Pundit Reveals The One Thing That XRP Holders Are Missing

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-03-18Обновлено 2026-03-18

Введение

Crypto pundit Nick argues that XRP holders are overly focused on price action and are missing the significant adoption wave the altcoin is experiencing. He states that despite continuous positive developments—including protocol upgrades, the introduction of a permissioned DEX for institutional use, and AI integration—investors remain dissatisfied until the price rises. Nick is extremely bullish, believing these accumulated advancements are building pressure" behind the scenes and will eventually lead to a major price surge. Supporting this, on-chain data shows the XRP Ledger reached a record 7.7 million non-empty wallets and saw a 5-week high in active addresses, with daily transactions surging nearly 300% since mid-2025. XRP is currently trading around $1.53, up over 3% in 24 hours.

Crypto pundit Nick has explained that XRP holders are too focused on price rather than on the massive adoption the altcoin is seeing. He noted that these adoptions are stacking and would, at some point, serve as catalysts to send the altcoin to new highs.

Pundit Says XRP Holders Are Missing The Adoption Wave

In an X post, Nick said that the majority of XRP holders are missing the adoption wave the altcoin is seeing and are focusing so much on the price. He noted that no matter how positive the news is, the token holders won’t be happy until they see the chart going up. The pundit added that they are missing the big point on why the chart is going up in the first place.

Nick declared that he is extremely bullish even if the altcoin were to hit $1 or lower. He explained that they have watched the XRP Ledger experience upgrade after upgrade over the last few months. He added that amendments are being passed to enable institutional adoption, with one of the latest being the permissioned DEX.

Furthermore, the pundit said that AI is being utilized with massive markets being tapped into. As such, he doesn’t see any reason why anyone could be bearish at this point. Nick assured that, at the end of the day, these positive developments are all pressure-cooking behind the scenes of negative price action.

Nick said that XRP holders simply don’t realize that these positive developments stack up over time, eventually leading to a vertical price action. He added that the token will wake up soon and that it will be way bigger than the move from November 2024 to January 2025.

XRPL Sees Massive Adoption Boost

In an X post, on-chain analytics platform Santiment revealed that the XRP Ledger now has more than 7.7 million holders (non-empty wallets) for the first time in its 13+ year history, as its usage continues to grow. The platform added that the network closed yesterday with a 5-week high of 46,767 active addresses as price jumped 14% in the last 48 hours, rising above $1.60.

XRP treasury company Evernorth earlier highlighted that the Ledger is seeing increased adoption, with transactions nearing 3 million daily as of last week. The transactions are up from 1 million daily in mid-2025, representing an increase of almost 300%. In line with this, the firm declared that price moves attract attention and that the network activity shows where adoption is growing as more financial assets move on-chain.

Related Reading: Why The XRP Price Might Crash To $0.87 Before The Bear Market Ends

At the time of writing, the altcoin’s price is trading at around $1.53, up over 3% in the last 24 hours, according to data from CoinMarketCap.

XRP trading at $1.52 on the 1D chart | Source: XRPUSDT on Tradingview.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to crypto pundit Nick, what are XRP holders too focused on, and what are they missing?

AXRP holders are too focused on the price rather than on the massive adoption the altcoin is seeing. They are missing the adoption wave and the positive developments that are stacking up to serve as catalysts for future price increases.

QWhat specific developments on the XRP Ledger does Nick mention as reasons for his bullish outlook?

ANick mentions that the XRP Ledger has experienced upgrade after upgrade, amendments are being passed to enable institutional adoption (like the permissioned DEX), and AI is being utilized to tap into massive markets.

QWhat on-chain milestone did Santiment report for the XRP Ledger, and what was the associated price movement?

ASantiment reported that the XRP Ledger now has more than 7.7 million non-empty wallets for the first time in its history. The network also closed with a 5-week high of 46,767 active addresses as the price jumped 14% in the last 48 hours, rising above $1.60.

QHow much has the daily transaction count on the XRP Ledger increased since mid-2025, according to Evernorth?

AAccording to Evernorth, daily transactions on the XRP Ledger have increased by almost 300%, rising from 1 million daily in mid-2025 to nearly 3 million daily as of last week.

QWhat is the current price of XRP and its 24-hour performance at the time the article was written?

AAt the time of writing, XRP is trading at around $1.53, up over 3% in the last 24 hours.

