Sharplink CEO: Selling off ETH Now is Like Selling Amazon During the Internet Bubble

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-30Обновлено 2026-05-30

Введение

Sharplink CEO Joseph Chalom argues that selling Ethereum (ETH) now is akin to selling Amazon during the internet bubble. He asserts that the Ethereum Foundation (EF) is correctly focusing on core protocol development, security, and decentralization, which form the bedrock of institutional trust. Chalom, a former BlackRock executive, emphasizes Ethereum's leading position in processing stablecoin settlements, tokenizing real-world assets, and hosting high-value DeFi transactions. He contends that Ethereum's decentralization is a strength, not a weakness, and is crucial for its role as a future financial settlement layer. Comparing ETH to early Amazon, he believes the market underestimates its potential total addressable market, which is the entire global financial system, not just crypto trading. Chalom views the current market fear and negative sentiment, highlighted by a prominent figure liquidating ETH holdings, as a potential buying opportunity for disciplined capital, drawing parallels to Warren Buffett's strategy. He calls for ecosystem participants to amplify Ethereum's narrative and actively support what he sees as an impending "super-cycle" of institutional adoption, noting Sharplink's significant investments and initiatives in the space.

Original |Joseph Chalom, CEO of Sharplink

Compiled | Odaily Planet Daily Qin Xiaofeng(@QinXiaofeng 888 )

Editor's Note: This week, former staunch ETH bull and Bankless co-founder David Hoffman published an article explaining why he sold off his ETH, which resonated strongly within the Ethereum community. The article garnered an astonishing 1.8 million reads on the X platform. Amidst the overwhelming public sentiment, Sharplink (Nasdaq: SBET), the second-largest listed company with an ETH treasury, couldn't sit idly by. (Odaily Note: Sharplink's treasury holds approximately 868,000 ETH, valued at nearly $1.8 billion, second only to BitMine.)

On May 30th, Sharplink CEO Joseph Chalom published an article titled "Ethereum Going Back on Offense" to bolster confidence among ETH holders. He stated that the Ethereum Foundation (EF) is fulfilling its core mission, focusing on the core protocol, security, and decentralization, which is the very foundation of institutional trust. He likened ETH today to Amazon during the internet bubble, undervalued and misunderstood (Odaily Note: Standard Chartered Bank has made a similar analogy, emphasizing the severe disconnect between ETH fundamentals and its price). Joseph Chalom believes the current market fear presents a prime buying opportunity, and that all parties in the ecosystem need to voice their support actively to drive an institutional adoption supercycle.

Below is the full text of Joseph Chalom's article, compiled by Odaily Planet Daily. Enjoy~

————————————————

The current controversies surrounding the Ethereum Foundation (EF) and the noise driven by ETH price volatility are overshadowing the broader picture. While I understand these discussions, they are not what will determine who leads the financial infrastructure of the next decade.

This is a perspective from a stakeholder. Before leading Sharplink, I spent twenty years as a senior executive at BlackRock, overseeing fintech business and digital asset strategy. That experience gave me a deep understanding of what institutions truly need before deploying capital into new infrastructure.

I want to cut through the noise and offer a different perspective on where Ethereum stands today and where it is headed.

The Ethereum Foundation is Fulfilling its Core Mission

Take a step back. What has been delivered over the past decade? On the attributes most valued for institutional adoption—trust, security, and liquidity—Ethereum is far ahead. It is winning, and by a significant margin.

Look at the data: Ethereum settles the majority of the world's stablecoin value; it hosts far more tokenized real-world asset projects than any other blockchain; it is the default venue for high-value DeFi transactions. In these dimensions, competitors are playing catch-up.

This is no accident. It's the result of years of rigorous protocol development by the Ethereum Foundation (EF). Ethereum is the only blockchain that has successfully launched major upgrades at its base layer for a decade running: The Merge, EIP-1559, Dencun, Pectra, Fusaka. The upcoming Glamsterdam upgrade will bring a step-change in scaling, while the EF is leading the industry toward the quantum-resistant era. This is the most ambitious technical roadmap in the entire industry.

Decentralization is a Feature, Not a Bug

Some of the fiercest criticism of the EF frames decentralization as a weakness. This viewpoint completely inverts the logic for institutions. The Ethereum ecosystem has the largest developer community of any blockchain—and the vast majority of those developers are not affiliated with the EF.

No foundation should have full control over a blockchain. Institutions are not looking to lock themselves in, only to migrate from one proprietary system to another. They need assurance that the underlying properties they rely on cannot be arbitrarily changed by a centralized owner. In fact, no blockchain should be dependent on a single entity.

Ethereum's credible neutrality and decentralization are precisely why it is becoming the future settlement layer for finance. These are not flaws.

Between a foundation focused on security, privacy, quantum resistance, and the core protocol, versus one optimized for short-term marketing, I choose the former every time.

ETH's Value Parallels Amazon

History is filled with examples where foundational innovation was overlooked by critics enamored with newer, trendier upstarts—only for the pessimists to be proven wrong. Amazon is the archetypal case.

Early on, the consensus on Amazon was that it was just an online bookseller propped up by the internet bubble and consistently losing money. Shorts focused solely on its profit & loss statement, missing Jeff Bezos's long-term vision—he was building an entirely new structure for e-commerce. Its total addressable market (TAM) was never just book sales, but the entire retail economy, later expanding into cloud computing and media. Analysts fixated on Amazon's short-term stock price missed the bigger opportunity.

