Bitwise: Why Are Top-Tier Capital Giants Aggressively Betting on New Public Blockchains Like Arc, Canton, and Tempo?

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-13Обновлено 2026-05-13

Введение

Why Top Institutions Are Betting Big on New Blockchains Like Arc, Canton, and Tempo This week saw a surge of major funding announcements for new, purpose-built blockchains. Circle's Arc raised $222M at a $3B valuation from investors like BlackRock. Canton Network developer Digital Asset secured $300M led by a16z at a $2B valuation. Stripe's Tempo, already a leader, raised $500M last year and has partnered with major firms. These three chains share key traits: they are designed for stablecoins and asset tokenization, they emerged after the US passed the *Genius Act* in July 2025, they natively support private transactions crucial for enterprise adoption, and they are backed by traditional finance and tech giants—unlike the crypto-native origins of Ethereum or Solana. This trend highlights three major shifts: 1) Clear regulation (like the pending *Clarity Act*) is unlocking massive institutional capital. 2) Built-in privacy is becoming a core feature for real-world business use, addressing the limitations of fully transparent ledgers. 3) Established corporations are now directly entering the blockchain arena, bringing significant resources and execution capability, which will accelerate innovation and competition across the entire crypto ecosystem.

Author: Matt Hougan, Chief Investment Officer at Bitwise

Translated by: Saoirse, Foresight News

Industry news often arrives in clusters. When such a moment occurs, it deserves close attention, as there must be a significant trend unfolding behind it.

Just this Monday, stablecoin issuer Circle officially announced that its new blockchain project, Arc, secured $222 million in funding, reaching an overall valuation of $3 billion. The investor lineup is impressive, including top-tier institutions like BlackRock, Apollo Funds, and the parent company of the New York Stock Exchange.

Just the day before, news surfaced of funding for Canton Network, another emerging blockchain developed by Digital Asset: a $300 million raise led by a16z at a $2 billion valuation.

Adding to the trend, Stripe's Tempo blockchain has been leading the charge: completing a $5 billion funding round at a $50 billion valuation late last year, and subsequently announcing strategic partnerships with enterprises like DoorDash and Visa.

Arc, Canton, and Tempo—all three public blockchains are tailor-made for stablecoin and asset tokenization scenarios. This wave of concentrated financing fervor has also led me to summarize three crucial insights for the crypto industry.

Capital Always Follows Regulation and Legislation

The aforementioned multi-hundred-million-dollar mega-rounds all occurred after the U.S. Congress passed the Genius Act in July 2025.

I have always believed that before the bill's enactment, the sluggish pace of crypto legislation in the U.S. directly dampened industry investment enthusiasm; major institutions were unwilling to hastily deploy capital or build public chain infrastructure amidst uncertain regulatory prospects. Now, with regulation clarified, the industry landscape is shifting.

No one can say for sure if these projects could have maintained their current valuations or completed such large-scale fundraising without the supportive framework of the Genius Act. However, it is certain that regulatory clarity played a pivotal role in propelling them forward.

For investors, the most critical question to ponder is: How much potential would be unlocked if the comprehensive crypto market structure bill, the Clarity Act, successfully passes Congress?

The Clarity Act has a much broader scope than the Genius Act, and its final text is yet to be finalized, making precise impact prediction difficult for now. But one thing is clear: the asset tokenization sector and compliant financial infrastructure will be among the biggest beneficiaries. I also hope the final bill will benefit areas like decentralized finance and innovative token design, though specifics await the official text. The Clarity Act is worth everyone's continued attention.

Privacy Protection Might Become the Next Killer App

Arc, Canton, and Tempo share a common feature—and the biggest distinction from Ethereum and Solana: all three public blockchains natively incorporate private transaction functionality.

As crypto assets gradually integrate into mainstream business scenarios, this design logic aligns perfectly with real-world needs. The transparency of public blockchains, originally a cornerstone for building trust, can become a drawback in commercial settings.

