# Yield Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Yield", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

In drafting the GENIUS Act, Congress prohibited licensed payment stablecoin issuers from paying interest or yield to holders—a rule that forced changes for USDC. However, Ethena's USDe, a rapidly growing "yield dollar," operates outside this regulation. USDe is a delta-neutral synthetic dollar backed by crypto collateral and hedged perpetual futures positions, generating yield from funding rates rather than traditional reserves. Because it doesn't fit the legal definition of a payment stablecoin, the GENIUS Act's restrictions do not apply. USDe's supply peaked above $14 billion in 2025, making it a top-three dollar-denominated crypto asset. Its model carries distinct risks, notably dependence on sustained positive funding rates and vulnerability during market deleveraging events, as seen in a brief depeg in October 2025. Regulatory approaches differ: Germany's BaFin banned USDe sales, viewing it as an unregistered security, while U.S. institutional capital, like Janus Henderson, has embraced it for treasury management. The GENIUS Act defined and regulated payment stablecoins but left synthetic dollars like USDe in a gray area. The unresolved question is whether future regulations will address this category or if yield will continue migrating to undefined spaces.

marsbit06/17 04:42

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

marsbit06/17 04:42

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

USDe, the synthetic dollar from Ethena, circumvents the GENIUS Act's prohibition on paying interest to stablecoin holders. Unlike regulated payment stablecoins like USDC, which must hold cash/Treasury reserves, USDe is a delta-neutral synthetic asset backed by crypto collateral and hedged perpetual short positions. It generates yield from funding rates and staking rewards, not issuer-paid interest, placing it outside the Act's scope. Growing to over $14B at its peak, USDe represents a significant regulatory gap. While Germany's BaFin has restricted it, US institutional adoption is rising, as seen with Janus Henderson's partnership. The core debate is whether USDe is an innovative yield-bearing instrument or an unregulated security posing unique risks, highlighting the need for specific rules for synthetic dollars that current legislation does not address.

Foresight News06/16 10:09

USDe Circumvents GENIUS Act Yield Ban: How Synthetic Dollars Became Crypto's Most Successful Gray Area?

Foresight News06/16 10:09

Saylor's Latest Long Read: Bitcoin is Not Money, It's Digital Capital, and Money is Built Upon It

Michael Saylor presents his "Digital Asset Stack" theory, positioning Bitcoin as the foundational layer of digital capital. He argues Bitcoin itself should remain unchanged—no staking, inflation, or protocol alterations. Instead, a five-layer financial architecture should be built atop it: Digital Capital (BTC), Digital Credit (e.g., yield instruments like STRC), Digital Currency (stable, yield-bearing instruments pegged to fiat), Digital Yield (leveraged/structured products), and Digital Equity (e.g., MSTR stock, absorbing residual volatility). Saylor asserts this stack transforms Bitcoin's high-volatility, high-energy capital into tailored products: stable currencies for payments/savings, yield instruments for income seekers, and equity for growth investors. This approach meets diverse needs—corporate treasuries, banks, retirees, emerging market users—without compromising Bitcoin's core properties (scarcity, decentralization). The "killer use case" is rebuilding global money, credit, and capital markets on Bitcoin, bridging the fiat world with a superior digital asset foundation. The system leverages traditional finance principles (risk layering, structured products) while using Bitcoin as the ultimate collateral. This expands Bitcoin's utility, drives adoption, and offers a better monetary experience: digital, yield-bearing, stable-value tools for everyday use.

marsbit06/16 07:57

Saylor's Latest Long Read: Bitcoin is Not Money, It's Digital Capital, and Money is Built Upon It

marsbit06/16 07:57

After Tokenization of Assets, How to Exit?

Title: How to Exit After Asset Tokenization? Author: Symbiotic Compiled by: Hu Tao, ChainCatcher Summary: Tokenization addresses how assets go on-chain but largely leaves the redemption question unresolved. While tokenized assets can settle instantly, the underlying redemption for assets like treasuries, private credit, or real estate can take from T+1 to 180 days. This gap hinders DeFi adoption of Real World Assets (RWAs). Three emerging models aim to provide instant exit liquidity, differing primarily in their capital structure and efficiency: 1. **Balance Sheet Model (e.g., Grove Basin):** A single entity (like Sky) provides immediate liquidity from its balance sheet, acting as a bridge during the settlement period. It offers simplicity and deep initial liquidity but is constrained by a single entity's capacity and risk appetite. 2. **Asset-Specific Vault Model (e.g., Upshift Clear):** Independent liquidity providers fund dedicated vaults for each supported asset, earning fees. It decentralizes capital sources but isolates liquidity and capital per asset, leading to potential fragmentation. 3. **Shared Liquidity Layer Model (e.g., Symbiotic Liquid Lane):** A shared capital pool supports multiple RWA types simultaneously. Funds remain productive between redemptions (e.g., earning yield in lending markets). Exits are settled via a competitive RFQ market. This model aims for higher capital efficiency, scalability across assets, and serves longer-duration assets like private credit. Key differentiators are: 1) Source of capital and risk bearer, 2) Redemption pricing mechanism, 3) Capital efficiency, 4) Scalability to new asset types, and 5) Composability. The shared liquidity layer model represents a move from piecemeal solutions toward scalable infrastructure, enabling T+0 exits by pooling capital, maintaining yield, and using competitive pricing, thus enhancing RWA utility in DeFi.

