Warsh's First Day in Office, Markets Deliver a 'Wake-up Call': Rate Hike Expected This Year

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-23Last updated on 2026-05-23

Abstract

On his first day in office, newly inaugurated Federal Reserve Chairman Warsh received a stark market warning, with expectations now fully pricing in a 25-basis-point interest rate hike this year. The shift was triggered by hawkish remarks from Fed Governor Waller, who stated that inflation is now the key policy "driver" and that the odds of a hike or cut are evenly split. This sent short-term Treasury yields higher. Waller signaled a significant pivot in his stance, citing disappointing inflation and labor data. He suggested removing "easing bias" language from Fed statements and did not rule out future rate increases if inflation fails to recede, though he noted immediate action isn't warranted without signs of unanchored inflation expectations. Chairman Warsh faces immediate pressure at his first FOMC meeting in June. With the preferred inflation gauge at a three-year high, analysts warn that failing to hike could be interpreted as an implicit easing of policy. The geopolitical situation in the Middle East is adding to existing price pressures. The market's expectation for a hike contrasts sharply with earlier forecasts for multiple cuts. While long-term Treasury yields have been contained by lower energy prices recently, analysts note they remain under structural upward pressure. Warsh's swearing-in at the White House highlights political scrutiny over Fed independence. However, the market has made it clear that inflation is the most urgent challenge, leaving the new c...

Written by: Bao Yilong

Warsh formally took the helm of the Federal Reserve, only to be met with a sharp market rebuke on his very first day.

On Friday, May 22, Trump presided over a swearing-in ceremony at the White House, formally handing over the Fed's reins to Warsh. Warsh assumes leadership of the Fed at a time when soaring energy and transportation costs triggered by the Iran war are persistently feeding into inflation.

As noted by Wall Street News, on the same day, Fed Governor Waller delivered hawkish remarks, clearly stating that inflation is the "driving force" for future policy decisions, and said the likelihood of future rate hikes and cuts is "fifty-fifty." This statement directly spurred a sharp surge in rate hike expectations.

The U.S. Treasury market was sold off that day, with the interest-rate-sensitive 2-year Treasury yield rising 4 basis points to its highest level since February this year.

(Weekly performance of key U.S. Treasury yields)

The futures market has now fully priced in a 25-basis-point rate hike expectation for this year.

(Market expects Fed to hike rates by 25 basis points within the year)

TS Lombard economist Steven Blitz bluntly stated that if Warsh chooses not to raise rates at his first monetary policy meeting in June, the market will grant him no leeway.

Waller's Sharp Pivot, Inflation Becomes Policy "Driving Force"

At the very moment Warsh was sworn in, Fed Governor Waller delivered his most hawkish signal to date in a speech titled "Policy Risks Have Changed" in Frankfurt, the significance of his shift in stance capturing the market's attention.

Waller stated:

Inflation is not moving in the right direction. I support removing the 'easing bias' wording from the policy statement to clearly convey that the likelihood of rate cuts and hikes is now roughly equal.

He further pointed out:

I can no longer rule out that future rate hikes may be necessary if inflation does not recede soon.

Waller admitted that recent labor market reports and inflation data have changed his previously long-held accommodative stance.

He also noted that the oil price shock might soon fade, but emphasized this does not mean "considering a rate hike in the near term is appropriate," and that rate hikes would require conditions where inflation expectations become "unanchored."

Previously, the Fed's April meeting minutes showed that "many" officials were already inclined to drop the easing bias, including three regional Fed presidents who had dissented on this issue in the April statement. Waller's latest remarks echo this trend.

Warsh's Debut Nears, Immense Pressure for June Meeting

Warsh will chair his first Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting in mid-June, and market observers are not optimistic about the situation he will face.

The Fed's preferred inflation gauge has risen to its highest level in three years, with the overall price growth rate reaching 6% in April. Market-implied one-year inflation expectations are around 4%.

TS Lombard economist Blitz added that if Warsh decides against a rate hike in June, even if economic growth remains solid and far from overheating at that time, the market will interpret it as de facto easing. Blitz said:

Against a backdrop of broadly rising inflation risks, failing to hike in June is effectively a form of easing.

Diane Swonk, chief economist at KPMG US, pointed out that the Middle East situation is adding pressure on top of already existing price pressures. She said:

This is one of many reasons why the Fed cannot ignore the war and its inflationary effects.

The current market expectation of a 25-basis-point Fed rate hike stands in stark contrast to the widespread market bets on multiple rate cuts at the beginning of the year.

(Comparison of market expectations for Fed rate path around February this year)

Although influenced by falling energy prices this week, the 10-year Treasury yield did not see a significant rise.

