# Strategy Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Strategy", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

94,500 May Become the Pivot Point for Bitcoin Bulls and Bears, Daily Chart Structure Enters Critical Observation Zone | Guest Analysis

**Bitcoin Technical Analysis: Key $94,500 Level as Market Enters Critical Phase** This analysis, authored by Cody Feng, reviews Bitcoin's performance from January 5-11 and provides a forward-looking outlook. Last week, the market precisely followed the predicted range-bound movement between $84,000 and $94,500, with a high of $94,789 and a low of $89,311. A successful short trade was executed at the $94,500 resistance level, yielding a 3.4% return. **Key Technical Observations:** * **Weekly Chart:** Indicators suggest a bearish trend is still in place, with the market remaining in an "air pocket" below a key multi-week moving average. A recent rejection at this level confirms sellers are still in control. * **Daily Chart:** The market is at a critical juncture. Momentum indicators show a struggle between bulls and bears, with no clear directional bias confirmed yet. **This Week's Forecast (Jan 12-18):** The primary expectation is for Bitcoin to continue consolidating within the $84,000-$94,500 range. A decisive break above $94,500 could trigger a stronger technical rebound towards $97,500. Conversely, a break below $84,000 would likely target the $80,000 support level. **Trading Strategy:** * **Mid-term:** Maintain a 65% short position as long as price remains below $94,500. * **Short-term:** Use 30% of capital for tactical trades based on range-bound (Plan A), breakdown (Plan B), or breakout (Plan C) scenarios, using the defined support/resistance levels and a strict 1.5% stop-loss. **Macro Focus:** A series of speeches from various Federal Reserve officials this week will be crucial for recalibrating market expectations on monetary policy. Their commentary on inflation and the economic outlook will significantly influence medium-term liquidity expectations and risk asset valuations, including Bitcoin. **Risk Management is emphasized:** Always set an initial stop-loss immediately upon opening a position and use a dynamic trailing stop to protect capital and lock in gains as the trade moves favorably.

marsbit01/12 07:15

94,500 May Become the Pivot Point for Bitcoin Bulls and Bears, Daily Chart Structure Enters Critical Observation Zone | Guest Analysis

marsbit01/12 07:15

94,500 May Become the Bull-Bear Battle Line for Bitcoin, Daily Chart Structure Enters Key Observation Zone | Guest Analysis

Bitcoin Price Analysis: $94,500 as Key Pivot Level, Weekly Outlook and Trading Strategies In this weekly analysis, crypto market analyst Cody Feng reviews Bitcoin's performance and outlines key levels and strategies for the coming week. Last week, BTC traded within the predicted range of $84,000–$94,500, hitting a high of $94,789 and a low of $89,311. A short trade executed at the $94,500 resistance level yielded a 3.4% gain using a 1x leverage. The trade was based on a "short at resistance" strategy, supported by proprietary quantitative models for momentum and spread trading. Current model readings suggest mixed signals: - Weekly charts indicate a bearish trend with momentum below zero, though selling pressure is slowing. - Daily charts show consolidation near the zero line, indicating a battle between bulls and bears. This week (Jan 12–18), BTC is expected to continue trading between $84,000–$94,500. A break below $84,000 could lead to a test of $80,000, while a sustained move above $94,500 may signal a stronger rebound. Key resistance levels are $92k–$93k, $94.5k–$95k, and $97.5k–$99.5k. Support levels are $89.5k–$91k, $86k–$86.5k, $83.5k–$84.5k, and $80k. Trading strategies include: - Maintaining a 65% mid-term short position unless $94,500 is broken. - Using 30% capital for short-term trades based on range-bound (A), breakdown (B), or breakout (C) scenarios. Macro focus this week features multiple Fed speakers whose comments may influence liquidity expectations and medium-term market sentiment. Risk management is emphasized: set stop-losses at entry, move to breakeven at +1% profit, and trail stops thereafter. Disclaimer: This analysis is for informational purposes only and not investment advice. Trade with caution.

Odaily星球日报01/12 07:01

94,500 May Become the Bull-Bear Battle Line for Bitcoin, Daily Chart Structure Enters Key Observation Zone | Guest Analysis

Odaily星球日报01/12 07:01

Has the Era of Project Buyback Bonuses Really Come to an End?

"Project Buybacks: The End of an Era?" In traditional finance, stock buybacks are often seen as a confidence booster. However, this strategy has largely failed to produce positive results in the Web3 space. Recently, Jupiter co-founder SIONG proposed halting $JUP's buyback program after the project spent over $70 million on repurchases with little positive impact on the token price. Similarly, Helium's founder Amir Haleem announced an end to their buyback, calling it "throwing money into a black hole." Data from 2025 shows a collective downturn for major projects that executed buybacks. Despite Hyperliquid spending $716 million and others like Pump.fun, LayerZero, Raydium, and Sky also making significant investments, most tokens continued to decline in value, raising questions about the efficacy of buybacks. The debate highlights a split in perspectives: some founders advocate reallocating funds towards user acquisition and product development to strengthen fundamentals. Others, like DeFi OG CM, argue that buybacks are inherently beneficial by reducing circulating supply, though they don't guarantee short-term price increases. Critics, including Helius CEO Mert Mumtaz, view buybacks as a pessimistic mechanism, signaling a lack of better growth opportunities. Former Aave executive Ajit Tripathi called the buyback narrative "the most value-destructive play after memecoins." Alternative strategies are emerging. Selini Capital's Jordi Alexander emphasizes the importance of execution timing, suggesting dynamic buybacks based on price-to-earnings ratios rather than repurchasing at inflated valuations. Solana's Anatoly favors long-term capital accumulation through staking mechanisms to reward long-term holders and dilute short-term speculators. The consensus is evolving: buybacks alone are not a solution. Effective token value management requires strategic financial planning—buying low, reserving capital during high valuations—and, crucially, building fundamental product value and user demand to sustain long-term growth. Without solid fundamentals, buybacks merely become an exit liquidity for short-term traders.

marsbit01/09 12:07

Has the Era of Project Buyback Bonuses Really Come to an End?

marsbit01/09 12:07

The Biggest Trap of Stablecoins: 99% of Companies Issuing Tokens Are Just 'Self-Indulgent'

Stablecoins are increasingly being adopted by traditional finance companies like Klarna, PayPal, Stripe, and Cash App due to their ability to reduce settlement costs, enable global reach, and provide instant settlements. However, the article argues that most companies issuing their own branded stablecoins are engaging in futile "self-aggrandizement," as the market cannot sustainably support thousands of different tokens. Key benefits of stablecoins include significantly lower transaction fees compared to credit cards, borderless transactions without FX fees, and 24/7 near-instant settlement. While these advantages are clear, the article emphasizes that success depends not on issuing a token, but on integrating stablecoins as a payment rail into existing products and workflows. Case studies highlight different approaches: PayPal’s PYUSD serves as a defensive move to retain users within its ecosystem; Klarna uses stablecoins to reduce internal payment friction; and Stripe strategically avoids issuing its own token, instead facilitating transactions using established stablecoins like USDC. The piece concludes that liquidity, acceptance, and integration matter far more than branding. Merchants and users will gravitate toward simplicity and reliability, leading to natural consolidation around a few dominant stablecoins. The real value lies in leveraging stablecoins to improve payment infrastructure—not in creating yet another branded digital dollar.

比推01/07 18:19

The Biggest Trap of Stablecoins: 99% of Companies Issuing Tokens Are Just 'Self-Indulgent'

比推01/07 18:19

活动图片