# Сопутствующие статьи по теме DAO

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "DAO", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Truth, Bubbles, and Illusions: Looking Back at the 2025 Crypto Report Card

Based on the article "Truth, Bubbles, and Illusions: A Look Back at the 2025 Crypto Report Card," here is a summary of its main points: The author reflects on their 2025 predictions for the crypto market. They admit to being wrong about Bitcoin's peak in Q4, as the cycle held, and wrong about a memecoin or AI agent supercycle, as retail investors favored traditional assets like gold and AI stocks instead. The AI x Crypto narrative saw mixed results with project development but poor token performance, and NFTs were declared "dead." Key insights from 2025 include: 1. **Bitcoin ETFs acted as a floor, not a ceiling:** Massive selling by long-term holders created a $95B supply overhang, causing BTC to underperform. However, its correlation with traditional risk assets fell, which is bullish long-term. 2. **Airdrops are not dead:** Nearly $4.5B was airdropped in 2025 (e.g., Story Protocol, Berachain). The game has shifted towards requiring more focused, high-conviction farming due to points fatigue and better Sybil detection. 3. **Fee switches set a price floor, not an engine for growth:** Token buybacks from fees establish a bottom price but don't guarantee appreciation, as seen with UNI's price action. The market treats everything as a trade. 4. **Stablecoins gained traction for payments, but "proxy trading" was difficult:** Stablecoins like USDT saw real-world adoption for payments. However, investing in related equities (e.g., Circle's IPO) proved challenging, as gains were often sold into. 5. **DeFi is more centralized than CeFi:** High concentration was observed in lending (Aave), L2s (multisigs), and oracles (Chainlink). Conflicts between equity holders (e.g., "Labs") and token holders raised questions about true ownership and governance. The overarching conclusion is that 2025 marked the "death of HODL culture." Everything became a short-term trade with very brief exit windows, and long-term conviction in tokens vanished.

比推01/12 04:09

Truth, Bubbles, and Illusions: Looking Back at the 2025 Crypto Report Card

比推01/12 04:09

6th Man Ventures Founder: How to Find the Most Valuable Crypto Projects?

Founder of 6th Man Ventures discusses the viability of the "dual-token + equity" structure, emphasizing that there is no one-size-fits-all answer. The key is backing an exceptional, long-term-focused team committed to building a founder-led, enduring enterprise, similar to Binance’s Changpeng Zhao. He argues that for application-layer projects requiring sustained leadership, tokens often underperform equity. Many DeFi 1.0 founders have departed, leaving DAOs and part-time contributors in "maintenance mode," struggling with slow and ineffective decision-making. In contrast, equity isn’t always superior—tokens enable unique utilities like fee discounts, staking for airdrops, and access rights, which equity cannot easily replicate. "Ownership tokens" currently face limitations in product integration and legal recognition in the U.S. due to regulatory gaps. However, a hybrid model is proposed: an equity entity operates on a "cost-plus" basis to serve a token-driven protocol, aiming to maximize token and ecosystem value rather than corporate profits. This structure benefits token holders with a well-funded Labs entity for development and a core team heavily incentivized via token holdings. Success hinges on trust in the team’s execution and vision, as token holders lack strong legal protections. Ultimately, team quality, credibility, and execution determine value. Over time, consistent delivery and clear value accrual to tokens—through buybacks, governance, and utility—will allow the best tokens to thrive by 2026, even with equity/Labs entities.

marsbit01/08 08:59

6th Man Ventures Founder: How to Find the Most Valuable Crypto Projects?

marsbit01/08 08:59

What Endures Through Bull and Bear Markets Is Not Consensus, But Structure: Learning from Century-Old Football Clubs to Understand Web3

This article draws parallels between the sustainability of century-old European football clubs and the challenges faced by Web3 projects in building lasting communities. It argues that while Web3 excels at discussing growth, incentives, and tokenomics, it often lacks the deep sense of belonging and trust that allows communities to endure market cycles. The piece uses the origins of clubs like Manchester United, FC Barcelona, and Juventus to illustrate how they were founded on strong cultural identity, grassroots community, and a shared sense of purpose—principles that Web3 projects can emulate. It highlights how these identities, forged in local communities and through powerful narratives, created unwavering fan loyalty. Furthermore, it examines how clubs like Liverpool and Borussia Dortmund survived existential crises not through wealthy owners, but through the unwavering support of their fan communities. The article points to governance models like the member-owned structure of FC Barcelona or Germany’s “50+1” rule as examples of how deep community integration creates resilience. Finally, it discusses the role of legendary figures, like Liverpool’s Bill Shankly, as spiritual leaders who embody the community’s values and provide a narrative anchor. For Web3, this underscores the importance of authentic leadership and using key figures to build emotional resonance, while also ensuring the community’s culture is institutionalized to outlast any individual. The core conclusion is that Web3 can learn from football’s focus on authentic identity, community-powered governance, and shared cultural narratives to build projects that survive beyond short-term hype.

比推12/30 04:52

What Endures Through Bull and Bear Markets Is Not Consensus, But Structure: Learning from Century-Old Football Clubs to Understand Web3

比推12/30 04:52

活动图片