"—a foundational building block for developers. It provides a standardized interface to integrate native BTC抵押 capabilities into applications like lending protocols, structured products, and RWA strategies, reducing development barriers. Institutional support spans custody (e.g., BitGo, Cobo), trading (e.g., FalconX, Bullish), security (e.g., OtterSec, Certora), and protocols (e.g., Suilend, Scallop). This ecosystem support aims to facilitate large-scale institutional BTC adoption into DeFi upon mainnet launch. Hashi addresses core trust issues in Bitcoin金融 by prioritizing non-custodial security, transparency, and composability, potentially unlocking Bitcoin's $1.4 trillion market cap for decentralized finance without sacrificing user control.

marsbit04/15 06:33

Supported by 20+ Institutions: How Does Sui's New Primitive Hashi Rewrite the Rules of Bitcoin Financial Trust?

marsbit04/15 06:33

The First Fed Chair with Crypto Holdings? Kevin Warsh Discloses at Least 20 Crypto Investments Including Solana and dYdX

Kevin Warsh, a former Federal Reserve governor and nominee for Fed Chair, has disclosed at least 20 cryptocurrency-related investments in a 69-page financial filing submitted to the U.S. Office of Government Ethics. The disclosure, required ahead of his Senate confirmation hearing, reveals indirect holdings in major crypto projects including Solana, dYdX, Optimism, Polychain Capital, Dapper Labs, and Lightning Network, among others. These investments are held through various venture funds and special purpose vehicles. Warsh and his wife, Jane Lauder, have a combined net worth of at least $192 million. While the crypto holdings are described as small, risk-focused positions, they span multiple sectors: L1 and L2 blockchains, DeFi protocols, NFT platforms, payment systems, and AI-integrated chains. Warsh has publicly endorsed Bitcoin in the past, calling it “a very good police for policy” and “the new gold for those under 40.” If confirmed, he would become the first Fed Chair with direct exposure to crypto venture investments. His confirmation hearing is scheduled for April 21, though political opposition remains a potential hurdle.

marsbit04/15 04:31

The First Fed Chair with Crypto Holdings? Kevin Warsh Discloses at Least 20 Crypto Investments Including Solana and dYdX

marsbit04/15 04:31

Ozak AI Maintains Strong Presale Activity as Market Attention Shifts Toward AI-Focused Blockchain Projects

Amid reduced crypto market volatility, investor focus is shifting toward utility-driven projects, with AI-blockchain initiatives like Ozak AI gaining prominence. While many altcoins struggle to attract funding, Ozak AI’s presale has surpassed $6 million, reflecting strong investor confidence. Priced at $0.014 per token, the project combines AI automation and analytics with decentralized infrastructure (DePIN) and cross-chain capabilities to support scalable Web3 applications. Strategic partnerships with firms like SINT, Hive Intel, and Pyth Network enhance its execution and data capabilities. This trend highlights a broader market move toward high-conviction, development-stage AI projects over speculative assets.

TheNewsCrypto04/15 04:05

Ozak AI Maintains Strong Presale Activity as Market Attention Shifts Toward AI-Focused Blockchain Projects

TheNewsCrypto04/15 04:05

Kraken is Also Issuing Tokens? A Comprehensive Guide to Ink Season 1 Points Program

Kraken Pro, the professional trading platform of the major cryptocurrency exchange Kraken, has launched the first season of its Ink Points program. Ink is Kraken’s Ethereum Layer 2 blockchain, introduced in October 2024, designed to simplify user onboarding into DeFi by addressing common pain points like complex wallet setups and high gas fees. The article explains the differences between Kraken's three service tiers: the basic Kraken for beginners, the subscription-based Kraken+ offering fee-free tiers, and Kraken Pro for advanced traders with lower fees and professional tools. All versions share the same account and funds. A step-by-step guide is provided for interacting with Kraken Pro: users must register, complete KYC, navigate to the "Promos" section to access Ink Points, deposit funds, and start trading to earn points. Ink Points serve as a loyalty incentive within the Ink Layer 2 ecosystem. Points are earned through trading, staking, and referrals on Kraken Pro, with an affiliate program offering 10% commission on referrals. Points are calculated daily, distributed weekly, and accumulated over four-week seasons. A ranked, tiered competition system is in place, though points currently have no monetary value or tokenization capability. The program is not accessible in all regions.

Odaily星球日报04/15 02:04

Kraken is Also Issuing Tokens? A Comprehensive Guide to Ink Season 1 Points Program

Odaily星球日报04/15 02:04

Crypto Traders On Alert: Is CLARITY The Last Chance To Protect Stablecoin Yield?

A U.S. Senator is preparing to release a compromise draft of the CLARITY Act to resolve the ongoing dispute over stablecoin yields. The key issue is whether crypto firms can pay interest on idle stablecoin holdings, which banks oppose as it competes with traditional deposits. The draft aims to distinguish between prohibited passive yield and permitted activity-based rewards. This legislation will significantly impact stablecoin yields, liquidity, and where traders hold their capital, potentially affecting competition with foreign digital currencies and offshore platforms.

bitcoinist04/14 20:06

Crypto Traders On Alert: Is CLARITY The Last Chance To Protect Stablecoin Yield?

bitcoinist04/14 20:06

Crypto Payments Just Changed In South Korea — Will This Avalanche Bet Rewrite The Rules?

