# Сопутствующие статьи по теме Bitcoin

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "Bitcoin", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Reviewing Past Bitcoin Bull Markets: Why the Four-Year Cycle Occurs and Is It Over?

The article examines Bitcoin's four-year market cycles, traditionally aligned with its halving events, and questions whether this pattern still holds. It outlines the typical cycle phases: accumulation (low volatility, long-term buying), pre-halving bullish anticipation, a parabolic bull run with retail FOMO and leverage, and a sharp correction leading to a bear market. Bitcoin halvings, which reduce mining rewards by half every four years, are highlighted as a core mechanism for creating scarcity, similar to precious metals. Past cycles (2013, 2017, 2021) are reviewed, each driven by distinct catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox collapse, ICO boom, COVID-19 stimulus) and ending with crashes exceeding 80%. Reasons for the cycle include the stock-to-flow model (measuring scarcity), market psychology/self-fulfilling prophecies, and global liquidity conditions. The current 2025 cycle is noted for unprecedented institutional involvement via ETFs and corporate treasuries, causing Bitcoin to hit new highs before the 2024 halving with less retail participation. Arguments for the cycle's end cite increased adoption by disciplined institutions (reducing volatility), Bitcoin's growing correlation with macro factors like Fed policy, and the diminishing impact of each halving. Key indicators to watch for cycle validation include post-halving price surges, large leverage unwinds, and retail altcoin speculation. The conclusion states that while historical patterns are evident, Bitcoin's evolution into a mainstream asset makes future cycles potentially different. Only time will tell if the four-year cycle persists or becomes obsolete.

marsbit12/16 06:26

Reviewing Past Bitcoin Bull Markets: Why the Four-Year Cycle Occurs and Is It Over?

marsbit12/16 06:26

Xinjiang's Computing Power Resurges, Then Gets Cleared Out Within 48 Hours: What Exactly Happened to the Bitcoin Network This Time?

On December 16, Bitcoin network hashrate dropped sharply within 48 hours, widely attributed to the concentrated shutdown and clearance of mining facilities in Xinjiang. Estimates suggest between 200,000 to 400,000 mining machines went offline, causing a hashrate decline of nearly 30%, from around 1200 EH/s to approximately 836 EH/s at its lowest. The resurgence of mining in Xinjiang was driven by three factors: surplus energy capacity and low electricity prices, underutilized data center infrastructure seeking revenue, and shorter ROI periods for miners amid rising Bitcoin prices. Despite China’s clear policy against cryptocurrency mining—classifying it as an obsolete industry—mining resurfaced periodically due to economic pressures and infrastructure availability. The recent crackdown was swift and severe, following a multi-department regulatory meeting emphasizing continued strict oversight of crypto-related activities, including anti-money laundering and cross-border capital risks. The concentrated nature of mining operations in specific regions meant that regulatory actions led to large-scale, simultaneous shutdowns. Short-term impacts include disrupted cash flows for miners and potential market volatility due to heightened policy sensitivity. In the medium term, the Bitcoin network will adjust mining difficulty, and hashrate is likely to migrate to other regions. The event underscores that mining in China remains a high-risk, grey-area activity driven by economic incentives rather than regulatory greenlight.

marsbit12/16 04:33

Xinjiang's Computing Power Resurges, Then Gets Cleared Out Within 48 Hours: What Exactly Happened to the Bitcoin Network This Time?

marsbit12/16 04:33

活动图片