However, Goldman Sachs' George Cole noted that while long-end Treasuries appear slightly cheaper relative to fair value, the valuation has not deviated enough to support a deeper rebound.

(Long-end Treasuries slightly cheap relative to fair value)

George Cole emphasized that until the macro risk landscape undergoes a substantive shift, long-end yields still face structural upward pressures from supply and the debt financing cycle.

Test of Independence, Underlying Concerns Behind Historic Inauguration Moment

Warsh is the first Fed chair since Greenspan to be sworn in at the White House, a detail itself seen by the market as a signal.

Trump hopes that this former Fed governor, whom he nominated in January this year, will be more amenable to demands for rate cuts. Warsh previously defeated White House economist Hassett, Waller, and BlackRock executive Rick Rieder in the nomination race.

The pressure on the Fed's independence has been particularly pronounced recently.

As noted by Wall Street News, Trump ally, Washington D.C. federal prosecutor Jeanine Pirro, had launched a criminal investigation into Powell regarding a $2.5 billion Fed headquarters renovation project. The investigation has been dropped, but Powell stated it was a pretext to pressure officials for rate cuts.

Warsh now begins a four-year term, becoming the 17th Chair of the Federal Reserve Board of Governors.

However, the market has already made it clear: regardless of the political environment, inflation is the most pressing issue at hand, and this new chair has little time for a measured approach.

Related Questions

QWhat major market reaction occurred on the day Kevin Warsh formally assumed the role of Federal Reserve Chair?

AOn the day Kevin Warsh formally assumed the role of Federal Reserve Chair, the market delivered a 'warning shot.' U.S. Treasury bonds were sold off, with the yield on the interest rate-sensitive 2-year Treasury note rising by 4 basis points to its highest level since February. Futures markets fully priced in expectations for a 25 basis-point rate hike within the year.

QWhat was the core message of Fed Governor Christopher Waller's speech on the same day, and how did it impact market expectations?

AFed Governor Christopher Waller delivered a strongly hawkish speech, stating that inflation is the 'driver' of future policy decisions and that the likelihood of rate hikes and cuts is now 'evenly balanced.' He explicitly said he could not rule out future rate increases if inflation does not fall promptly. This speech directly caused a sharp rise in market expectations for a rate hike.

QAccording to economists cited in the article, what would be the market interpretation if Chair Warsh does not raise interest rates at the June FOMC meeting?

AEconomists cited in the article believe that if Chair Warsh does not raise interest rates at the June FOMC meeting, the market will interpret it as an act of policy easing, even if economic growth remains solid and not overheated. In the context of rising inflation risks, failing to hike would be seen as a de facto loosening of policy.

QWhat significant pressure on the Federal Reserve's independence is mentioned in the article?

AThe article mentions that Trump ally, federal prosecutor Jeanine Pirro, launched a criminal investigation into former Chair Jerome Powell over a $2.5 billion headquarters renovation project. Although the investigation was dropped, Powell stated it was a pretext to pressure officials to cut interest rates, highlighting concerns about the Fed's political independence.

QHow have market expectations for the Federal Reserve's interest rate path changed from the beginning of the year to the time of the article?

AMarket expectations have reversed dramatically. At the beginning of the year, the market was widely betting on multiple rate cuts. By the time of the article, futures markets had completely priced in expectations for a 25 basis-point rate hike within the year, forming a stark contrast.

Related Reads

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

Microsoft, once seen as an early AI frontrunner due to its investment in OpenAI, is navigating a strategic shift amid increased competition. Its initial reliance on OpenAI’s GPT models has been complicated by OpenAI’s growing ambitions as a direct competitor, rapid advancements from rivals like Claude and Gemini, and the disruptive rise of AI agents, which challenge its traditional SaaS business model. These factors contributed to stock declines and slower-than-expected adoption of its flagship Copilot products. In response, CEO Satya Nadella has taken a hands-on role in product development, signaling the urgency of change. Microsoft is pivoting from a model-centric strategy to a "model-agnostic" enterprise platform approach. It aims to become the foundational layer connecting various AI models—from OpenAI, Anthropic, or its own new "Superintelligence" team—with enterprise workflows, data, security, and cloud services. Recent organizational changes merged consumer and enterprise Copilot teams to accelerate innovation, exemplified by new products like Copilot Tasks and Copilot Cowork. However, this transformation comes at a high cost. Microsoft faces massive capital expenditures, potentially reaching ~$190 billion by 2026, to support AI infrastructure. While its platform strategy shows early signs of traction with growing Azure AI revenue, it must balance startup-like agility with the reliability expected by enterprise clients. The core challenge is no longer being the sole AI winner but defending its position as the essential enterprise software entry point amidst rapid technological commoditization and the shift towards always-on AI agents.

