Hong Kong-Based Asset Manager VSFG and Value Partners Apply for Spot Bitcoin ETF

CoinDeskPolicyОпубликовано 2024-03-26Обновлено 2024-03-27

Введение

In January, Harvest Global Investments, a major asset-management company in China, purportedly became the first to apply for a spot-bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) with the...

Asset manager VSFG, together with its partner, Value Partners, have applied for a spot-bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) with Hong Kong’s Securities and Futures Commission (SFC), its Head of Investment & Products Brian Chan told CoinDesk on Wednesday.

Earlier this week, a report from Bloomberg Intelligence said the SFC is likely to allow in-kind creations and redemptions for spot bitcoin ETFs in the second quarter of this year.

In December 2023, less than two weeks after nearly a dozen applicants won approval for spot bitcoin ETFs in the U.S., Hong Kong regulators said they were ready to consider applications for spot crypto ETFs.

Advertisement
Advertisement

In January, Harvest Global Investments, a major asset-management company in China, purportedly became the first to apply for a spot bitcoin exchange-traded fund (ETF) with the SFC. As many as 10 financial institutions have planned to apply to launch bitcoin ETFs in Hong Kong, local reports have previously said.

Hong Kong firm Venture Smart Financial Holdings has also said it will file a spot bitcoin ETF application, according to Bloomberg.

Hong Kong’s regulators have been attempting to loosen their grip on crypto in an attempt to become a global hub for the sector.

Edited by



Похожее

a16z Founder: In the Agent Era, What Truly Matters Has Changed

Marc Andreessen, co-founder of a16z, argues that the current AI boom is not an overnight success but the culmination of 80 years of research, now delivering practical results. He emphasizes that this era is defined by the convergence of four key capabilities: large language models (LLMs), reasoning, coding, and agents capable of recursive self-improvement. Andreessen describes the agent architecture—combining an LLM with a shell, file system, markdown, and cron/loop—as a fundamental shift beyond chatbots. This structure leverages existing software components, allowing agents to maintain state, introspect, and extend their own functionality. He predicts a move away from traditional GUI and browser-based interactions toward an "agent-first" world where software is primarily operated by bots, not humans, with people simply stating their goals. He draws parallels to the 2000 internet bubble but notes key differences: current AI infrastructure investments are led by cash-rich giants and quickly monetized. He highlights that scaling constraints involve not just GPUs but the entire chip ecosystem. Open source and edge inference are crucial for democratizing knowledge and enabling low-latency, cost-effective applications on local hardware. Finally, Andreessen identifies significant non-technical challenges: potential short-term cybersecurity crises, the need for "proof of human" identity solutions, financial infrastructure for agents, and institutional resistance from sectors like education and healthcare. He cautions that societal adoption will be slower than technological change.

marsbit2 мин. назад

a16z Founder: In the Agent Era, What Truly Matters Has Changed

marsbit2 мин. назад

The Code Was Fine, But It Was Still Hacked: What Is the 'DVN Configuration Vulnerability' Behind the Biggest Hack of 2026?

Title: Code Was Secure, Yet $293M Stolen: The 2026 DVN Configuration Breach Explained On April 18, 2026, Kelp DAO’s restaking protocol was exploited, losing 116,500 rsETH (worth $293M at the time) due to a configuration flaw—not a smart contract vulnerability. The attacker used a forged cross-chain message to drain funds via LayerZero’s bridge, then dispersed the stolen rsETH across Aave V3, Compound V3, and Euler to borrow real assets, ultimately escaping with $236M in WETH. The root cause was a critical misconfiguration in Kelp’s LayerZero V2 setup: the protocol used a 1-of-1 Decentralized Verifier Network (DVN) threshold, meaning only one node approval was needed to validate cross-chain messages. The attacker compromised that single node, allowing unauthorized minting of rsETH on Ethereum. This configuration choice—permitted by LayerZero but highly risky—left zero fault tolerance. In contrast, protocols like ApeChain using multi-node validation (e.g., 2-of-3 or 5-of-9) remained secure. This incident highlights a blind spot in DeFi security audits: tools like Slither and Mythril scan code for logic flaws but ignore configuration parameters. The 2022 Nomad hack ($190M loss) also stemmed from a config error, bringing total losses from such issues to ~$482M—rivaling private key breaches. The Kelp exploit underscores the need for standardized config audits and higher baseline security in cross-chain designs.

marsbit8 мин. назад

The Code Was Fine, But It Was Still Hacked: What Is the 'DVN Configuration Vulnerability' Behind the Biggest Hack of 2026?

marsbit8 мин. назад

The More Frequently They Are Updated, the More Similar Claude Code and Codex Become

OpenAI's recent release of GPT-5.4-Cyber demonstrates a striking convergence with Anthropic's Claude Mythos, reflecting a broader trend of product and strategic alignment between the two AI giants. This is particularly evident in their flagship coding assistants, Codex and Claude Code, which have evolved from distinct philosophies into increasingly similar tools. Initially, Codex emphasized speed and real-time interaction, acting like a fast, junior developer, while Claude Code focused on handling extreme complexity with methodical, large-context analysis. However, both have adopted near-identical solutions to core challenges, such as using isolated sub-tasks or agent teams to prevent context pollution during large-scale code modifications. Benchmark results show a tight race: Codex leads in terminal tasks, while Claude Code excels in complex software engineering benchmarks. Community feedback highlights nuanced differences; Claude Code is faster but can accumulate technical debt, whereas Codex is slower but more deliberate and autonomous. The open-source framework OpenClaw has accelerated this homogenization by standardizing workflows, eroding proprietary advantages. Ultimately, the competition has shifted from pure capability to ecosystem strategy, pricing, and user experience. As these tools become ubiquitous, the developer's role evolves toward higher-level problem definition and architectural thinking, beyond automated code generation.

marsbit8 мин. назад

The More Frequently They Are Updated, the More Similar Claude Code and Codex Become

marsbit8 мин. назад

Торговля

Спот
Фьючерсы
活动图片