WisdomTree Files To Withdraw Ethereum Trust Registration Statement – Details

bitcoinistОпубликовано 2024-09-07Обновлено 2024-09-08

Введение

American investment company WisdomTree has requested to withdraw its Ethereum Trust registration statement three years after submission to the US...

American investment company WisdomTree has requested to withdraw its Ethereum Trust registration statement three years after submission to the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This development comes a few hours after fellow asset manager VanEck closed down its Ethereum futures ETF citing a lack of demand.

Related Reading: Bitcoin ETF Issuer WisdomTree Introduces Prime App In NY, Gains Approval For New Crypto Offerings

WisdomTree To Terminate Ethereum ETF Registration 

In a filing on September 6, WisdomTree approached the SEC to retract the S-1 registration form of the exchange-traded fund known as “WisdomTree Ethereum Trust”. The American asset manager first filed this registration statement on May 27, 2021, seeking to launch an ETF that offered investors exposure to Ethereum but with lower costs and fewer liabilities. 

A statement from the application read:


In seeking to achieve its investment objective, the Trust will hold ether and will value its Shares daily based on the [CF Ether-Dollar US Settlement Price], which is an independently calculated value based on an aggregation of executed trade flow of major ether spot exchanges.”

The “WisdomTree Ethereum Trust” was to be traded on the Chicago Board Options Exchange (Cboe) with the proposed maximum aggregate offering price of $1,000,000. 

Three years later, WisdomTree has moved to withdraw the registration statement of this ETF alongside all relevant exhibits. The asset manager states that no securities in relation to the said application have been/will be sold to investors. In addition, WisdomTree has acknowledged that the filing fees for this registration statement, valued at $109.10, cannot be refunded. They have also requested that these fees be directed toward future use. 

As earlier stated, WisdomTree’s announcement comes shortly after VanEck unveiled plans to shut down its VanEck Ethereum Strategy ETF (EFUT), an investment fund based on Ethereum futures contracts. According to VanEck, this decision is based on an analysis of several factors including “performance, liquidity, assets under management, and investor interest”.  Trading activity on EFUT will come to a halt on September 16, followed by shares liquidation on or about September 23.

Related Reading: VanEck To Launch Bitcoin ETF Exposure For French Pension Plans

ETH Spot ETF Market Sees $6 Million In Loss

In other news, the Ethereum spot ETF market had recorded an outflow of $6 million in the last day according to data from Farside Investors. The total cumulative net flows of the nascent market now stand at -$568.5 million despite holding over 2% of the Ethereum market. Meanwhile, data from CoinMarketCap shows Ethereum trades at $2,237 following a 6.64% decline in the last day. 

WisdomTree
ETH trading at $2,237 on the daily chart | Source: ETHUSDT chart on Tradingview.com
Featured image from Markets Insider, chart from Tradingview
Semilore Faleti

Semilore Faleti

Semilore Faleti works as a crypto-journalist at Bitconist, providing the latest updates on blockchain developments, crypto regulations, and the DeFi ecosystem. He is a strong crypto enthusiast passionate about covering the growing footprint of blockchain technology in the financial world.

Related Posts

Base Ethereum bridge transactions

VC Blasts Ethereum and Layer-2s, Endorses Dash: Here’s Why

13 hours ago
Ethereum Whale

Ethereum Slips To $2,350 As Whales Make Exchange Inflows Worth $751 Million

16 hours ago
Ethereum

VanEck Shuts Down Ethereum Futures ETF Amidst Struggling Market Conditions

20 hours ago
Ethereum

Ethereum Rockets Forward With 3.3% Network Growth While Bitcoin Goes Stale

3 days ago
Ethereum

Spot Ethereum ETFs Exhibit Similar Trend To Spot Bitcoin ETFs, Market Expert Observes

