# Agents Related Articles

HTX News Center provides the latest articles and in-depth analysis on "Agents", covering market trends, project updates, tech developments, and regulatory policies in the crypto industry.

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

The article "From Token to Machine Labor: AI is Evolving from Tool to 'Worker'" argues that the business model for AI is shifting beyond simply selling computational resources (tokens, GPU hours) or model access. Instead, a new "machine labor market" is emerging, where the core economic transaction is the purchase of economically useful work directly performed by software. The central thesis is that AI pricing will evolve through four stages: 1) raw tokens, 2) standardized LLM capabilities (e.g., text generation), 3) industry-specific labor markets (e.g., legal review, radiology), and finally 4) a programmable results market where tasks like resolving a support ticket are bid on and priced based on outcome. In this future, buyers will care less about *which* model or GPU completes a task and more about whether the work meets specified standards for accuracy, latency, and cost. This transition reframes the impact of AI on human labor. Rather than simple replacement, it suggests a re-coordination where machines handle standardized, verifiable work, freeing humans for roles involving oversight, context management, responsibility, and final judgment. In some cases, this "last 1%" of human input becomes more valuable as it enables the other 99% to be automated. Furthermore, as AI reduces the cost of work, demand may expand, creating larger markets (e.g., 24/7 customer service) rather than just cheaper versions of existing ones. The article concludes that while infrastructure (GPUs, models, tokens) remains crucial upstream, the market is converging on a simpler, tradeable unit: machine labor that can be defined, measured, priced, and procured based on contractible specifications.

marsbit05/31 12:33

From Tokens to Machine Labor: AI is Shifting from Tool to "Worker"

marsbit05/31 12:33

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

Title: Who Makes Money from Agents? The rise of AI Agents as potential blockchain users raises a crucial question: if they become the next billion users, who will capture the value? Traditional crypto value capture theories—like "fat protocols" (where value accrues to the base layer) and "fat applications" (where value accrues to user-facing apps)—assume human users who value UX, brand, and convenience. Agents, however, operate differently: they interact via APIs, have no brand loyalty, and can switch services with near-zero cost. This shift could disrupt existing value flows. Applications might become "headless," offering their routing and infrastructure as APIs to Agents. Alternatively, Agents might bypass intermediaries entirely, allowing protocols to regain value capture ("fat protocols" reborn). A more extreme scenario is that Agents, being purely rational and cost-sensitive, could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward marginal cost and turning crypto into a low-margin utility. However, Agents may not just amplify existing activities; they could enable entirely new ones—like continuous, sub-penny portfolio rebalancing, machine-to-machine commerce, and new market types only viable at automated speeds. This expands the economic pie rather than just redistributing it. Ultimately, the key question for builders is: what will make an Agent return to your service instead of a cheaper alternative? The answer may not be UX but factors like liquidity, latency, settlement guarantees, or a yet-unnamed business model. As humans and Agents will coexist as users, value capture may split: "fat apps" for human-facing services, and a new, evolving model for the Agent-dominated layer.

marsbit05/28 08:31

In the Era of Agent Users, Where Does Crypto Value Flow?

marsbit05/28 08:31

Will OpenAI Swallow the Application Layer? a16z Says Real Opportunities Lie Outside General Models

