a16z: 7 Charts to Understand How Tokenization Is Changing the Nature of Assets

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-05-24Обновлено 2026-05-24

Введение

a16z: 7 Charts on How Tokenization is Transforming the Nature of Assets Tokenized Assets, often referred to as "real-world assets" (RWA), are altering the form, flow, and structure of the financial system. The market recently surpassed $30 billion (excluding stablecoins), driven largely by tokenized U.S. Treasuries. These offer investors digital, yield-bearing assets with efficient settlement. Growth varies significantly by asset class. Asset-backed credit leads in speed, followed by niche financial assets, while venture capital and active strategies took longer to scale. U.S. Treasuries and commodities dominate, holding about two-thirds of the current market share. Within commodities, gold tokenization dominates entirely due to its standardization and historical appeal in crypto. The ecosystem is spread across multiple blockchains. Ethereum holds over half the market, with others like BNB Chain, Solana, and Stellar holding significant shares. However, a key insight is that most tokenized assets currently lack "composability." While the total market is large, only a small fraction (e.g., 5% of tokenized bonds) is used within DeFi protocols. Many tokens are simply digital records of off-chain assets, not natively programmable financial building blocks. In contrast, smaller categories like reinsurance tokens see very high on-chain usage. Looking ahead, forecasts for the tokenized asset market by 2030 range from $2 trillion to over $30 trillion, representing immense potenti...

This article is from:a16z crypto

Compiled by|Odaily Planet Daily(@OdailyChina); Translator|Moni

Tokenized Assets, often referred to as "Real World Assets (RWA)", are transforming the form of assets, how they flow, and how financial systems are constructed.

Just last month, the market size of tokenized assets surpassed $30 billion and is currently hovering around $34 billion (excluding stablecoins). This scale is roughly equivalent to a regional bank or a top-tier university endowment. While still minuscule compared to the global financial system, it is significant enough to have a tangible impact.

Two years ago, the tokenized asset market was worth less than $3 billion. Since then, the market has undergone dramatic changes: The US GENIUS Act has brought a clearer regulatory framework for stablecoins, institutional-grade on-chain infrastructure has matured, and a large number of financial institutions have nearly simultaneously begun deploying blockchain technology—it is precisely under the impetus of these factors that the tokenized asset market has grown tenfold in less than two years. (Note: While stablecoins are not included in the above statistics, they have substantially driven the growth of the entire market by greatly simplifying on-chain payments and settlements.)

This article will use 7 charts to analyze the reasons behind the rise of tokenized assets and their future trajectory.

Tokenized Assets Take Off: US Treasuries Become the Biggest Growth Engine

US Treasury bonds are the primary driver of the recent growth in the tokenized asset market.

The advantages of tokenized US Treasuries are clear and intuitive: investors can hold stable yield-generating assets in a digital form, enabling more efficient and flexible trading and transfer; financial institutions can achieve efficiency gains in settlement and collateral asset allocation, seamlessly connecting with digital financial markets.

Crypto investors can also use tokenized Treasuries to leverage idle stablecoins to gain returns from traditional money markets. Asset management institutions like BlackRock and Franklin Templeton have strategically positioned themselves accordingly, catalyzing a trillion-dollar market.

It is important to note that the growth rates of various tokenized assets vary widely, stemming from both the technical and regulatory difficulties of putting different assets on-chain and the market acceptance of products after launch.

  • Asset-backed credit assets have seen leading growth. Such tokenized assets mainly include tokenized home equity lines of credit, lending vault tokens, with reinsurance contracts, Bitcoin mining notes, and other niche financial assets following, reaching a market value of $1 billion within two years.
  • Venture capital assets took over seven years to exceed $10 billion in market value, with actively managed strategy assets following a similar cycle. These assets have complex structures, long investment horizons, and higher operational and regulatory barriers.
  • Treasuries and commodities have moved on-chain at a moderate pace, breaking the $10 billion market cap mark within 2 to 3 years and now representing mainstream categories.