marsbit06/16 06:09

After Tokenization of Assets, How to Exit?

marsbit06/16 06:09

Insurance Veteran Re-Entrepreneurship, Re Opens the Door to Reinsurance with On-Chain Protocols

Insurance veteran Karn Saroya leads Re, a protocol aiming to digitize the global reinsurance market by bridging it on-chain. It tackles high regulatory barriers by using a licensed reinsurer, Cover Re SPC, to handle compliant contracts, separating legal risk from the protocol layer. Users can deposit stablecoins into two tokenized tranches: reUSD (senior, principal-protected with fixed yield) and reUSDe (junior, higher-yield, first-loss). The protocol has secured $409 million in underlying premiums across low-volatility commercial lines like auto and workers' compensation. Re has raised $21 million from investors including Tribe Capital and Electric Capital. Its fixed-supply 1 billion RE governance token, part of an ongoing points program, is planned for a Coinbase listing. Re differentiates itself by offering non-correlated real-world asset yields, a compliant structure, and substantial scaled capital compared to peers like Nexus Mutual or Ensuro.

Foresight News06/15 06:17

Insurance Veteran Re-Entrepreneurship, Re Opens the Door to Reinsurance with On-Chain Protocols

Foresight News06/15 06:17

Coinbase And Ethena Launch High Yield USDC Vault Powered By Morpho

Coinbase has launched a new High Yield USDC Vault in collaboration with Ethena Labs and powered by Morpho, curated by Steakhouse Financial. This marks the first live product from the Coinbase-Ethena partnership, offering Coinbase users access to enhanced yields through a simplified interface. Unlike Coinbase's more conservative vaults, this product accepts a broader collateral mix, including synthetic assets like Ethena's USDe, which allows for higher potential returns but introduces greater risks related to collateral behavior and market dynamics. The annual percentage yields (APYs) are dynamic and not guaranteed. The launch underscores a trend of centralized exchanges packaging complex DeFi strategies into user-friendly products, expanding access while highlighting the need for clear risk disclosure. The vault is currently available to eligible users in the U.S. (excluding New York) and select international markets.

bitcoinist06/13 23:04

Coinbase And Ethena Launch High Yield USDC Vault Powered By Morpho

bitcoinist06/13 23:04

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

The article discusses the evolution of on-chain credit, distinguishing three markets: overcollateralized crypto lending, unsecured lending (largely unsuccessful), and asset-backed credit (ABC). ABC, backed by identifiable real-world collateral with legal recourse, is identified as the fastest-growing category and the only one credibly addressing adverse selection—the core problem in credit where the riskiest borrowers self-select. Current growth in on-chain Real World Assets (RWAs), particularly tokenized private credit funds (e.g., Maple Finance, Centrifuge), is substantial but often merely "wraps" existing fund structures, inheriting their risks rather than solving adverse selection at the protocol level. The regulatory landscape is a key driver, with the US GENIUS Act (prohibiting stablecoin issuers from paying yield) and the proposed CLARITY Act (closing loopholes on indirect yield) set to redefine permissible yield-bearing products. This makes vaults (like ERC-4626) the critical architecture—they become the primary compliant vehicle for delivering yield, functioning as issuance, disclosure, distribution, and recovery mechanisms. The author's thesis is that the correct post-GENIUS/CLARITY architecture involves building ABC solutions where credit assessment, structure, and recovery are encoded directly into the smart contract vault layer, moving beyond mere tokenized fund wrappers to solve adverse selection fundamentally and ensure regulatory compliance.

Foresight News06/11 11:13

After the Passage of the GENIUS Act and the CLARITY Act, What Is the Correct Architecture for On-Chain Yield?

Foresight News06/11 11:13

Banks Battle Stablecoins: Where Will Deposits Ultimately Flow?

