Robinhood Achieves Best Performance in History, Why Did Its Stock Price Halve?

比推Published on 2026-02-11Last updated on 2026-02-11

Abstract

Robinhood reported its best-ever annual performance in 2025, with revenue reaching $4.5 billion, a 52% year-over-year increase. Despite strong results in options trading, equities, and subscription services, its stock price fell nearly 50% from its October peak. The decline was largely driven by a significant drop in cryptocurrency trading revenue, which fell 38% year-over-year to $221 million in Q4, as lower Bitcoin prices reduced retail trading activity. Monthly active users also declined by 1.9 million. While Robinhood is diversifying into new products and expanding internationally to reduce crypto dependency, its near-term performance remains tied to cryptocurrency market sentiment and volatility.

Written by: Ada, Deep Tide TechFlow

Original title: Robinhood Achieved Its Best Performance in History, But the Stock Price Fell by Nearly Half


Robinhood is experiencing a peculiar split.

After the U.S. stock market closed on February 10, this retail trading platform delivered a seemingly impeccable report card: full-year revenue of $4.5 billion, a year-on-year increase of 52%, reaching a record high. Diluted earnings per share were $2.05. Net deposits for 2025 hit a record $68 billion, with $16 billion in the fourth quarter. The number of Robinhood Gold subscribers reached a record 4.2 million.

CEO Vlad Tenev was triumphant during the earnings call: "We are building a financial super app."

But the stock price fell 7% after hours. Combined with the decline this year, Robinhood's stock price has halved from its peak last October. A company that just achieved its best performance in history saw its market capitalization evaporate by half in four months.

What's the problem?

Looking closely at the earnings report, cryptocurrency trading revenue: $221 million, a sharp year-on-year drop of 38%.

This figure was $357 million in the same period last year and $268 million in the previous quarter. By Q4, the crypto trading volume on the Robinhood App had halved to $34 billion.

Retail traders have stopped trading. Bitcoin fell from $126,000 to $65,000, and FOMO (fear of missing out) has disappeared, replaced by fear. Opening the app reveals a sea of red instead of green, and closing the app has become the most rational choice.

This is Robinhood's dilemma: its core business is improving, but the market is only focused on the part that is deteriorating.

How Much Did Crypto Contribute to the $4.5 Billion Revenue?

Breaking down Robinhood's revenue structure reveals an ongoing identity shift.

Q4 trading commission revenue was $776 million, a year-on-year increase of 15%. Among this, options trading contributed $314 million, up 41%; stock trading contributed $94 million, up 54%; other trading revenue was $147 million, tripling. The only drag was crypto, which plummeted from $358 million to $221 million.

Net interest income was $411 million, up 39%, primarily driven by growth in interest-earning assets and securities lending activities. Gold membership subscription revenue was $50 million, up 56%.

For the full year, the proportion of crypto trading revenue in total revenue has dropped from around 35% in Q4 2024 to 17% in Q4 2025.

Robinhood is well aware of this trend.

Over the past year, it has aggressively expanded its product categories: the prediction market saw 12 billion contract trades in its first year, with trading volume more than doubling in the fourth quarter alone; futures trading now covers stock indices, energy, metals, and crypto; the number of Gold Card holders is approaching 1 million.

As early as the Q3 2025 earnings call, the management stated: "We now have 11 business lines with annualized revenue exceeding $100 million."

The message is: don't just focus on crypto. But Wall Street is fixated on crypto.

A Brokerage Living in Bitcoin's Shadow

This brings to mind Strategy's earnings report five days ago.

Strategy reported a net loss of $12.4 billion for the quarter, almost entirely due to unrealized impairments from Bitcoin's price drop in Q4. Saylor doesn't care; he says Bitcoin's decline is a gift, and every pullback is a buying opportunity.

Robinhood's situation is the opposite. It doesn't hold Bitcoin, doesn't bear price risk, and doesn't rely on issuing debt to buy coins to stay afloat. It is merely a trading platform that earns fees.

But when Bitcoin falls, retail traders stop trading, and the revenue from fees disappears.

Strategy relies on Bitcoin's price direction. Robinhood relies on Bitcoin's volatility. The two companies appear entirely different, but at their core, they depend on the same thing: retail sentiment toward cryptocurrencies.

Strategy bets on price direction; Robinhood bets on casino traffic. In other words, when Bitcoin falls, the casino empties out. Both models lose.

Data confirms this judgment. Strategy's MSTR fell 76%, acting as a 1.6x leveraged bet on Bitcoin. Robinhood's stock price fell about 50% from its peak last October, while Bitcoin fell 48% over the same period. The two curves almost overlap.

One is a leveraged long position on Bitcoin; the other is an at-the-money call option on Bitcoin. The underlying asset is the same: the temperature of the crypto market.

The Trap of "Record-Breaking"

The word "record-breaking" appears multiple times in Robinhood's earnings report. Record annual revenue, record adjusted EBITDA, record net deposited funds, record Gold membership numbers, record EPS.

These numbers are all true.

Strategy's earnings report also says "record-breaking." Record Bitcoin holdings. Record cash reserves. Record BTC Yield. But its stock price fell 76%.

"Record-breaking" is a medal in a bull market and an epitaph in a bear market. It only describes your state at the peak, not what happens next.

Robinhood's Q4 reveals a key metric: monthly active users (MAU) dropped from 14.9 million in the same period last year to 13 million, a decrease of 1.9 million.

