Bitcoin

Focuses on news, price analysis, technological evolution, and market trends within the Bitcoin ecosystem. It explores its role and influence in the global financial system.

The Glamour Belongs to the 'Epsteins', Saylor Just Wants to Hoard Bitcoin

Summary: The recently unsealed Epstein files revealed an unexpected connection to Michael Saylor, CEO of MicroStrategy (now Strategy). In a 2010 email, Epstein's PR coordinator, Peggy Siegal, complained about Saylor's presence at a high-society dinner, describing him as a "zombie on drugs" who was impossible to engage socially and had no personality or understanding of social etiquette. This social awkwardness, however, may have been his saving grace, as it from deeper involvement in the scandal. This perceived personal flaw is presented as a professional strength in his role as a Bitcoin maximalist. Saylor’s company is the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, with 712,647 BTC purchased at an average cost of $76,037. Despite recent market volatility pushing the price down and his company's stock falling 60%, Saylor remains committed to his strategy of buying Bitcoin weekly, famously tweeting "More Orange" to signal his intent to continue accumulating. The article argues that the traits that made him a social outcast—being闷 (boring), uninteresting, and unresponsive to external noise—are the exact same traits that make him a successful "Bitcoin zombie." His strategy is simple and requires no complex decision-making: buy and never sell. While his approach is not advisable for the average investor without his corporate financial tools, the core lesson is that in investing, "interesting" strategies like frequent trading and chasing hype often lead to losses. The most profitable strategies are often boring. The piece concludes that both in investing and in life, the spotlight of "热闹" (excitement/hot spots) is often fleeting and dangerous, while long-term value is found in committed, "boring" work.

marsbit02/02 10:06

The Glamour Belongs to the 'Epsteins', Saylor Just Wants to Hoard Bitcoin

marsbit02/02 10:06

Bitcoin Continues to Plunge, Focus on Whether MSTR Is Forced to Sell

Bitcoin is undergoing a severe stress test as its price falls below key psychological levels, approaching the cost basis of major institutional holders like MicroStrategy. The cryptocurrency dropped below $80,000 over the weekend, hitting its lowest point since April 7, 2025, and has declined over 30% recently amid thin liquidity. Despite the sell-off, MicroStrategy’s Executive Chairman Michael Saylor signaled intentions to continue accumulating Bitcoin, even as the company raised the dividend on its perpetual preferred shares to 11.25% to attract capital. However, analysts warn that high dividend costs could strain cash flow if Bitcoin’s price remains stagnant or falls below its cost basis. The market is highly institutionalized, with MicroStrategy and 11 spot Bitcoin ETFs holding approximately 10% of Bitcoin’s circulating supply. These institutions face combined unrealized losses of around $7 billion, with an average acquisition cost of $85,360 per Bitcoin. Spot Bitcoin ETFs have seen net outflows for 10 consecutive days, exacerbating downward pressure. MicroStrategy holds 712,647 Bitcoin at an average cost of $76,037. With Bitcoin hovering near $78,000, its unrealized gains have narrowed to less than 3%. The company’s aggressive financing strategies, including high-yield debt, highlight both its commitment and the risks of its Bitcoin-centric strategy. Macro strategist Jim Bianco notes that Bitcoin faces a "narrative exhaustion," as the "institutional adoption" story has been fully priced and may now be reversing. Without new sustained buying interest, institutional holdings—once a support—could become a major source of selling pressure. The key question is where the next wave of buyers will emerge at current price levels.

比推02/02 05:57

Bitcoin Continues to Plunge, Focus on Whether MSTR Is Forced to Sell

比推02/02 05:57

From Libya to Iran: Nations in Blackout, Bitcoin Miners Uninterrupted

From Libya to Iran: Nations in Darkness, Bitcoin Miners That Never Stop In the summer of 2025, Tehran and other parts of Iran faced extreme heat and severe power outages, forcing government offices and schools to shut down. Hospitals relied on diesel generators to keep life-saving equipment running. Yet, behind city walls, rows of Bitcoin mining machines continued operating at full capacity, almost never losing power. Similarly, in Libya, residents endure daily blackouts of 6 to 8 hours, while unauthorized mining farms in abandoned industrial sites run non-stop, using some of the world’s cheapest electricity—subsidized as low as $0.004 per kWh—to mine Bitcoin, often with outdated equipment smuggled into the country. This reflects one of the 21st century’s starkest energy paradoxes: in nations crippled by sanctions and civil conflict, electricity is no longer just a public service but a form of “exportable” hard currency. In Iran, mining was legalized in 2019 as a state strategy to bypass international financial sanctions. Miners were required to sell mined Bitcoin to the central bank. However, an estimated 85% of mining occurred illegally or semi-legally, often with ties to powerful entities. Despite temporary bans and crackdowns, mining rebounded quickly, draining the national grid and worsening public power shortages. Libya, fragmented since the fall of Gaddafi, lacks coherent regulation. Although cryptocurrency transactions and mining imports are officially banned, enforcement is weak. Low subsidized electricity prices create irresistible incentive for mining operators—including foreign groups—to run energy-intensive operations with obsolete machines, while ordinary citizens face daily blackouts. In both countries, Bitcoin mining functions less as a legitimate industry and more as a form of resource extraction: it creates few jobs, contributes little in taxes, and often channels profits overseas. The real cost is borne by society—frequent blackouts, overloaded grids, and compromised public services like healthcare and education. Ultimately, the issue is not Bitcoin itself, but who controls the allocation of public resources. When energy subsidies meant for public welfare are diverted for private gain, it deepens inequality and institutional distrust. As citizens sit in darkness, the miners’ machines continue to hum—a symbol of energy injustice in a fractured world.

marsbit02/02 02:38

From Libya to Iran: Nations in Blackout, Bitcoin Miners Uninterrupted

marsbit02/02 02:38

活动图片