Businesses do not want every pending transaction to be publicly visible on a global ledger, and employees do not want their salary payments traceable by anyone via a block explorer. In such cases, transparency ceases to be an advantage and instead becomes a practical pain point.

Even the staunchest advocates of blockchain transparency must admit: the business world inherently requires a degree of privacy and confidentiality. These new public chains, designed from the ground up with privacy features, precisely address the genuine needs of traditional institutions. The recent series of high-value funding rounds confirms that this direction is spot on.

Traditional Giants Are Officially Entering the Arena

The most unique aspect of Arc, Canton, and Tempo is their backing by top-tier corporations and financial institutions.

  • Arc is developed and led by the publicly-traded company Circle;
  • Canton's backers include Wall Street giants like Goldman Sachs, Citadel, The Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), Nasdaq, BNY Mellon, S&P Global, and Virtu;
  • Tempo is co-created by payments giant Stripe and crypto venture firm Paradigm, with Anthropic, Deutsche Bank, Revolut, Shopify, Visa, and OpenAI all participating in its architectural design.

In stark contrast, established public chains have different origins: Ethereum was proposed by a 19-year-old dropout on a Bitcoin forum, and Solana was conceived from an engineer's spark of inspiration at Qualcomm.

Of course, this doesn't guarantee that traditional giants will inevitably win. Personally, I remain more bullish on crypto-native projects in the long term. However, it's undeniable that the entry of banks and large tech corporations brings deeper pockets, stronger execution for real-world implementation, and more professional, standardized operations to the industry.

Competition breeds excellence. I believe that under the two-way competition between giants and native projects, the pace of innovation and the boundaries of development for the entire crypto industry will be further expanded.

After all, iron sharpens iron, and progress is born from competition.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the key regulatory catalyst mentioned in the article that spurred major funding rounds for new blockchains like Arc, Canton, and Tempo?

AThe article identifies the passage of the U.S. 'Genius Act' in July 2025 as the key regulatory catalyst that spurred major funding for new blockchains like Arc, Canton, and Tempo.

QAccording to the article, what is a core technical feature that distinguishes the new blockchains (Arc, Canton, Tempo) from established ones like Ethereum and Solana?

AAccording to the article, a core feature distinguishing Arc, Canton, and Tempo from Ethereum and Solana is their native, built-in private transaction functionality.

QWhat major traditional financial or corporate entities are backing the Canton Network, as listed in the article?

AThe article states that Canton Network's backers include Goldman Sachs, Citadel, the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation (DTCC), Nasdaq, BNY Mellon, S&P Global, and Virtu.

QWhy does the author argue that privacy features are crucial for blockchain adoption in mainstream business, according to the article?

AThe author argues that privacy features are crucial because the transparency of public blockchains, while good for trust, becomes a drawback in business. Companies don't want unfinished deals public, and individuals don't want salary details searchable, so some confidentiality is a real-world necessity.

QWhat potential future legislative development does the author suggest investors should watch closely, and which sector does he expect to be the biggest beneficiary?

AThe author suggests investors should watch the potential passage of the broader 'Clarity Act.' He expects the asset tokenization sector and compliant financial infrastructure to be the biggest beneficiaries.

Похожее

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

OpenAI has announced a major internal reorganization just months before its anticipated IPO. The company is merging its three flagship product lines—ChatGPT, Codex, and the API platform—into a single, unified product organization. The most significant leadership change involves co-founder and President Greg Brockman moving from a background technical role to take full, permanent control over all product strategy. This follows the indefinite medical leave of AGI Deployment CEO Fidji Simo. Additionally, ChatGPT's longtime lead, Nick Turley, has been reassigned to enterprise products, with former Instagram executive Ashley Alexander taking over consumer offerings. The consolidation, internally framed as a strategic move towards an "Agentic Future," aims to break down internal silos and create a cohesive "Super App." This planned desktop application would integrate ChatGPT's conversational abilities, Codex's coding power, and a rumored internal web browser named "Atlas" to autonomously perform complex user tasks. The reorganization occurs amid significant internal and external pressures. OpenAI has recently seen a wave of high-profile departures, including Sora co-lead Bill Peebles and other senior technical leaders, leading to concerns about a thinning executive bench. Externally, rival Anthropic recently secured funding at a staggering $900 billion valuation, surpassing OpenAI's own. Google's upcoming I/O developer conference also poses a competitive threat. Analysts suggest the dramatic restructure is a pre-IPO move to present a clearer, more focused narrative to Wall Street—streamlining operations and demonstrating decisive leadership under Brockman to counter internal turbulence and intense market competition.