Похожее

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

A critical vulnerability in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, discovered by researcher Taylor Hornby on May 29, 2026, could have allowed an attacker to create an unlimited amount of undetectable counterfeit ZEC. The flaw, involving an under-constrained element in the Orchard circuit, existed from the pool's 2022 activation until an emergency fix was deployed by June 2, 2026. Hornby identified the bug using AI-assisted auditing tools and confirmed its exploitability in a test environment. Due to Orchard's privacy features, which hide transaction amounts and history, there is no cryptographic way to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited before the fix. While Shielded Labs assesses prior exploitation as unlikely, this uncertainty has sparked a debate on proving supply integrity in privacy-preserving systems. In response, Shielded Labs and other developers are exploring a network upgrade, potentially involving a new shielded pool and formal verification of the circuit rules to prevent future vulnerabilities and allow verification of the ZEC supply's integrity. ZEC's price fell nearly 45% following the disclosure.

bitcoinist10 мин. назад

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

bitcoinist10 мин. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit1 ч. назад

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

In 2026, a historic shift occurred in AI as major cloud providers' inference spending surpassed training spending for the first time, signaling a move from "building large models" to "using large models." This shifts the core challenge from computing power to the "memory wall"—the bottleneck of data movement (model weights, activations, KV Cache) between external DRAM and processors, where energy and latency from data transfer far exceed computation itself. Companies like Nvidia face GPU idle time due to bandwidth limits. In contrast, Cerebras Systems adopts a radical "wafer-scale" approach with its Wafer-Scale Engine (WSE). Instead of cutting a silicon wafer into many chips, Cerebras uses almost the entire wafer as one massive chip (WSE-3). This design provides 44GB of on-chip SRAM, delivering memory bandwidth thousands of times higher than traditional HBM (e.g., 21 PB/s vs. Nvidia B200). For LLM inference, weights are streamed layer-by-layer from external MemoryX storage to the chip, avoiding HBM bottlenecks. This results in token generation speeds 1.5–5 times faster than Nvidia's B200 in some models and significant advantages in first-token latency and long-context tasks. Additionally, Cerebras's architecture offers much lower interconnect power consumption (0.15 pJ/bit vs. GPU's ~10 pJ/bit). However, Cerebras faces challenges: SRAM scaling has slowed with advanced nodes, limiting future capacity gains; the chip requires specialized liquid cooling and custom software stacks; and its external I/O bandwidth (150 GB/s) is low compared to NVLink, hindering multi-system scaling for very large models. Competition is intensifying. Major players are pursuing three paths: 1) Developing proprietary inference ASICs (e.g., Google TPU, Microsoft Maia), 2) Leveraging advanced packaging (e.g., TSMC's SoW) to democratize wafer-scale-like integration, potentially eroding Cerebras's process advantage within a few years, and 3) Exploring optical interconnects for ultimate bandwidth. Commercially, Cerebras is transitioning from a hardware vendor to a service provider, facing the immense challenge of building high-power, specialized data centers to meet large contracts (e.g., 250MW/year from 2026–2028). In conclusion, the AI inference era presents a fundamental architectural trade-off. Cerebras opts for extreme physical optimization for low-latency, single-task performance, while Nvidia prioritizes versatility and massive cluster throughput. The path forward remains uncertain, with technology and business models still evolving in the race toward advanced AI.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

marsbit1 ч. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

**Title: Has Bitcoin's Rebound Ended, Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?** **Summary:** Bitcoin's price has declined by 13% this week, signaling a potential return to late-stage bear market conditions. The price fell to around $67k, positioned between the Realized Price and Realized Cap Weighted Average. For the first time since early 2022, the Short-Term Holder cost basis has dropped below this key average, confirming a hallmark of late-cycle bear markets. Profitability metrics have collapsed sharply. The 7-day average of the Realized Profit/Loss ratio plummeted from a local high of 3.16 to 0.29, mirroring the February panic sell-off. Critically, the 90-day average never breached the threshold of 2, indicating the recent rally to $82k was a bear market bounce, not a structural shift. Realized losses surged to $1.35 billion daily, with $770 million coming from Long-Term Holders selling at a loss. This accelerating redistribution of supply from weak to strong hands is a necessary but ongoing process for a market bottom. The rally stalled almost precisely at the aggregate cost basis (~$83k) of US spot Bitcoin ETF investors, turning that level into strong resistance and leaving the average ETF holder underwater again. Spot market flows have turned decisively negative, showing sellers are dominating order books despite the price drop. While a significant futures long liquidation event cleared over $400 million in leverage, providing a potential reset, sustained spot demand is yet to materialize. Options markets continue to price in higher future volatility (Implied Volatility) than recent price action (Realized Volatility) has shown, with a persistent skew towards put options, indicating ongoing demand for downside protection. In conclusion, multiple metrics point to a fragile market structure. Resistance at the ETF cost basis, accelerating realized losses, dominant spot selling, and cautious options pricing all suggest the bear market trend persists. A sustainable recovery likely requires a resurgence of spot demand, ETF holders returning to profit, and a clear reduction in selling pressure.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот

Фьючерсы

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ONE (ONE) представлены ниже.

Pundit Reveals The One Thing That XRP Holders Are Missing

Введение

Pundit Says XRP Holders Are Missing The Adoption Wave

XRPL Sees Massive Adoption Boost

Связанные с этим вопросы

Похожее

Zcash Bug Could Have Minted Unlimited ZEC Undetected

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

Crossing the 'Memory Wall': The Wafer-Level Revolution and Computing Power Routes in the AI Inference Era

Has Bitcoin's 'Rebound Ended', Officially Entering the Late Bear Market Phase?

Торговля

Популярные статьи

Как купить ONE

Обсуждения

Топ вопросы

Популярные категории

Популярные теги