As large language models (LLMs) from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic become more powerful, many fear they will dominate the AI application layer, leaving no room for startups. However, this article argues that the real opportunity lies not on the "Yellow Brick Road"—the high-profile, general-purpose tasks like code and text generation that model labs are directly pursuing—but in the "rest of Oz": complex, vertical-specific applications. On the Yellow Brick Road, model companies have inherent advantages: control over the model, better margins, pricing power, and strong distribution. Startups building generic, horizontal "co-pilot" tools for standard tasks are competing directly on this path and are vulnerable. True defensibility and value are found in specialized, vertical applications. These involve deep integration into messy, multi-step business workflows (e.g., sales, insurance, legal), handling legacy systems, data quality issues, compliance, and governance. The "scaffolding" around the model—the specialized tools, automations, workflows, and industry knowledge—becomes more critical than the raw model power itself. Vertical AI companies can build defensible moats through: * **Data & Learning Flywheels:** Capturing unwritten industry practices and specific customer feedback not found in public training data. * **Managing Model Complexity:** Routinely evaluating and routing queries across multiple models (including open-source) to optimize for performance and cost, and absorbing the migration burden of model upgrades for clients. * **Cost Optimization:** Using cheaper, fine-tuned models for specific sub-tasks instead of always calling the most expensive, general-purpose model. * **Governance & Compliance:** Providing the control plane for permissions, auditing, and ensuring compliance with industry-specific regulations (e.g., HIPAA, FINRA). Examples from sales (11x) and insurance (FurtherAI) illustrate that clients pay for systems that drive specific business outcomes (e.g., sales pipeline, policy underwriting), not for generic intelligence. These systems become the "operational memory" of a business, a layer that is hard to replace, even as the underlying LLMs commoditize and improve. To test if a startup is building in the "rest of Oz," it should pass checks like the **Tool & Steps Test** (requires complex, multi-step workflows), the **System Test** (owns the end-to-end workflow, not just a tool on top), and the **Hedge Fund / P&L Test** (measured by client business outcomes, not benchmark scores). Both model labs and vertical application companies will win. The next generation of enterprise software will be built in the specialized, complex, and high-value territory beyond the Yellow Brick Road.

marsbit05/28 04:28

Will OpenAI Swallow the Application Layer? a16z Says Real Opportunities Lie Outside General Models

marsbit05/28 04:28

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

In the Agents era of blockchain, traditional value capture theories face challenges. The "Fat Protocol" theory, dominant since 2016, suggested protocols capture most value as their tokens are essential for network use. However, the proliferation of interchangeable L1s, L2s, and modular layers has eroded protocol scarcity and pricing power. Conversely, the "Fat App" theory posits that applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and exchanges) become the primary value layer by controlling distribution and transaction flows. This aligns with the current "Great Repricing" cycle. Agents disrupt this logic. As software users, they lack brand loyalty, prioritize cost and efficiency, and switch between platforms seamlessly. This undermines the front-end UX moats that "Fat Apps" rely on. The article explores several potential futures: 1. **Headless Applications:** Current leading apps could strip their front-ends and become backend API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their role. 2. **Protocol Resurgence:** If integration becomes trivial, Agents might bypass aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving "Fat Protocol" dynamics. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse:** Agents' rational, frictionless routing could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost and leaving little profit for intermediaries. 4. **Unprecedented Activity:** Agents may enable new, high-frequency, machine-to-machine economic activities, expanding the total value pie even if margins are thin. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model:** Historically, major tech shifts (like the internet's attention economy) create unforeseen business models. The Agents era may spawn entirely new ways to capture value. The most likely outcome is a coexistence where "Fat Apps" continue to serve human users valuing UX, while a separate, Agent-driven economy emerges governed by different rules—where loyalty is based on factors like liquidity, latency, and settlement guarantees rather than brand.