3 days ago
Ethereum

Ethereum Reserves On Exchanges Climb Sharply Here’s What It Means For ETH

4 days ago

Похожее

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

Three Years Later: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's launch, I made 20 predictions about its future. Now, in mid-2026, I've used AI agents to fact-check each one against the latest data. Overall, most major directional forecasts were correct, with only one outright error (incorrectly stating GPT-4 had 100 trillion parameters). Key successes included predicting that RAG and retrieval architectures would become the standard for handling knowledge and hallucinations, that natural language interfaces (LUI) would create a massive new industry layer beyond the models themselves, and that China would develop viable large language models, significantly closing the performance gap with Western counterparts within about three years. Predictions about the absence of mass unemployment, the rise of a new "robot network" for agent communication, and ChatGPT not possessing consciousness also held true in their core arguments. However, the "devil was in the details." Errors frequently involved specific numbers, timelines, or overlooking distributional effects. I tended to overestimate the speed of adoption (e.g., for agent networks) while underestimating the ultimate scale of capabilities or costs (e.g., AI winning IMO gold without tools, or the extreme capital required for frontier models). Other misjudgments included: underestimating how AI would reinforce, not dissolve, information filter bubbles; incorrectly assuming AI-generated content would easily circumvent copyright (it has instead triggered record-breaking settlements); and misidentifying where value would be captured (it accrued overwhelmingly to the compute layer, like Nvidia, not just the application or model layers). Key lessons from reviewing these predictions are: 1) Directional and mechanistic insights are far more reliable than precise numbers or absolute statements. 2) There's a consistent bias to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude. 3) Errors often lie in missing distributional impacts within a generally correct aggregate trend. 4) Predictions phrased with nuance and caveats aged the best. 5) Some fundamental debates (e.g., on machine consciousness or the ultimate value chain) remain unresolved even after three years. This exercise is less about scoring the past and more about establishing rules for clearer thinking about the next three years of AI.

marsbit1 ч. назад

Three Years Later: Looking Back at My Predictions About ChatGPT in 2023

marsbit1 ч. назад

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

Looking Back After Three Years: Revisiting My 2023 Predictions on ChatGPT In March 2023, shortly after ChatGPT's debut and before GPT-4's release, I made over twenty predictions about AI's future based on limited information and intuition. Now, in May 2026, I revisited those forecasts using an AI-driven analysis with 41 Opus 4.8 agents to cross-reference them with the latest data. The assessment used symbols: ✅ Correct, 🟢 Mostly Correct, 🟡 Partially Correct, ❌ Incorrect. Overall, the directional judgments held up well, with only one major factual error regarding GPT-4's rumored parameter size (incorrectly cited as 100T). However, nuances and degrees of accuracy revealed more. **What Was Largely Correct:** Predictions about mechanisms and directions proved accurate. The rise of RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) as the standard architecture for combating AI hallucination was confirmed, as was the transformative potential of LUI (Language User Interface) in creating a new industry layer atop GUIs. The emergence of "robot networks" (agent-to-agent communication protocols) and China's rapid catch-up in developing capable large models (closing the performance gap with top models to ~2.7%) were also on point. The analysis affirmed that LLMs lack consciousness and that the Turing Test merely measures perceived intelligence. **What Was Off Target:** Errors often involved specific numbers, over-optimistic timelines, or misjudged distributions. The prediction that value would primarily accrue to the application layer was half-right but missed NVIDIA's dominance as the profitable infrastructure layer. Forecasts about AI circumventing copyright issues and fostering a "global common ground" by averaging human viewpoints were incorrect; instead, major copyright settlements occurred and AI personalization is increasing. Estimates for model training costs ("$5-10 billion cap") were significantly off, underestimating frontier costs and overestimating replication costs. The notion that LLMs could never do complex math without tools was disproven by later models winning IMO gold. **Key Patterns from the Review:** 1. **Direction over precision:** Judgments about mechanisms and trends were more reliable than specific numbers or definitive statements. 2. **Timing bias:** There was a tendency to overestimate short-term speed but underestimate long-term magnitude and transformation. 3. **The distribution blind spot:** Aggregate-level correctness often masked uneven impacts (e.g., on young professionals' employment). 4. **The value of qualifiers:** Predictions framed with caution (e.g., "reportedly," "for now," "prototype in 2-3 years") aged better. 5. **Some debates continue:** Issues like the nature of "emergent abilities" or machine consciousness remain unresolved. This three-year review highlights that while seeing the big picture is crucial, humility regarding specifics, timelines, and disparate impacts is essential for future forecasting.

