Solana network usage jumps 56% – Is $147 zone next for SOL?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-18Last updated on 2026-01-18

Abstract

Solana's on-chain activity surged, with active addresses increasing 56% to 27.1 million and weekly transactions reaching 515 million, indicating strong underlying demand. The price broke out of a multi-month downtrend, reclaiming the $135.5–$147.1 zone as support and stabilizing near $142. Momentum improved as the MACD turned positive, signaling reduced selling pressure. Derivatives data showed traders leaning long with a balanced long/short ratio of 3.17, reflecting growing confidence. Liquidation maps reveal significant short liquidity above current prices near $153 and $201, which could fuel upward momentum if price advances. The rebound is supported by measurable network usage and improving structure. Holding above $135.5 is crucial for continued upside; a break below may lead to consolidation.

Solana’s on-chain metrics expanded sharply, signaling renewed demand beneath the recent rebound.

Active Addresses surged 56% week-over-week to 27.1 million, while Weekly Transactions climbed to 515 million, therefore confirming sustained usage. This scale matters because price strength often follows persistent network engagement.

However, activity alone rarely drives rallies. In this case, usage growth aligned with price stabilization near $119.8–$135.5 demand.

Consequently, the recovery gained structural backing.

Moreover, such transaction volume highlighted capital rotation into Solana’s [SOL] ecosystem.

Still, activity must remain elevated. A drop below recent averages could weaken conviction. For now, usage metrics support the view that buyers regained control beneath price.

Solana breaks free from its regression downtrend

Price action confirmed a structural shift as SOL exited its multi-month regression downtrend. Buyers defended the $119.8 low before pushing the price above descending resistance.

The breakout reclaimed the $135.5–$147.1 zone, flipping it into support. Previously, rallies stalled below this region. However, this move held.

Consequently, downside pressure weakened. Moreover, the price traded near $142, maintaining higher lows.

This structure favored continuation if $135.5 holds. Still, failure to defend this zone could reopen downside risk toward $119.8.

For now, price structure supports a transition from correction into recovery, therefore favoring upside attempts.

Momentum indicators reinforced the improving structure as MACD crossed higher from negative territory. The MACD line rose to 3.60, overtaking the signal line near 2.92, while the histogram turned positive at 0.68.

This shift reflected fading sell pressure rather than overextension. Earlier bounces failed without momentum confirmation.

However, this crossover aligned with reclaimed support.

Moreover, expanding histogram bars suggested a strengthening trend force. Still, momentum requires continuation. A flattening histogram could signal consolidation.

Traders lean long as confidence quietly rebuilds

Derivatives data showed traders positioning increasingly on the long side. Binance top trader accounts held 76% long exposure, leaving shorts at 24%, pushing the Long/Short Ratio to 3.17.

This bias reflected growing confidence without extreme crowding. Overleveraged conditions often emerge above ratios of 4.0.

However, current levels remain balanced.

Moreover, long positioning followed the technical breakout rather than anticipation. Therefore, Derivatives flow aligned with the structure. Still, leverage remains sensitive to support holds.

A breakdown below $135.5 could unwind longs quickly. For now, positioning supports continuation rather than distribution.

Solana Hyperliquid data reveals upside liquidity magnet

The Hyperliquid Liquidation Map highlighted dense short-side liquidity above current price near $153, $201, and extending toward $300+. In contrast, cumulative long liquidations below $135 remained thin.

This imbalance reduced downside cascade risk while creating upside fuel. If price pushes higher, forced short liquidations could accelerate momentum.

However, liquidity requires price initiation.

In this setup, structure and momentum align with liquidation incentives. Therefore, upside liquidity remains the dominant attraction.

Failure to advance could instead trigger consolidation.

Still, current liquidation dynamics favor continuation rather than sharp pullbacks.

Conclusively, Solana’s rebound now reflects measurable demand rather than speculative enthusiasm.

Rising network activity, a confirmed trendline breakout, improving MACD momentum, and long-leaning derivatives positioning all align with upside-biased liquidation dynamics.

As long as price holds above the $135.5 support zone, overhead short liquidity remains a valid upside driver.

However, failure to defend this level could stall momentum and force consolidation before any further advance.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s rebound now appears anchored in participation rather than speculative flow, with structure and positioning reinforcing each other.
  • How price behaves around $135.5 could determine whether momentum extends or pauses into consolidation.

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage increase in Solana's active addresses week-over-week, and what was the new total?

ASolana's active addresses surged 56% week-over-week to 27.1 million.

