Strategy’s STRC Funds 7,000 Bitcoin Purchase as Experts Warn High-Yield Risks

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2026-03-12Last updated on 2026-03-12

Abstract

Strategy has purchased 7,000 Bitcoin this week using funds raised through its high-yield preferred stock, STRC, which offers investors an 11.5% yield with monthly payouts. The company has bought over 11,000 BTC in the past two weeks and accumulated roughly 34,000 BTC since STRC’s launch. STRC is a perpetual preferred stock designed to trade near its $100 face value, though it has occasionally dipped below that level, prompting Strategy to raise dividends to attract buyers. Experts, including Two Prime CEO Alexander Blume, caution that high yields like STRC’s come with elevated risks, especially given Bitcoin’s volatility. Despite the risks, strong investor demand continues to fund Strategy’s rapid Bitcoin acquisitions.

Strategy has reportedly purchased 7,000 Bitcoin this week by using the funds raised through high-yield preferred stock called STRC. The product currently offers investors a yield of around 11.5% with monthly payouts that have attracted strong demand from investors looking for a higher return. As per the market, Strategy has purchased more than 11,000 BTC in the past two weeks. Since the product launched, the company has accumulated roughly 34,000 BTC funded through STRC.

How STRC Works

STRC is a type of perpetual preferred stock, which means investors buy shares that pay regular dividends. The company adjusts the dividend rate when needed to help keep the stock trading near its $100 face value. The strong yield has attracted institutional investors. This growing institutional interest shows how the product is becoming part of Strategy’s broader capital-raising strategy to fund Bitcoin purchases.

Alexander Blume, who is the CEO of the crypto investment firm Two Prime, says that unusually high yields should always be treated cautiously. In financial markets, government bonds such as U.S. Treasuries are considered very safe investments. Although STRC is designed to remain close to its $100 price, that stability is not guaranteed. In fact, STRC has already traded below its $100 value several times. When that happened, Strategy increased the dividend to attract buyers and push the price back up.

Blume pointed out that the investors’ demand for the high yields remains strong and the strategy currently has sufficient funds to pay dividends. Analysts say that investors should understand that higher returns always come with higher risk, especially when they are tied to volatile assets like Bitcoin. Strategy’s STRC preferred stock has quickly become a powerful tool for funding large Bitcoin purchases, which helps the company accumulate thousands of BTC in a short period of time.

Highlighted Crypto News:

Kraken Announces Pi Network Listing Ahead of Pi Day, Boosting Interest in PI Coin

TagsCryptocurrencystrategy

Related Questions

QWhat is the STRC and how does it work?

ASTRC is a type of perpetual preferred stock that pays regular dividends. Investors buy shares, and the company adjusts the dividend rate as needed to help keep the stock trading near its $100 face value. The funds raised through STRC are used by Strategy to purchase Bitcoin.

QHow many Bitcoins has Strategy purchased using STRC funds since the product launched?

ASince the STRC product launched, Strategy has accumulated roughly 34,000 BTC funded through STRC.

QWhat yield does the STRC product currently offer to investors?

AThe STRC product currently offers investors a yield of around 11.5% with monthly payouts.

QAccording to Alexander Blume, why should high yields like those from STRC be treated cautiously?

AAlexander Blume warns that unusually high yields should always be treated cautiously because higher returns always come with higher risk, especially when tied to volatile assets like Bitcoin. Although designed for stability, the $100 price is not guaranteed.

QWhat is one method Strategy has used to maintain the price of STRC near its $100 face value when it has dropped?

AWhen STRC has traded below its $100 value, Strategy has increased the dividend to attract buyers and push the price back up.

Related Reads

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

NEAR Returns to AI Origins: From Payroll Struggles to Blockchain, Now Focusing on AI Agents and Privacy NEAR Protocol's journey began not with grand blockchain ambitions, but from a practical hurdle: its AI startup founders, including Transformer paper co-author Illia Polosukhin, couldn't efficiently pay international developers in 2017. This led them to pivot and build a high-performance, scalable blockchain. After years navigating various crypto narratives like sharding and cross-chain interoperability, NEAR is now leveraging its AI roots to re-enter the AI arena. A key driver is its "NEAR Intents" layer, which abstracts complex cross-chain transactions. Users simply state their goal (e.g., swap BTC for ETH), and a solver network finds the optimal route. This system has processed over $20B in cross-chain volume, generating significant fee revenue. A major growth area is private transactions via "Confidential Intents/Swaps," which hide trade details until settlement to protect against MEV and front-running. Remarkably, private swaps recently accounted for over 40% of NEAR's transaction volume, highlighting strong demand but also potential regulatory scrutiny. With its AI-founder pedigree, NEAR is positioning itself at the intersection of blockchain, AI agents, and privacy, aiming to become infrastructure for the emerging agent economy while navigating the challenges of its rapid adoption.

