Solana (SOL) Bears Press On: Will It Hold Its Ground or Bounce Back?

TheNewsCryptoPublished on 2025-12-24Last updated on 2025-12-24

Abstract

Solana (SOL) faces continued bearish pressure, declining nearly 3% amid a broader crypto market downturn. After opening around $125.40, SOL dropped to a low of $121.81, with further losses possible if selling pressure increases. Market cap stands at approximately $68.34 billion, while trading volume fell to $3.09 billion. Over $20 million in SOL positions were liquidated in 24 hours. Technical analysis indicates a bearish trend, with SOL potentially testing the $120.36 support level. A break below could lead to a deeper correction toward $119.51. On the upside, resistance lies at $122.64, and a break above might push the price toward $123.49. Indicators like MACD, CMF (-0.02), and Bull Bear Power (-3.85) all reflect bearish dominance, while the RSI (37.06) suggests SOL is nearing oversold conditions. Market sentiment remains negative, though a reversal could occur if key resistance levels are breached.

Red dominates the crypto market as the bearish momentum shows no signs of easing. With the fear still intact, all major assets are losing momentum, moving toward their previous lows. The largest assets, Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH), hover on the downside. Meanwhile, Solana (SOL) has posted a 2.95% loss after a series of key retests.

The asset opened the day trading at a high range of $125.40. After it bounced between certain support and resistance levels, the bearish shift happened, and SOL slipped to a low of $121.82. Should the selling pressure increase, the asset may face additional losses. As per CMC data, Solana currently trades at $121.81.

Besides, the market cap likely stays at $68.34 billion, with the daily trading volume of Solana having dropped briefly, reaching the $3.09 billion mark. The Coinglass data has reported that the market has witnessed an event of liquidation of $20.07 million worth of Solana within the last 24 hours.

Will Solana Slide Further in the Coming Sessions?

The 4-hour trading chart shows Solana’s bearish presence, and it might fall toward the support at around $120.36. A plunge below this range could accelerate the bearish correction and trigger the death cross to emerge. Eventually, it would send the price below the $119.51 mark.

On the upside, assuming an uptrend forms, the asset’s price could climb and bring in a test at the $122.64 resistance. Overcoming this level might strengthen the bullish pressure, leading to the formation of the golden cross, and the Solana price potentially rises to the $123.49 zone.

Solana’s technical analysis demonstrates the downtrend, with the Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) line and the signal line found below the zero line. It indicates bearish momentum, and a bullish crossover in this zone could be weak unless it moves back above zero.

Moreover, the Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) indicator value at -0.02 suggests slight selling pressure in the SOL market. The capital is flowing out of the asset, but the move is weak, not aggressive. A deeper negative value might signal a stronger bearish momentum.

The Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of -3.85 exhibits strong bearish dominance. The sellers are firmly in control, with the price trading below the recent highs. Unless it starts moving back toward zero, the downtrend is likely to persist. Furthermore, Solana’s current market sentiment is bearish as the daily Relative Strength Index (RSI) stays at 37.06. Notably, the asset may approach the oversold territory, below 30.

Top Updated Crypto News

Bitcoin Never Hit $100K in Real Terms Despite $126K Peak

TagsAltcoinCryptocurrencySOLSOL PriceSolana

Related Questions

QWhat is the current price of Solana (SOL) and how much has it lost in the recentl?

ASolana is currently trading at $121.81 and has posted a 2.95% loss.

QAccording to the technical analysis, what is the key support level that Solana might fall toward?

AThe 4-hour trading chart shows that Solana might fall toward the key support level at around $120.36.

QWhat do the MACD and CMF indicators suggest about Solana's market momentum?

AThe Moving Average Convergence Divergence (MACD) being below the zero line indicates bearish momentum. The Chaikin Money Flow (CMF) value of -0.02 suggests there is slight selling pressure and capital is flowing out of the asset.

QWhat is the significance of the Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of -3.85 for Solana?

AA Bull Bear Power (BBP) reading of -3.85 exhibits strong bearish dominance, indicating that sellers are firmly in control and the price is trading below recent highs.

QWhat event did Coinglass data report regarding Solana in the last 24 hours?

ACoinglass data reported a liquidation event of $20.07 million worth of Solana within the last 24 hours.

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

**Daily Tech & Markets Roundup: AI Advances, Market Turmoil, and Geopolitical Tensions** **AI / LLMs**: Anthropic's internal report on AI self-improvement sparked serious discussions about Recursive Self-Improvement (RSI). Meanwhile, debate continues on AI coding tools after Claude was accused of introducing bugs into the rsync codebase. In positive news, DeepSeek V4 Flash impressed in local deployment tests, and GitHub Copilot now supports custom endpoints for local models. A surprising research turn suggests removing chain-of-thought prompting can sometimes improve LLM performance. **Crypto / Web3**: Bitcoin plunged below $60,000, with its RSI hitting levels last seen during the COVID-19 crash, driven by strong U.S. jobs data reviving interest rate hike fears. Discussions highlight Ethereum DeFi's continued lack of a smooth consumer payment layer. **Chips / Hardware**: Chip stocks suffered a massive sell-off, with the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index posting its worst single-day drop in six years, erasing over a trillion dollars in value. Marvell, Micron, AMD, and Intel were among the biggest losers. **Tech Companies**: A leaked Microsoft document revealing goals to make Copilot "addictive" drew criticism. LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman left Microsoft's board to focus full-time on his AI agent startup, Manus. Google was revealed to be paying SpaceX $920 million monthly for AI training compute. **Markets & Macro**: A blowout U.S. jobs report (172k vs. 80k expected) crushed hopes for near-term rate cuts, sending Treasury yields soaring and triggering a broad market sell-off. CEOs from Kraft, McDonald's, and Whirlpool simultaneously warned U.S. consumers are exhausting their savings. **Geopolitics**: U.S.-Iran tensions escalated with missile/drone interceptions and U.S. strikes on Iranian radar sites, keeping the critical Strait of Hormuz largely closed since late February and posing ongoing oil supply risks. **The Bottom Line**: The strong jobs data acted as a single trigger for correlated sell-offs across equities, crypto, and chips. Underlying the volatility is a stark contradiction between robust employment data and warnings of consumer weakness, alongside geopolitical risks that could reignite inflation, leaving markets to price in a fraught macro outlook with no clear "soft landing" path.

