The Exquisite Self-Interest of Former OpenAI CTO Murati: Personally Handing Over the Knife and Then Being the First to Seek Reconciliation

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-11Last updated on 2026-05-11

Abstract

Court documents from Elon Musk's lawsuit reveal OpenAI's former CTO, Mira Murati, played a central and seemingly self-interested role in Sam Altman's November 2023 ouster and reinstatement. As early as 2022, she complained to Altman about his shifting priorities and pressure to prioritize revenue. By 2023, she privately supplied co-founder Ilya Sutskever with extensive internal evidence against Altman, which became a key 52-page memo for the board. She was appointed interim CEO after Altman's firing and informed Microsoft. However, text messages show Murati simultaneously relayed the board's stance to Altman while secretly urging Microsoft's CEO to help reverse the decision. Once employee backlash mounted, she refused to publicly defend the board's move she helped engineer. She then became the first signatory on the employee petition demanding the board resign and reinstate Altman. A former board member testified Murati was "waiting to see which way the wind blew," not realizing "she herself was the wind." The evidence depicts her actions as consistently aligning with her own interests throughout the crisis.

Court evidence and testimonies in Musk's lawsuit against Altman reveal the complete role played by former OpenAI CTO Mira Murati (now founder of AI startup Thinking Machines Lab) during the November 2023 coup: a key behind-the-scenes force driving the dismissal, and also the first to sign for Altman's return after the winds shifted.

The root of the conflict dates back a year before the coup. An internal document from September 2022 shows that Murati directly handed a complaint list to Altman. OpenAI's primary target at the time was $100 million in revenue. Altman's attitude was "must achieve by any means necessary," but Murati wrote, "Making what users want is not in OpenAI's DNA." A research-focused company being pressured to chase revenue put the executive team in a difficult position. She complained that Altman constantly shifted priorities, created panic, often urging "we're not fast enough" while also saying "I'm not sure about the situation either, maybe I'm mistaken," essentially pressuring the team based on incomplete understanding.

By 2023, Murati began providing screenshots, Slack records, and internal documents in bulk to co-founder Sutskever, also informing him that Altman had management issues during his time at Y Combinator. Sutskever compiled these into a 52-page memo for the board. In another piece of court testimony, Murati stated that Altman had also lied to her about AI safety review issues: Altman claimed the legal department deemed a certain model didn't need to go before the safety committee. Upon checking with Chief Legal Officer Jason Kwon, she found the story didn't match, so she submitted the model for review herself. Former board member Toner testified that the materials provided by Murati and Sutskever "greatly facilitated" the board's decision.

On November 16, the four board members unanimously signed the document to dismiss Altman. Murati was appointed interim CEO and volunteered to notify Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella.

The court released 78 text messages between Murati and Altman, spanning from Sunday evening to early Monday morning. Murati relayed the board's tough stance to Altman: they "don't care if everyone resigns," they just "don't want you touching AGI," and had already found "someone from Twitch" (former Twitch CEO Emmett Shear) as the new CEO. Yet, within the same batch of texts, Murati also told Altman, "I hope Nadella can help overturn this." As the board-appointed interim CEO, she was already secretly seeking external help for the person whose dismissal she had helped engineer.

The turning point came when Murati judged the board couldn't hold out. On Sunday, the board issued a statement "firmly supporting the dismissal decision." Murati texted Nadella: "I won't be signing this." Early Monday morning, she informed Microsoft CTO Kevin Scott: "The board is about to resign." Scott replied, "For real this time?" She answered, "Seems like it, Ilya signed our petition." Subsequently, 750 employees signed a petition demanding the board resign and Altman be reinstated; Murati's signature was the first on the list.

Toner's assessment in testimony was direct: Murati was "extremely uncooperative" and "incredibly negative" after Altman's dismissal, "completely unwilling to tell the team that her conversations with the board significantly contributed to the decision to fire Altman." She was the only one who could have defended that decision, but she refused to step forward. As a result, employees thought it was a sudden move by a few external board members and quickly sided with Altman. Toner's exact words: "She was waiting to see which way the wind was blowing, but she didn't realize she herself was the wind."