Users are leaving.

The assets under custody on the platform increased by 68% year-on-year, but that's due to market capitalization膨胀 from rising stock and crypto prices. The annualized growth rate of net deposited funds has slowed from over 30% at the beginning of the year to 19% in Q4. This means the inflow of money is slowing down. People are decreasing.

This is structurally the same problem Strategy faces. In a bull market, all metrics reinforce each other: prices rise, trading is active, revenue increases, users grow, stock prices rise. In a bear market, every环节 reverses.

The flywheel can spin backward. Robinhood has its own flywheel.

De-Cryptoization: A High-Stakes Gamble

Robinhood clearly knows this. Over the past 12 months, Robinhood's strategy can be summarized in one sentence: reduce reliance on cryptocurrency while doubling down on cryptocurrency infrastructure.

It sounds contradictory, but the logic is clear.

On the revenue side, aggressively pursue diversification. Prediction markets, futures, short selling, Gold Card, banking services, retirement accounts, international expansion, etc.

On the infrastructure side, aggressively deepen. Last year, it acquired Bitstamp, the world's longest-running crypto exchange, and trading volume has already doubled. Launched 2,000 tokenized stocks in Europe. Signed acquisition agreements for brokerages and crypto platforms in Indonesia.

Robinhood learned from Coinbase's 2022 lesson.

Coinbase nearly died in the last bear market because its revenue structure was too单一. Armstrong spent two years rebuilding. Tenev is trying to achieve diversification before the bear market arrives.

But time is not on his side. Robinhood's adjusted operating expenses and equity incentive budget for 2026 is $2.6 billion to $2.725 billion, an increase of about 18% year-on-year. This money will be spent on international expansion, new product development, and acquisition integration. If the crypto winter persists and growth in the traditional brokerage business is not fast enough, cost expansion coupled with slowing revenue will squeeze profit margins.

With approximately $4.3 billion in cash and cash equivalents on hand, it can burn for a long time. But like Strategy, "surviving" and "growing" are two different things.

The Thermometer in the Crypto Winter

Looking at Strategy's and Robinhood's earnings reports together, you see two ways Bitcoin's bear market plays out.

Strategy is a chronic illness. Bitcoin doesn't rise, the flywheel stops, but the $2.25 billion in cash can last two and a half years. It has time, but time consumes faith.

Robinhood is an acute reaction. Crypto revenue plummeted 38% in one quarter, MAU lost 1.9 million, but other businesses are still growing. It won't die, but it will hurt.

The commonality between the two companies is: they cannot control the most critical variable in their destiny.

Strategy cannot control Bitcoin's price. Robinhood cannot control retail sentiment. And retail sentiment, ultimately, is determined by Bitcoin's price.

Everyone in this industry pretends they have Alpha, but in reality, everyone only has Beta. Beta is Bitcoin. When Bitcoin rises, everyone is a genius. When Bitcoin falls, everyone is naked swimming.

Robinhood did set records in 2025, but no number of records seems to掩盖 the pain brought by the decline in the crypto business.

Tenev now faces a question with no standard answer.

Current Robinhood is like a casino owner who has started to quit gambling. He knows the problem, he is taking action, but the dividends gained in the bull market have all turned into debts in the bear market.

For Robinhood, the real test is not the records in the bull market, but the floor in the bear market.

Where is the floor? No one knows yet.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7611079

Related Questions

QWhy did Robinhood's stock price drop by nearly 50% despite reporting record annual revenue and earnings?

ARobinhood's stock price dropped significantly because its cryptocurrency trading revenue plummeted by 38% year-over-year in Q4, and monthly active users (MAU) decreased by 1.9 million. The market is primarily focused on the declining crypto segment, which saw trading volume halve, rather than the overall strong performance in other areas like options and stock trading.

QWhat was the contribution of cryptocurrency trading revenue to Robinhood's total revenue in Q4 2025?

ACryptocurrency trading revenue contributed $221 million, accounting for approximately 17% of Robinhood's total revenue in Q4 2025. This is a significant decrease from around 35% in Q4 2024.

QHow is Robinhood's dependence on cryptocurrency market volatility similar to MicroStrategy's reliance on Bitcoin?

ABoth Robinhood and MicroStrategy are heavily dependent on cryptocurrency market sentiment, but in different ways. MicroStrategy acts as a leveraged bet on Bitcoin's price direction, while Robinhood relies on Bitcoin's volatility to drive trading activity and transaction fees. When Bitcoin prices fall, both companies suffer: MicroStrategy faces unrealized losses, and Robinhood experiences reduced trading volume and user engagement.

QWhat strategies is Robinhood implementing to reduce its reliance on cryptocurrency trading?

ARobinhood is diversifying its revenue streams by expanding into new product categories such as prediction markets, futures trading, short selling, Gold Card, banking services, retirement accounts, and international expansion. It is also strengthening its crypto infrastructure through acquisitions like Bitstamp and expanding tokenized stock offerings in Europe.

QWhat key metric indicates a slowdown in Robinhood's user growth and fund inflows despite record overall performance?

AMonthly active users (MAU) decreased by 1.9 million year-over-year to 13 million in Q4 2025. Additionally, the annualized growth rate of net deposits slowed to 19% in Q4, down from over 30% earlier in the year, indicating a deceleration in new money inflows even as total assets under custody increased due to market appreciation.

Related Reads

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit2h ago

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit2h ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit2h ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ADA (ADA) are presented below.

活动图片