Revenue Soars 16%, Restaurant Chain Credits Bitcoin: Real Growth or PR Stunt?

Foresight NewsPublished on 2026-07-17Last updated on 2026-07-17

Abstract

Steak ’n Shake, a U.S. fast-food chain, attributed a 16% year-over-year increase in July same-store sales partly to its adoption of Bitcoin as a payment method. However, the company has not disclosed key data points, such as the actual number of Bitcoin transactions, total sales volume processed in Bitcoin, or the exact amount saved on payment processing fees. This lack of detailed information makes it difficult to isolate Bitcoin's direct impact on sales growth from other contributing factors like marketing campaigns, menu updates, promotional discounts, and operational changes. While the brand highlights the cost advantage of Bitcoin transactions—estimated to be about 50% cheaper per transaction than credit card fees—it has not provided evidence that a significant volume of sales actually uses this payment method. Steak ’n Shake’s parent company, Biglari Holdings, had already reported strong sales growth earlier in the year, driven by factors such as product upgrades and operational improvements, with no mention of Bitcoin in prior shareholder communications. The article questions whether the primary value of Bitcoin for Steak ’n Shake lies more in its public relations and branding benefits—attracting crypto enthusiasts and generating media attention—rather than in tangible business gains. To validate Bitcoin's role as a genuine growth driver and provide a replicable model for other merchants, the company would need to share comprehensive data, including Bitcoin transacti...


Author: Liam Akiba Wright

Translated by: Chopper, Foresight News


The US fast-food chain Steak ’n Shake has reported a 16% year-over-year increase in same-store sales for July at its US locations, attributing part of the credit to Bitcoin. However, there is a key piece of data that Steak ’n Shake has omitted: exactly how many customers actually used Bitcoin to pay?


This raises a question: Has the public relations value Bitcoin brings to brands now surpassed the actual commercial value it creates?


On July 10th, the burger brand announced that the revenue increase for the month up to the date of the announcement was built on top of a 16% growth from the same period last year. The brand thanked loyal regular customers on one hand, and on the other, singled out the Bitcoin holder community, stating that Bitcoin payments have lower processing fees compared to credit cards, and the saved costs are fully invested in upgrading to healthier ingredients.


The 16% sales increase was announced unilaterally by Steak ’n Shake, but the brand has never disclosed the following key information: the number of customers who checked out using Bitcoin, the corresponding total transaction volume, and the scale of processing fee savings brought by Bitcoin payments.


Without this data, it is impossible to distinguish whether the revenue growth came from Bitcoin payments or from other factors such as concurrent marketing campaigns, product price adjustments, promotional activities, menu updates, or changes in store structure.


Steak ’n Shake has publicly stated: Anyone who questions the value of Bitcoin is making a huge mistake.


Steak ’n Shake Only Argues Single-Transaction Cost Advantage, Lacks Overall Data


Steak ’n Shake rolled out Bitcoin payments across all its US stores in May 2025, and later announced that Bitcoin received by stores would be allocated to strategic reserve assets. These two moves have made Bitcoin both a brand label and an optional payment method at the checkout counter.


Even if very few consumers actually pay with Bitcoin, supporting Bitcoin payments itself can attract crypto enthusiasts to the stores; meanwhile, the processing cost for each Bitcoin order is indeed lower than traditional credit cards. However, the brand has consistently not revealed exactly how much transaction volume actually flows through the Bitcoin channel.


As of July 16th, Steak ’n Shake still had not disclosed the number of Bitcoin orders, total transaction value, total actual fee savings, nor provided store-level data to substantiate Bitcoin user repurchase rates or the impact of promotional activities on payment penetration. The lack of data makes it impossible to quantify the real operational gains from Bitcoin payments.


At the 2026 Bitcoin Conference, Steak ’n Shake executive Michael Boes stated that the processing cost per Bitcoin transaction is about 50% lower than traditional credit cards; if all credit card customers switched entirely to Bitcoin payments, stores could save approximately $6 million in fees annually.


He also mentioned that following the launch of Bitcoin payments, the brand saw an increase of about 2 million customer visits annually. However, this presentation did not prove that the increased traffic was brought by Bitcoin payments, nor did it provide statistical basis for the traffic attribution.


The Bitcoin payment details disclosed by Steak ’n Shake are informative: menu prices are still quoted in US dollars, the checkout process integrates with a third-party Bitcoin payment service provider, and stores do not charge customers additional payment processing fees; however, users may still bear wallet fees, on-chain network fees, exchange spreads, and currency fluctuation costs.