marsbit2 ч. назад

Breaking: OpenAI Undergoes Major Reorganization, President Brockman Assumes Command

marsbit2 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

Market makers and arbitrageurs represent two distinct survival structures in high-frequency trading. Market makers primarily use limit orders (makers) to profit from the bid-ask spread, enjoying high capital efficiency (nominally 100%) but bearing inventory risk. This "inventory risk" arises from passive, fragmented, and discontinuous order fills in the limit order book (LOB). This risk, while a potential cost, can also contribute to excess profit if managed within control boundaries, allowing for mean reversion. Market makers essentially sell "time" (uncertainty over execution timing) to the market for price control and low fees. In contrast, cross-exchange arbitrageurs typically use market orders (takers) to exploit price differences or funding rates, resulting in lower nominal capital efficiency (requiring capital on both exchanges) and higher transaction costs. Their risk exposure stems from asymmetries in exchange rules (e.g., minimum order sizes), execution latency, and infrastructure risks (e.g., ADL, oracle drift). These exposures are active, exogenous gaps that primarily erode profits rather than contribute to them. Arbitrageurs essentially sell "space" (capital sunk across venues) for localized, immediate certainty. Both strategies engage in a trade-off between execution friction and residual risk. Optimal systems allow for temporary, controlled risk exposure rather than enforcing zero exposure at all costs. Their evolution converges towards hybrid models: arbitrageurs may use maker orders to reduce costs, while market makers may use taker orders or hedges for risk management. Ultimately, both use different forms of risk exposure—market makers exposing inventory, arbitrageurs immobilizing capital—to extract marginal, hard-won certainty from the market.

链捕手2 ч. назад

Two Survival Structures of Market Makers and Arbitrageurs

链捕手2 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

This article, based on Anthropic's analysis, outlines the intensifying systemic competition between the U.S./allies and China for AI leadership by 2028. It argues that access to advanced computing power ("compute") is the critical bottleneck, where the U.S. currently holds a significant advantage through chip export controls and allied innovation. However, China's AI labs remain competitive by exploiting policy loopholes—via chip smuggling, overseas data center access, and "model distillation" attacks to copy U.S. model capabilities—keeping them close to the frontier. The piece presents two contrasting scenarios for 2028. In the first, decisive U.S. action to tighten compute controls and curb distillation locks in a 12-24 month AI capability lead, cementing democratic influence over global AI norms, security, and economic infrastructure. In the second, policy inaction allows China to achieve near-parity through continued access to U.S. technology, enabling Beijing to promote its AI stack globally and integrate advanced AI into its military and governance systems, altering the strategic balance. Anthropic contends that maintaining a decisive U.S. lead is essential for shaping safe AI development and governance. The core recommendation is for U.S. policymakers to urgently close compute and model access loopholes while promoting global adoption of the U.S. AI technology stack to secure a lasting strategic advantage.

marsbit4 ч. назад

Who Will Define the Rules of the AI Era? Anthropic Discusses the 2028 US-China AI Landscape

marsbit4 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить ARC

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение AI Rig Complex (ARC) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки AI Rig Complex (ARC).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение AI Rig Complex (ARC)После приобретения вами AI Rig Complex (ARC) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля AI Rig Complex (ARC)С легкостью торгуйте AI Rig Complex (ARC) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

458 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.01.09Обновлено 2025.03.21

Как купить ARC

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ARC (ARC) представлены ниже.

活动图片