At the beginning of 2024, Treasuries and commodities accounted for almost the entire tokenized asset market share. After 2024, the share of credit, niche finance, and equity categories steadily increased, but market concentration remains high. Currently, tokenized US Treasuries and commodities together account for about two-thirds of the market share.

Segmentation of the Tokenized Asset Market

The commodity tokenization sector is highly concentrated internally, with gold tokens dominating the vast majority, with a total scale of approximately $5.1 billion, of which gold tokens account for $5.0 billion. Silver and other category tokens total only $57.6 million, accounting for less than 0.01%.

Gold is naturally suited to the tokenized asset model. Currently, the commodity token market is essentially led by gold because: gold has a global unified standard, is convenient to store, is not easily damaged, and has long been traded via claim certificates.

Furthermore, crypto market investors have historically favored gold assets, with Bitcoin being called digital gold in its early days. Products like Tether's gold token XAUT and Paxos's gold token PAXG map ownership of vaulted gold onto the blockchain, transforming physical gold claims into digital tokens that can be held in on-chain wallets.

The market share for tokenized assets of crude oil, agricultural products, and emerging categories like energy and computing power is extremely low, with the industry still in its infancy.

Looking at the underlying public chain landscape, the tokenized asset ecosystem is more diversified. Ethereum, with its first-mover advantage in decentralized finance and institutional adoption foundation, still holds the leading position, hosting $15.7 billion in assets, accounting for over half of the market.

The remaining tokenized asset market is distributed across multiple public chains: BNB Chain's tokenized asset market size is about $4.0 billion, Solana about $2.2 billion, Stellar about $1.7 billion, Bitcoin sidechain Liquid Network about $1.5 billion. Tokenized asset sizes on XRP Ledger, ZKsync Era, and Arbitrum are all close to $1 billion.

The tokenized asset industry has not consolidated onto a single public chain. Assets are distributed across major blockchain ecosystems based on transaction costs, liquidity, compliance requirements, and business partnerships. However, the most telling data point is not the size of the tokenized asset market... but how these assets are being used.

Let's continue the analysis—

Most Tokenized Assets Are Not Yet "Composable"

Market size is not the only core metric; the actual application value of assets is more informative.

Bonds are the largest category of tokenized assets by market capitalization, at $15.2 billion, but only 5% of the circulating supply is used in DeFi protocols, amounting to only about $800 million. The utilization rate of precious metal tokenized assets is similarly low. Most tokenized assets are only used for on-chain storage and have not yet become freely composable, interconnected, and reusable financial building blocks.

Smaller tokenized asset categories show the opposite performance: reinsurance tokens with a market cap of $362 million have an on-chain protocol usage rate as high as 84%; private credit tokens have a 33% usage rate. These two asset classes were designed from the outset for on-chain composability. In contrast, top categories like Treasuries and gold are positioned primarily to simplify holding and transferring assets on-chain, without altering their original operational logic. This situation also highlights a core divergence in the tokenized asset industry: the varying degrees of on-chain native-ness among different tokenized assets.

Some assets can be freely transferred and applied across chains, while others merely use the blockchain as a ledger tool, limiting asset transfer and composability functions. Currently, most tokenized assets are essentially just digitized assets, merely moving accounting onto the chain, without unlocking their composability potential. And composability is the core value of on-chain finance and a key to upgrading the financial system.

The Pantera Capital Token Native Index shows that over 70% of tokenized assets have the lowest level of on-chain native-ness. A large number of tokens are merely digital certificates for offline physical assets, with actual asset control still relying on offline ledgers and intermediaries.

Currently, the tokenized asset industry is still in its early stages: one type is assets that are only digitally recorded on-chain, and another is assets that are natively on-chain and deeply integrated with blockchain characteristics.

The on-chain composability technology infrastructure is ready, and asset categories are gradually enriching, but deep integration and application have just begun.

Future Trends of Tokenized Assets

Industry predictions for the long-term scale of the tokenized asset market vary, but all generally agree the market will continue to expand.

  • McKinsey predicts the tokenized asset market will reach $2-4 trillion by 2030;
  • Ark Invest estimates the tokenized asset market at $11 trillion;
  • Boston Consulting Group and Ripple jointly calculate that the tokenized asset market will reach $9.4 trillion by 2030 and climb to $18.9 trillion by 2033;
  • Standard Chartered predicts the tokenized asset market will exceed $30 trillion by 2034.

