Fairshake Raises $193 Million as Crypto Firms Prepare for 2026 Midterm Elections

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-01-29Обновлено 2026-01-29

Введение

Fairshake, the largest crypto-backed political action committee (PAC), has raised $193 million in preparation for the 2026 U.S. midterm elections. Major contributors include Ripple, Andreessen Horowitz, and Coinbase. The group supports candidates based on their stance toward cryptocurrency, aiming to influence lawmakers to back clear crypto regulations. It operates through affiliated groups supporting both Democrats and Republicans who are crypto-friendly. Key legislative priorities include the stalled Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which defines regulatory roles and rules for crypto companies. Fairshake is mobilizing early to prevent further delays in crypto legislation, particularly if Democrats gain congressional control, and to protect the industry from becoming a political target. The effort underscores crypto’s growing influence in U.S. politics.

Fairshake, the largest political action committee (PAC) backed by the crypto companies, has build $183 million fund ahead of the 2026 U.S. midterm elections. The crypto industries are once again stepping into U.S. politics. This move shows that crypto has become a permanent force in the U.S. election strategy.

Fairshake’s funding comes from the strong, powerful players in the crypto industry, like Ripple with $25 million, Andreessen Horowitz with $24 million, and Coinbase with $25 million. Nearly $200 million already raised, and Fairshake is closely matching what it spent during the last election cycle.

Fairshake’s Political Stand

Fairshakes basically support the political candidate based on their views on crypto. Its goal is to make the lawmakers who support clear crypto rules and those who don’t. It operates through two major affiliated groups, one which supports the Democrats, friendly to crypto, and the other which supports republicans friendly to crypto. Together, they form a permanent political operation to influence future crypto laws in Congress.

The Republicans have passed one major crypto-related law GENIUS Act. This law established the first U.S. federal framework for stablecoins payment in the U.S. and was supported by both parties. However, the progress has largely stalled beyond that.

The most important unresolved issue is the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act. The bill clearly explains which government agencies regulate crypto and how exchanges should be treated. It also explains what rules the crypto companies must follow. The bill has been delayed due to political disagreements and even disagreements within the crypto industry.

Why Fairshake is preparing early

If democrats takes the control of the congress, then there will be more delays in passing major crypto laws. Stricter rules focused on consumer protection and crypto regulation took a back seat to other political issues. This is the reason why Fairshake is preparing early and raising large amounts of money now.

Fairshake’s main goal is not just winning elections; it’s about making sure crypto does not become an easy target during political fights. Without clarity, companies remain vulnerable to sudden enforcement actions and policy changes. So this move from the Firshake shows that the crypto is now deeply embedded in U.S. politics.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Coinbase Expands Prediction Markets to All 50 U.S. States

TagsClarity ACTCryptoGenius ACT

Связанные с этим вопросы

QHow much money has Fairshake raised for the 2026 midterm elections, and which companies are the major contributors?

AFairshake has raised $183 million for the 2026 midterm elections. Major contributors include Ripple with $25 million, Andreessen Horowitz with $24 million, and Coinbase with $25 million.

QWhat is the primary goal of Fairshake's political action committee?

AFairshake's primary goal is to support political candidates based on their views on cryptocurrency, aiming to elect lawmakers who support clear crypto regulations and oppose those who do not, ensuring crypto is not an easy target in political fights.

QWhat are the two major crypto-related legislative acts mentioned in the article, and what is their status?

AThe two major crypto-related acts are the GENIUS Act, which established the first U.S. federal framework for stablecoins and was passed with bipartisan support, and the Digital Asset Market Clarity Act, which defines regulatory agencies and rules for crypto exchanges but has been delayed due to political and industry disagreements.

QWhy is Fairshake preparing early for the 2026 elections, according to the article?

AFairshake is preparing early because if Democrats take control of Congress, there may be more delays in passing major crypto laws, with stricter consumer protection rules taking a back seat to other political issues, making early fundraising crucial to influence future crypto legislation.

QHow does Fairshake operate to influence crypto laws in Congress?

AFairshake operates through two major affiliated groups: one supporting Democrats friendly to crypto and another supporting Republicans friendly to crypto, forming a permanent political operation to influence future crypto laws in Congress.