Today, Ethereum and ETH are in the same position. Their TAM is not cryptocurrency trading; it is the entire global financial system. ETH's intrinsic value is tied to the network's expansion. And the Ethereum network is at an inflection point for step-change growth in transaction volume—encompassing stablecoins, tokenized RWAs, DeFi, and the emerging wave of agentic finance. To secure such enormous transaction volume, Ethereum will be the in-demand incentive layer and ultimate trust infrastructure, with a corresponding monetary premium.

No ETH, no Ethereum. The asset and the network are inseparable.

It's Time to Make Money When Others Capitulate

In nearly every market cycle, the moment of maximum retail capitulation and lowest sentiment is precisely when disciplined capital moves in to build positions. Warren Buffett built Berkshire by buying quality assets at the point of maximum pessimism—from GEICO in the 1970s to Bank of America and Goldman Sachs during the 2008 financial crisis.

For much of the past year, the Fear & Greed Index has reflected extreme fear. The smartest investors buy quality assets when the market is most fearful. They invest counter-cyclically, not pro-cyclically.

In the crypto winter following FTX's collapse, most institutions ran from Bitcoin and ETH exposure or shelved product launches. When I was at BlackRock, we did the opposite. We doubled down, invested in infrastructure, built ecosystem partnerships, and launched products bridging TradFi with crypto.

We can all learn a lot from Buffett and BlackRock.

Ethereum Needs New Voices

The EF is fulfilling its core mission. Going forward, it will focus even more on CROPS. (Odaily Note: CROPS is an internal framework prioritizing censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security. This shift means the Ethereum Foundation will focus on making Ethereum a "haven technology," prioritizing fundamental, long-term protocol security, user privacy, and resistance to censorship/control, rather than pursuing aggressive scaling and raw speed).

For most, it's clear the current gap is in go-to-market leadership; meanwhile, institutions are broadly eager to embrace Ethereum. I firmly believe stakeholders and participants in the ecosystem need to play a larger role in Ethereum's narrative and institutional adoption.

Since last summer, digital asset treasury companies and Ethereum's core stewards have played a crucial part in this. This includes Sharplink, Tom Lee of BitMine, Joe Lubin of Consensys, Etherealize, Nethermind, Aave, Morpho, the EEA, and other ecosystem stakeholders. We also work closely with the small team within the EF focused on institutional education and adoption.

Sharplink is actively investing in this ecosystem. We were the first company to stake billions in ETH capital and have deployed hundreds of millions into high-quality DeFi protocols. We recently announced a $125 million DeFi yield fund with Galaxy Digital to provide capital to existing and emerging protocols.

That said, we can and will do more—actively advocating for Ethereum and proactively supporting the coming institutional adoption supercycle.

The future of Ethereum is happening now.

Recommended Reading:

"Bankless Co-founder's Confession on Selling ETH: Ethereum Did the Rightest Thing, But 'ETH as Money' Has No Future"

"Bankless Founder Sells Off ETH, Ethereum Faith Collective Shattered"

Похожее

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手2 ч. назад

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手2 ч. назад

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbit2 ч. назад

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbit2 ч. назад

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbit3 ч. назад

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbit3 ч. назад

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbit4 ч. назад

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbit4 ч. назад

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

Cognition AI, the company behind the AI programmer "Devin," has raised over $1 billion in new funding at a valuation of $26 billion, just eight months after reaching a $10.2 billion valuation. The round was led by Lux Capital, General Catalyst, and 8VC. Founded by three young Chinese entrepreneurs with strong competitive programming backgrounds, Cognition initially gained fame with Devin, marketed as the world's first AI software engineer capable of handling tasks from start to finish. While its early demos were impressive, real-world usage revealed reliability and cost-effectiveness issues, leading to a significant price cut for Devin in 2025. A pivotal moment came when Cognition acquired the assets of AI IDE company Windsurf after a failed acquisition by OpenAI. This move gave Cognition a crucial developer-facing tool, allowing it to pursue a two-pronged strategy: Devin for autonomous task execution and Windsurf for integrated, collaborative coding within an IDE. This shift helped the company move away from the controversial "AI replacement" narrative towards a model of augmenting human engineers, particularly for repetitive or maintenance tasks. This strategic pivot is backed by strong commercial metrics. The company reports a 10x increase in enterprise usage this year, with an annual revenue run-rate of $492 million and a 50% month-over-month growth in enterprise Devin usage over the past six months. Its client list now includes major corporations like Goldman Sachs and Mercedes-Benz, as well as government agencies like NASA and the U.S. Army. Investors are betting on Cognition becoming a foundational piece of next-generation software engineering infrastructure, positioning it at the center of a hybrid future where AI agents and human developers work in tandem.

marsbit5 ч. назад

$26 Billion: An 'All-Chinese Team' Backs the World's Highest-Valued AI Programming Company

marsbit5 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Manyu: восходящая мем-звезда на Ethereum, готовая открыть новую эру культуры Shiba

Manyu - это мемтокен на Ethereum, который приносит децентрализованную культурную и развлекательную ценность через вирусное влияние в соцсетях и вовлечённость сообщества.

1.9k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.11.27Обновлено 2025.11.27

Manyu: восходящая мем-звезда на Ethereum, готовая открыть новую эру культуры Shiba

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам 14: Glamsterdam — самое ожидаемое обновление Ethereum в 2026 году

Ordinals/Runes по-прежнему стимулируют доходы от комиссий за блоки и активность разработчиков, рассматриваются как отправная точка «нативной эмиссии активов» в сети.

1.5k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2026.04.29Обновлено 2026.04.29

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам 14: Glamsterdam — самое ожидаемое обновление Ethereum в 2026 году

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ETH (ETH) представлены ниже.

活动图片