From secretly handing over materials to push for the dismissal, refusing to endorse it after the fallout while turning to pull in Microsoft, and finally leading the signing of the petition to demand Altman's return, Murati stood only on her own side throughout the entire coup.

Related Questions

QWhat key role did Mira Murati play in Sam Altman's ouster from OpenAI in November 2023, based on the court documents?

AAccording to court evidence and testimony, Mira Murati played a central role by actively providing internal documents, screenshots, and complaints about Altman's management to co-founder Ilya Sutskever, who compiled them into a key memo for the board. This material was described as "significantly driving" the board's decision to fire Altman.

QWhat actions did Mira Murati take as interim CEO immediately after Altman's dismissal?

AAs the board-appointed interim CEO, Murati took on the task of informing Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella about Altman's firing. However, she also simultaneously began secretly texting Altman, relaying the board's stance while expressing hope that Nadella could help overturn the decision, effectively working against the board that appointed her.

QHow did Murati's position change when she sensed the board was losing support?

AWhen Murati judged that the board could not withstand the pressure—particularly after Ilya Sutskever signed a petition for Altman's return—she switched sides. She refused to sign a statement supporting the board's decision, informed Microsoft executives the board was about to resign, and became the first signatory on a staff petition demanding the board resign and reinstate Altman.

QWhat was former board member Helen Toner's critique of Murati's behavior during the crisis?

AHelen Toner testified that Murati was "extremely uncooperative" and "incredibly passive" after Altman's firing. She refused to tell the team that her conversations with the board had significantly contributed to the decision. Toner stated Murati was "waiting to see which way the wind blew" but failed to realize "she was the wind," meaning her actions created the situation but she wouldn't defend the outcome.

QWhat internal conflict between Murati and Altman predated the 2023 coup, according to the article?

AAn internal document from September 2022 shows Murati directly complained to Altman. She criticized his relentless focus on hitting a $100 million revenue target, stating "making what users want is not in OpenAI's DNA." She also complained about Altman's shifting priorities, creating panic, and pressuring the team based on incomplete information, which planted the seeds of later conflict.

Related Reads

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

**Summary: Rising Interest Rates Are Not the Killer of Tech; EPS Is: The "Keep the Strong, Ditch the Weak" Strategy After the AI Theme Plunge** The author argues that the sharp sell-off in tech and AI-related stocks, triggered by a strong US jobs report that heightened Fed rate hike fears, represents a "pullback to pick up passengers" rather than a "car crash." The true end of a tech bull market is not determined by an extra 25 basis point hike, but by industry overcapacity and the disproval of earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Historical analysis shows that during past rate hike cycles, the Nasdaq-100 often outperformed, provided EPS growth remained strong. The current phase is seen as a shift from a "broad narrative-driven rally" to a "focused verification stage" for AI. The investment strategy should be to "keep the strong, ditch the weak." * **Retain exposure** to high-conviction AI infrastructure leaders with clear order visibility, stable margins, strong cash flow, and upward EPS revisions (e.g., AI servers, advanced packaging, optical modules, key cloud suppliers). * **Reduce exposure** to high-beta, narrative-driven stocks with unclear profit paths (e.g., some quantum computing, space, or speculative chip stocks), especially on rebounds. Valuation concerns should focus on whether earnings can catch up to high multiples, not on high P/E alone. Crowded positioning signals a concentration into quality assets, not necessarily a market top. The upcoming Q2 earnings season will be a key validation point. The core principle is to hold stocks with proven EPS, while using macro events (CPI data, central bank meetings) to manage timing and risk.

marsbit1h ago

Raising Interest Rates Is Not a Tech Killer, EPS Is: A Strategy for Discarding the Weak and Retaining the Strong After the AI Theme's Sharp Decline

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片