# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Compliance

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Compliance", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Discourse Power, Internalization, Positive Externalities: Understanding Binance's Triple Dilemma and 'Original Sin'

An article titled "Discourse Power, Internalization, Positive Externalities: Understanding Binance's Triple Dilemma and 'Original Sin'" critiques Binance's dominant role in the crypto industry. It argues that Binance's near-monopoly on "discourse power" allows it to dictate which projects succeed, stifling genuine innovation as builders and VCs focus on pleasing its listing committee rather than users. This leads to a "blackout" effect, hindering organic growth. Furthermore, Binance's strategy is described as extreme "internalization." Its Launchpad model, featuring high Fully Diluted Valuations (FDV) and low circulation, functions like an internal capital vacuum. This, along with activities on BNB Chain, turns the market into a "slaughterhouse" where insiders profit while retail investors lose, preventing mass adoption and consuming user trust. Finally, the article highlights Binance's lack of "positive externalities." Unlike competitors like Coinbase (contributing to compliance and ETFs) or the Ethereum Foundation (advancing core technology), Binance's actions are seen as self-serving. Its focus on memes and a closed "walled garden" ecosystem, instead of fostering real innovation or open infrastructure, fails to benefit the broader industry. As the industry leader, this perceived lack of responsibility and担当 (dāndāng, bearing responsibility) creates a "virtue-position mismatch," making it a target of criticism. The solution isn't PR but ceding discourse power to the community and channeling liquidity to support genuine technological progress.

marsbit01/30 04:45

Discourse Power, Internalization, Positive Externalities: Understanding Binance's Triple Dilemma and 'Original Sin'

marsbit01/30 04:45

Regulatory Clarity for Tokenized Securities: Which Hot Projects Won't Pass the SEC's Scrutiny?

The U.S. SEC has issued new guidance clarifying the regulatory treatment of tokenized securities, emphasizing that the use of blockchain does not change the fundamental nature of securities obligations. The guidance distinguishes between two main types of tokenized securities: those led by the issuer (where blockchain is used as a technical upgrade to record ownership registry, without altering rights or regulatory requirements) and those created by third parties (which may not confer direct ownership rights and introduce additional risks such as custody or counterparty risk). The SEC stresses that regardless of the technology used, any asset that meets the definition of a security or derivative remains subject to existing federal securities laws. This move aims to address market confusion, particularly around unauthorized “tokenized stocks” that mimic equity without issuer involvement—such as certain products offered by platforms like Robinhood in Europe or third-party claims of tokenized equity in companies like OpenAI. In contrast, compliant initiatives—such as those by Kraken, NYSE, or DTCC—focus on integrating tokenization within existing regulatory frameworks, ensuring issuer participation and clear accountability. The guidance reinforces that tokenization is not a shortcut to bypass securities laws but must align with legal and economic substance.

Odaily星球日报01/30 03:36

Regulatory Clarity for Tokenized Securities: Which Hot Projects Won't Pass the SEC's Scrutiny?

Odaily星球日报01/30 03:36

活动图片