2026-04-16 Четверг

Новостной центр - Страница 1034

Получайте криптоновости и тенденции рынка в режиме реального времени с помощью Новостного центра HTX.

Before You Jump on Any ICO Bandwagon, Read This First

Before participating in any ICO, it's crucial to understand that most projects fail, and only a few achieve success. The recent hype around ICOs, driven by projects like MegaETH and Plasma, often leads to impulsive investments without proper due diligence. Here are key points to consider: 1. **Product Fundamentals**: Evaluate if the product solves a real problem and has genuine innovation. Avoid projects based on future promises or testnet data without a working product. 2. **Team Experience**: The team's track record matters. Experienced teams can adapt to market changes, while weak teams may disappear when hype fades. 3. **Investors and Valuation**: Check if reputable VCs are involved and assess the valuation. Avoid projects where insiders have low valuations, leaving retail investors at risk. 4. **Authentic Data**: Look beyond surface metrics like TVL or user numbers. Ensure data is genuine and not inflated by incentives or fake activity. 5. **Marketing and Narrative**: Strong projects control their narrative and attract organic attention. Poor projects rely on buzzwords without substance. 6. **Tokenomics**: Understand token unlock schedules, vesting, and fully diluted valuation (FDV). Avoid structures that favor insiders and shift risk to retail. 7. **Market Conditions**: Market cycles significantly impact valuation and returns. The same project may perform differently in a bull vs. bear market. ICO investments are not free money. Avoid FOMO-driven decisions and prioritize projects with real value over hype.

深潮12/16 06:49

Before You Jump on Any ICO Bandwagon, Read This First

深潮12/16 06:49

Reviewing Past Bitcoin Bull Markets: Why the Four-Year Cycle Occurs and Is It Over?

The article examines Bitcoin's four-year market cycles, traditionally aligned with its halving events, and questions whether this pattern still holds. It outlines the typical cycle phases: accumulation (low volatility, long-term buying), pre-halving bullish anticipation, a parabolic bull run with retail FOMO and leverage, and a sharp correction leading to a bear market. Bitcoin halvings, which reduce mining rewards by half every four years, are highlighted as a core mechanism for creating scarcity, similar to precious metals. Past cycles (2013, 2017, 2021) are reviewed, each driven by distinct catalysts (e.g., Mt. Gox collapse, ICO boom, COVID-19 stimulus) and ending with crashes exceeding 80%. Reasons for the cycle include the stock-to-flow model (measuring scarcity), market psychology/self-fulfilling prophecies, and global liquidity conditions. The current 2025 cycle is noted for unprecedented institutional involvement via ETFs and corporate treasuries, causing Bitcoin to hit new highs before the 2024 halving with less retail participation. Arguments for the cycle's end cite increased adoption by disciplined institutions (reducing volatility), Bitcoin's growing correlation with macro factors like Fed policy, and the diminishing impact of each halving. Key indicators to watch for cycle validation include post-halving price surges, large leverage unwinds, and retail altcoin speculation. The conclusion states that while historical patterns are evident, Bitcoin's evolution into a mainstream asset makes future cycles potentially different. Only time will tell if the four-year cycle persists or becomes obsolete.

marsbit12/16 06:26

Reviewing Past Bitcoin Bull Markets: Why the Four-Year Cycle Occurs and Is It Over?

marsbit12/16 06:26

The Economist: The Real Threat of Cryptocurrency to Traditional Banks

The Economist article "The Real Threat Cryptocurrency Poses to Traditional Banks" examines the escalating tensions between the traditional banking sector and the crypto industry. Despite both benefiting from a more favorable regulatory environment, especially following the passage of the GENIUS Act which provided a legal framework for stablecoins, a significant power shift is occurring. Banks' most immediate concern is regulatory arbitrage in stablecoins. Although the GENIUS Act prohibits issuers from paying interest to prevent deposit outflows, companies like Circle circumvent this by sharing revenue with exchanges, which then pay "rewards" to users. Banks are demanding this loophole be closed. Furthermore, crypto firms are breaking into the core of the financial system. In a landmark move, U.S. regulators granted national bank trust charters to five digital asset firms, including Circle and Ripple, allowing them to provide custody services nationwide. The collective impact of these developments poses a profound threat. The core of the banks' dilemma is their waning political influence. Crypto has firmly entrenched itself within the right-wing, anti-establishment political sphere, amassing a massive war chest for lobbying. Banks are no longer the most powerful financial voice in the Republican party. In a ironic twist, they now sometimes find themselves allied with Democratic senators and left-leaning groups who share concerns over stablecoin risks, proving that political alliances in this battle are increasingly unpredictable.

深潮12/16 05:57

The Economist: The Real Threat of Cryptocurrency to Traditional Banks

深潮12/16 05:57

活动图片