Based on the above institutional estimates, compared to the current market size of $34 billion, the future growth space for the tokenized asset market industry could be a hundredfold. Of course, the numerical differences are not due to disagreements about the speed of industry adoption, but rather to different statistical definitions. The scope of statistics varies among institutions, covering differences in asset categories, whether stablecoins and deposits are included, and the defined scope of tokenization. For example: McKinsey's statistics focus on bonds, credit, funds, and stocks; Standard Chartered adds commodities and trade finance; BCG and Ripple additionally include deposits and stablecoins. However, despite the differences in statistical scope, the industry unanimously agrees that the scale of tokenized assets will undergo a leap forward expansion.

Looking at the global financial landscape, the current size of tokenized assets is still minuscule.

  • The global bond market is over $140 trillion, while tokenized bonds are only $15.2 billion, accounting for 0.01%;
  • The global physical gold market is worth tens of trillions of dollars, while tokenized gold is $5 billion, accounting for less than 0.02%;
  • The global stock market is over a hundred trillion dollars, while tokenized stocks are $1.5 billion, accounting for only 0.001%.

Today, emerging sectors have steadily taken shape. Assets with clear pricing, stable demand, and simple ownership, such as US Treasuries, gold, and private credit, have taken the lead in going on-chain. Currently, tokenization has not yet disrupted the underlying nature of assets, only optimizing the settlement and transfer methods. The deep integration of assets with the digital financial system is still being explored.

Currently, tokenized assets are more about digitization, and assets struggle to achieve programmable composable applications. The next phase of the industry faces a core challenge: bringing the more complex parts of the financial system on-chain and more deeply integrating tokenized assets into composable, internet-native financial infrastructure.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat is the primary driver behind the recent explosive growth of the tokenized asset market?

AThe primary driver is U.S. Treasury bonds, which offer investors a stable, interest-bearing asset in a digital format with efficient settlement and transfer.

QAccording to the article, which specific type of tokenized asset currently dominates the commodities sector and why is it particularly well-suited for tokenization?

AGold dominates the tokenized commodities sector. It's well-suited because it has a globally unified standard, is easy to store, doesn't deteriorate, and has historically traded via ownership certificates, making its transition to a tokenized form natural.

QWhat key metric, beyond market size, does the article highlight as crucial for understanding the true value of tokenized assets?

AThe key metric is how the assets are *used*, specifically their utilization and composability within DeFi protocols, which reveals their actual integration and functional value beyond just being a digital record.

QWhat is the major limitation of most current tokenized assets like bonds and gold, as identified in the article?

AMost current tokenized assets lack 'composability.' They are often just digital records of off-chain assets, managed by traditional intermediaries, and are not deeply integrated or programmable within the DeFi ecosystem for combined, innovative uses.

QWhat is identified as the next critical challenge for the tokenized asset industry?

AThe next critical challenge is to bring more complex parts of the financial system on-chain and to integrate tokenized assets more deeply into composable, internet-native financial infrastructure, moving beyond simple digitization to true programmability.

Похожее

The Revived Codex, Carrying OpenAI's Hopes for IPO

This article analyzes the intense recent development of OpenAI's Codex, positioning it as a crucial component for OpenAI's impending IPO. Over the past two months, Codex has seen a rapid series of major updates focused on integrating into real enterprise workflows. Key new features include enhanced context capture (Appshots, file previews, built-in browser), long-running task execution ("Goal Mode"), remote operation (phone control, lock-screen access), and enterprise management tools (plugin sharing, access tokens, automated risk review). These updates aim to make Codex a comprehensive AI workbench that can "see the scene, push tasks, and manage risks." The author argues that while ChatGPT proves OpenAI's massive user base and API provides foundational revenue, Codex represents OpenAI's clearest path to demonstrating tangible, high-value commercial viability. It targets developers and engineering teams—a segment already accustomed to paying for efficiency gains in costly software development cycles. This is critical because, despite higher overall revenue, OpenAI's adjusted operating margins remain deeply negative, highlighting the challenge of outrunning immense compute costs. The pressure is amplified by competitor Anthropic's success with Claude Code, which has shown that a focused approach on high-value enterprise and developer workflows can lead to a path toward profitability. Codex's aggressive evolution is thus seen as OpenAI's strategic move to capture a similar enterprise-ready, revenue-generating narrative essential for its market debut. In essence, "ChatGPT proved OpenAI has users. Codex needs to prove OpenAI is a business that can make money."

