Solana network usage jumps 56% – Is $147 zone next for SOL?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-18Last updated on 2026-01-18

Abstract

Solana's on-chain activity surged, with active addresses increasing 56% to 27.1 million and weekly transactions reaching 515 million, indicating strong underlying demand. The price broke out of a multi-month downtrend, reclaiming the $135.5–$147.1 zone as support and stabilizing near $142. Momentum improved as the MACD turned positive, signaling reduced selling pressure. Derivatives data showed traders leaning long with a balanced long/short ratio of 3.17, reflecting growing confidence. Liquidation maps reveal significant short liquidity above current prices near $153 and $201, which could fuel upward momentum if price advances. The rebound is supported by measurable network usage and improving structure. Holding above $135.5 is crucial for continued upside; a break below may lead to consolidation.

Solana’s on-chain metrics expanded sharply, signaling renewed demand beneath the recent rebound.

Active Addresses surged 56% week-over-week to 27.1 million, while Weekly Transactions climbed to 515 million, therefore confirming sustained usage. This scale matters because price strength often follows persistent network engagement.

However, activity alone rarely drives rallies. In this case, usage growth aligned with price stabilization near $119.8–$135.5 demand.

Consequently, the recovery gained structural backing.

Moreover, such transaction volume highlighted capital rotation into Solana’s [SOL] ecosystem.

Still, activity must remain elevated. A drop below recent averages could weaken conviction. For now, usage metrics support the view that buyers regained control beneath price.

Solana breaks free from its regression downtrend

Price action confirmed a structural shift as SOL exited its multi-month regression downtrend. Buyers defended the $119.8 low before pushing the price above descending resistance.

The breakout reclaimed the $135.5–$147.1 zone, flipping it into support. Previously, rallies stalled below this region. However, this move held.

Consequently, downside pressure weakened. Moreover, the price traded near $142, maintaining higher lows.

This structure favored continuation if $135.5 holds. Still, failure to defend this zone could reopen downside risk toward $119.8.

For now, price structure supports a transition from correction into recovery, therefore favoring upside attempts.

Momentum indicators reinforced the improving structure as MACD crossed higher from negative territory. The MACD line rose to 3.60, overtaking the signal line near 2.92, while the histogram turned positive at 0.68.

This shift reflected fading sell pressure rather than overextension. Earlier bounces failed without momentum confirmation.

However, this crossover aligned with reclaimed support.

Moreover, expanding histogram bars suggested a strengthening trend force. Still, momentum requires continuation. A flattening histogram could signal consolidation.

Traders lean long as confidence quietly rebuilds

Derivatives data showed traders positioning increasingly on the long side. Binance top trader accounts held 76% long exposure, leaving shorts at 24%, pushing the Long/Short Ratio to 3.17.

This bias reflected growing confidence without extreme crowding. Overleveraged conditions often emerge above ratios of 4.0.

However, current levels remain balanced.

Moreover, long positioning followed the technical breakout rather than anticipation. Therefore, Derivatives flow aligned with the structure. Still, leverage remains sensitive to support holds.

A breakdown below $135.5 could unwind longs quickly. For now, positioning supports continuation rather than distribution.

Solana Hyperliquid data reveals upside liquidity magnet

The Hyperliquid Liquidation Map highlighted dense short-side liquidity above current price near $153, $201, and extending toward $300+. In contrast, cumulative long liquidations below $135 remained thin.

This imbalance reduced downside cascade risk while creating upside fuel. If price pushes higher, forced short liquidations could accelerate momentum.

However, liquidity requires price initiation.

In this setup, structure and momentum align with liquidation incentives. Therefore, upside liquidity remains the dominant attraction.

Failure to advance could instead trigger consolidation.

Still, current liquidation dynamics favor continuation rather than sharp pullbacks.

Conclusively, Solana’s rebound now reflects measurable demand rather than speculative enthusiasm.

Rising network activity, a confirmed trendline breakout, improving MACD momentum, and long-leaning derivatives positioning all align with upside-biased liquidation dynamics.

As long as price holds above the $135.5 support zone, overhead short liquidity remains a valid upside driver.

However, failure to defend this level could stall momentum and force consolidation before any further advance.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s rebound now appears anchored in participation rather than speculative flow, with structure and positioning reinforcing each other.
  • How price behaves around $135.5 could determine whether momentum extends or pauses into consolidation.

Related Questions

QWhat was the percentage increase in Solana's active addresses week-over-week, and what was the new total?

ASolana's active addresses surged 56% week-over-week to 27.1 million.

QWhat key price level must SOL hold to maintain its current upside structure, according to the article?

ASOL must hold above the $135.5 support zone to maintain its current upside structure.

