Polymarket 10亿美元的胜利——“特朗普vs哈里斯”是唯一的责任吗?

币界网Опубликовано 2024-08-02Обновлено 2024-08-02

币界网报道:
    Polymarket的累计交易量超过10亿美元,每周活跃用户也增长了14倍以上

对于加密货币领域及其社区来说,这是忙碌而富有成效的一年。不仅比特币和以太坊现货ETF获得批准,两党政治领导人也在排队支持加密货币。不用说,一些项目从中受益匪浅。流行的去中心化预测平台Polymarket就是其中之一。

Polymarket的用户使用加密货币买卖股票,以押注现实世界的事件。在过去的6个月里,随着美国选举周期的加速,越来越多的人开始使用Polymarket进行此类押注。

事实上,就在最近,它在图表上的累计交易量超过了10亿美元,仅7月份就记录了超过3.87亿美元的数字。

但这还不是全部。月活跃交易者从6月的2940万增至7月的4450万,未平仓合约也飙升至9000万美元。每周活跃用户从约1400人增长到20000多人,增长了约14倍。

现在,大多数分析人士认为,美国正在进行的选举周期与这种兴趣激增有关。而且,值得称赞的是,我们也有充分的理由相信这一点,尤其是在人们押注“谁将成为下一任美国总统”的情况下占Polymarket总交易量的45%以上。

然而,根据Polymarket最大的单一投资者ParaFi Capital的说法,这并不能告诉我们全部情况。在X上的一条病毒式传播的帖子中,这家资产管理公司声称,

“在使用Polymarket的近7万个地址中,只有42%是在与选举相关的市场进行首次交易的。另外58%,即约4万名用户,最初是在非选举市场进行交易的,包括文化、商业、科学和宏观市场。”

也,

“在28000多名在选举相关市场首次下注的用户中,56%的用户随后在不同的市场进行了交易。”

过去几个月,与选举相关的市场交易量飙升,与其他现实世界事件相关的交易量也飙升。美国证券交易委员会对现货以太坊ETF的批准时间表就是一个很好的例子,这一事件刺激了累计交易量增加了1300万美元。

在这里,其他市场包括对奥运会奖牌数的投注、泰勒·斯威夫特的参与统计数据,以及对GPT-5可能推出日期的投注。

简单地说,虽然Polymarket的实用性和受欢迎程度在这个选举周期中飙升,但仅凭这些政治事件并没有决定该平台在过去几个月的交易量。

在这里,值得一提的是,在该平台最近取得成功的基础上,该平台的高管们正在考虑不同的策略,特别是那些以盈利为目标的策略。向平台增加费用是目前正在探索的一个想法。

Похожее

A 120,000 Yuan Tombstone or 399 Yuan AI Immortality: Which Would You Choose?

"The 'Deathcare Moutai' Fushouyuan, once a highly profitable cemetery operator, has halted trading amid a severe crisis, with its net profit plummeting by 52.8% in 2024. This reflects a broader trend of people rejecting expensive traditional burials, as average grave prices in China have soared to over ¥120,000. In response, the industry is pivoting to digital alternatives, with companies like Fushouyuan offering AI-powered memorial services, such as virtual farewell halls and AI-generated recreations of the deceased. Simultaneously, a low-cost, unregulated AI 'resurrection' industry has emerged online, with services priced as low as ¥399. These often use open-source tools to create crude digital avatars from photos and voice clips, exploiting vulnerable individuals, particularly bereaved parents who have lost their only child. However, these services raise significant ethical and legal concerns, including data privacy risks and potential use in scams. Academic studies warn that such AI companions may exacerbate grief, leading to prolonged mourning disorders and emotional dependency, rather than providing genuine comfort. While regulations are being drafted to manage digital human services, the deep emotional drive to 'reconnect' with loved ones often overshadows rational concerns. Ultimately, the article questions whether digital immortality truly preserves memory or merely offers a commercialized illusion, emphasizing that no technology can replace the real, irreplaceable loss of a human life."

marsbit1 ч. назад

A 120,000 Yuan Tombstone or 399 Yuan AI Immortality: Which Would You Choose?

marsbit1 ч. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片