# Сопутствующие статьи по теме AI

Новостной центр HTX предлагает последние статьи и углубленный анализ по "AI", охватывающие рыночные тренды, новости проектов, развитие технологий и политику регулирования в криптоиндустрии.

Over 80% of New Tokens Peak at TGE: The Root Cause and Cure for Web3's False Prosperity

Nearly 85% of tokens launched in 2025 have seen their fully diluted valuation (FDV) fall below their initial TGE valuation, with a median decline of 71%. Only 15% of new tokens outperformed their TGE price. This trend reveals systemic issues in the Web3 space, where high fundraising, large communities, and major exchange listings—often considered markers of quality—show no statistical correlation with token performance. Key findings include: - Projects raising $1 million performed similarly to those raising $10 million. Excessive funding often leads to faster token failure due to investor unlocks and market pressure. - Community size (e.g., 50k vs. 500k followers) has no predictive value for token success. Most "communities" are speculative and disappear when prices drop. - Token pricing is critical: tokens priced between $0.01–$0.05 at launch showed the best survival rates, while those outside this range often failed. - AI tokens outperformed others in both peak and sustainability, while Gaming and DeFi sectors struggled severely. - IDO/IEO platforms provided no reliable protection; most launches resulted in significant losses. The root causes include flawed tokenomics, over-reliance on speculative metrics, poor timing, and a market that prioritizes narrative over substance. The article urges builders in 2026 to focus on sustainable fundraising, realistic token pricing, product-market fit, and genuine metrics like user retention and revenue—rather than vanity indicators. The old playbook is broken; adaptation and integration are essential for survival.

marsbit12/23 03:07

Over 80% of New Tokens Peak at TGE: The Root Cause and Cure for Web3's False Prosperity

marsbit12/23 03:07

2025 Asset Review: Why Did Bitcoin Significantly Underperform Gold and U.S. Stocks?

In 2025, Bitcoin underperformed compared to both gold and U.S. equities, particularly those driven by AI leaders like NVIDIA. This divergence stems from deeper physical and informational dynamics rather than mere price movements. A key factor is energy arbitrage and shifting computational priorities. AI's exponential growth in total factor productivity has attracted massive capital and energy investment, diverting resources away from Bitcoin mining. Electricity used for AI training now yields higher marginal economic returns than Bitcoin’s proof-of-work mechanism, leading many miners to transition to AI data centers. Gold’s strong performance reflects its atomic-level certainty amid rising geopolitical entropy. As a physical store of value, it remains viable without digital infrastructure—unlike Bitcoin, which still depends on internet connectivity and centralized liquidity channels. Bitcoin is increasingly seen as a liquidity overflow asset, while gold serves as a hedge against systemic collapse. The introduction of Bitcoin ETFs has also diluted its volatility, integrating it into traditional portfolios and reducing its explosive potential. It now behaves more like a high-beta tech asset, sensitive to prolonged high-interest rates. Moreover, the opportunity cost of holding non-cash-flow-generating Bitcoin has risen as capital flocks to high-growth equities anticipating a productivity singularity led by AI. From a complex systems perspective, the current phase represents a recalibration. U.S. markets are in a parabolic AI-driven acceleration, while gold acts as a Cantor Set-like resilient core in a fragmenting global order. Bitcoin is caught between sell pressure from early adopters and steady institutional accumulation, leading to low volatility and price compression—a dynamic known as attractor reorganization. Bitcoin hasn’t been invalidated; it is being repriced. It temporarily yields to AI-driven growth and geopolitical safety but remains a long-term cross-cycle store of value, awaiting future liquidity expansion and shifts in technological efficiency.

marsbit12/23 02:09

2025 Asset Review: Why Did Bitcoin Significantly Underperform Gold and U.S. Stocks?

marsbit12/23 02:09

Lighthouses Guide the Way, Torches Claim Sovereignty: A Hidden War Over AI Allocation Rights

The article "Lighthouse Guides Direction, Torch Fights for Sovereignty: A Hidden War Over AI Allocation" by Zhixiong Pan examines the underlying power struggle in AI development, moving beyond superficial metrics like model size and performance rankings. It identifies two coexisting paradigms: the "Lighthouse," representing state-of-the-art (SOTA), centralized AI systems controlled by tech giants like OpenAI and Google, which push cognitive boundaries but are resource-intensive and create dependency risks; and the "Torch," symbolizing open-source, locally deployable models (e.g., DeepSeek, Mistral) that democratize access, ensure data sovereignty, and enable private, customizable AI assets. The Lighthouse drives innovation and sets technical directions but poses risks in accessibility, control, and single-point failures. The Torch, while shifting security and responsibility to users, offers resilience, cost stability, and compliance for critical applications in sectors like healthcare and finance. The interplay between these models forms a symbiotic relationship: Lighthouses expand capabilities, while Torches disseminate and stabilize these advances, collectively elevating AI’s baseline. Ultimately, the conflict is over AI allocation rights—defining default intelligence, managing externalities, and determining individual control. A dual strategy—using Lighthouses for frontier tasks and Torches for private, reliable deployment—is proposed as the pragmatic path forward, balancing extreme capability with broad, sovereign access. The true measure of the AI era lies not in raw power but in whether individuals possess "a light they don’t have to borrow from anyone."

marsbit12/22 11:13

Lighthouses Guide the Way, Torches Claim Sovereignty: A Hidden War Over AI Allocation Rights

marsbit12/22 11:13

活动图片