‘We’re in crypto winter’- Bitwise turns bearish as Bitcoin price slips below $75K

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-04Last updated on 2026-02-04

Abstract

Bitcoin's recent decline below $75,000 has led analysts to declare a "crypto winter." Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan stated the bear market began in January 2025 and may be nearing its end, though he noted such cycles typically last around 13 months. CryptoQuant's Julio Moreno, however, argued the downturn started in November 2025 and could extend into Q3 2026. Analysts are eyeing $70,000 as a key support level, based on historical cycle bottoms. Nansen's Aurélie Barthere noted that capitulation has begun in ETFs and highlighted the importance of potential regulatory developments, such as the CLARITY Act, to stabilize the market. On-chain data suggests the market may not yet have reached its true bottom.

Bitcoin’s brief and extended dip to $72K on Tuesday, the 3rd of February, has now led more analysts and asset managers to accept that the bear market is here.

In fact, Matt Hougan, CIO of digital asset manager Bitwise, said the “crypto winter” began in January 2025, and that $75 billion in demand from ETF and treasury firms was the only thing keeping it going.

Otherwise, Bitcoin [BTC] price would have dropped 60%, Hougon noted, and added,

“We have been in a crypto winter since January 2025. Chances are, we’re closer to the end than the beginning. We are in a full-blown crypto winter.”

According to Hougan, the bear markets typically last 13 months. But he doubted that the current one would extend to next November.

What’s next for Bitcoin and the crypto market?

Although CryptoQuant’s Head of Research, Julio Moreno, agreed with Hougan’s analysis, he differed with his timestamps.

According to Moreno, the bear market phase began in November 2025 and could possibly end later in 2026.

“The Bitcoin bear market started in November 2025, as suggested by on-chain and market data, and the timing has implications for when it will end. My current expectation is Q3 2026.”

For the unfamiliar, BTC dropped below $100K and the bull market support of the 50-week Exponential Moving Average (EMA) in November.

In fact, from a price charts perspective, Moreno’s statement aligned with AMBCrypto analysis.

Assessing the potential crypto market bottom

With a projection for a potential reversal by mid to late 2026, how low can the BTC correction go?

In the past cycle, the bear market bottomed out at the peak of the 2017 cycle.

If a similar trend plays out, that would be around $70K, which is the 2021 market top.

In fact, this was the same level marked out by Aurelie Barthere, Principal Research Analyst at crypto analytics firm Nansen. In an email statement, Barthere told AMBCrypto,

“The price trend in crypto is negative, and capitulation has just started in ETFs. I would expect the bearish move to lead BTC to test $70k support.”

When asked what could help reverse the bearish trend, Barthere said a “potential adoption of the CLARITY Act by Congress could help stabilize prices.”

However, on-chain data showed the MVRV Z-Score was sloping downwards and headed toward the fair-value zone that marked the past market cycle bottoms.

Put differently, at press time value, we may still be far from a true market bottom, based on this metric. Meanwhile, Fundstrat’s Tom Lee said that ‘all pieces’ were in place for the market to rebound.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitwise CIO stated that the sector was in a ‘full-blown’ crypto winter, but it could end soon.
  • For CryptoQuant, however, the winter will end in Q3 2026, while Nansen eyed $70k as potential support.

Related Questions

QAccording to Bitwise CIO Matt Hougan, when did the crypto winter begin?

AAccording to Matt Hougan, the crypto winter began in January 2025.

QWhat price level does Nansen's analyst, Aurelie Barthere, identify as a key support level for Bitcoin?

AAurelie Barthere identifies $70,000 as a key support level for Bitcoin.

QWhat is CryptoQuant's Head of Research, Julio Moreno's, prediction for when the bear market will end?

AJulio Moreno predicts the bear market will end in Q3 2026.

QWhat does Matt Hougan say has been the Bitcoin price from dropping 60%?

AMatt Hougan states that $75 billion in demand from ETF and treasury firms has been preventing the Bitcoin price from dropping 60%.

QWhat potential event does Aurelie Barthere suggest could help stabilize crypto prices?

AAurelie Barthere suggests that a potential adoption of the CLARITY Act by Congress could help stabilize prices.