链捕手3 ч. назад

Three Years Later: Looking Back on My 2023 Predictions for ChatGPT

链捕手3 ч. назад

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

The article issues a stark warning about a potential AI investment bubble. It notes that while the AI boom shares similarities with the TMT bubble of the late 1990s, its scale is vastly larger, currently driving 93% of U.S. GDP growth. Major hyperscale cloud providers like Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta, and Oracle are planning to invest trillions in AI data centers over the coming years. However, calculations based on analyst projections for 2025-2030 reveal a concerning math problem: expected capital expenditure growth far outpaces projected revenue growth. Even under an extremely optimistic scenario of zero costs, the implied return on investment for most of these tech giants (except Amazon) is deeply negative. This suggests that the current trajectory could lead to one of history's largest shareholder value destruction events. The piece outlines two potential escapes: AI generating vastly more revenue than currently anticipated—a near-impossible task—or a significant cutback in the planned investment splurge. The latter scenario could trigger a domino effect, severely impacting the entire tech supply chain (from Nvidia to TSMC), potentially pushing the U.S. economy into recession, and causing a major stock market downturn. The author suggests upcoming high-profile IPOs by companies like OpenAI and Anthropic might represent a transfer of risk from early investors to public market participants. While the peak of the hype cycle might sustain investment through 2026, the fundamental financial dilemma remains unresolved, setting the stage for a potential market correction in 2027 or 2028, similar to the years following Alan Greenspan's "irrational exuberance" warning.

marsbit4 ч. назад

AI Bubble Warning: AI Investments Are Negative Returns for Most Tech Giants

marsbit4 ч. назад

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbit4 ч. назад

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbit4 ч. назад

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

The price of Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.5 series API has been permanently reduced by up to 99%, specifically for the "Input (Cache Hit)" cost, which covers users re-reading historical context in long conversations. MiMo's head, Luo Fuli, published a detailed technical blog to clarify that this drastic price cut stems from genuine engineering breakthroughs, not a marketing stunt or a simple price war. The core of the achievement lies in six key engineering optimizations. First, the model architecture adopts a Hybrid Sliding Window Attention (SWA), reducing the memory footprint (KVCache) to 1/7th of a traditional model. Second, a dual-pool memory management system actually utilizes these savings, allowing a single GPU to handle over 5 times more concurrent users. Third, an upgraded prefix caching mechanism achieves a cache hit rate of 93-95% for repeated reads, meaning most such requests bypass GPU computation entirely. Fourth, a self-developed distributed cache (GCache) utilizes idle SSD space on existing GPU servers, eliminating additional storage costs. Fifth, an intelligent scheduling system (LLM-Router) efficiently routes requests to maximize cache reuse and performance. Sixth, Multi-Token Prediction (MTP) accelerates the model's text generation ("output") side. Together, these systemic optimizations dramatically lower the real computational cost per request, enabling the 99% price reduction for cached inputs while reportedly maintaining positive gross margins. Luo Fuli's disclosure aims to shift the narrative from "price war" to a demonstration of substantive AI engineering progress.

marsbit6 ч. назад

Xiaomi MiMo's 99% Price Cut is Not Marketing! Luo Fuli Posts on X to Refute Critics

marsbit6 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы

Популярные статьи

Manyu: восходящая мем-звезда на Ethereum, готовая открыть новую эру культуры Shiba

Manyu - это мемтокен на Ethereum, который приносит децентрализованную культурную и развлекательную ценность через вирусное влияние в соцсетях и вовлечённость сообщества.

1.9k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2025.11.27Обновлено 2025.11.27

Manyu: восходящая мем-звезда на Ethereum, готовая открыть новую эру культуры Shiba

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам 14: Glamsterdam — самое ожидаемое обновление Ethereum в 2026 году

Ordinals/Runes по-прежнему стимулируют доходы от комиссий за блоки и активность разработчиков, рассматриваются как отправная точка «нативной эмиссии активов» в сети.

1.5k просмотров всегоОпубликовано 2026.04.29Обновлено 2026.04.29

Неделя обучения по популярным токенам 14: Glamsterdam — самое ожидаемое обновление Ethereum в 2026 году

Обсуждения

Добро пожаловать в Сообщество HTX. Здесь вы сможете быть в курсе последних новостей о развитии платформы и получить доступ к профессиональной аналитической информации о рынке. Мнения пользователей о цене на ETH (ETH) представлены ниже.

活动图片

Топ вопросы

Популярные категорииright-arrow

Популярные тегиright-arrow