A South Korean payment giant, NHN KCP, has partnered with Ava Labs to build a new payments-focused Layer-1 blockchain on Avalanche. This chain, developed via Ava Cloud, is designed for real-world payments with features like sub-second authorization, encrypted transaction data, and support for tokenized deposits and multi-stablecoin settlements. The collaboration aims to merge traditional payment expertise with blockchain technology to create an innovative business model. Its success depends on South Korea's upcoming crypto regulations. If implemented, it could position Avalanche (AVAX) as a major real-world payments network, potentially boosting its adoption and market appeal.

bitcoinist04/14 16:17

Crypto Payments Just Changed In South Korea — Will This Avalanche Bet Rewrite The Rules?

bitcoinist04/14 16:17

Why Does the Automated Market Maker (AMM) Mechanism Fail in the Prediction Market Field?

The article explores why Automated Market Makers (AMMs), particularly the x*y=k model popularized by Uniswap, fail in prediction markets despite their success in decentralized finance (DeFi). AMMs excel in DeFi by enabling permissionless liquidity provision and continuous trading for tokens that fluctuate indefinitely. However, prediction markets involve binary outcomes where assets settle to either $1 or $0 at expiration. This structural difference causes inherent flaws: liquidity providers (LPs) inevitably suffer losses as pools automatically rebalance toward the losing side upon settlement—making "impermanent loss" permanent. Additionally, AMMs distort price discovery for probability-based markets due to slippage and low liquidity. Early prediction platforms like Polymarket and Augur experimented with AMMs but abandoned them for Central Limit Order Books (CLOBs), which better handle precise probabilistic pricing and binary settlements. The article concludes that while AMMs revolutionized token swaps, their mechanics are mismatched for prediction markets, requiring alternative infrastructure that accommodates binary outcomes and mandatory settlement.

marsbit04/14 13:18

Why Does the Automated Market Maker (AMM) Mechanism Fail in the Prediction Market Field?

marsbit04/14 13:18

Franklin Templeton's Latest Research: How to Understand RWA Tokenization

Franklin Templeton's research explores the rapid growth and structural evolution of real-world asset (RWA) tokenization, which has expanded from $5 billion in 2023 to over $25 billion by early 2026. This surge is driven by clearer regulations and greater trust in blockchain technology. RWA tokenization covers assets like stocks, bonds, commodities, and real estate, distinguishing them from native cryptocurrencies. The market saw a turning point as tokenization expanded from government bonds to equities, with early movers like Robinhood, Kraken, and Ondo launching tokenized stock offerings. Traditional institutions, including DTCC, NYSE, and Nasdaq, have since announced significant tokenization initiatives, signaling a major shift in securities processing. The article identifies three tokenization models: 1. **Digital Native Tokens**: Direct ownership of the underlying asset with on-chain settlement (e.g., Franklin Templeton’s money market fund). 2. **Synthetic Asset Tokens**: Indirect economic exposure via special purpose vehicles, allowing broader DeFi utility but limited investor rights. 3. **Digital Mirror Tokens**: Tokenized receipts of off-chain assets, with legacy settlement systems and restricted transferability. Synthetic tokens are permissionless, requiring only KYT checks, while digital native and mirror tokens require full KYC/AML compliance. Each model offers distinct advantages in transparency, utility, and efficiency compared to traditional systems. Tokenization is driving convergence between crypto and traditional finance, with wallets emerging as a universal financial interface.

marsbit04/14 11:35

Franklin Templeton's Latest Research: How to Understand RWA Tokenization

marsbit04/14 11:35

What The SEC’s Latest Crypto Self-Custody Update Means For DeFi, Wallets, And Bitcoin

The US SEC's Division of Trading and Markets has issued new guidance clarifying that certain trading interfaces—including DeFi front-ends, wallets, and mobile apps—may avoid broker-dealer registration if they meet strict conditions. Key requirements include user control of private keys, purely facilitative functions without discretionary routing or investment advice, and transparent, fixed fees. The guidance applies only to "crypto asset securities," excluding Bitcoin, which the SEC considers a commodity. This marks a tonal shift from the Gensler era, emphasizing that self-custodial, non-intermediated activity lies outside broker-dealer regulation. SEC Chair Paul Atkins has hinted at a potential "innovation exemption" for decentralized trading infrastructures.

bitcoinist04/14 08:22

What The SEC’s Latest Crypto Self-Custody Update Means For DeFi, Wallets, And Bitcoin

bitcoinist04/14 08:22

Five-Year Exemption Window: SEC Officially Eases Restrictions on Crypto Asset Securities Trading Interfaces

The U.S. SEC’s Division of Trading and Markets has issued a staff statement providing a five-year exemption from broker-dealer registration for certain crypto asset securities trading interfaces, effective until April 13, 2031. The guidance clarifies that front-end interfaces—such as DeFi platforms, browser extensions, and self-custody wallet integrations—are not considered brokers if they solely act as neutral tools that translate user trading parameters into executable on-chain instructions and provide market data (e.g., gas fees, execution routes), without engaging in order execution, custody, or transaction facilitation. To qualify, these “Covered user interfaces” must adhere to 12 strict conditions centered on neutrality, transparency, and user control. Key requirements include: - Strict neutrality: no promotion of specific securities or execution paths; only objective, verifiable data display. - No payment for order flow or third-party compensation; only fixed, uniform fees permitted. - Full disclosure of conflicts, operational policies, and clear statements that the interface is not SEC-registered. The statement explicitly prohibits interfaces from negotiating terms, offering investment advice, handling user assets, or routing orders. This move aims to separate technical front-ends from financial intermediation, pushing the industry toward compliant, non-custodial, and transparent operations while addressing risks like MEV through enhanced user awareness.

marsbit04/14 07:25

Five-Year Exemption Window: SEC Officially Eases Restrictions on Crypto Asset Securities Trading Interfaces