Solana flips Ethereum in perps volume – Is a $190 move loading?

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-14Last updated on 2026-01-14

Solana [SOL] just pulled off a quiet but telling overtake. Over the last 24 hours, Solana posted $1.548 billion in perpetual Futures Volume, at press time, narrowly overtaking Ethereum’s [ETH] $1.523 billion.

That flip is small in absolute terms but meaningful in context. It shows traders actively choosing Solana for short-term, leveraged exposure.

Momentum played a role. Faster execution, lower fees, and strong SOL volatility pulled flows toward Solana.

However, the broader picture adds nuance. Ethereum dominated over longer horizons, with $50.86 billion in 30-day Perps Volume versus Solana’s $31.61 billion.

Yet, Solana’s Open Interest (OI) of $347.6 million exceeded Ethereum’s $268.4 million, signaling more capital currently committed to SOL derivatives.

This matters, as short-term trader attention is shifting. More importantly, Solana is proving it can compete with Ethereum not just in narratives but in real, leveraged trading activity.

SOL’s pressure below $144 resistance

The 90-day Futures Taker CVD has turned positive and continues to rise as of writing.

Taker Buy orders are increasingly outweighing Taker Sells, signaling that aggressive buyers are stepping in.

This pattern often emerges when markets absorb supply without triggering sharp price increases, creating what is commonly described as a “coiled spring” setup.

Notably, the growing green bars reflect rising leverage demand and improving confidence. Traders are showing a willingness to cross the spread to take long positions.

That usually reflects expectations of higher prices, not short-term noise. At the same time, price action remains capped. SOL continues to face resistance near $144, confirming that sellers still defend this zone.

However, persistence is the key signal. If the taker’s buying stays dominant and OI holds without sharp liquidations, pressure will continue to build. Liquidity thins above resistance.

As a result, optimism remains justified. Sustained green CVD could unlock a breakout. If it does, momentum may carry SOL toward the $190-$200 zone, aligning leverage intent with price expansion.

OI growth outpaces price, hinting at...

At the time of writing, the OI‐Weighted Funding Rate showed recurring green spikes. This signals that traders are opening new long positions rather than simply reacting to liquidations.

Meanwhile, OI has climbed to $8 billion, well above the lower levels seen in 2025, while price has stabilized in the $140–143 range, notably higher than the $120–130 zone.

These spikes are largely driven by leveraged traders and funds as volatility settles.

The steady investment alongside stable prices suggests that accumulation is taking place without the risk of overcrowding. Importantly, the price has not surged violently.

This restraint indicates that long positions are being absorbed without triggering aggressive squeezes.

For sustainability, two conditions are critical: Funding Rates must remain positive but controlled, and OI should be maintained without sparking cascading liquidations.

When these conditions hold, leverage supports the market structure rather than destabilizing it.

Overall, the setup points to constructive positioning. New longs are gradually building exposure, and the market reflects confidence without tipping into euphoria, keeping the upside case intact.


Final Thoughts

  • Solana’s derivatives momentum is strengthening, as perps volume, taker demand, and open interest turn supportive.
  • Price compression below $144 with rising leverage hints at a breakout, keeping the $190 – $200 zone in focus.

Trending Cryptos

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit3m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit3m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片