marsbit2h ago

Near Returns to the AI Stage: Transformation into a Public Chain Due to 'Payroll Difficulties,' Agent and Privacy Emerge as New Growth Narratives

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

In recent discussions, Vitalik Buterin has frequently emphasized the concept of "CROPS," a framework defining core values for Ethereum's development. CROPS stands for Censorship Resistance, Capture Resistance, Open Source, Privacy, and Security. Initially outlined in the Ethereum Foundation's "EF Mandate," it represents a commitment to user sovereignty, ensuring that the network resists external control, remains open, protects privacy, and prioritizes security. The relevance of CROPS extends beyond Ethereum's foundational principles, becoming crucial in the context of AI integration. As AI agents begin handling wallet operations and automated transactions, the risk increases that users may cede control over their digital assets, privacy, and intentions to centralized AI service providers. A "CROPS AI" would therefore emphasize local execution where possible, privacy-preserving remote model calls (e.g., using zero-knowledge proofs), and transparent, verifiable processes to maintain user agency. Vitalik highlights a significant convergence between "CROPS Ethereum access layer" and "CROPS AI." Both address the same fundamental challenge: how users can access powerful services—be it blockchain data via RPCs or AI models—without exposing sensitive information or relinquishing ultimate control. This intersection points toward a future digital entry point that is more private, secure, and user-controlled. Ultimately, CROPS is not merely an abstract ideal but a practical guidepost. It steers development—from protocol resilience and wallet design to AI agent safety—towards a future where users retain self-sovereignty even as digital systems grow more complex and powerful. In an era of accelerating AI adoption, these "slow variables" of censorship resistance, openness, privacy, and security may define Ethereum's enduring value.

marsbit2h ago

From Ethereum to AI's 'CROPS': What Exactly is This Set of 'Slow Variables' That Vitalik Repeatedly Emphasizes?

marsbit2h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

Silicon Valley investor and "Godfather of Startups" Steve Hoffman warns that combining Web3 with AI is likely a trap, not a promising venture. In an interview, Hoffman argues that while AI is a foundational technology touching all industries, Web3 adds complexity, friction, and regulatory risk without solving mainstream consumer or business needs. He advises founders to focus on deep, specialized applications where startups can out-iterate giants, rather than on generic features easily replicated by large tech companies. Hoffman observes that Silicon Valley will lead foundational AI research, while China excels at rapid, large-scale application and commercialization, particularly in robotics. He stresses that AI-driven autonomous agents capable of collaborative, multi-step tasks are 2-4 years away, which will cause significant job displacement. The solution is not to slow AI but to redesign business models around human-AI collaboration and reform social systems like education and retraining. For startups, Hoffman recommends focusing on vertical, expertise-heavy domains to build defensibility. He sees major opportunities in AI fraud detection and cybersecurity. Key founder mindsets include systemic thinking over feature-focus, relentless customer centricity, building adaptive teams, and deeply understanding AI's capabilities and limits. Hoffman is also leading a non-profit initiative to establish university centers aimed at training future leaders in responsible, human-value-aligned AI innovation.

marsbit3h ago

Silicon Valley 'Startup Guru' Steve Hoffman: Web3 + AI Could Be a Trap

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

The article "Tokens Aren't Economical, Economics Aren't Tokenized" analyzes a pivotal shift in the AI industry from a technology-driven narrative to one dominated by capital efficiency. It highlights two concurrent trends: a severe capital shortage due to the exorbitant and recurring costs of compute (e.g., OpenAI's high burn rate) and a wave of corporate spin-offs where major tech companies are separating their AI units (like Kuaishou's Kling and Baidu's Kunlunxin). The core argument is that AI's "anti-internet" business model, where user growth increases costs rather than profits, has created a disconnect between high valuations and actual cash flow. Spin-offs address this by allowing AI assets to be valued independently. Within a parent company, they are seen as cost centers, but as standalone entities, they are priced based on their growth potential and scarcity in the primary market, leading to massive valuation premiums (e.g., Kling's estimated value tripling post-spin-off). The industry is at an inflection point, moving from "model worship" to "value realization." The competition is evolving from a pure compute (GPU) race to a broader focus on systemic efficiency and full-stack engineering (involving CPUs and orchestration) to achieve viable commercialization. The year 2026 is framed as a critical moment where the industry must definitively answer how to economically translate AI capability into tangible business value, reshaping the sector's future power structure.

marsbit3h ago

Token Inefficient, Economy Tokenless

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片