Banks are facing a challenge from stablecoins, which offer near-instant, low-cost global transfers and the potential for higher yields via DeFi protocols, threatening traditional deposit bases. The article draws a historical parallel to the 1970s when Merrill Lynch's Cash Management Account (CMA) circumvented Regulation Q's interest rate caps by funneling client funds into money market funds, forcing banks to adapt with new products. Today, the competition centers on two forms of digital dollars. The first is stablecoins (e.g., USDC), which remove funds from bank balance sheets, reducing lending capital. While regulations like the GENIUS Act prohibit issuers from paying interest, users can seek yield elsewhere in crypto. The second is tokenized deposits, where banks represent deposits as on-chain tokens for efficient settlement while keeping funds insured and on their books for lending. Bank consortia like the Clearing House network and Cari Network are developing such platforms. The core battleground is control over the movement and utility of money. SoFi Bank exemplifies a potential fusion path by launching its own stablecoin (SoFiUSD) and allowing seamless conversion to/from insured, interest-bearing tokenized deposits within one app, giving users flexibility between crypto's efficiency and banking's safety/yield. The article concludes that blockchain technology is not replacing bank deposits but forcing the industry to disaggregate and improve its value propositions—security, yield, and liquidity. The ultimate winners will be institutions that enable frictionless switching between these attributes, much as banks historically absorbed innovations (like the CMA) to maintain their role.

marsbit06/10 10:27

Banks Battle Stablecoins: Where Will Deposits Ultimately Flow?

marsbit06/10 10:27

Ethena Interview: USDe is Not Just a High APY Product, but a System-Level Dollar Infrastructure in the Crypto World

Ethena is building USDe not merely as a high-yield product, but as a fundamental dollar infrastructure layer for the crypto ecosystem. In an interview, the team emphasized that as USDe scales, metrics like collateral usage, velocity, and integration depth within DeFi and CeFi will become more important than its APY. Ethena is diversifying USDe's collateral beyond crypto basis trades to include stablecoins, DeFi/ institutional lending, and RWAs, but with strict boundaries to maintain its core identity as a predictable synthetic dollar. The project views capacity limits as a market structure issue, triggered when its hedging activity starts negatively impacting funding rates or concentrating risk. While USDe is gaining adoption as crypto-native collateral, its next challenge is becoming a core dollar asset for broader institutions, which requires building trust in its stability, liquidity, and simple risk structure under stress. Ethena sees its future role as a hybrid—part savings account, part offshore dollar system—acting as a programmable dollar balance sheet and potentially the underlying yield engine for other platforms.

Foresight News06/10 09:09

Ethena Interview: USDe is Not Just a High APY Product, but a System-Level Dollar Infrastructure in the Crypto World

Foresight News06/10 09:09

Banks Battle Stablecoins: Where Will Deposits Ultimately Flow?

"Banks vs. Stablecoins: Where Will Deposits Flow?" By: Prathik Desai The traditional banking model, where banks profit from lending out low-interest deposits, faces a fundamental challenge from blockchain-based stablecoins. While U.S. savings accounts offer ~0.6% interest, stablecoins provide near-instant, low-cost global transfers and, via DeFi protocols, access to 5-8% yields. This threatens bank deposit bases and their net interest margins. History offers a parallel: In the 1970s, Merrill Lynch's Cash Management Account (CMA) circumvented Regulation Q's interest caps by sweeping funds into money market funds, causing massive deposit outflows until banks responded with their own high-yield accounts. Today, two competing "digital dollar" models are emerging: 1. **Stablecoins (e.g., USDC):** Funds leave the banking system to back the tokens. While laws like the GENIUS Act forbid issuers from paying interest, users can earn yield via DeFi. This poses an existential threat, especially to regional banks. Predictions suggest significant deposit migration to stablecoins. 2. **Tokenized Deposits:** Banks convert deposits into on-chain tokens for fast, cheap transfers, while the original funds remain on their balance sheets, protected by FDIC insurance and available for lending. Two major bank consortia are developing platforms: one for institutions (led by JPMorgan, Citi, etc.) and Cari Network (regional banks) for retail users. The competition centers on control. Stablecoins offer openness and programmability but lack insurance. Tokenized deposits offer safety and yield but within the traditional, regulated system. A third path, exemplified by SoFi Bank's launch of SoFiUSD, aims to bridge this divide. SoFi integrates a stablecoin, a tokenized deposit (with yield and FDIC insurance), and a bank account in one app, allowing seamless switching based on the user's need for yield, safety, or liquidity. The core insight is that the future belongs not to a single product form, but to the *ability to frictionlessly switch* between forms—optimizing for security, yield, or liquidity as needed. Blockchain technology is becoming financial infrastructure, not to replace banks, but to force them to deconstruct and rebuild their services. The ultimate winners will be institutions that enable this seamless conversion, forcing an evolution similar to the post-Regulation Q era, where traditional finance absorbed innovations to survive.

Foresight News06/10 07:04

Banks Battle Stablecoins: Where Will Deposits Ultimately Flow?

Foresight News06/10 07:04

活动图片

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow

Trading Strategiesright-arrow

Indepth Researchright-arrow