marsbit2h ago

TechFlow Intelligence Bureau: Chip Stocks Lose Trillions in a Single Day, Bitcoin Falls Below $60,000, US-Iran Conflict Escalates

marsbit2h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

After a year building infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, and Coinbase, the author shares a sobering analysis of the current state of Agent payments. The core finding is a stark lack of genuine, immediate demand across most envisioned use cases. The article breaks down four key market segments: 1. **Agent-to-Merchant (Consumer Shopping):** For most product categories (e.g., clothing, electronics), conversational AI shopping is a step backwards from visual e-commerce interfaces. While agents excel at understanding needs, they can't replace side-by-side product comparison. Real merchant interest is defensive "Agent Engine Optimization," not driven by current customer demand. Potential exists for high-frequency, low-decision purchases (like food delivery) or navigating complex store UIs, but these require massive B2C distribution channels dominated by giants like Amazon. 2. **Agent-to-API (Developer Services):** Developers already have subscriptions and billing relationships for APIs (compute, data). Prepaid balances solve micro-payment issues for low transaction volumes. A deeper structural problem is that major SaaS vendors' business models rely on enterprise contracts, resisting granular pay-per-call pricing. While protocols like MPP and x402 serve the long tail of niche services, this market is small and developers are historically low-willingness-to-pay. 3. **Agent-to-Agent:** This remains largely theoretical with minimal transaction volume. While it represents a long-term bet on a fundamentally new transaction infrastructure (sub-second, micro-penny to million-dollar, multi-party settlements), it does not constitute a present market. 4. **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with existing, paying demand. Integrating AI into financial workflows (trading, portfolio management) is a natural evolution and enables new capabilities like autonomous rebalancing. However, competition favors established, regulated institutions. The "real problem" is not moving money between agents, but the broader challenge of **coordination**—orchestrating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and settling results. Payment is just one component of settlement, which is itself part of coordination. Companies that solve the coordination layer will subsume payment, not the other way around. While well-funded incumbents build defensively for a long-term future, startups must find where the market is today—which, for the author's team, lies outside these four categories in an area of real, growing, and underserved activity.

marsbit3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Bitter Truth About Agent Payments

marsbit3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

**Title: It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments** Over the past year, I've worked on infrastructure for the Agent economy, engaging with major players like Stripe, Visa, Coinbase, and numerous startups. The findings reveal a stark reality: genuine, widespread demand for Agent-based payments does not yet exist. **Key Observations:** * **Agent-to-Merchant (Shopping):** The user experience for AI shopping often falls short, especially for visual product discovery. While AI excels at understanding needs, conversational interfaces can't yet replace browsing and comparing multiple products visually. Current merchant interest is largely defensive ("Agent Engine Optimization") for a future that hasn't arrived. High-frequency, low-friction purchases (like food delivery) are potential fits, but lack open APIs and face high AI inference costs. Simpler, more affordable, or cross-language interactions for complex UIs are a niche opportunity but require massive consumer distribution to scale. * **Agent-to-API (Developer Tools):** Developer payment needs for APIs (computing, data, models) are already met through subscriptions and prepaid credits. The core challenge is not payment friction but supplier economics: most large SaaS providers prefer enterprise contracts over micropayments for API calls. Protocols like MPP and x402 suit the long-tail of smaller services but cater to a developer market historically reluctant to pay for these tools. Major infrastructure needs at the top of the stack are already being addressed. * **Agent-to-Agent (Machine Commerce):** This is a long-term vision with almost no current transaction volume. While a future with high-speed, high-frequency, multi-party machine-to-machine transactions would require novel infrastructure, it remains theoretical. The market is not here yet. * **Agent-to-Finance:** This is the only category with clear, present demand. Financial professionals and DeFi users already pay for tools, and AI augmentation is a natural evolution. Autonomous AI agents can enable entirely new financial strategies. However, competition is fierce from established, regulated incumbents who can more easily layer AI onto their existing products. **The Core Insight:** Companies, especially giants with long time horizons, are building defensively for a potential future of mass machine commerce. For them, early investment is a low-cost hedge. For startups, the current market reality is different. The primary challenge isn't just moving money between agents (payments). The larger, unsolved problem is **orchestration** – coordinating work between agents and humans, verifying outcomes, and then settling. Payment is just a part of settlement, which is just a part of orchestration. Companies that solve the orchestration problem will subsume payments, not the other way around. After a year of building, we see the real, growing, and underserved market opportunity lies in this broader domain of orchestration.

链捕手3h ago

It Took Me a Year to See the Hard Truth About Agent Payments

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片