marsbit2h ago

Has Microsoft Lost Its Way in the AI Race, and Can Copilot Bring It Back on Track?

marsbit2h ago

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

Why FX Stablecoins Never Took Off: A Path Forward via Synthetic FX Despite the explosive growth of stablecoin-powered digital banking, which has seen ~$6B in VC investment and a 24x surge in crypto card spending in under a year, a major limitation persists: these banks are essentially dollar-only accounts. This leaves 95-99% of global accounts, which are denominated in non-USD currencies, underserved. Attempts to create native foreign currency (FX) stablecoins (like EURC) have largely failed, with total FX stablecoin TVL at ~$600M compared to $400B for USD stablecoins—a 700x gap. These FX tokens face critical challenges: fragile pegs due to low liquidity, limited exchange/FinTech acceptance, poor on/off-ramps, complex regional compliance, and a chicken-and-egg adoption problem. The article argues that the solution lies not in competing with entrenched USD stablecoin networks (USDT/USDC), but in adopting a synthetic FX model inspired by traditional finance. Specifically, it advocates for Mark-to-Market Non-Deliverable Forwards (NDFs)—cash-settled FX derivatives that allow users to maintain underlying USD stablecoin holdings while having their account balance and P&L denominated in a foreign currency. This approach offers key advantages: strong oracle-based pegs, retention of deep USD stablecoin liquidity and yield, superior on/off-ramps, scalability to any currency with a reliable feed, and capital efficiency. It mirrors how modern institutional FX markets operate. Primary use cases for on-chain NDFs include: 1. **Digital Banks/Wallets:** Enabling multi-currency accounts for international users without leaving the USD stablecoin ecosystem, boosting deposits and retention. 2. **FX Carry Trade Vaults:** Offering access to sovereign interest rate differentials (e.g., earning yield on BRL) in a more stable and scalable format than crypto-native products like Ethena. 3. **Global Enterprise Payments:** Allowing merchants to receive payments in local currency equivalents while settling in USD stablecoins, similar to services offered by Stripe for fiat. The conclusion is that synthetic FX, not native FX stablecoins, is the viable path to integrating foreign exchange into the growing stablecoin digital banking landscape, potentially unlocking the next phase of institutional DeFi and multi-trillion-dollar global adoption.

链捕手3h ago

Why Haven't Forex Stablecoins Taken Off?

链捕手3h ago

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is "Bleeding Out" – How Can Practitioners Survive Better? In a candid reflection, the founder of IOSG Ventures voices deep concerns about the current state of Web3, describing an ecosystem experiencing severe "blood loss." Despite the recent MuShanghai event showcasing a successful pivot towards a more diverse, global community, a somber reality persists: many crypto-native attendees were there exploring exits or new labels in biotech, AI, and robotics. The core issue is identified as a breakdown in the ecosystem's positive feedback loop. Alarmingly, underestimated "low-probability bad events" are occurring simultaneously: a significant brain drain of Chinese developers to AI, a lack of breakout applications despite massive funding, and a widening credibility gap for practitioners globally, often stigmatized as scam artists. This has created a dire接班人 (successor) problem, with the next generation seeing little professional prestige or financial upside in crypto compared to fields like AI. A significant portion of the critique focuses on Ethereum and Vitalik Buterin. While not pessimistic about Ethereum's technology, the founder worries that critical development windows were missed by focusing on niche technical narratives like ZK and L2 instead of mass-market applications. A more urgent concern is that Vitalik may be isolated in an "information bubble," shielded from the grassroots community's hardships by layers of intermediaries, preventing crucial feedback from reaching him. The call is for Vitalik to return to a founder's mindset, re-engage directly with the community, and rally efforts for the next decade. The divergence between U.S. and Chinese OG (Original Gangster) ecosystems is stark. While many U.S. builders reinvest their wealth into the ecosystem, the Chinese scene suffers from a severe lack of "造血能力" (blood-making ability), with most market-driven funds struggling and many early success stories cashing out entirely. This threatens the entire Asian Web3 ecosystem's survival. For individual practitioners, survival advice is pragmatic: find your core "why," maintain life balance beyond token prices, continuously learn new skills (like AI), form small, trusted alliances for mutual support, and practice self-compassion. The industry's greatest need is not money or tech, but lighthouses—individuals at all levels who offer mentorship, grants, referrals, and honest reflection to guide others. The piece concludes with a direct appeal: OGs must pay forward the opportunities the industry gave them; founders must not struggle alone; and builders must continue their work, ensuring it remains a viable profession. The survival of Web3's "cathedral" depends not on any single leader but on the collective responsibility of everyone who remains.

marsbit4h ago

IOSG Founder: Web3 Is 'Losing Blood,' How Can Practitioners Survive Better?

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片