Rebound or liquidation? SOL at a make or break point!

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-07-10Last updated on 2026-07-10

Abstract

Solana (SOL) traders are facing a critical juncture as market sentiment hits yearly lows. Trading volume has plummeted to approximately $2.27 billion, its lowest in 2026, while negative sentiment has surged significantly. This frustration stems from SOL's price performance lagging behind its growing ecosystem activity. Despite the prevailing negativity, which can sometimes precede a bullish reversal, the derivatives market shows a heavy skew towards long positions, with $7.4 billion in long exposure versus $3.1 billion in shorts. A major cluster of long liquidations sits around $61-$62, posing a risk if the price declines. Although technical indicators like the RSI are neutral and the MACD is positive, the upward momentum is cooling. SOL's price, near $77.95, is testing resistance. The crowded long positions remain a potential source of selling pressure, meaning SOL needs to break above recent highs to rebuild trader confidence and avoid a deeper downturn.

Solana [SOL] traders are openly losing confidence in the market. However, another set of long positions may still be open. Hence, the question: Will SOL rebound or fall and experience further downside?

Solana sentiment and trading activity at YTD lows

At the time of writing, SOL’s trading volume had fallen to around $2.27 billion – Its lowest level in 2026. Meanwhile, the negative sentiment score also shot up to 14.05.

This has been the biggest wave of negativity around the token since November 2025.

Source: Santiment Intelligence

Much of the frustration comes from the gap between Solana’s growing ecosystem and its price performance. Despite pickup around the tokenized stocks and RWA narratives, traders are yet to see light.

Note that extreme negativity can sometimes make room for an unexpected move up. As it stands, even a modest return of demand could lead to a positive price move.

There’s a catch though!

Solana’s derivatives market did seem inclined towards long positions though. In fact, the liquidation map showed around $7.4 billion in long exposure, compared to roughly $3.1 billion in shorts.

Source: Alphractal

The largest long liquidation cluster was at around $61-$62, roughly 20% below the press time price.

Source: Alphractal

Meanwhile, the long/short ratio across major exchanges had started recovering and was near 2.23 at press time. Traders appeared to be bullish again.

Source: Cryptoquant

Now, none of this guarantees a sell-off. However, if SOL drops, crowded long positions could add to the pressure.

SOL holds, but the bullishness is starting to cool

Despite the heavy long positioning, Solana’s price chart seemed to give way to hope. SOL was trading near $77.95 at the time of writing. It had recovered from its June lows and was testing the $82-$83 area.

The RSI was in neutral territory rather than an overbought market. The MACD was also positive, with the MACD line at 1.91, above the signal line at 1.38.

Source: TradingView

However, the upward pace appeared to be slowing down.

A move back above the recent highs may be needed to rebuild confidence. Until then, crowded long positions could be a risk.


Final Summary

  • SOL’s trading volume and negative sentiment are now at their worst levels of the year.
  • Downside risk was also relatively higher at press time.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the two main factors indicating a loss of confidence in the Solana (SOL) market according to the article?

AAccording to the article, the two main factors indicating a loss of confidence are SOL's trading volume falling to its lowest level in 2026 (around $2.27 billion) and its negative sentiment score shooting up to 14.05, which is the biggest wave of negativity since November 2025.

QWhat is the potential risk posed by the crowded long positions in SOL's derivatives market?

AThe crowded long positions, with around $7.4 billion in long exposure compared to roughly $3.1 billion in shorts, pose a liquidation risk. If SOL's price drops, these long positions could be liquidated (especially with a large cluster around $61-$62), which would add significant selling pressure and potentially accelerate a price decline.

QWhat technical indicators are mentioned as showing potential for a positive price move for SOL?

AThe article mentions that the RSI (Relative Strength Index) was in neutral territory (not overbought), and the MACD (Moving Average Convergence Divergence) was positive, with the MACD line (1.91) above the signal line (1.38). These indicators suggest there is room for upward movement if demand returns.

QWhat contradiction does the article highlight regarding trader sentiment and positioning?

AThe article highlights a contradiction between widespread negative market sentiment and the positioning in the derivatives market. While general sentiment is very negative (at a yearly low), traders in the derivatives market appear bullish, as indicated by a recovering long/short ratio of 2.23 and significant long exposure.

QWhat price level does the article suggest SOL needs to reclaim to rebuild trader confidence?

AThe article suggests that SOL needs to move back above its recent highs. Specifically, it was testing the $82-$83 area at the time of writing, and reclaiming levels above this recent high is implied as necessary to rebuild confidence.

Related Reads

RWA Weekly: EU Proposes Revision of MiCA to Cover Tokenization and Non-EU Stablecoins; Swift and 17 Banks to Pilot Tokenized Cross-Border Payments

RWA Weekly: EU Proposes MiCA Revision for Tokenization and Non-EU Stablecoins; Swift to Pilot Tokenized Cross-Border Payments with 17 Banks During the statistical period of July 3-10, 2026, the RWA sector showed signs of recovery. The total on-chain market capitalization of RWAs rebounded to $33.12 billion, ending a prolonged decline. The stablecoin market cap also returned above $300 billion, with active addresses and holders increasing, indicating restored market vitality. Key regulatory developments include China promoting the use of digital yuan in consumption vouchers, the EU considering revisions to its MiCA framework to cover tokenization and non-EU stablecoins, and Kazakhstan authorizing stablecoin use for cross-border corporate and government payments. In Hong Kong, HSBC issued its first "digitally native" structured product. Major project updates feature Swift announcing readiness of its blockchain ledger for a 24/7 tokenized cross-border payment pilot involving 17 global banks. Ondo launched a perpetuals platform allowing tokenized stocks as collateral. Sony received conditional U.S. OCC approval to launch a stablecoin-focused trust bank in 2027. Tether plans to natively issue USDT on Bitcoin via the RGB protocol. Significant funding rounds saw Securitize planning to deploy over $400 million for acquisitions to expand its institutional tokenization business, while Tether invested $20 million in Brazil's Mercado Bitcoin to support its growth in on-chain financial services. Analysis highlights that stablecoins are evolving into global financial infrastructure with regional specializations and that institutions should consider international expansion to gain practical experience in the RWA tokenization space amidst evolving regulations.

marsbit19m ago

RWA Weekly: EU Proposes Revision of MiCA to Cover Tokenization and Non-EU Stablecoins; Swift and 17 Banks to Pilot Tokenized Cross-Border Payments

marsbit19m ago

The first to catch the wave of the Robinhood Chain hype is Arbitrum, up nearly 20%

"ARB, the native token of Arbitrum, surged nearly 20% recently, emerging as a top-performing L2 token. This rally is attributed to the launch of 'Robinhood Chain,' a Real-World Asset (RWA) Layer 2 built using Arbitrum's technology. The launch has brought renewed attention to the 'Arbitrum Expansion Plan' (AEP), a year-and-a-half-old program. AEP allows external projects to build their own chains using Arbitrum's Orbit technology. In return, these 'tenant' chains that do not settle on Arbitrum's main networks must share 10% of their net protocol revenue with the Arbitrum ecosystem—8% to the DAO treasury and 2% to the developer guild. While smaller chains like Degen Chain previously triggered AEP, Robinhood Chain is the first major, high-profile tenant, making the revenue-sharing model economically significant for the first time. Initial data from Robinhood Chain is impressive, with over 35 million transactions, 350,000 addresses, $2.5 billion in TVL, and over $1 billion in DEX volume shortly after launch. However, its current protocol revenue, at roughly $146,000 net, translates to only a minimal payout to Arbitrum DAO. The ARB price surge thus reflects the market's anticipation of future revenue as Robinhood's vast $324 billion platform assets potentially migrate on-chain. This 'landlord' model mirrors Optimism's approach with its OP Stack and Superchain. However, Optimism's model faces pressure as its largest tenant, Base, announced plans to depart, causing a significant drop in OP's price. Similarly, analysts question Robinhood Chain's long-term dependence on Arbitrum, noting its daily sequencer revenue already nears three times that of Arbitrum itself. There is speculation that, like Base, it may eventually seek independence, with ETH potentially being its primary economic token rather than ARB."

Foresight News47m ago

The first to catch the wave of the Robinhood Chain hype is Arbitrum, up nearly 20%

Foresight News47m ago

The Ethereum Foundation is Dead, The Era of Ethereum's Pluralistic Organizations Has Dawned

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced the dissolution of its Protocol Support Team, marking a significant organizational shift. This move, described as the largest layoff in EF's history with a 20% staff reduction, follows a major internal restructuring announced in late June. The restructuring, which EF framed as necessary to streamline for future challenges, has drawn criticism for its perceived cold execution. Concurrently, several new independent non-profit organizations have emerged, founded by former EF members. These include Ethlabs, a research and development lab, and Ethereum Institutional, which focuses on promoting institutional adoption of Ethereum. Their rise is seen as both filling roles vacated by EF's downsizing and signaling a fragmentation of the Ethereum ecosystem's leadership. Amidst these changes, EF is also integrating advanced AI tools into its security operations. The security team has begun using AI agents to conduct red-team testing, which has already uncovered vulnerabilities in Ethereum's code. While EF states that AI complements rather than replaces human researchers, this technological shift hints at potential future reductions in human-centric roles within the organization. The article posits that these developments—massive layoffs, the exodus of key personnel like former Executive Director Xiaowei Wang, the rise of rival organizations, and AI integration—collectively point to a decline in EF's central authority. Once the undisputed leader of the Ethereum ecosystem, EF now faces questions about its future role, with speculation that it may evolve into more of a symbolic "ecosystem mascot" rather than a driving force for growth and adoption. This organizational turmoil unfolds against a backdrop of ongoing market pressure and community debate over Ethereum's value proposition.

marsbit52m ago

The Ethereum Foundation is Dead, The Era of Ethereum's Pluralistic Organizations Has Dawned

marsbit52m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of SOL (SOL) are presented below.

活动图片