Expert Predicts What Will Happen To Bitcoin Price Amid The Miner Shift To AI

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2026-04-19Обновлено 2026-04-19

Введение

Expert Charles Edwards warns that Bitcoin miners are rapidly pivoting to AI, which could negatively impact BTC's price and network security. Public mining firms expect Bitcoin revenue to drop from 90% to 30% in 2-3 years, driven by stock performance incentives—companies targeting over 80% AI revenue saw shares surge 500%. This shift reduces investment in new mining hardware, potentially weakening network security. Additionally, miners are selling BTC holdings aggressively, with over 32,000 BTC sold in Q1 2026, creating sell-side pressure. The halving rewards and low hash prices further squeeze profits, suggesting industry leaders lack long-term Bitcoin price confidence.

Charles Edward, founder of the digital asset hedge fund Capriole Investments, has warned that BTC miners are rapidly shifting to artificial intelligence (AI), raising concerns about the future of mining activity and its impact on the Bitcoin price. He described the trend as both unexpected and worrying based on statements from publicly listed Bitcoin mining companies about future revenue targets.

Bitcoin Price At Risk As Miners Pivot to AI

Edwards reported in an X post that every major public Bitcoin mining firm has announced plans to pivot toward AI services. According to the data he shared, these companies expect their Bitcoin revenue to fall sharply, from an average of about 90% to roughly 30% over the next two to three years.

Notably, Edwards pointed to stock market performance as one of the main signals behind the recent shift. He explained that companies that set aggressive AI revenue targets above 80% reportedly saw their share prices rise by an average of more than 500%. Meanwhile, firms that targeted less than 60% of their revenue to AI saw significantly weaker performance, with many posting negative returns over two years.

He also highlighted changes in mining hardware investment strategies among Bitcoin miners. Edwards stated that several companies are not planning to buy new Bitcoin mining equipment and instead intend to run their existing machines until the end of their lifespan while redirecting future spending into AI infrastructure.

His warning further included concerns about the long-term security of the Bitcoin network. He emphasized that mining companies provide the computing power that secures the network. As a result, Edwards argued that reduced investment in mining hardware, such as Application-Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), could weaken this security if fewer resources are committed to maintaining or expanding capacity.

Separately, the recent pivot to AI could affect the Bitcoin price, which has already come under pressure as public BTC miners increasingly sell their holdings. Moreover, with fewer miners actively accumulating the cryptocurrency, the reduced buy-side demand could significantly weigh on price performance over time.

Edwards also referenced the rise of quantum computing as an additional risk factor. He stated that advances in quantum computing could pose a serious challenge to Bitcoin’s cryptographic systems unless changes are made to the network’s code to address future technological threats.

Overall, he emphasized that the current shift is significantly different from past downturns in the Bitcoin mining sector. He noted that previous mining capitulation events usually involve about 20% to 30% of miners exiting the market. However, he noted that mining companies collectively valued at more than $100 billion are signaling a major move away from cryptocurrencies. According to him, this widespread shift into AI suggests that industry leaders do not currently expect strong long-term growth in the BTC price.

Public Bitcoin Miners Dump Thousands Of BTC In Q1

A recent report from TheEnergyMag, a research firm, revealed that public miners are increasingly selling off their BTC at a pace not seen since the final stages of the previous crypto bear market. The company noted that this selling activity has been fueled by a prolonged decline in mining revenue and economics, prompting operators to liquidate their holdings as many shift toward AI technology.

Additionally, Hashprice previously dropped to near all-time lows around $33 per PH/s, making it increasingly difficult for miners to turn a profit. The 2024 halving event, which cut block rewards, has also further shrunk miners’ earnings, while network difficulty is dramatically higher than it was in 2021.

According to the report, public miner companies such as MARA, Riot, Congo, CleanSpark, and Bitdeer have already collectively sold more than 32,000 BTC in the first quarter of 2026. The research firm noted that this figure surpasses total net Bitcoin sales across all four quarters of 2025, setting a new industry record.

BTC trading at $76,990 on the 1D chart | Source: BTCUSDT on Tradingview.com

Связанные с этим вопросы

QAccording to Charles Edwards, what is the expected change in Bitcoin mining revenue for major public companies over the next 2-3 years?

AAccording to Charles Edwards, major public Bitcoin mining companies expect their Bitcoin revenue to fall sharply from an average of about 90% to roughly 30% over the next two to three years.

QWhat is one of the main reasons, as cited by Edwards, that is driving the shift towards AI for Bitcoin mining companies?

AOne of the main reasons for the shift is stock market performance. Companies that set aggressive AI revenue targets above 80% reportedly saw their share prices rise by an average of more than 500%.