QWhat does the positive MACD histogram reading of 0.68 indicate about the market momentum?

AThe positive MACD histogram reading of 0.68 indicates fading sell pressure and a strengthening trend force.

QWhat does the Binance top trader Long/Short Ratio of 3.17 suggest about market sentiment?

AA Long/Short Ratio of 3.17 suggests traders are leaning long with growing confidence, but the positioning is not yet considered overleveraged or extremely crowded.

QAccording to the Hyperliquid Liquidation Map, where is a significant concentration of short-side liquidity located that could act as a magnet for the price?

AThe Hyperliquid Liquidation Map shows a dense concentration of short-side liquidity above the current price near $153, $201, and extending toward $300+.

Related Reads

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

"World Models" has become a widely used yet confusing term in AI. To address this, a team led by Fei-Fei Li and World Labs proposed a functional taxonomy based on the Partially Observable Markov Decision Process framework. This taxonomy categorizes systems called "world models" into three distinct projections: Renderers, Simulators, and Planners. Renderers, like OpenAI's Sora and other video generation models, focus on producing photorealistic visual outputs for human perception. They prioritize visual fidelity over physical accuracy. Simulators, such as NVIDIA Omniverse, aim to compute precise future environmental states for computational tasks like engineering analysis or digital twins. Planners, like Vision-Language-Action models, take in observations and goals to output executable actions for robots or agents. The article clarifies that most current "world models," including Sora, are primarily Renderers. They generate convincing visuals but lack the core ability to simulate state transitions based on actions, a key requirement for a true world model in classic reinforcement learning definitions. This conceptual confusion has practical implications, leading to potential misalignment in technology selection, investment, and public understanding of AI capabilities. Clear categorization is crucial. It helps enterprises avoid costly mistakes (e.g., using a renderer for robot training), allows investors to accurately assess markets, and enables researchers to build comparable benchmarks. While future systems may integrate these functions, recognizing current boundaries is essential for honest assessment and progress.

marsbit59m ago

Fei-Fei Li's Team Clarifies the Concept of 'World Models', Sora Merely a Renderer

marsbit59m ago

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

**Summary: How Wealthy Chinese Circumvent $50,000 Annual Foreign Exchange Limits** Despite China's strict capital controls, including an annual $50,000 per person foreign exchange quota, an estimated $150 billion in funds still leaves the country annually via various gray and underground channels. This report outlines the evolution of China's "capital wall" and the methods used to bypass it. **The Evolving Capital Controls:** * **Foundation (1994):** The system of "current account convertibility with strict capital account controls" was established. * **Quota Set (2007):** The $50,000 individual annual forex purchase limit was formalized. * **Crackdown Begins (2015-2017):** Following market volatility, enforcement tightened. Banks were required to scrutinize transactions, and channels like using UnionPay cards for Hong Kong insurance premiums or buying overseas property were blocked. * **Digital & Legal Upgrades (2024-2026):** Enhanced algorithms now flag suspicious patterns (e.g., "smurfing"). The Common Reporting Standard (CRS) provides Chinese tax authorities with data on citizens' offshore accounts. Unlicensed cross-border brokers have been targeted. **Five Primary Methods for Moving Capital:** 1. **Underground Banking / "Hawala" (Duiqiao):** The largest-scale method. No money crosses borders. Clients pay RMB to a domestic account; an overseas associate deposits equivalent foreign currency into the client's offshore account. Risks include high fees, account freezes, and legal penalties. 2. **"Smurfing" or "Ant Moving":** Using multiple individuals' $50,000 quotas to pool funds for one offshore recipient. Increasingly detected by anti-money laundering algorithms. 3. **Trade Invoice Manipulation:** Businesses over-invoice imports or under-invoice exports via offshore shell companies, creating a pretext to transfer excess funds abroad under the guise of trade. 4. **Channel Migration:** After a crackdown on internet brokers, funds flow toward more compliant but costly channels like major banks' cross-border wealth management services or Qualified Domestic Institutional Investor (QDII) quotas. 5. **Structural Arrangements:** High-net-worth individuals use complex, high-cost legal structures involving offshore trusts, insurance, and investment migration programs to transfer asset ownership. **Regulatory Response: Focusing on People, Not Just Money** The current strategy extends oversight from enterprises to **individual residents**. Tools like CRS allow retroactive visibility into offshore assets. Cryptocurrencies, once seen as a potential loophole, are now actively monitored and prosecuted as an illegal channel. The underlying driver remains: with significant wealth concentrated among millions of affluent households seeking diversification amid domestic economic shifts, the incentive to move assets offshore persists despite regulatory barriers.

marsbit1h ago

Bloomberg Uncovered: How Do China's Wealthy Circumvent the Annual $50,000 Limit to Transfer Assets?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片