QWhat key price level must SOL hold to maintain its current upside structure, according to the article?

ASOL must hold above the $135.5 support zone to maintain its current upside structure.

QWhat does the positive MACD histogram reading of 0.68 indicate about the market momentum?

AThe positive MACD histogram reading of 0.68 indicates fading sell pressure and a strengthening trend force.

QWhat does the Binance top trader Long/Short Ratio of 3.17 suggest about market sentiment?

AA Long/Short Ratio of 3.17 suggests traders are leaning long with growing confidence, but the positioning is not yet considered overleveraged or extremely crowded.

QAccording to the Hyperliquid Liquidation Map, where is a significant concentration of short-side liquidity located that could act as a magnet for the price?

AThe Hyperliquid Liquidation Map shows a dense concentration of short-side liquidity above the current price near $153, $201, and extending toward $300+.

Related Reads

Who Funds the Agents?

**Summary: Who Funds AI Agents?** OpenAI recently shut down a feature allowing AI agents to shop for users, highlighting the challenge of creating a secure and regulated environment for agent-driven transactions. While payment infrastructure exists, a crucial governance layer—defining spending limits, fraud detection, tax handling, and return policies—is largely missing. The potential is enormous: AI agents already processed $73M across 176M transactions last year, with McKinsey forecasting this could grow to $3-5T in global consumer commerce by 2030. The core competition isn't just about processing payments, which can be very cheap (especially with crypto-based settlement), but about controlling the rules that govern agent spending. Key players like Stripe and Coinbase are racing to dominate this governance layer. Stripe's acquisition of wallet provider Privy allows it to set spending policies, identity checks, and human-in-the-loop approvals directly at the wallet level. Similarly, Coinbase's stack, including its x402 protocol and AgentKit, embeds governance rules. This vertical integration across settlement, wallet, and governance layers is becoming the dominant strategy. Control over the governance layer is where significant future value lies. If agents handle trillions in transactions, even a small fee for managing compliance, fraud prevention, and policy enforcement could generate billions in annual revenue. The companies that successfully integrate across the payment stack will capture value from idle agent balances, transaction fees, and governance services, positioning themselves as the foundational banks of the AI agent economy.

marsbit15m ago

Who Funds the Agents?

marsbit15m ago

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

**Title: Great Powers Blockade Chips, Giants Buy Nuclear Plants: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI** In May 2026, the US closed loopholes for Chinese firms to acquire advanced NVIDIA chips via overseas subsidiaries. That same month, Kenya halted a $1B geothermal data center project involving Microsoft, fearing its immense energy consumption. Meanwhile, Huawei announced mass production of its Ascend AI chip. These disparate events underscore a new reality: the competition for computing power ("compute") has escalated beyond the tech industry, becoming a geopolitical and infrastructural battleground. A new era of oligopoly is forming, with control over the AI stack—from GPU chips (NVIDIA) and cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, Google Cloud) to foundational models (OpenAI, Anthropic)—concentrating in a few Western "AI Octopus" corporations. This centralization creates systemic risks: pricing power and platform lock-in for users, infrastructure fragility, and a widening "compute divide" that threatens to marginalize nations without independent AI capacity. An "AI Iron Curtain" is deepening through export controls. In response, some nations like Saudi Arabia and the UAE are investing heavily to buy compute power, aiming to transition from oil to AI economies. The EU seeks to triple its compute capacity by 2030 to reduce dependency. However, the spending gap is vast, with four US tech giants alone planning ~$750B in AI capex for 2026. The race is increasingly constrained by energy, with AI tasks consuming up to 1000x more power than web searches, pushing firms to even acquire nuclear plants. This landscape is fueling interest in Decentralized AI (DeAI). It proposes a third way: using open protocols to coordinate a global network of idle GPUs, independent developers, and data centers, creating an AI infrastructure without a single controlling entity. Leveraging blockchain and cryptographic verification, DeAI aims to break market concentration, disperse energy demands, reduce geopolitical dependencies, and enhance transparency. While still nascent in performance and stability, DeAI's core promise is not immediate superiority but providing a crucial alternative architecture to resist monopoly, censorship, and centralized power. As specialized AI hardware costs fall and open-source models flourish, the window to build this foundation is open. The very existence of such competition serves as a vital check against the inevitable abuse of concentrated power.

marsbit1h ago

A Nation Blocks Chips, a Giant Buys a Nuclear Power Plant: Why It's Time to Seriously Consider DeAI

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片