Why $2.38 and $1.72 are NEAR’s key price levels

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-09Last updated on 2026-07-09

Abstract

NEAR Protocol (NEAR) experienced significant bearish pressure, dropping 9.07% in 24 hours alongside declining Open Interest. Long-term weekly charts confirmed a bearish structure, with the $3.34 swing high remaining a key bullish target. The price failed to sustain above the critical $2.80 (78.6% Fibonacci) level, leading to a slump toward the $2 support zone. On shorter timeframes, a retracement bounce toward $2.1 was seen as a pullback within the downtrend. The ideal resistance area for sellers was identified as the $2.24-$2.38 Fibonacci golden pocket. However, a bearish shift in broader market sentiment, triggered by Bitcoin's rejection above $64k, caused NEAR to slide from $2.07 to $1.88. Key momentum indicators like MFI, CMF, and OBV remained neutral, showing no clear dominance. The analysis advises traders to wait for a move toward $2.38 for a better selling opportunity or watch for a break below $1.72, which would signal a bearish continuation and invalidate the current retracement structure. Both long-term and short-term trends remain bearish.

NEAR Protocol [NEAR] was down 9.07% in the past 24 hours, with a 7.06% increase in daily trading volume. Coinalyze data showed the Open Interest was down 14.92% in a day.

Source: Coinalyze

Moreover, the spot CVD has been in steady decline in recent days, and the funding rate had flipped negatively. These factors pointed to short-term stress in the NEAR market and expectations of a continued price drop.

NEAR long-term trend favors more downside

Source: NEAR/USDT on TradingView

On the 1-week chart, two bearish structural confirmations were highlighted. They occurred in 2025, when the price broke below a long-term swing low, keeping the downtrend going.

At the time of writing, the swing high at $3.34 is the one bulls want to break, to flip the long-term swing structure bullishly. The buyers tried to engineer this scenario in May, but were unable to climb past the $3 resistance.

The $2.80 level marked the 78.6% Fibonacci retracement level for NEAR, and two weeks of repeated effort did not yield a positive result for the bulls. Since then, the altcoin has been in a slump.

The $2 psychological level was now a key supply zone to watch out for.

Traders’ call to action- Wait

Source: NEAR/USDT on TradingView

The 4-hour chart showed that the downtrend was in a retracement phase. The bounce toward $2.1 a week ago appeared to be the beginning of a pullback within the downtrend.

Based on this timeframe’s swing structure, the $2.24-$2.38 Fibonacci golden pocket would have been an ideal area for sellers to take control of the market once more.

Instead, the Bitcoin [BTC] rejection from just above $64k in recent days shifted the broader market sentiment bearishly. It brought about a NEAR price slide from $2.07 to $1.88.

The MFI was at a neutral 45, showing neither bear nor bull domination. Similarly, neither the CMF nor the OBV indicated either side was in control of the market.

Therefore, swing traders can afford to remain patient. A move toward $2.38 would offer a better risk-to-reward trade setup than a bearish bet at current market prices.

A drop below $1.72 would signal another bearish continuation, and would require a revision of the golden pocket highlighted here.


Final Summary

  • The NEAR Protocol price action was bearish in the long-term and short-term.
  • The price bounce earlier in July reached the $2.10 area but was unable to climb to the golden pocket at $2.24-$2.38.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the two key price levels for NEAR mentioned in the title, and what do they represent?

AThe two key price levels are $2.38 and $1.72. $2.38 represents the upper boundary of the Fibonacci golden pocket ($2.24-$2.38), which would be an ideal area for sellers to take control again. $1.72 is a level where a drop below would signal another bearish continuation, requiring a revision of the analysis.

QWhat recent factors point to short-term stress and expectations of a continued price drop in the NEAR market?

ARecent factors include the spot CVD being in steady decline, the funding rate flipping negative, a 9.07% price drop in 24 hours, and a 14.92% decrease in Open Interest. These collectively indicate bearish pressure and expectations of further downside.

QAccording to the weekly chart, what price level must bulls break to flip the long-term swing structure bullishly?

AAccording to the 1-week chart, bulls must break the swing high at $3.34 to flip the long-term swing structure bullishly. An attempt was made in May but the price could not climb past the $3 resistance.

QWhy does the article suggest that a move toward $2.38 offers a better trade setup than a bearish bet at current prices?

AThe article suggests a move toward $2.38 offers a better risk-to-reward trade setup because it represents the Fibonacci golden pocket area ($2.24-$2.38), which would be an ideal zone for sellers to re-enter, providing a clearer signal and more favorable entry point for a short trade than entering at lower, current prices.

QWhat is the overall recommendation for swing traders based on the current market analysis in the article?

AThe overall recommendation for swing traders is to remain patient. They should wait for a price move toward the $2.38 level for a better shorting opportunity, or for a drop below $1.72 which would signal bearish continuation, before taking action based on clearer signals.

Related Reads

Private Credit in US Dollar

Stablecoins are evolving into a new type of money market fund, channeling crypto deposits into the $2 trillion private credit market. This mirrors the 1970s innovation where money market funds pooled small deposits to buy high-yield government securities, bypassing bank restrictions. Today, platforms like Apollo's ACRED tokenized fund and Figure's on-chain lending system allow stablecoin holders to access institutional private credit strategies with no minimum investment, offering yields of 8-12%. On-chain tokenization enables greater liquidity and DeFi composability (e.g., using tokens as collateral for leveraged positions) compared to traditional, locked-up private credit funds. Consequently, on-chain private credit has grown 15x in a year to $5.87 billion, though it remains a tiny fraction (0.3%) of the global market. However, this model carries significant risks, as illustrated by the failure of Goldfinch. Launched in 2021, it directed crypto deposits to motorcycle loans in Kenya and Nigeria. Critical issues included a lack of local oversight, leading to unauthorized fund transfers and borrower defaults. With $56 million now trapped in non-performing loans, its collapse highlights that while blockchain streamlines capital transfer, the essential 90% of lending—underwriting, monitoring, and recovery—remains a costly, localized challenge. Success requires robust, traditional credit infrastructure, not just on-chain execution.

marsbit12m ago

Private Credit in US Dollar

marsbit12m ago

Goldman Sachs: How to Invest in Tech Stocks in the Second Half of the Year?

Goldman Sachs remains bullish on tech stocks in the second half of the year, advising a shift from "buying the sector" to "picking individual companies." The firm's latest report indicates the AI-driven tech cycle shows no signs of peaking, with supply exceeding demand or technological progress slowing yet to materialize. Recent pullbacks are viewed as healthy corrections following rapid gains, not a trend reversal. Three core investment themes are highlighted: 1) Maintain overweight positions in AI server and data center-related hardware stocks. 2) Conduct more nuanced risk-reward assessments in sub-sectors where supply and demand are tightening. 3) During periods of declining risk appetite, consider software and IT services companies leveraging AI to create new business opportunities as a defensive play. The report emphasizes that future outperformance will depend more on individual company competitiveness (alpha) rather than broad sector momentum (beta). Companies likely to excel are those benefiting from price increases, possessing strong capacity expansion capabilities, having undervalued AI growth potential, or holding unique catalysts. For defense, Goldman suggests focusing on AI-enabling software and service firms—such as those in AI consulting, data infrastructure, and cybersecurity—which may see efficiency gains and new demand, rather than retreating to traditional defensive sectors. Overall, the strategy balances offensive exposure to AI infrastructure with defensive positioning in AI-applicable software and services.

链捕手16m ago

Goldman Sachs: How to Invest in Tech Stocks in the Second Half of the Year?

链捕手16m ago

Wall Street's Take on the June Fed Meeting Minutes: Focus on Core Inflation, No Short-Term Urgency to Hike Rates

Wall Street's View on Fed June Minutes: Inflation is the Key, No Urgency for Near-Term Hike The minutes of the Federal Reserve's June FOMC meeting revealed a unified Wall Street interpretation: inflation remains the true determinant for future policy moves. Major institutions including Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, and Citigroup concluded that the Fed remains data-dependent, with its path hinging on upcoming inflation data. Key takeaways from the minutes: * **No Immediate Tightening**: Despite "a few" participants seeing reasons to hike, none actively advocated for it at the June meeting. The consensus was to hold the federal funds rate steady at 3.5%-3.75%. * **Inflation as the Decisive Factor**: The Fed outlined two primary scenarios. If inflation declines "soon" toward the 2% target, "almost all" officials would support maintaining or eventually cutting rates. If inflation persists high due to factors like AI demand or supply shocks, "almost all" would see some policy tightening as necessary. * **Patience is Warranted**: Officials noted inflation remains above target but cited anchored inflation expectations and a labor market not currently driving price pressures as reasons for patience. The Fed is focused on the *direction* of inflation over the next few months. * **No Policy Framework Shift**: The minutes reaffirmed a data-dependent approach rather than a fundamental shift toward pre-emptive tightening. Institutional Forecasts: * **Morgan Stanley**: Expects rates on hold in 2026, with potential cuts in 2027 if inflation cools. * **Goldman Sachs**: Baseline scenario sees rates unchanged through 2026, with inflation moderating gradually. * **Citigroup**: Takes a more dovish view, suggesting market pricing for a July hike is too aggressive and forecasting potential rate cuts starting in late 2026. Overall, the minutes were perceived as marginally dovish, emphasizing a watchful stance on inflation data with no near-term urgency to hike.

marsbit23m ago

Wall Street's Take on the June Fed Meeting Minutes: Focus on Core Inflation, No Short-Term Urgency to Hike Rates

marsbit23m ago

Trump Earns $2.2 Billion Annually, Two-Thirds from Cryptocurrency, with 87 Stock Trades Daily

Former U.S. President Donald Trump reported a personal income exceeding $2.2 billion in 2025, the highest annual income for a sitting president, according to U.S. government financial disclosures. This income primarily stemmed from cryptocurrency ventures and investments, starkly contrasting the standard presidential salary of $400,000. More than two-thirds ($1.4 billion) of his income originated from cryptocurrency-related activities. This includes over $1 billion in Bitcoin and Ethereum holdings, approximately $800 million from World Liberty Financial (a crypto project co-founded with his son), and about $635 million from sales of the TRUMP meme coin. Overall, Trump family crypto operations reportedly generated over $2.3 billion in profit after his 2025 inauguration. Trump's stock portfolio showed heavy trading activity, with over 22,000 trades executed in 2025—averaging 87 trades per day. Major holdings included tech giants like Google, Apple, Nvidia, and Microsoft. Notably, some large-scale stock purchases coincided with major policy announcements, such as tariffs, raising questions about potential insider trading. His traditional business empire, centered on real estate and branding, contributed $575 million. Additionally, he earned nearly $60 million through numerous "DT Marks" licensing companies, which leverage the Trump brand globally in locations like Dubai and Abu Dhabi. The report highlights significant conflicts of interest, as countries like the UAE and Saudi Arabia, whose entities invested in Trump's businesses, later received favorable U.S. policy treatment. Trump has stated he delegates financial management and is not directly involved in day-to-day investment decisions.

Odaily星球日报23m ago

Trump Earns $2.2 Billion Annually, Two-Thirds from Cryptocurrency, with 87 Stock Trades Daily

Odaily星球日报23m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片