marsbit39 мин. назад

The Revived Codex, Carrying OpenAI's Hopes for IPO

marsbit39 мин. назад

Data Theft at Will! Major Vulnerability Exposed in This Popular AI Programming Tool

A critical vulnerability in Anthropic's Claude Code AI programming tool allowed attackers to bypass its network sandbox for over five months, enabling potential data exfiltration. Independent researcher Aonan Guan discovered a second complete bypass exploiting a null-byte injection in the SOCKS5 proxy. This flaw, present since the sandbox's launch in October 2025, let processes inside the sandbox access any host, contrary to user-configured domain whitelists. The attack chain involved manipulating hostnames (e.g., `attacker.com\x00.google.com`). JavaScript's `endsWith()` check would pass `.google.com`, while the underlying C `getaddrinfo()` function would only parse `attacker.com` due to the null byte, creating a parser discrepancy. Combined with a previously disclosed prompt injection method, this could leak API keys, credentials, and internal data. Anthropic silently fixed the issue in April 2026 without a security advisory, CVE, or user notification. The researcher noted that Claude Code itself confirmed the vulnerability's severity when tested. This incident highlights broader industry issues, as similar vulnerabilities found in Google's Gemini CLI and GitHub's Copilot Agent also lacked public disclosures. The report criticizes the false sense of security created by a broken sandbox and emphasizes the need for defense-in-depth and transparency in AI tool security.

marsbit4 ч. назад

Data Theft at Will! Major Vulnerability Exposed in This Popular AI Programming Tool

marsbit4 ч. назад

Under the squeeze between giants Tether and Circle, how can foreign exchange stablecoins break through?

In the face of dominance by Tether (USDT) and Circle (USDC), new entrants in the stablecoin space face significant challenges competing directly, especially in the foreign exchange (FX) market. A more viable and efficient path forward is the adoption of synthetic foreign exchange (Forex) built atop existing USD stablecoin rails. The rise of stablecoin neo-banks represents the next major growth area for mass crypto adoption, with FX becoming a core component. However, replicating the vast liquidity, distribution channels, and network effects of USDT/USDC is extremely difficult for new FX stablecoin issuers. The total market cap of all FX stablecoins is a fraction (roughly 1/700th) of USD stablecoins, leading to issues like poor liquidity, peg instability, limited acceptance, and complex compliance hurdles. Instead of issuing spot FX stablecoins, the article advocates for a model inspired by traditional finance's non-deliverable forwards (NDFs). Users would continue to hold underlying USDT/USDC, while their account balances are displayed and economically settled in their preferred local currency through MtM (Mark-to-Market) NDF structures. This approach leverages the deep liquidity and infrastructure of USD stablecoins while providing synthetic forex exposure. Key advantages include strong peg stability via oracles, retained access to USD stablecoin yields and liquidity, high capital efficiency, and easy scalability to new currencies. Primary use cases for this on-chain NDF forex include: 1. Neo-banks, custodians, and wallets offering multi-currency accounts to attract international users and increase deposits. 2. Forex carry trade strategies, potentially offering more stable and scalable yields compared to crypto-native products like Ethena. 3. Global corporate payments, allowing businesses to receive payments in local currencies while hedging forex risk on-chain, similar to services offered by Stripe in traditional finance. This synthetic forex model presents a pragmatic solution to overcome the network effects of incumbents and unlock the next wave of stablecoin utility for global consumers and businesses.

marsbit5 ч. назад

Under the squeeze between giants Tether and Circle, how can foreign exchange stablecoins break through?

marsbit5 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片