QHow does Edwards believe the pivot to AI could affect the security of the Bitcoin network?

AEdwards argues that reduced investment in mining hardware, such as ASICs, could weaken the security of the Bitcoin network because mining companies provide the computing power that secures it.

QWhat additional technological risk factor, besides the shift to AI, did Edwards reference as a challenge to Bitcoin?

AEdwards referenced the rise of quantum computing as an additional risk factor, stating that advances in it could pose a serious challenge to Bitcoin’s cryptographic systems.

QHow many BTC did the named public mining companies reportedly sell in the first quarter of 2026, according to the article?

AAccording to the article, public miner companies such as MARA, Riot, Congo, CleanSpark, and Bitdeer collectively sold more than 32,000 BTC in the first quarter of 2026.

Похожее

The World Cup is Approaching: Sports Entering the Era of 'Fragmented Finance'

With the approaching World Cup, sports are entering an era of "fragmented finance." This shift is exemplified by FIFA's new rule requiring debutant players to wear a special "World Cup debut patch." Post-tournament, these patches will be authenticated, cut, and embedded into collectible cards, potentially transforming into high-value assets. The global sports trading card market, valued at over $11.5 billion, represents a sophisticated alternative asset class with deep secondary markets and distinct bull/bear cycles. While football has a massive fanbase, its card market has historically lacked the liquidity and unified narrative of the NBA's system. The NBA's success stems from its centralized, star-driven storytelling—from draft nights to championships—which perfectly fuels financialization. The World Cup patch initiative is FIFA's attempt to create similar "financial raw material" for football. The NBA card market, evolving over 70 years, has matured into a financial ecosystem. After a 1990s crash due to overproduction, the industry rebounded by embracing scarcity: limited editions, autographs, game-worn memorabilia (patches), and serial numbering. Today, it features professional grading (e.g., PSA, BGS), auction platforms, live "break" streams, and dedicated marketplaces, mirroring aspects of cryptocurrency markets with their volatility, speculation, and community-driven trading. The core driver is narrative. A card's value is tied to a specific historic moment or player potential—like Stephen Curry's 1/1 card commemorating his Olympic game-winning shot selling for $518,500. This trade in "ownership of history" or "future greatness" parallels prediction markets, both monetizing collective emotion. Unlike many NFT projects that struggle to generate sustained narratives, sports are a perpetual emotion-generating machine. Leagues like the NBA and UFC constantly produce real-world drama—rivalries, comebacks, and triumphs—that fuels ongoing interest and investment. For younger audiences consuming sports via highlights and social media clips, trading cards become a direct financial instrument for engaging with these narratives. Thus, traditional sports leagues are leading the charge in assetization, leveraging their unique advantages: real events, global fan consensus, and endless storytelling. They are becoming platforms for issuing financial assets, turning fragments of history—a patch, a signature, a moment—into tradable commodities.

Odaily星球日报3 мин. назад

The World Cup is Approaching: Sports Entering the Era of 'Fragmented Finance'

Odaily星球日报3 мин. назад

Vitalik's Latest Long Read: In the AI Era, How Can Code Become More Secure?

Vitalik Buterin explores the role of formal verification as a critical tool for software security, especially in the AI era and for blockchain systems. He defines formal verification as using machine-checkable mathematical proofs to verify that code meets specified properties, moving beyond manual auditing. The article highlights that while AI can generate code and find vulnerabilities rapidly, it also makes formal verification more accessible by assisting in writing proofs. This is crucial for Ethereum's complex components like STARKs, ZK-EVMs, consensus algorithms, and high-performance EVM implementations, where bugs can lead to irreversible losses. Vitalik argues that formal verification enables a powerful "separation of concerns": AI can write highly optimized (e.g., assembly) code for efficiency, while a separate, human-readable specification defines correctness. A machine-checked proof then verifies their equivalence. This paradigm can create a more secure "trusted core" of software. However, he cautions that formal verification is not a panacea. "Proven correctness" depends on the accuracy of the specifications and proofs themselves, which can be wrong or incomplete. Risks include unverified code sections, hardware-level side-channel attacks, and overlooked assumptions. The true goal is not absolute proof but increased confidence through redundant expressions of intent—using code, tests, types, and formal proofs—and automatically checking their consistency. The article concludes that AI and formal verification are complementary: AI enables scale, while verification ensures accuracy. For critical systems, this combination offers a path toward stronger security in a future with powerful AI adversaries, helping to maintain the defensive advantage essential for a decentralized internet.

marsbit48 мин. назад

Vitalik's Latest Long Read: In the AI Era, How Can Code Become More Secure?

marsbit48 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片