Wintermute Market Weekly: Iran War Ends, Inflation Meets Expectations, BTC Rebounds to Lower 60ks But Don’t Rush to Buy the Dip

marsbitОпубликовано 2026-06-17Обновлено 2026-06-17

Введение

**Wintermute Market Weekly: BTC Rebounds to $60K Lows, But Caution Advised** This week saw a broad market rebound, primarily driven by two converging factors: a US CPI inflation reading that met expectations (4.2% YoY) and former President Trump's announcement of a deal to end the Iran conflict. The latter triggered a sharp drop in oil prices, reducing geopolitical risk premiums and easing inflation fears. Consequently, risk assets like equities and cryptocurrencies rallied, with Bitcoin recovering from lows around $60,000 to close the week up 1.9%, while altcoins gained 3.1%. Despite the price bounce, the underlying liquidity picture for crypto remains weak. Key funding channels—stablecoin flows, ETF inflows, and Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) activity—show no signs of structural improvement. ETF outflows recently hit a record streak, and DAT assets have declined significantly. The rally from $60K to $83K earlier is now viewed as a bear-market rally that has failed. The current environment is characterized by low directional conviction and choppy, range-bound trading, likely persisting into summer. The report advises caution against aggressively buying the dip. While the $60K area offers attractive long-term risk/reward, a sustained bull run requires a visible turnaround in capital inflows, which hasn't materialized. The upcoming FOMC meeting and Powell's commentary, alongside the formal Iran deal signing, are noted as near-term catalysts. The core takeaway is to watch fund...

Author: Wintermute

Compiled by: TechFlow

TechFlow Insight: Markets rebounded this week as US inflation data met expectations and Trump announced an end to the Iran conflict, with plunging oil prices boosting risk assets. However, the real turning point for the crypto market depends on capital inflows, not price rebounds – there has been no structural improvement in stablecoins, ETF flows, or institutional capital. Do not get chopped up in volatile markets before seeing these signals.

Macro Markets

This week's rally was driven by two events, both surprisingly pulling in the same direction.

First, May CPI data.

Year-on-year at 4.2%, it accelerated for the third consecutive month, hitting a new high since 2023, but it was in line with expectations. This "in-line" reading is the whole story. The bond market had been bracing for hotter inflation, fearing it would push Warsh to turn hawkish earlier, but the data wasn't that bad. Core inflation cooled to 2.9%, suggesting energy-driven inflation may be peaking rather than spreading to services and wages. After three weeks of market anxiety about a secondary inflation spiral, an in-line reading was enough for relief.

Second, and more importantly, the end of the Iran conflict.

After over 100 days, Trump announced an agreement on Sunday, authorizing the reopening of the Strait of Hormuz and lifting the maritime blockade, with a formal signing scheduled for June 19th in Switzerland. Brent crude plunged from around $110 a month ago to the low $80s, dropping 6.6% this week alone. The geopolitical risk premium that has driven markets since late February is rapidly unwinding, pulling the dollar (DXY -1%) and yields (10-year back to around 4.50%) down with it. Falling oil directly lowers the forward inflation path, which is why the CPI data and ceasefire reinforced each other this week instead of offsetting.

Cross-asset moves clearly tell this relief story. The Russell 2000 led gains at +4.0%, Nasdaq +2.3%, altcoins +3.1%, BTC +1.9%, with Brent crude at the bottom. Risk appetite rotated, energy premium flowed out. The only notable laggard was long-dated Treasuries: 20+ year Treasuries were only +0.8%, as the 4.2% headline inflation capped yield downside even with the war premium exiting.

All this sets up a genuinely tricky situation for the upcoming FOMC meeting. The 4.2% headline argues for "higher for longer." Softer core and plummeting oil argue the shock is transitory and the next move could even be a cut. No one expects a policy change on Wednesday, so the dot plot, updated projections, and Warsh's first press conference are everything. How he frames this contradiction – anchoring on headline or looking through to core and oil – will set the tone for the second half of the year.

