The Ethereum Foundation is Dead, The Era of Ethereum's Pluralistic Organizations Has Dawned

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-10Last updated on 2026-07-10

Abstract

The Ethereum Foundation (EF) has announced the dissolution of its Protocol Support Team, marking a significant organizational shift. This move, described as the largest layoff in EF's history with a 20% staff reduction, follows a major internal restructuring announced in late June. The restructuring, which EF framed as necessary to streamline for future challenges, has drawn criticism for its perceived cold execution. Concurrently, several new independent non-profit organizations have emerged, founded by former EF members. These include Ethlabs, a research and development lab, and Ethereum Institutional, which focuses on promoting institutional adoption of Ethereum. Their rise is seen as both filling roles vacated by EF's downsizing and signaling a fragmentation of the Ethereum ecosystem's leadership. Amidst these changes, EF is also integrating advanced AI tools into its security operations. The security team has begun using AI agents to conduct red-team testing, which has already uncovered vulnerabilities in Ethereum's code. While EF states that AI complements rather than replaces human researchers, this technological shift hints at potential future reductions in human-centric roles within the organization. The article posits that these developments—massive layoffs, the exodus of key personnel like former Executive Director Xiaowei Wang, the rise of rival organizations, and AI integration—collectively point to a decline in EF's central authority. Once the undisputed lead...

Original | Odaily Planet Daily (@OdailyChina)

Author | Wenser (@wenser 2010 )

Last night, the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team officially announced its dissolution. Prior to this, Wang Xiaowei, co-executive director of the Ethereum Foundation, who was seen as "one of the representative figures of the EF's organizational reform," had also officially resigned. So far this year, at least 8 senior personnel have left the Ethereum Foundation.

Alongside the organizational and personnel changes, there is the functional replacement and encroachment on the Ethereum Foundation's role by non-profit independent organizations such as ETHLabs and Ethereum Institutional; there is also the technical progress, like the EF's security team recently using AI agents for red team testing of the ETH network and discovering real vulnerabilities.

As ETH's price faces wave after wave of industry scrutiny, what lies before the Ethereum Foundation are the more complex and diverse contradictions and tests following its internal reform. Related to this is the divisive transformation that the leading body of Ethereum is directly confronting.

The Ethereum Foundation Enters an Era of Decline: The Rise of Multiple Contenders, Talent Drain, and the AI Transformation

The Ethereum Foundation (hereinafter referred to as EF) has long been criticized for its rigid structure, decision-making by a few, organizational value, and actions affecting market sentiment through token sales. Criticism of the EF within the Ethereum community is particularly fierce. Not long ago, Bankless founder David Hoffman even went so far as to "sell his final ETH holdings" to express his dissatisfaction with the EF, urging the Ethereum community to build the ecosystem in their own way.

Now, the formal dissolution of the EF's Protocol Support Team is like a thunderclap, fully exposing the internal contradictions and crisis of division within the EF organization to everyone. It is noteworthy that this round of organizational changes is particularly different from the organizational changes initiated by Ethereum founder Vitalik last year—this is a thorough personnel purge, also seen as 'the largest round of layoffs since the EF's establishment,' not merely changes among some leadership personnel as before.

When the Ethereum Ecosystem Leader Chooses to Sever Its Tail to Survive: The Course of EF's Major Layoffs

It all begins with the official announcement "New EF Structure" officially released by the EF on June 23.

In this lengthy article spanning thousands of words, the EF distinguished its new organizational structure into layers: Protocol, Access, User, Community, and Institutional. It later explained that "this organizational restructuring involves laying off 54 people, representing 20% of EF's membership." What feels even more disheartening is that the announcement begins by stating: "Through this process, we have obtained the structure, activities, and personnel necessary to execute the critical tasks we will soon face." In other words, the laid-off personnel and departments are considered obsolete, unnecessary, and without value.

It must be said that the EF, which has always presented itself as a research-oriented organization and an ecosystem leader with a scholarly demeanor, has for the first time revealed a冷酷 aspect of its organizational management.

