Sui 元老再创业，现实世界区块链 Rialo 是什么？

深潮Опубликовано 2025-08-10Обновлено 2025-08-11

Rialo 是由 Subzero Labs 专为现实世界开发的区块链，但其定位跳出了过往的 Layer1、Layer2 或 Layer3 框架。

撰文：KarenZ，Foresight News

尽管 Crypto 在华尔街和散户投资者中获得了越来越多的关注，但一个尴尬的现实始终存在：现有公链大多困在「加密圈」的闭环中，与现实世界的服务、数据和用户习惯脱节，让区块链始终难以融入普通人的生活。同时，开发者也希望专注于业务逻辑，而非耗费大量精力对接预言机、维护节点或处理链下数据。

在这样的背景下，现实世界区块链 Rialo 旨在通过打破区块链与现实世界的壁垒，使团队能够像 Web2 开发一样轻松交付可用于生产环境的应用程序，让区块链像智能手机一样，无缝嵌入现实世界的运行逻辑。

Rialo 是什么？

Rialo 是由 Subzero Labs 专为现实世界开发的区块链，但其定位跳出了过往的 Layer1、Layer2 或 Layer3 框架，全称为「Rialo isn’t a layer 1」。

用 Subzero Labs 联合创始人 Ade Adepoju 在《财富》杂志上的比喻：「这就像当年 iPod 到 iPhone 的进化 —— 我们不需要另一个只能听歌的设备，而是需要一个能整合相机、网络、GPS 的全能工具。”

Rialo 的核心目标是降低区块链的使用门槛，让非加密领域的开发者也能轻松构建应用。它最显著的特点是「原生连接现实世界」：例如，开发者可以直接在智能合约中调用网页信息（如 FICO 信用分），无需依赖第三方预言机；用户可以用社交账号、邮箱等熟悉的身份登录，无需从零开始学习钱包操作。

Fabric Ventures 解释其为何投资 Rialo 时表示，Rialo 通过将现实世界开发者所需的核心功能嵌入协议本身，改变了区块链 L1 的侧重点。调用、数据流、 timers 和跨链操作都变成了原生指令，而非依赖外呼。预言机、跨链桥、索引器和其他「传统」基础设施可能不再有必要。

团队和融资背景

8 月初，Subzero Labs 宣布完成 2000 万美元种子轮融资，领投方为 Pantera Capital，参投方除 Sui 开发商 Mysten Labs 之外，还包括 Variant、Hashed、Fabric Ventures、Coinbase Ventures、Mirana Ventures、Susquehanna、Edge Ventures、Flowdesk 等。据财富杂志，CEO Ade Adepoju 表示，这笔融资于今年一季度完成，涉及股权和代币认股权证。

Subzero Labs 团队成员曾任职于 Meta、Apple、Amazon、Netflix、Google、TikTok、Citadel、Mysten Labs、Solana 等公司或项目，在区块链、人工智能、分布式系统和硬件领域拥有比较丰富的经验。

  • 联合创始人兼 CEO Ade Adepoju：今年 30 岁，居住在纽约市，早期曾在芯片制造商 AMD 工作，后陆续在戴尔和 Netflix 担任工程师。2021 年年底，Ade Adepoju 投身加密领域，作为创始工程师加入 Mysten Labs（截至 2024 年 2 月）。

  • 联合创始人兼 CTO Lu Zhang：曾任 Mysten Labs 工程师。

Rialo 如何运行？

尽管 Rialo 尚未披露其区块链架构，不过从其简要介绍可以看出运行逻辑围绕「结合 RISC-V 、Solana VM 兼容性」、「降低摩擦」和「原生整合」等展开，具体可从几个层面理解：

  • 结合 RISC-V 、Solana VM 兼容性：Rialo 致力于减少对跨链桥、预言机等中间件的需求，并结合 RISC-V 智能合约、Solana VM 兼容性。

值得一提的是，今年 4 月份，Vitalik Buterin 还在在 Ethereum Magicians 论坛提议将以太坊 EVM 更换为开源指令集架构 RISC-V，以提升扩展性。在以太坊基金会研究员 Justin Drake 8 月份发布的未来十年以太坊「lean Ethereum」发展愿景中页指出，以太坊将在共识层、数据层和执行层进行重大升级，可能基于开源 RISC-V 指令集构建 EVM 2.0。Vitalik Buterin 解释称，用 RISC-V 替换 ZK-EVM 可以大幅提升以太坊执行层的效率 ，解决主要的扩展瓶颈之一，并大幅提升执行层的简洁性。

  • 开发者友好的技术架构：与传统公链不同，Rialo 在设计时就嵌入了「现实世界交互」的能力。例如，使用智能合约中的一行 HTTPS 调用即可将实时数据提取到任何地方，且可以无缝集成智能合约中的任何链下 API。同时，Rialo 优化智能合约的编程体验，引入了类似传统软件开发的 「事件驱动」「异步处理」等机制，开发者可以写出像普通代码一样简洁的逻辑。