Digital Assets

To understand this week, you have to start two weeks ago when the sector dropped over 10%, with BTC down 14% in a single week. Crypto-only observers blamed it on Saylor selling 32 BTC and ensuing capital fears. The reality was two other drivers:

(i) A broad risk-off rotation triggered by rising inflation fears and strong jobs data,

(ii) plus confirmation that the rally from the lower 60ks to $83k lacked further support. That was a bear market rally, now confirmed.

This week was a bounce. BTC rebounded from the lower 60ks to close up +1.9%, altcoins +3.1%, benefiting from in-line CPI and the ceasefire. ETH was a clear laggard, down 0.4% for the week while everything around it rose, extending its relative weakness. There's no structural change here. This is high-beta risk assets reacting to a better market environment.

Stepping back, we've had three >20% drawdowns since last October. The difference is in character. The first two were directional sell-offs. The recent one from $83k to $60k was a bear trap, the kind of move that cuts both bulls and bears on both sides. Perpetuals and options show little interest in directional exposure, which is normal for now. Barring major news, the base case is chopping into summer.

The harder question is when it turns, and the answer lies in liquidity. Crypto remains a macro asset, a release valve for excess liquidity, and that liquidity arrives via three channels: stablecoins, ETFs, and DATs (Digital Asset Treasuries). None are reversing. DAT AUM has fallen from ~$220B to ~$140B, and new funding has largely stopped outside of Strategy, Bitmine, and Strive. ETFs just set their longest streak of outflows since launch, with no sign of a turn last week. Stablecoin flows follow the same outflow trend.

It's worth remembering how the last cycle actually started. There was a bottom and recovery, but the real move began in early 2024 with the ETF approval, which was front-run, and the money it brought. If the thesis is a run back to $100k, the question is where that money comes from. Right now, institutions are on the sidelines, retail is busy trading levered ETFs and single stocks. Until that trend reverses, calling the bottom feels premature. We need to see a structural shift in momentum behind stablecoin mints/redemptions, ETF flows, and/or DAT activity.

Our Take

Don't Get Chopped

Risk/reward around the lower 60ks is attractive long-term; each flush leaves a higher-quality, more convicted holder base. That doesn't mean the bottom is in. Trading into the 50ks before we see any improvement is possible. Positioning has been cleaned up, net selling pressure has eased, but it's on dwindling summer volume.

The only thing to watch is flow, not price, not news. The turn to persistent inflows into ETFs and stablecoins marked the real move of the last cycle, and there's no sign of it yet. The advice facing this chop is not to bet too heavily on any rebound and get chopped up.

Near-term, Warsh's comments on Wednesday are a catalyst. A dovish read on softer core and lower oil extends the relief; a hawkish read on 4.2% headline ends it. Beyond that, the US-Iran signing ceremony in Switzerland on Friday is the event.

Связанные с этим вопросы

QWhat were the two main events that drove the market rebound this week according to Wintermute's report?

AThe two main drivers were: 1) The May U.S. CPI data, which came in at 4.2% year-on-year, meeting expectations and easing fears of a more hawkish Fed pivot. 2) The end of the Iran conflict announced by former President Trump, which led to a sharp drop in oil prices, reducing inflation pressure and geopolitical risk premium.

QWhy does Wintermute advise caution against rushing to buy the dip in the crypto market despite BTC's bounce from the $60k lows?

AWintermute advises caution because the report indicates a lack of structural improvement in the three key liquidity channels for crypto: stablecoin inflows, ETF flows, and Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) activity. Without a reversal in these fund flows, the recent price action is considered a bear market fakeout or a dead-cat bounce within a consolidating range, not a confirmed bottom or start of a sustained uptrend.

QWhat is identified as the key signal for a genuine turning point in the crypto market cycle?

AThe key signal for a genuine turning point is a structural shift in liquidity flows, specifically sustained inflows into crypto ETFs and stablecoin net issuance, not just price rebounds or news events. The report references the start of the last bull cycle, which was marked by the anticipation and approval of spot Bitcoin ETFs and the capital they brought in.