Schematic diagram of the new EF structure

The Dissolution of the EF Protocol Support Department Becomes a Significant Marker of EF's Organizational Split

It is worth mentioning that the work of the EF Protocol Support Department leaned towards infrastructure construction, primarily responsible for coordinating the Ethereum protocol development process, including organizing and coordinating core developer meetings, tracking Ethereum network upgrades, supporting EIP progression, running the Ethereum protocol, etc. Now, its main functions have been allocated to the Protocol layer part of the EF.

Coinciding with the day the EF announced its new structure, Ethlabs, a non-profit R&D lab co-founded by 5 former EF researchers, was officially announced. This organization aims to promote Ethereum as the settlement layer for the global economy and has received support from a series of investment institutions, Ethereum ecosystem projects, independent individuals, and EF members, including Ethereum co-founder Joe Lubin (Chairman of Sharplink, founder of Consensys), ETH treasury company BitMine (Ethereum treasury company under Tom Lee), Sharplink, and crypto investment firm SNZ.

List of ETHLabs community participants (Source: Official account)

On July 1st, Ethereum Institutional, co-founded by former EF members David Walsh, Marius Smith, and Matthew Dawson, was officially unveiled.

This organization's main concept is "Ethereum's Institutional Finance Application Plan," dedicated to promoting the institutionalization and institutional-grade application of Ethereum, its secondary layers, applications, and the entire ecosystem. Simultaneously, the organization emphasizes its collaboration with Ethlabs, Etherealize, and the Enterprise Ethereum Alliance, responsible for institutional demand对接 and explaining Ethereum's value proposition to banks; Ethlabs focuses on translating related demands into technical products. As a non-profit independent institution, Ethereum Institutional will provide free consulting related to Ethereum applications for banks and asset management companies.

A week later, Ethereum Institutional announced the commencement of core team recruitment, focusing in the coming weeks on hiring for roles such as Institutional Business Development (Institutional GTM), Marketing & Community Operations, and technical positions like Solutions Architect, Technical Project Lead.

Thus, the EF layoff turmoil formally concluded with the emergence of two major non-profit independent organizations and the dissolution of the Protocol Support Department, also drawing an imperfect full stop to the "internal organizational transformation" personally pushed by Vitalik last year. Beyond the organizational-level split and the loss of top talent like Executive Director Wang Xiaowei, the EF also faces the impact of AI technology.

The Era of AI Attack and Defense Begins, Upgrades in EF Security Team Testing

Yesterday, researchers from the EF Protocol Security Team stated in a blog post that they have deployed a series of AI agents to test software dependencies within the Ethereum ecosystem, searching for vulnerabilities in cryptographic systems, protocol code, and smart contracts.

Vulnerabilities discovered by the AI agents include a remotely triggerable panic issue in the libp2p gossipsub peer-to-peer layer used by Ethereum consensus clients. This issue has been fixed and disclosed on Github as CVE-2026-34219.

Researchers stated that the AI agents were organized into specialized roles such as reconnaissance, searching, gap filling, and verification to find potential attack paths, reproduce failures, and verify their applicability to production code. The EF stated that AI has not replaced security researchers but has changed the way of working, enabling the team to cover a far greater scope than manual review, but requiring researchers to exercise more cautious judgment over a large number of seemingly credible conclusions.

Considering today's news of the official launch of the GPT 5.6 model, the future maintenance of Ethereum protocol security will likely be jointly handled by AI models and EF security researchers. Moreover, although the EF currently mentions that "AI has not replaced researchers," with the continuous development and evolution of AI models, personnel in the EF security team and even across the entire organizational structure may be further reduced in the future. In other words, the EF will also face the test of AI models on its organizational structure and the fulfillment of its functions.

Summary: The EF Organizational Reform Phase Concludes, Might It Become an Ecosystem Mascot in the Future?

