Why $2.38 and $1.72 are NEAR’s key price levels

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-09Last updated on 2026-07-09

Abstract

NEAR Protocol (NEAR) experienced significant bearish pressure, dropping 9.07% in 24 hours alongside declining Open Interest. Long-term weekly charts confirmed a bearish structure, with the $3.34 swing high remaining a key bullish target. The price failed to sustain above the critical $2.80 (78.6% Fibonacci) level, leading to a slump toward the $2 support zone. On shorter timeframes, a retracement bounce toward $2.1 was seen as a pullback within the downtrend. The ideal resistance area for sellers was identified as the $2.24-$2.38 Fibonacci golden pocket. However, a bearish shift in broader market sentiment, triggered by Bitcoin's rejection above $64k, caused NEAR to slide from $2.07 to $1.88. Key momentum indicators like MFI, CMF, and OBV remained neutral, showing no clear dominance. The analysis advises traders to wait for a move toward $2.38 for a better selling opportunity or watch for a break below $1.72, which would signal a bearish continuation and invalidate the current retracement structure. Both long-term and short-term trends remain bearish.

NEAR Protocol [NEAR] was down 9.07% in the past 24 hours, with a 7.06% increase in daily trading volume. Coinalyze data showed the Open Interest was down 14.92% in a day.

Source: Coinalyze

Moreover, the spot CVD has been in steady decline in recent days, and the funding rate had flipped negatively. These factors pointed to short-term stress in the NEAR market and expectations of a continued price drop.

NEAR long-term trend favors more downside

Source: NEAR/USDT on TradingView

On the 1-week chart, two bearish structural confirmations were highlighted. They occurred in 2025, when the price broke below a long-term swing low, keeping the downtrend going.

At the time of writing, the swing high at $3.34 is the one bulls want to break, to flip the long-term swing structure bullishly. The buyers tried to engineer this scenario in May, but were unable to climb past the $3 resistance.

The $2.80 level marked the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level for NEAR, and two weeks of repeated effort did not yield a positive result for the bulls. Since then, the altcoin has been in a slump.

The $2 psychological level was now a key supply zone to watch out for.

Traders’ call to action- Wait

Source: NEAR/USDT on TradingView

The 4-hour chart showed that the downtrend was in a retracement phase. The bounce toward $2.1 a week ago appeared to be the beginning of a pullback within the downtrend.

Based on this timeframe’s swing structure, the $2.24-$2.38 Fibonacci golden pocket would have been an ideal area for sellers to take control of the market once more.

Instead, the Bitcoin [BTC] rejection from just above $64k in recent days shifted the broader market sentiment bearishly. It brought about a NEAR price slide from $2.07 to $1.88.

The MFI was at a neutral 45, showing neither bear nor bull domination. Similarly, neither the CMF nor the OBV indicated either side was in control of the market.

Therefore, swing traders can afford to remain patient. A move toward $2.38 would offer a better risk-to-reward trade setup than a bearish bet at current market prices.

A drop below $1.72 would signal another bearish continuation, and would require a revision of the golden pocket highlighted here.


Final Summary

  • The NEAR Protocol price action was bearish in the long-term and short-term.
  • The price bounce earlier in July reached the $2.10 area but was unable to climb to the golden pocket at $2.24-$2.38.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the two key price levels for NEAR mentioned in the title, and what do they represent?

AThe two key price levels are $2.38 and $1.72. $2.38 represents the upper boundary of the Fibonacci golden pocket ($2.24-$2.38), which would be an ideal area for sellers to take control again. $1.72 is a level where a drop below would signal another bearish continuation, requiring a revision of the analysis.

QWhat recent factors point to short-term stress and expectations of a continued price drop in the NEAR market?

ARecent factors include the spot CVD being in steady decline, the funding rate flipping negative, a 9.07% price drop in 24 hours, and a 14.92% decrease in Open Interest. These collectively indicate bearish pressure and expectations of further downside.