QHow did Ethereum (ETH) perform relative to the broader crypto market this week?

AEthereum (ETH) was an obvious laggard this week, declining by 0.4% while Bitcoin (BTC) was up 1.9% and altcoins as a sector gained 3.1%. This continued its trend of relative weakness.

QWhat are the two potential interpretations of upcoming economic data that could impact the market, as mentioned regarding the Fed (Warsh) press conference?

AThe two potential interpretations are: 1) A dovish interpretation focusing on softening core inflation and lower oil prices, which would extend the market relief. 2) A hawkish interpretation focusing on the 4.2% headline inflation rate, which would bring the relief rally to an end. Fed Chair Warsh's framing of this contradiction will set the tone for the latter half of the year.

Похожее

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

U.S. Federal Reserve officials who previously advocated for rate cuts, including Governor Christopher Waller, have recently shifted their stance, with many now not ruling out the possibility of future rate hikes. This sets a challenging stage for new Fed Chair Kevin Warsh's first policy meeting. Appointed by President Trump based on his dovish views, Warsh now faces a committee where the debate has pivoted from "when to cut" to "whether to hike," driven by persistent inflation above 3%, a strong labor market, and supply-side pressures from AI infrastructure demands and geopolitical tensions. Key figures illustrate the shift. Governor Waller, once concerned about employment, now says data has pushed him toward considering rate increases. Even moderate voices like Governor Lisa Cook, while expecting inflation to ease, have indicated readiness to hike if it fails to do so. Long-time hawks such as regional Fed presidents Beth Hammack, Lorie Logan, and Neel Kashkari have grown more vocal, arguing that the real policy rate is effectively falling and that action may soon be needed. The upcoming Fed meeting is expected to keep rates steady but will likely remove the "easing bias" from its statement, signaling a neutral stance between cuts and hikes. The quarterly "dot plot" is anticipated to show most officials projecting no cuts this year, with some potentially indicating hikes. Chair Warsh, a critic of the Fed's reliance on forward guidance like the dot plot, must navigate communicating this pivot using tools he has questioned, all while steering policy in a direction counter to the preferences of the president who appointed him. The consensus suggests the Fed's next move could well be a rate increase.

marsbit22 мин. назад

Fed's Internal Doves Flock to Hawkish Stance, Warsh's Debut "Between a Rock and a Hard Place"

marsbit22 мин. назад

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

The article analyzes the three leading Chinese optical module companies, collectively nicknamed "Yi Zhong Tian": Xinyisheng, Zhongji Innolight, and TFC Optical Communication. It evaluates their "cost-performance" not by current stock price, but through three lenses: PEG ratio (growth vs. valuation), earnings quality, and premium/discount for certainty. Xinyisheng shows the most attractive PEG ratio and high profitability, but its valuation reflects discounts for risks like high customer concentration and reliance on overseas markets. Zhongji Innolight, the most expensive, commands a premium for its market leadership, dominant share in key products like 800G/1.6T modules, and higher earnings certainty, though it faces geopolitical risks. TFC Optical, as an upstream component supplier ("water seller"), has the highest gross margin and bets on the long-term CPO/NPO architecture trend, but trades at a high valuation with more stable, less explosive growth. The core argument is that while these companies dominate module assembly, the true profit pool and technological moat lie upstream in laser and switch chips, currently controlled by U.S. firms like Lumentum and Coherent. The long-term "cost-performance" for these Chinese leaders hinges on whether the domestic industry, exemplified by companies like Yuanjie Technology, can successfully move up the value chain into high-power laser chips. Otherwise, their high growth may remain confined to the lower-margin assembly segment.

marsbit32 мин. назад

The Trillion-Yuan Market Cap 'Yi Zhong Tian': Who is the True Value King?