In January of last year, we systematically analyzed the EF's organizational reform in the article "Vitalik Fires the First Shot of 'Reform', Where is the Ethereum Foundation Heading?" Back then, Vitalik was still ambitiously and forcefully pushing for EF organizational reform; in May of this year, after more than a year of organizational renewal, Vitalik surprisingly changed his tune, stating that "the Ethereum Foundation should not be the center of the ETH ecosystem and will shift towards a smaller, long-termist approach."

It must be said that as ETH has grown into an asset worth hundreds of billions, the EF, this official ecosystem organization established for nearly a decade, has also entered the awkward position of being "a large ship hard to turn." No wonder Vitalik previously declared—"will no longer write regular blog posts and has decided to try writing some science fiction on the topic of decentralized governance."

As former EF researcher and Ethlabs member Ansgar Dietrichs said earlier this month in a podcast, "After five years of failing to break through $5,000, ETH still lacks a clear value narrative."

Currently, it seems the EF can hardly shoulder the banner of "revitalizing the Ethereum ecosystem and driving a breakthrough in ETH's price." Future large-scale adoption and institutional-grade investment may have to be hoped for from organizations like ETHlabs, Ethereum Institutional, and Etherealize.

Perhaps, in the not-too-distant future, playing the role of an "ecosystem mascot" would be more suitable for the EF.

Recommended Reading

Ethereum in a "Mid-Life Crisis," Analyzing Its Development Performance from a Data Perspective

Given: ETH = Nokia, Find: Ethereum = iOS?

Ethereum is 'Sick,' Are These Three Prescriptions the Right Cure?

Where is the Road? A Brief Analysis of the 3 Major Abstract Problems Facing the Ethereum Ecosystem

Listing Ethereum's Seven Deadly Sins, Who Can Play the "Divine Comedy of Salvation" for It?

Where Lies Ethereum's Orthodoxy? A Detailed Explanation of the "Cryptocurrency Masterpiece" in Vitalik's Mind

Ethereum's Tenth Anniversary: Revisiting ETH's Journey of Changing Hands, The Resurgence of Token Centralization

Are L2s a Detour for Ethereum?

Bankless Founder Liquidates ETH Holdings, Collective Disillusionment with Ethereum Faith

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat significant organizational change was announced by the Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team, and what was its broader implication?

AThe Ethereum Foundation's Protocol Support Team announced its formal dissolution. This event is seen as a major indicator of internal conflict and a splitting crisis within the EF, marking one of its largest rounds of layoffs to date.

QAccording to the article, what are the names and primary goals of the two new non-profit independent organizations that emerged following the EF restructuring?

AThe two new organizations are Ethlabs and Ethereum Institutional. Ethlabs aims to promote Ethereum as a global economic settlement layer. Ethereum Institutional focuses on driving the institutionalization and enterprise-level application of Ethereum and its ecosystem.

QHow has the Ethereum Foundation's security team incorporated AI, and what was a key outcome of this integration?

AThe EF security team deployed a series of AI agents to test software relied upon by the Ethereum ecosystem, searching for vulnerabilities. A key outcome was the discovery of a remotely triggerable panic issue in the libp2p gossipsub library (CVE-2026-34219), which has since been patched.

QWhat shift in perspective did Vitalik Buterin reportedly express regarding the Ethereum Foundation's role, as mentioned in the article's conclusion?

AVitalik Buterin shifted from actively pushing for organizational reform to stating that the Ethereum Foundation should not be the center of the ETH ecosystem and should move towards a smaller, more long-termist approach. The article suggests he may even see a future where the EF plays more of a 'mascot' role.

QWhat criticism from within the Ethereum community towards the EF is highlighted in the article, and who exemplified this sentiment?

AThe EF has been criticized for its rigid structure, decision-making by a few, organizational value, and market-affecting sell-offs. Bankless founder David Hoffman exemplified this sentiment by selling his remaining ETH holdings to express dissatisfaction and encouraging the community to build independently of the EF.

