AI Agents Tested to Prevent $3.4B Crypto Hacks

TheNewsCryptoОпубликовано 2026-02-19Обновлено 2026-02-19

Введение

In 2025, the crypto industry suffered significant breaches, with three major incidents accounting for 70% of total thefts, including a $1.4 billion hack on Bybit. To combat vulnerabilities, OpenAI is testing AI agents in collaboration with Paradigm and OtterSec using EVMbench. These AI systems aim to detect and fix smart contract flaws more efficiently than human auditors, addressing the $3.4 billion lost to hackers in 2025. While AI agents excel at identifying vulnerabilities, concerns remain about potential misuse by attackers. Industry leaders suggest AI and crypto could become increasingly intertwined, with stablecoins and crypto payments playing key roles in future AI-driven systems.

In 2025, the crypto industry witnessed some massive breaches, with just three major incidents being responsible for around 70% of the overall money theft. It is noteworthy that the biggest hack is said to be the Bybit exchange hack, which alone swept around $1.4 billion.

For a solution, OpenAI is testing if AI agents can detect vulnerabilities in real blockchain spaces, working with Paradigm and OtterSec, using its EVMbench. Any bug associated with smart contract code will impact the money of big and small investors, as these automated programmes look after over $100 billion in open-source digital assets.

In 2025, hackers swept up around $3.4 billion from crypto platforms, and developers can now just feel how vulnerable the system is when hackers exploit weak code. Depending on human audits will not help anymore as live contracts face new and evolving attacks, and also, it takes a lot of time and costs.

Instead, AI agents can complete the same work in less time, so frameworks such as EVMbench are used by OpenAI. EVMbench leverages AI agents in test environments to aid developers in understanding how smart contracts may work under real-world pressure before the real deployment.

AI Agents are Performing Better

Primarily, the agents will find hidden vulnerabilities in code, fix the issue without breaking the function of the contract, and then attempt to exploit the weakness to drain funds if the problem still exists.

As per the prior results, AI agents are performing better at detecting vulnerabilities instead of fixing them safely. People are now worried that attackers could misuse AI-powered tools to detect weaknesses in blockchain systems more skilfully than ever.

Jermy Allaire, an American technologist, revealed that a lot of AI agents will leverage stablecoins to trade over blockchain networks. Changpeng Zhao, the founder and ex-CEO of Binance, also revealed that crypto could be the native payment layer for AI-driven systems in the future.

If this happens, then it will benefit both the users and the attackers as soon as they interact with contracts directly in real financial environments where actual money is at stake.

Highlighted Crypto News Today:

Hyperliquid Launches DeFi Lobby in Washington

TagsAIHackOpenAI

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat was the total amount stolen in crypto hacks in 2025, and what percentage did the three major incidents account for?

AIn 2025, hackers stole around $3.4 billion from crypto platforms, with the three major incidents accounting for approximately 70% of the total theft.

QWhich company is testing AI agents to detect vulnerabilities in blockchain, and what is the name of the benchmarking framework they are using?

AOpenAI is testing AI agents to detect vulnerabilities in real blockchain spaces, and they are using a framework called EVMbench.

QAccording to the article, what are the two main limitations of relying solely on human audits for smart contract security?

AHuman audits are limited because live contracts face new and evolving attacks that are hard to anticipate, and the auditing process is very time-consuming and costly.

QWhat specific tasks can AI agents perform to improve smart contract security, as mentioned in the article?

AAI agents can find hidden vulnerabilities in code, attempt to fix the issue without breaking the contract's function, and then test to see if they can still exploit the weakness to drain funds.

QWhat concern does the article raise about the potential misuse of AI-powered tools in the crypto space?

AThe article raises the concern that attackers could misuse AI-powered tools to more skillfully detect weaknesses in blockchain systems, posing a greater security risk.

Похожее

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Bitcoin prices declined 13% this week, reversing the recent rebound and signaling a likely transition into the later stages of a bear market. Key on-chain metrics deteriorated, with the short-term holder cost basis falling below the Realized Price—a pattern last seen in early 2022, characteristic of bear market maturity. The rally to ~$82k proved to be a bear market bounce, as evidenced by the 90-day realized profit/loss ratio failing to sustain above the bullish threshold of 2. Daily realized losses surged to $1.35B, including significant selling from long-term holders who accumulated near cycle tops, indicating ongoing supply redistribution. Price was rejected almost precisely at the aggregate US spot ETF cost basis of ~$83k, turning that level into resistance and leaving the average ETF investor underwater again. Spot market selling pressure intensified, with the 7-day volume delta turning significantly negative to its weakest level since February. While a major long liquidation event cleared over $400M in leverage, spot demand has not yet stepped in to absorb the resulting supply. Options markets continue pricing in higher future volatility (elevated volatility risk premium) and maintain a skew toward put options, reflecting persistent demand for downside protection, though not yet panic. Overall, market structure remains fragile. Sustained recovery likely requires a reclaim of the ETF cost basis, a shift back to positive spot demand, and a slowdown in realized loss-taking. Until then, the market risks further downside or extended consolidation within the broader bear trend.

Foresight News1 ч. назад

Bitcoin's 'Rally Ends,' Officially Entering the Later Stage of a Bear Market?

Foresight News1 ч. назад

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Summary: This article explores the perceived "death spiral" risk between MicroStrategy (MSTR), its Bitcoin holdings, and its perpetual preferred stock (STRC), drawing comparisons to the LUNA-UST collapse. While both systems feature price anchors, high yields for holders, and potential feedback loops, their core mechanisms differ fundamentally. The MSTR-STRC structure relies on continuous financing to sustain its high dividend payouts, primarily through stock ATM offerings. A negative feedback cycle could occur: falling MSTR stock price makes raising equity capital harder, increasing pressure to sell Bitcoin, which undermines STRC confidence and further depresses MSTR. However, unlike LUNA-UST's automated, direct linkage, the MSTR-STRC loop is weaker and has brakes: STRC dividends can be deferred or rates lowered, and STRC holders have a $100/share liquidation preference in bankruptcy, providing a price floor. The company's sustainability hinges on its ability to continue financing. Its current ~$900 million USD reserves cover only about 6.3 months of its ~$1.71 billion annual interest/dividend burden. The next six months are critical, aligning with both the potential bottom in Bitcoin's four-year cycle and the depletion timeline of its reserves. While a LUNA-style catastrophic collapse is deemed highly unlikely due to structural differences, the key question is whether MicroStrategy can navigate this period through healthy deleveraging to restart its capital engine.

Foresight News1 ч. назад

How Risky is the "Death Spiral" of MSTR and STRC?

Foresight News1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

2025 год — год институциональных инвесторов, в будущем он будет доминировать в приложениях реального времени.

1.8k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.12.16Обновлено 2025.12.16

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам (2): 2026 может стать годом приложений реального времени, сектор AI продолжает оставаться в тренде

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на AI (AI) представлены ниже.

活动图片