The available information can only prove that Bitcoin orders have a per-transaction fee advantage, but cannot prove that the volume of orders using this channel is substantial enough to generate meaningful cost savings.


Revenue Growth Already Existed


Financial reports from Steak ’n Shake's parent company, Biglari Holdings, had already shown that a sales recovery trend was in place well before this July revenue announcement. The quarterly report for the period ending March 31st showed same-store sales growth of 10% for company-owned stores and about 13% for franchise partner stores.


First-quarter marketing expenses increased from $3.232 million in the same period last year to $5.427 million, a rise of 67.9%; the cost of ingredients as a percentage of revenue for company-owned stores increased from 30% to 31.4%, primarily due to a complete switch to cooking with pure beef tallow.


The store structure also changed significantly. As of March 31st, the number of company-owned stores decreased from 146 to 128; franchise partner stores increased from 172 to 182, while traditional franchise stores decreased from 104 to 96.


Biglari's 2025 letter to shareholders disclosed full-year same-store sales growth of 10.2%, attributing the growth at that time to product quality upgrades, renovation of checkout equipment and self-ordering kiosks, improved operational efficiency, and optimization of the owner-operator model—Bitcoin was not mentioned throughout the letter.


During the July revenue reporting period, Steak ’n Shake simultaneously launched multiple promotional activities. For the entire month, two signature combo meals were priced at $17.76, with free Tesla Tallow Fries; hours before announcing the positive revenue news on July 10th, they had just announced free fries with no minimum purchase required for that day. Steak ’n Shake also did not specify the exact cut-off time for the revenue statistics.


The superposition of multiple variables makes it difficult to isolate Bitcoin's contribution to the growth. Marketing campaigns, brand pricing, menu exposure, promotional activities, operational reforms, and franchise structural adjustments would all, along with the Bitcoin payment label, jointly influence store traffic and revenue.


A user in the Reddit Bitcoin community commented that it was the store's support for Bitcoin payments that prompted their first visit. However, users in both the Bitcoin subreddit and the cryptocurrency-skeptical Buttcoin subreddit also pointed out that the traffic increase might stem from the brand's value positioning, menu appeal, or consumer diversion due to store closures, and that the actual usage rate of Bitcoin might be extremely low. Such user comments are merely anecdotal; they can only indicate that Bitcoin can attract traffic and shape brand image, but cannot prove the actual scale of its use for payments.


For Offline Merchants to Replicate This Model, Complete Data Disclosure is Essential


If Steak ’n Shake hopes that offline physical merchants will view this Bitcoin business strategy as a replicable growth model, it must subsequently disclose data linking payment implementation to business outcomes.


Key disclosure metrics should include the total number of Bitcoin orders and their transaction share, total sales volume through the Bitcoin channel, and the total actual fee savings. Store-level data and user segmentation data could intuitively show whether there are differences in business performance at stores with higher Bitcoin penetration. Repurchase data could distinguish between one-time novelty visits and long-term, stable usage. Promotional activity data could isolate the interference of sales campaigns on payment penetration.


This data should be able to reveal whether Bitcoin brought customer traffic, reduced payment costs, or both. Only by cross-referencing with data on marketing investment, product pricing, customer traffic, profits, menu updates, and franchise store operations can the true proportional contribution of Bitcoin to revenue growth be calculated.


At this stage, Steak ’n Shake has only announced the impressive same-store sales growth while explaining the per-transaction cost advantage of Bitcoin. The brand itself is firmly bullish on Bitcoin. If Bitcoin transactions did indeed play a substantive role in driving July's revenue growth, then disclosing complete transaction data would be the logical next step.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main question raised by the article regarding Steak 'n Shake's attribution of sales growth to Bitcoin?

AThe main question is whether the publicity and marketing value Bitcoin brings to the brand now exceeds its actual commercial value, as the brand has not disclosed key data to prove Bitcoin's direct contribution to the sales increase.

QWhat key data does the article say Steak 'n Shake has failed to disclose about its Bitcoin payments?

ASteak 'n Shake has failed to disclose the number of customers using Bitcoin, the total transaction volume processed in Bitcoin, the actual amount saved on payment processing fees from Bitcoin, and per-store data to correlate Bitcoin adoption with performance.

QAccording to the article, what other factors could have contributed to Steak 'n Shake's 16% sales growth in July, besides Bitcoin?