marsbit32 мин. назад

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

The crypto market is in a period of significant debate, with leading institutions offering differing views on whether a bottom has been reached. Three prominent firms have published detailed analyses: * **Galaxy Digital** argues Bitcoin has **not yet bottomed**. Their analysis of 13 historical indicators across six dimensions (valuation, profit-taking, miner pressure, etc.) shows only four are fully met. They project a potential bottom range between $30k and $54k. * **NYDIG** states a bottom is **possible but not likely**. While metrics are close to historic bear market extremes, they note the absence of a classic panic-selling event. They also suggest increased institutional adoption may have structurally altered the market cycle, potentially leading to a shallower downturn. * **Standard Chartered Bank** asserts the **bottom has already occurred** at around $59k. They cite two key factors: potential US-Iran diplomatic progress and the anticipated SpaceX IPO, which they believe absorbed capital and caused ETF selling pressure that is now subsiding. They forecast a year-end price target of $100k. Despite the surface-level disagreement, the reports share critical common ground more valuable for long-term investors: 1. All three believe the market bottom will form **within this year**. 2. All agree the current price is **closer to the bottom than to previous highs**. 3. All maintain a **bullish long-term outlook** for Bitcoin and a new cycle. The core takeaway is that while the exact bottom price ($40k, $50k, or $60k) is debated, the consensus is that a bottom is imminent. For long-term holders, the primary focus should not be pinpointing the absolute low, but on the future potential for prices to reach $100k, $200k, or higher. The fundamental thesis for Bitcoin—sovereign debt accumulation, inflation, declining trust in centralized institutions, global digitization, and improved accessibility—remains intact and is arguably strengthening. The overall landscape is viewed as more favorable than in previous crypto winters.

marsbit42 мин. назад

Has the Crypto Market Bottomed? Here's What Institutions Think

marsbit42 мин. назад

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

China's Photonics Industry: Bottlenecks and Breakthroughs In the global AI race, computing chips dominate the narrative, but the underlying bottleneck increasingly defining the scale of AI clusters is light—or more specifically, optical connectivity. Optical modules, which translate electrical signals to light and vice versa, are crucial for connecting thousands of GPUs in AI data centers, preventing data congestion and ensuring efficient model training. High-speed modules (800G, 1.6T) are now standard, with performance hinging on advanced DSP (Digital Signal Processor) chips. This is where a critical dependency lies. Two US giants—Marvell and Broadcom—collectively dominate over 90% of the high-end DSP chip market. Chinese optical module leaders like Zhongji Innolight and Eoptolink rely on these chips to manufacture modules for overseas AI customers, primarily in North America. While this creates a supply chain vulnerability, complete decoupling is difficult. Marvell derives over half its revenue from Greater China, and the US firms depend on Chinese partners for chip packaging and optical components. The risk from laser chips (e.g., from Lumentum), another key component, is considered more manageable due to multiple global suppliers and faster progress in domestic alternatives from companies like YOFC and Accelink. To mitigate risks, China's industry is pursuing a multi-pronged strategy: diversifying supply chains and locking in long-term orders; fostering a domestic market ecosystem to adopt homegrown DSPs from firms like Huawei HiSilicon and CETC; accelerating R&D in high-speed DSPs and advanced packaging; and investing in next-gen technologies like silicon photonics and Co-Packaged Optics (CPO) to reduce reliance on discrete DSPs. The ultimate solution lies not in short-term博弈 but in persistent advancement of domestic high-end chip R&D and manufacturing. While challenges remain in performance, certification, and ecosystem building, China's vast domestic market and manufacturing base provide a crucial buffer, buying time for the industry to achieve greater technological independence.

marsbit56 мин. назад

The 'Chip' Challenge and Breakthroughs in China's Optical Industry Chain

marsbit56 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить T

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение Threshold Network Token (T) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки Threshold Network Token (T).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение Threshold Network Token (T)После приобретения вами Threshold Network Token (T) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля Threshold Network Token (T)С легкостью торгуйте Threshold Network Token (T) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

862 просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.03.29Обновлено 2026.06.02

Как купить T

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на T (T) представлены ниже.

活动图片