Related Reads

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

Behind the "AI factories" of Elon Musk and Jensen Huang lies a hidden battle for a critical resource: fresh water. As AI models like ChatGPT and Claude process billions of prompts daily, they consume vast amounts of water for cooling. By 2030, global AI infrastructure is projected to use 9.3 trillion liters annually—enough to meet the basic needs of 1.3 billion people. This "water grab" stems from the massive heat generated by high-powered GPUs. Over 70% of data centers use evaporative cooling systems, where water absorbs heat and evaporates into the atmosphere, depleting local groundwater. Training models like GPT-4 can consume over 600 million liters of water. Tech giants like Google and Microsoft report skyrocketing water usage, sparking conflicts with local communities over resources. A flashpoint occurred in Memphis, Tennessee, where Musk's xAI built the Colossus supercomputer. It draws nearly 3.8 million liters of drinking water daily from local aquifers, leading to public outrage and legal action. In response, xAI is building an $80 million water recycling plant to use treated wastewater instead. Facing pressure, companies like Microsoft promote "waterless" closed-loop cooling systems. However, these systems increase electricity consumption by 20-30%, shifting the water burden to power plants, which require immense cooling water themselves—a case of indirect water footprint transfer. For China's AI industry, this crisis offers a strategic warning and opportunity. Instead of replicating the West's resource-intensive model, China can leverage its "East Data, West Computing" policy to locate data centers in cooler, water-rich regions like Guizhou. Furthermore, developing lightweight edge computing for smart homes and embodied AI robots can drastically reduce the need for constant cloud queries, cutting both water and energy consumption at the source. The freshwater war underscores a fundamental question: Will AI be a tool for human advancement or a silicon-based monster competing for our planet's last drops of clean water? The answer is becoming clearer as the water vapor rises.

marsbit18m ago

Behind Musk and Huang Jen-hsun's 'AI Factories', an Unseen Battle for Freshwater Has Begun

marsbit18m ago

AGI is Just One Step Away

The article discusses Anthropic's release of the Fable 5 model, a heavily restricted version of its powerful Mythos model. Initially unveiled in April, Mythos reportedly identified over 10,000 high-risk vulnerabilities for 50 enterprise clients, causing significant concern. Due to its dangerous capabilities in areas like autonomous cyber-attacks and biochemical weapons design guidance (classified as CB-1 level), the unaltered Mythos 5 remains limited to about 200 vetted entities like government agencies. Fable 5, released with a safety classifier, demonstrates extraordinary performance, leading benchmarks in coding (SWE-Bench Pro), software engineering, and research. It exhibits true "long-horizon agency," autonomously planning and executing complex, multi-step tasks like migrating 50 million lines of code in a day, moving beyond simple question-answering. The article positions Fable 5 at OpenAI's Level 3 ("Agent") and progressing toward Level 4 ("Innovator"), suggesting AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is within reach, potentially 18-24 months away. To mitigate risks, Anthropic implemented a two-layer safety "cage": a silent routing system that redirects dangerous queries to a weaker model, and a mandatory 30-day data retention policy for all Mythos traffic to detect patterns of malicious use. Despite its high cost ($10/$50 per million input/output tokens), the model targets the enterprise market, where its unparalleled productivity and defensive capabilities against AI-powered cyber threats justify the premium. This signals a market maturation where top-tier AI becomes a strategic, high-value tool for businesses, potentially widening the gap with consumer-focused models and accelerating the rise of "one-person companies" while disrupting labor markets.

marsbit30m ago

AGI is Just One Step Away

marsbit30m ago

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

In 2026, a wave of investor anxiety questions the defensibility of AI startups as models improve, fearing that most companies are just "thin wrappers" destined to be absorbed by foundation models or chipmakers. The author argues against this despair, positing that true moats lie not in benchmark performance but in areas models cannot easily reach. The logic of despair is that if models excel at all measurable tasks, only compute and cutting-edge model weights hold lasting value. However, the essay contends that the most valuable work is inherently "untrainable." Benchmarks measure what can be measured and thus optimized for, but real-world correctness often resides in private, complex systems. Examples include legacy codebases, intricate legal transactions, or hospital workflows. This kind of correctness is proprietary, costly to establish, and cannot be validated quickly—it requires time and trust within an organization. As models commodify visible, measurable tasks from both above (labs absorbing scaffolding) and below (saturation by cheaper models), value shifts to "untrainable ground." This encompasses work where correctness is a private truth, locked behind integration barriers, licenses, liability frameworks, and entrenched user habits. Trust and adoption are slow, human-centric processes that smarter models cannot accelerate. Successful companies defend their position by embedding deeply into client operations, owning the definition of "good" within a specific domain (e.g., Harvey in law, OpenEvidence in medicine), and pricing on outcomes rather than tokens. While labs compete fiercely, they are incentivized to keep the application layer vibrant. The future belongs not to those competing on generic benchmarks but to those navigating unscoreable terrain, doing the "unsexy work" of translation between models and messy human realities. The most cited benchmark scores are thus maps of territory about to become worthless, signaling who will lose the right to define what counts as good.

marsbit2h ago

AI Investors' 2026 Anxiety: When Models Devour Everything, What Moat Is Left for Startups?

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片