QAccording to the weekly chart, what price level must bulls break to flip the long-term swing structure bullishly?

AAccording to the 1-week chart, bulls must break the swing high at $3.34 to flip the long-term swing structure bullishly. An attempt was made in May but the price could not climb past the $3 resistance.

QWhy does the article suggest that a move toward $2.38 offers a better trade setup than a bearish bet at current prices?

AThe article suggests a move toward $2.38 offers a better risk-to-reward trade setup because it represents the Fibonacci golden pocket area ($2.24-$2.38), which would be an ideal zone for sellers to re-enter, providing a clearer signal and more favorable entry point for a short trade than entering at lower, current prices.

QWhat is the overall recommendation for swing traders based on the current market analysis in the article?

AThe overall recommendation for swing traders is to remain patient. They should wait for a price move toward the $2.38 level for a better shorting opportunity, or for a drop below $1.72 which would signal bearish continuation, before taking action based on clearer signals.

Related Reads

South Korean Broker's 'Below-Expectations' Forecast Triggers 12% Plunge in SK Hynix, Putting Pressure on Entire Storage Sector

South Korean brokerage KIS released a forecast for SK Hynix's Q2 2026 earnings, predicting operating profit of 60.4 trillion won, up 556% year-over-year. However, this figure was about 8% below the market consensus of 65 trillion won. The shortfall was attributed to SK Hynix's high proportion of HBM (High Bandwidth Memory) revenue. HBM is typically sold under long-term agreements (LTAs) with fixed prices, which limited the company's average selling price (ASP) growth compared to the soaring spot market prices for standard DRAM and NAND. KIS emphasized this was a methodological adjustment to include LTA pricing, not a fundamental deterioration, and maintained its buy rating and 3.8 million won target price. Nevertheless, the report triggered a sharp market sell-off. SK Hynix's stock plunged over 12%, falling below 2 million won and extending its pullback from recent highs. The sell-off spread to related assets: leveraged ETFs tracking SK Hynix and Samsung Electronics fell sharply in Hong Kong, and A-share memory stocks also declined. Analysts note the incident highlights market sensitivity to earnings misses versus high expectations. However, KIS argues the long-term investment thesis remains intact, with the industry shift toward LTAs potentially leading to more stable, sustained profitability rather than volatile quarter-to-quarter ASP gains.

链捕手4m ago

South Korean Broker's 'Below-Expectations' Forecast Triggers 12% Plunge in SK Hynix, Putting Pressure on Entire Storage Sector

链捕手4m ago

Is the MicroStrategy Model Failing? Imitator Holding 30,000 Bitcoins Sees Pre-IPO Investors Backing Out

"The 'Bitcoin Treasury' model is facing a critical test. BSTR Holdings, a company founded by Adam Back and holding 30,021 Bitcoin, has called off its planned merger with SPAC Cantor Equity Partners I. The deal, which would have taken it public, fell apart as the attached private investment (PIPE) financing collapsed. This failure highlights a core vulnerability of the 'Bitcoin accumulation company' strategy popularized by MicroStrategy. The model relies on a key metric: mNAV, or the premium of a company's stock market value over the value of its Bitcoin holdings. This premium fuels a cycle where companies issue shares at a premium, use the cash to buy more Bitcoin, and theoretically increase the Bitcoin per share for investors. However, with Bitcoin's price down roughly 49% from its late-2024 peak, this premium has evaporated across the sector. Companies like American Bitcoin and Metaplanet are also under severe pressure. For BSTR, the lack of premium meant investors were unwilling to fund the original deal structure at the proposed terms. The companies are now renegotiating. The next SEC filing detailing any new agreement will be a crucial indicator. It will show if the model can be repriced for a low-premium environment by preserving Bitcoin holdings and investor commitments, or if it requires significantly diluting shareholders and scaling back ambitions. The outcome is a public stress test for the entire 'Bitcoin treasury' investment thesis."