marsbit05/27 14:05

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

marsbit05/27 14:05

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

Who will capture value in an era where AI Agents become the primary blockchain users? Existing crypto value capture theories assume human users. "Fat Protocols" (2016) posited that protocols capture the most value as applications commoditize on open data, but this weakened as blockchain infrastructure proliferated and became interchangeable. The emerging "Fat Apps" theory argues applications capturing user relationships (like wallets and aggregators) win by controlling distribution and monetizing user flows. Agents fundamentally disrupt this logic. They don't value UX, brand, or convenience, bypassing the front-end moats of fat apps. This leads to several possible futures: 1. **"Headless" Apps**: Current app leaders (e.g., wallets) strip their front ends and become API infrastructure for Agents, preserving their value capture. 2. **Protocol Renaissance**: If integration is easy, Agents skip aggregators and interact directly with protocols, reviving the fat protocol thesis. 3. **Pricing Power Collapse**: Agents' rational, frictionless price shopping could commoditize the entire stack, compressing margins toward cost. Value flows to Agent owners or end-users. 4. **Unprecedented Activity**: Agents could enable entirely new, high-frequency economic activity (e.g., machine-to-machine commerce), expanding the total value pie. 5. **A New, Unnamed Model**: As with the internet's attention economy, a novel, unforeseen business model may emerge. Likely, human and Agent ecosystems will coexist with distinct value capture dynamics. For builders in the Agent realm, the key question shifts from UX to competitive advantages like liquidity, latency, or settlement guarantees that retain automated users.

链捕手05/27 13:51

Who Will Make Money in the Age of Agents?

链捕手05/27 13:51

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

On May 19, Bitroot, an emerging Layer 1 blockchain, participated in the Tencent Cloud AI Summit in Singapore alongside key industry players like Solana Foundation. The event explored the intersection of AI infrastructure, enterprise applications, AI Agents, and Web3. Bitroot's invitation, despite being pre-mainnet, highlights industry interest in its focus on high-performance, AI-native architecture tailored for future AI Agent execution and verifiable on-chain automation. Bitroot CEO Juan Jose emphasized that AI competition is shifting from model performance to data, real-world application scenarios, and trust infrastructure. He argued that for AI Agents to evolve from assistants to autonomous executors managing transactions and assets, they require low-latency, low-cost, and high-throughput blockchain environments. Bitroot aims to address this through its EVM-compatible design, optimistic parallel execution, and a consensus mechanism targeting high scalability. Currently in its Testnet 5.0 phase, Bitroot reports metrics like over 50,000 peak TPS and sub-0.3 second average block time. Its narrative positions it within a growing landscape where next-generation Layer 1s like Monad and Aptos also compete on performance, while Bitroot differentiates by integrating AI computational capabilities natively across its stack. The summit underscored that the fusion of AI and Web3 is moving from concept to infrastructure competition, where networks balancing performance, security, and verifiability will be crucial for enabling scalable AI-driven applications.

marsbit05/27 08:13

Bitroot Public Chain Invited to Attend Tencent Cloud Singapore AI Conference, Discussing the Future Alongside Solana

marsbit05/27 08:13

The Paradox of Automation: The Stronger the AI, the Busier Humans Become

The Paradox of Automation: The more powerful AI becomes, the more work humans have to do. This article, based on observations from AI-heavy company Every, argues that while AI agents automate tasks like coding, writing, and customer service, they don't eliminate human jobs. Instead, they transform work and create *more* demand for human expertise. AI commoditizes "yesterday's human capabilities" by cheaply generating code, text, and images from past data. This leads to an abundance of similar, generic outputs. Consequently, what becomes scarce and valuable is human judgment in the present moment: knowing *what* is worth doing, *why*, and *how* to do it well. The article identifies two collaboration models: "Agent employees" for delegated tasks and "human-AI collaboration" within tools like Claude Code for complex work. In both cases, humans are essential to set direction, judge quality, and maintain systems. As AI makes execution cheap, human roles shift from executors to designers, reviewers, and meaning-makers. The author addresses "benchmark anxiety" by explaining that AI excels within specific, human-defined problem "frames." As AI masters one frame (e.g., code rewriting), new, more complex frames emerge (e.g., deciding *when* to rewrite). This creates an ongoing cycle where AI chases the frames, but humans remain the "framers." Even with advanced AGI, this dynamic may persist as long as AI lacks true human-like agency and self-directed purpose. The core paradox holds: automation amplifies the need for the very human judgment it seems to replace.

marsbit05/24 07:06

The Paradox of Automation: The Stronger the AI, the Busier Humans Become

marsbit05/24 07:06

活动图片