Related Reads

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

The U.S. Treasury Department has expanded sanctions on Iran to target its digital asset sector, citing over $100 million in cryptocurrency payments allegedly used to facilitate Iranian oil sales. The Treasury’s Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) announced new sectoral sanctions covering digital assets, technology, gold, aviation, and shipping, alongside sanctions against nearly 60 entities, individuals, and vessels linked to nuclear, missile, cyber, and oil networks. The move allows OFAC to sanction foreign persons and firms operating in or supporting Iran’s crypto sector, which the Treasury stated is increasingly used as a "tool of choice" to circumvent sanctions, including by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC). Specific targets include Ukrainian broker Ivan Obukhov and his UAE-registered firm Foscom FZE, accused of processing over $100 million in crypto payments to facilitate oil sales for the IRGC’s Quds Force. This follows recent U.S. actions against Iran-linked crypto exchanges, including sanctions against UK-based Zedcex and Zedxion in January, four Iranian exchanges including Nobitex in June, and exchanges Shelbit and Aban Tether in August. Unlike previous targeted sanctions, the new measures establish a framework to penalize broader involvement in Iran’s crypto sector, significantly expanding OFAC’s authority under Executive Order 13902. Designated persons’ U.S.-linked property will be blocked, and foreign banks facilitating significant transactions for them may face U.S. account restrictions.