Похожее

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Polymarket, a leading prediction market platform, is facing significant technical challenges as its growth outpaces its current infrastructure on Polygon. Users are experiencing laggy transactions, unresponsive orders, and delayed confirmations, severely impacting the trading experience. In response, DeFi Engineering VP Josh Stevens outlined a comprehensive engineering overhaul. The plan includes reducing on-chain data delays, fixing order cancellation issues, rebuilding the central limit order book (CLOB), improving website performance, and developing a unified SDK and API. A major revelation was the ongoing "chain migration," indicating a potential move away from Polygon. The core issue is that Polymarket has evolved from a simple prediction market into a high-frequency trading platform, making Polygon's limitations—such as block space, gas fees, and block time—a ceiling for further growth. The migration is not just a simple chain switch but a fundamental rebuild of its trading system to support more complex products like perpetual contracts (Perps). This announcement has sparked competition among chains like Solana, Sui, and Algorand, all vying to host Polymarket. For Polygon, losing this key application, which contributes significantly to its gas fee revenue, would be a major setback. The real test for Polymarket is no longer attracting users but proving it can provide a stable, reliable trading environment that retains them.

Odaily星球日报35 мин. назад

Stuck Polymarket: The Real Test After Riding the Traffic Boom Has Arrived

Odaily星球日报35 мин. назад

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

The author, Alex Xu, explains his decision to significantly reduce his Bitcoin holdings (from full to ~30% of his portfolio) during the current bull cycle, citing a lowered long-term outlook for BTC's price appreciation in the next cycle. He outlines six key reasons for this reduced expectation: 1. **Diminished Growth Drivers:** The narrative of exponential user adoption has largely played out with institutional ETF adoption. The next major growth phase—adoption by sovereign national reserves or central banks—seems unlikely in the near future. 2. **Personal Opportunity Cost:** More attractive investment opportunities have emerged in other assets, such as undervalued companies. 3. **Industry-Wide Contraction:** The broader crypto industry is struggling, with most Web3 business models (SocialFi, GameFi, DePIN) failing. This overall萧条 (depression) reduces the fundamental demand and consensus for Bitcoin. 4. **Strain on Major Buyer:** MicroStrategy, a major corporate buyer of BTC, faces rising financing expenses for its debt, which could slow its purchasing rate and create significant marginal pressure on the market. 5. **Increased Competition from Gold:** The emergence of "tokenized gold" has closed the functional gap (portability, divisibility) between physical gold and Bitcoin, offering a strong competitor in the non-sovereign store-of-value space. 6. **Security Budget Concerns:** The block reward halving continues to exacerbate the long-standing issue of funding Bitcoin's network security, with new fee source explorations like Ordinals and L2s largely failing. The author's decision to hold a significant (though reduced) position reflects a cautious, not bearish, outlook. He remains open to increasing his exposure if the fundamental reasons for his skepticism change or if new positive catalysts emerge.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Lowering Expectations for BTC's Next Bull Market

marsbit1 ч. назад

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

Iran has announced a comprehensive plan to assert control over the strategic Strait of Hormuz, a critical global oil shipping chokepoint. The proposed measures include requiring all vessels to obtain Iranian permission for passage, imposing fees for security, environmental protection, and navigation management—preferably paid in Iranian rials—and absolutely banning Israeli ships. Vessels from countries deemed hostile by Iran’s top security bodies may also be barred. Analysts suggest Iran’s motives are multifaceted: increasing pressure on the U.S. and Israel by leveraging control over oil transit to influence global prices and inflation; creating a new revenue stream, potentially exceeding $7.7 billion annually, to counter Western sanctions and support postwar reconstruction; and using transit permissions as bargaining chips in future negotiations, notably with the U.S. However, the plan faces significant practical and diplomatic challenges. Enforcing comprehensive interception and fee collection in the busy waterway, patrolled by international military forces, would be difficult. The U.S. has already countering with a blockade of Iranian ports and threats to intercept any ship paying fees, potentially strangling Iran’s oil exports and fee revenue. Broad international opposition, led by European and Gulf states, and legal controversies further complicate implementation. The proposal may ultimately serve more as a negotiating tactic than a feasible policy, with its execution remaining highly uncertain.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Can Iran 'Control' the Strait of Hormuz?

marsbit2 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片