  • 用户体验的「去区块链化」：Rialo 希望重构身份系统，用户可以用电子邮件、SMS 或现有社交身份登录作 Web3 护照。此外，Rialo 也将支持发送加密信息。Rialo 宣称交易确认采用亚秒级速度，费用稳定且可预测，避免了传统公链「Gas 费暴涨」、「三明治攻击」等问题；同时 Rialo 支持 2FA、定时交易等 Web2 用户熟悉的功能。

  • 生态协同，打破「链上链下」壁垒：Rialo 的底层协议将支持与各类现实服务直接交互，例如支付系统、天气等。这种「原生整合」能力，让 Rialo 上的应用能覆盖更广泛的场景。

小结

当应用足够简单、场景足够日常，加密技术才有可能能真正从「小圈子」走出来。

当然，Rialo 仍面临挑战：如何在连接现实世界的同时保持去中心化特性？如何平衡去中心化和合规性？又该如何平衡数据开放与隐私保护？

Похожее

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

Three Years Later: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's launch, I made 20 predictions about its future. Now, in mid-2026, I've used AI agents to fact-check each one against the latest data. Overall, most major directional forecasts were correct, with only one outright error (incorrectly stating GPT-4 had 100 trillion parameters). Key successes included predicting that RAG and retrieval architectures would become the standard for handling knowledge and hallucinations, that natural language interfaces (LUI) would create a massive new industry layer beyond the models themselves, and that China would develop viable large language models, significantly closing the performance gap with Western counterparts within about three years. Predictions about the absence of mass unemployment, the rise of a new "robot network" for agent communication, and ChatGPT not possessing consciousness also held true in their core arguments. However, the "devil was in the details." Errors frequently involved specific numbers, timelines, or overlooking distributional effects. I tended to overestimate the speed of adoption (e.g., for agent networks) while underestimating the ultimate scale of capabilities or costs (e.g., AI winning IMO gold without tools, or the extreme capital required for frontier models). Other misjudgments included: underestimating how AI would reinforce, not dissolve, information filter bubbles; incorrectly assuming AI-generated content would easily circumvent copyright (it has instead triggered record-breaking settlements); and misidentifying where value would be captured (it accrued overwhelmingly to the compute layer, like Nvidia, not just the application or model layers). Key lessons from reviewing these predictions are: 1) Directional and mechanistic insights are far more reliable than precise numbers or absolute statements. 2) There's a consistent bias to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude. 3) Errors often lie in missing distributional impacts within a generally correct aggregate trend. 4) Predictions phrased with nuance and caveats aged the best. 5) Some fundamental debates (e.g., on machine consciousness or the ultimate value chain) remain unresolved even after three years. This exercise is less about scoring the past and more about establishing rules for clearer thinking about the next three years of AI.

marsbit55 мин. назад

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

marsbit55 мин. назад

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手3 ч. назад

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手3 ч. назад

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbit4 ч. назад

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbit4 ч. назад

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbit4 ч. назад

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbit4 ч. назад

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbit6 ч. назад

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbit6 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Как купить SUI

Добро пожаловать на HTX.com! Мы сделали приобретение SUI Network (SUI) простым и удобным. Следуйте нашему пошаговому руководству и отправляйтесь в свое крипто-путешествие.Шаг 1: Создайте аккаунт на HTXИспользуйте свой адрес электронной почты или номер телефона, чтобы зарегистрироваться и бесплатно создать аккаунт на HTX. Пройдите удобную регистрацию и откройте для себя весь функционал.Создать аккаунтШаг 2: Перейдите в Купить криптовалюту и выберите свой способ оплатыКредитная/Дебетовая Карта: Используйте свою карту Visa или Mastercard для мгновенной покупки SUI Network (SUI).Баланс: Используйте средства с баланса вашего аккаунта HTX для простой торговли.Третьи Лица: Мы добавили популярные способы оплаты, такие как Google Pay и Apple Pay, для повышения удобства.P2P: Торгуйте напрямую с другими пользователями на HTX.Внебиржевая Торговля (OTC): Мы предлагаем индивидуальные услуги и конкурентоспособные обменные курсы для трейдеров.Шаг 3: Хранение SUI Network (SUI)После приобретения вами SUI Network (SUI) храните их в своем аккаунте на HTX. В качестве альтернативы вы можете отправить их куда-либо с помощью перевода в блокчейне или использовать для торговли с другими криптовалютами.Шаг 4: Торговля SUI Network (SUI)С легкостью торгуйте SUI Network (SUI) на спотовом рынке HTX. Просто зайдите в свой аккаунт, выберите торговую пару, совершайте сделки и следите за ними в режиме реального времени. Мы предлагаем удобный интерфейс как для начинающих, так и для опытных трейдеров.

1.1k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2024.03.29Обновлено 2025.03.21

Как купить SUI

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на SUI (SUI) представлены ниже.

活动图片

Топ вопросы

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow