Goldman Sachs: How to Invest in Tech Stocks in the Second Half of the Year?

链捕手Published on 2026-07-09Last updated on 2026-07-09

Abstract

Goldman Sachs remains bullish on tech stocks in the second half of the year, advising a shift from "buying the sector" to "picking individual companies." The firm's latest report indicates the AI-driven tech cycle shows no signs of peaking, with supply exceeding demand or technological progress slowing yet to materialize. Recent pullbacks are viewed as healthy corrections following rapid gains, not a trend reversal. Three core investment themes are highlighted: 1) Maintain overweight positions in AI server and data center-related hardware stocks. 2) Conduct more nuanced risk-reward assessments in sub-sectors where supply and demand are tightening. 3) During periods of declining risk appetite, consider software and IT services companies leveraging AI to create new business opportunities as a defensive play. The report emphasizes that future outperformance will depend more on individual company competitiveness (alpha) rather than broad sector momentum (beta). Companies likely to excel are those benefiting from price increases, possessing strong capacity expansion capabilities, having undervalued AI growth potential, or holding unique catalysts. For defense, Goldman suggests focusing on AI-enabling software and service firms—such as those in AI consulting, data infrastructure, and cybersecurity—which may see efficiency gains and new demand, rather than retreating to traditional defensive sectors. Overall, the strategy balances offensive exposure to AI infrastructure with defe...

Author: Li Jia

The AI rally has entered a phase of high volatility. Can tech stocks still be bought in the second half of the year? Goldman Sachs' answer remains: Stay bullish, but shift from 'buying the sector' to 'picking the company.'

In its latest report, Goldman Sachs points out that there are currently no signs that the AI-driven tech cycle has peaked, as signals of supply exceeding demand and slowing technological progress have not yet appeared. Analysts at Goldman Sachs believe this cycle could become one of the largest and longest-lasting technology upturns in history. Following profit-taking in related stocks after July, the report characterizes this as a healthy correction after a rapid price increase, not a trend reversal.

Regarding stock selection strategy, the report proposes three core themes: First, maintain a bullish view on AI server and data center-related hardware stocks. Second, in subsectors where supply and demand are already tight, place greater emphasis on fine-grained assessment of individual stock risk-reward. Third, when market risk appetite declines, focus on software and IT services stocks that are leveraging the AI disruption wave to explore new business opportunities as a defensive allocation.

AI Cycle Has Not Peaked; The Correction Is a Healthy Pullback

Goldman Sachs maintains an overall bullish view on the Asian AI supply chain.

The report notes that determining whether a tech cycle is nearing its end primarily involves observing two signals: first, whether semiconductors and electronic components shift from undersupply to oversupply; second, whether technological innovation slows, and industry competition reverts to being price-driven rather than performance-driven. Currently, neither of these signals is present.

Goldman Sachs believes that AI infrastructure investment is still in an expansion phase, and future new applications such as physical AI and edge AI will take over from AI servers and data center construction, further extending this tech cycle. Therefore, recent profit-taking in related stocks should be seen as a healthy adjustment after rapid gains, not a fundamental reversal.

At the same time, tight supply and demand are gradually spreading from hot areas like memory and optical communication to more semiconductor sub-sectors, indicating the scope of industry prosperity is still expanding.

Focus for the Second Half: Shift from Sector Selection to Stock Picking

Following significant gains in many AI beneficiary sectors, Goldman Sachs believes the investment logic for the second half will gradually shift from "getting the industry right" to "selecting the right company."

The report suggests that companies worth attention typically share several common characteristics: they can directly benefit from product price increases; possess strong capacity expansion capabilities to capture profit opportunities arising from tight supply and demand; have AI business growth potential not yet fully reflected in valuations by the market; or possess unique catalysts not fully priced in by the market.

In other words, after an overall valuation uplift, future excess returns will increasingly come from a company's own competitiveness, rather than industry beta.

Defensive Strategy Shifts to AI Applications, Not Traditional Defensive Sectors

Beyond continuing to allocate to AI hardware, Goldman Sachs also proposes a new defensive approach.

The report argues that when market risk appetite declines, instead of avoiding the tech sector, investors should focus on software, IT services, and internet companies that are leveraging AI to create new business opportunities. Goldman Sachs points out that generative AI is spurring new enterprise service demand in areas like AI consulting, data infrastructure construction, and cybersecurity. Some software and IT services companies may actually see improved profitability from using AI tools to enhance development efficiency and reduce costs.

At the same time, previous market concerns about AI diminishing content value are easing. Goldman Sachs believes that AI is more likely to become a new tool for improving commercialization efficiency and operational efficiency, rather than simply replacing existing businesses. Therefore, the growth logic for some internet and digital content companies is improving.

Overall, Goldman Sachs believes that second-half tech investment in Asia should still adhere to the AI theme, but the allocation approach needs to be more balanced: on the offensive side, continue to focus on AI infrastructure and hardware industry chains with sustained improving fundamentals; on the defensive side, pay attention to software and IT services companies that can leverage AI to create new demand and improve efficiency, balancing growth and defensiveness in a more volatile market environment.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is Goldman Sachs' overall stance on investing in Asian technology stocks, particularly those related to AI, in the second half of the year?

AGoldman Sachs maintains an overall bullish stance on investing in Asian technology stocks, especially those related to AI, for the second half of the year. They advise shifting from a strategy of 'buying the sector' to one of 'picking individual companies'.

QAccording to Goldman Sachs, what are the two key signals that a technology cycle driven by AI might be nearing its end?

AGoldman Sachs identifies two key signals: 1) A shift in semiconductors and electronic components from supply shortages to oversupply. 2) A slowdown in technological innovation, causing industry competition to revert to being price-driven rather than performance-driven. Currently, neither of these signals has appeared.

QWhat are the three core investment themes suggested by Goldman Sachs in their report for selecting stocks?

AThe three core investment themes are: 1) Maintaining a bullish view on AI server and data center-related hardware stocks. 2) Conducting a more nuanced assessment of risk and reward for individual stocks within supply-tight sub-sectors. 3) Focusing on software and IT services companies that are leveraging the AI wave to create new business opportunities, as a defensive allocation when market risk appetite declines.

QWhat characteristics should investors look for in individual technology companies, according to Goldman Sachs' shift towards 'picking companies'?

AInvestors should look for companies with these characteristics: the ability to directly benefit from rising product prices, strong capacity expansion to seize profit opportunities from supply-demand tightness, AI-related growth potential not yet fully reflected in their valuation, and unique catalysts that the market has not fully priced in.

QHow does Goldman Sachs propose a new defensive approach within the technology sector when market risk appetite decreases?

AInstead of avoiding the tech sector, Goldman Sachs suggests a defensive approach by focusing on software, IT services, and internet companies that are using AI to create new business opportunities (e.g., AI consulting, data infrastructure, cybersecurity) or improve operational efficiency. They argue AI is more likely to be a tool for enhancing commercialization and efficiency rather than simply replacing existing business models.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit10m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit10m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片