AOther potential factors include ongoing promotional campaigns, product repricing, menu updates, operational efficiency improvements, marketing expenditures, and structural changes such as converting company-owned stores to franchised locations.

QWhat argument does Steak 'n Shake make about the per-transaction cost advantage of Bitcoin?

ASteak 'n Shake argues that the processing cost for a single Bitcoin transaction is approximately 50% lower than that of a traditional credit card transaction, potentially saving the company millions annually if widely adopted.

QWhat does the article suggest Steak 'n Shake must do if it wants its Bitcoin strategy to be seen as a replicable model for other businesses?

AThe article suggests Steak 'n Shake must disclose comprehensive data, including Bitcoin order volume and sales share, total fee savings, per-store performance comparisons, customer repurchase rates, and the impact of promotions, to isolate and quantify Bitcoin's true contribution to growth.

Related Reads

Who Is Shaping Ethereum's Future: The Takeover by Token-Holding Companies Could Be the Best Thing for ETH in Years

**Title: Who is Building Ethereum's Future? Corporate ETH Holders Take Over Funding, Possibly the Best Thing for ETH in Years.** **Summary:** The Ethereum Foundation is scaling back due to fiscal concerns, but publicly traded companies holding large amounts of ETH, like Bitmine and SharpLink, are stepping in to fund protocol development. These firms collectively hold nearly 5% of ETH's circulating supply and are using their staking yields to pay for R&D. Unlike MicroStrategy, which merely accumulates Bitcoin, these ETH treasury companies are reinvesting profits directly into the protocol's development—potentially allowing all ETH holders to benefit from this free "spillover." Key drivers for this shift include these companies' stalled business model. Their "flywheel" of issuing stock to buy more ETH broke as their stock prices fell below the net value of their crypto holdings (mNAV < 1). With their ETH holdings also deeply underwater, simply waiting for price appreciation failed. By funding Ethereum's roadmap—through new non-profits like ETH Labs and Ethereum Institutional—they aim to increase the utility and value of the underlying asset that dominates their balance sheets. This creates a new alignment of interests: these companies are highly incentivized to see Ethereum succeed and are less likely to sell en masse. However, risks remain. The exact funding amounts are undisclosed, and these treasury firms themselves are vulnerable if ETH prices fall further, which could halt their contributions. **Additional Context:** The article also contrasts Jito's new "token-centric" proposal (JIP-38), which credibly directs platform fees to token buybacks, with Venice's less concrete promises, highlighting the importance of where revenue legally lands and who controls the mechanisms. Other notable industry updates include the rise of TradFi perpetuals on Hyperliquid, new Bitcoin staking via Stacks, and various DeFi product launches.

marsbit29m ago

Who Is Shaping Ethereum's Future: The Takeover by Token-Holding Companies Could Be the Best Thing for ETH in Years

marsbit29m ago

Opening Claude's Brain Is Useless; The True Key to the AI Black Box Lies in Ontology Engineering

"Dissecting Claude's Brain Is Futile: The Real Key to the AI Black Box Lies in Ontology Engineering" This article critiques the limitations of Anthropic's "J-Space" research, which attempts to explain AI models by observing their internal neural activation patterns, akin to fMRI brain scans. While this "internalist" approach offers unprecedented visibility into model states, it fundamentally conflates observability with true explainability. The core issue is that understanding a model's output requires more than tracing neural activity; it necessitates examining the meaning of the information it processes—its relationship to the world, semantic norms, and human cognitive frameworks. The author proposes a paradigm shift: moving from a neuroscience-inspired focus on the model itself to an "information ontology" approach centered on the knowledge the model handles. Drawing from Kant's philosophical categories, the argument posits that true explainability lies in structuring and understanding information within a formal conceptual framework, not in peering into the "black box." The practical application of this theory is ontology engineering. Ontologies provide a structured, computable framework for knowledge, serving as a semantic anchor for model outputs. The article details a bidirectional synergy: Large Language Models (LLMs) can automate and scale ontology construction, while ontologies, in turn, enhance AI explainability. They act as a verification framework, allowing model reasoning to be traced back to defined concepts, properties, and relationships. This transforms explainability from the impossible task of making neural networks transparent into the achievable engineering goal of making their outputs and impacts understandable, traceable, and accountable. The future of AI explainability, therefore, lies not in explaining the model's internal mechanics but in explaining and governing the knowledge structures and real-world effects of its outputs.

marsbit38m ago

Opening Claude's Brain Is Useless; The True Key to the AI Black Box Lies in Ontology Engineering

marsbit38m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

849 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片