marsbit27m ago

Is the MicroStrategy Model Failing? Imitator Holding 30,000 Bitcoins Sees Pre-IPO Investors Backing Out

marsbit27m ago

Want Another Bull Market? Bitcoin Needs Trillions in Fresh Capital Inflow

Title: Want Another Bull Run? Bitcoin Needs Trillions in New Capital Bitcoin has fallen 50% from its October 2025 high of $126k, now trading near $63,000. Recent on-chain reports reveal structural differences in this downturn compared to past cycles, extending beyond simple price charts. A key issue is declining capital efficiency. CryptoQuant analysis shows the capital required for price appreciation has surged dramatically. In 2011, $27 billion in net inflows drove a 55,436% gain. From 2018-2021, $36.5 billion fueled a ~2000% rise. This cycle, $69.7 billion in realized cap growth has yielded only a 689% increase. Today, an estimated $101 billion is needed to double the price, versus just $5 million in 2011. The report concludes that triggering a major bull run now likely requires over $1 trillion in new institutional capital, positioning Bitcoin as a core global asset class rather than relying on retail ETF flows. Meanwhile, supply is tightening. K33 Research notes long-term holder supply has hit a record 79% of circulating coins. Dormant bitcoin moving after 2+ years is at its lowest since 2012. Alphractal data confirms this trend, with ~830k BTC recently moving to long-term storage. This scarcity of tradable supply can amplify price moves from any new buying pressure but doesn't guarantee capital inflow. Profitability metrics signal a potential bottom. CryptoQuant's Net Realized Profit/Loss ratio has dropped to -0.35, a 43-month low matching levels seen during the 2022 FTX crash. Historically, such extremes preceded major bull markets in 2015 and 2019. The current price is only 16% above the network's realized price; historically, this has led to average gains of 41% in six months and 81% in one year. Bitcoin is testing key support near $60,000, with analysts noting a potential W-bottom pattern forming. Macro headwinds persist. U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs saw record monthly outflows of over $4.5 billion in June. Uncertainty around Federal Reserve policy under a potential new chair and mixed economic data add pressure. While European institutional infrastructure is slowly developing (e.g., German banks offering BTC services), this is a demand factor, not an immediate liquidity catalyst. In summary, the market shows signs of bottoming: sell-side pressure is largely exhausted, supply is scarce, and metrics are at historical extremes. However, for a significant bull run akin to past cycles, unprecedented institutional capital—likely exceeding $1 trillion—is required to overcome the new reality of drastically lower capital efficiency. The decisive variable of massive new institutional inflows remains absent.

Foresight News30m ago

Want Another Bull Market? Bitcoin Needs Trillions in Fresh Capital Inflow

Foresight News30m ago

The Signal That Has Appeared Before Every BTC Bottom Since 2014, It Was Close This Time

A valuation model tracking Bitcoin for 12 years has been updated. The new model shows a current score of 24.3, placing BTC in the historical bottom 20% range. However, analysis reveals that since 2014, every Bitcoin bear market bottom has seen this score drop *below 20* for a sustained period before turning around. The current cycle's low so far was 21.5 on July 1st. The author explains the model was rebuilt to address a flaw in its historical baseline, making it a more accurate "map" of current value. Two interpretations are offered: either the historically definitive washout has not yet occurred, or this cycle's bottom will be shallower, as each cycle has been less volatile than the last. The author's action plan involves automated buying triggered at specific score levels. A purchase was made at the cycle's cheapest reading (21.5), with more capital allocated for a potential drop below 20. The strategy emphasizes following a pre-written plan over emotion. Additional market context is provided: Bitcoin reclaimed its 200-week moving average, the BTC/Gold ratio is at a 3-year low showing capital preference for gold, and Bitcoin dominance remains high at 59%, indicating no "altcoin season." The summary concludes by noting the model's inconvenient implication—the market looks less like a bottom now—and poses a question to readers: at what score would they deploy their final capital?

marsbit1h ago

The Signal That Has Appeared Before Every BTC Bottom Since 2014, It Was Close This Time

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片