cryptonews.ru7m ago

U.S. Aims at Iran's Crypto Sector Due to Oil Payments Exceeding $100 Billion

cryptonews.ru7m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

Dialogue with Charles Zhang: In the Era of AI's Sprint, Why Create "Anti-Efficiency" Content Standing out among China's early internet pioneers, Charles Zhang, founder and CEO of Sohu, maintains a distinct personal identity. He keeps a consistent public presence and embodies traits of high-energy individuals: sleeping only 4-5 hours daily, running 5km or marathons, and hosting frequent offline tech forums and dialogues with Nobel laureates. He has shifted focus from external business expansion to internal self-reconstruction, adhering to his own pace. "People aren't afraid of being busy; the busier you are, the better your health. Having nothing to do can lead to emotional issues and poor health." Marking the 10th anniversary of his live-streamed "Charles Zhang's English Class," he recently took it offline for a real-world classroom session. Following this, he discussed the course's decade-long journey, Sohu Video's content ecosystem, and the value of content in the AI era. **Pen and Mouth Diligence: A Class Against Instant Mastery** His English class began in August 2016 on "Qianfan Live." He spends about 40 minutes daily preparing, reviewing dozens of news headlines, reading five in detail, and selecting three for the lesson. Over ten years, he has completed over 2000 live sessions totaling more than 110,000 minutes, with over 52 million views. Initially, the stream was a way to "talk more" and combat emotional struggles. He started by repeating after TV news anchors, then moved to live-streaming with the launch of Qianfan Live. It was 40% for personal emotional regulation ("like a monk chanting sutras"), 30% to deliver authentic news, and 30% to promote the new platform. This daily "ritual" helped him overcome depression, leading to what he calls his "peak life state." From a product perspective, it was counter-intuitive—launched without prior market research or growth strategies, based on the founder's personal need that resonated with users. Yet, his content creation follows a strict routine. The decade of covering geopolitics, economics, tech, health, and society has built a vast "knowledge compound interest" system. In an age of AI summaries and algorithmic content, Zhang insists on "hard work": meticulous reading, handwritten notes, and manually created teaching materials, refusing AI-generated content. The English class is now a fixed daily rhythm; preparing for his weekly physics class requires a full day of solitary deduction on a blackboard. In his live streams, Zhang positions himself as a "content creator," not a CEO or teacher. He sees physics as extreme brain training and English as a "sensor" to understand the world. This explains why a top entrepreneur persists for a decade in seemingly "unprofessional" pursuits—it's the information input and psychological healing method he found during a low point. It's fundamentally an "anti-efficiency" commitment. He believes the meaning of reading lies in finding community and spiritual support, not just fleeting conversation points. For today's media, he states: "Reading news isn't the goal. As humans with many confusions, we need reference points, to find a group, find kindred spirits, or seek support and spiritual nourishment. Large language models can't satisfy these starting points; they only give you information." This offers solace and a value defense for media professionals impacted by AI summaries. **"Don't Think Earth Stops Turning Because AI Arrived"** A content creator expressed anxiety: after feeding their article to AI, it produced a more comprehensive, profound version, making their work feel valueless. Zhang responded with an analogy: "Carrots from the market, with a bit of soil, not glossy, taste delicious and flavorful. Tomatoes forced by chemical fertilizer have no taste at all." He sees AI giving world content a "plastic feel," but acknowledges its significant role in improving information access efficiency, especially in physics and social science research where he often queries AI for quick professional answers. The key, Zhang stresses, is that the outside world still needs to guide our perspective. LLMs provide "information," while the outside world offers "viewpoints." He cares deeply about *what* that external viewpoint is and *how* someone thinks about an issue. "Don't think the Earth stops turning because AI arrived," he analyzes. AI currently replaces rule-based work, noting significant impact on the software industry with many programmers laid off as even less experienced people can now write decent code. However, AI cannot yet replace arts, social sciences, emotions, and creative content. "Hollywood remains thriving, producing great works. Oscars will continue, Nobel Literature Prizes will still be awarded—all by real people, with works conceived by real people." While wary of AI, Zhang isn't anti-technology and is open to its applications. Sohu itself has launched AI assistants. In Sohu's AI practice, Zhang defines his role as a "large language model corpus provider." He believes LLM training is inseparable from human-original content as its data foundation, so original content retains irreplaceable value. "The era of self-media indeed offers everyone new ways to discover their strengths and achieve growth." He suggests every young person should consider self-media. Most importantly, the bottom line of content creation should be "authenticity." If using AI avatars, they must be clearly labeled; not doing so and misleading viewers wastes their time, especially when people still prefer real human content. Behind AI's sprint lie unavoidable realities. As AI quickly provides seemingly perfect answers, people grow accustomed to accepting "summarized" results, omitting processes of questioning, deduction, and trial-and-error, leading to a decline in deep thinking. Zhang's "anti-efficiency" practice with his two live-streamed classes is his answer to AI's狂奔: In an algorithm-driven era chasing ultimate efficiency, don't expect AI to fill inner voids. Read books, speak in front of a camera, sweat on a running track, and build connections with real people.

marsbit17m ago

Conversation with Charles Zhang: Amidst the AI Frenzy, Why Pursue 'Anti-Efficiency' Content?

marsbit17m ago

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

The article traces the decade-long path of Zcash (ZEC), a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, to its potential launch as the first privacy coin spot ETF, with Grayscale's ZCSH filing in August 2026. It argues ZEC's suitability stemmed not from regulatory acceptance of its privacy technology, but from its centralized, institutional structure from inception—a commercial company (ECC) with venture capital backing and a Founder's Reward—making it easier to package than decentralized alternatives. Three key institutions, intertwined in a network, drove the process: Grayscale (owned by DCG, an early ZEC investor), which had held ZEC in a trust since 2017; Coinbase, providing custody, prime brokerage, derivatives, and venture investment; and ZODL, a new for-profit entity formed in 2026 when ECC's core development team split from the non-profit foundation. The major regulatory hurdle was SEC scrutiny (2023-2026) over ZEC's historical structure, which resembled an unregistered investment contract due to automatic block rewards to ECC and the Foundation. This was resolved through governance changes (NU6 upgrade in 2024) that ended direct funding and shifted control to community voting, coinciding with a broader shift in SEC enforcement policy. Notably, the law firm Davis Polk represented both the Zcash Foundation in its SEC defense and Grayscale in the ETF filing. The push is also driven by DCG's dire financial needs amid Genesis bankruptcy lawsuits, seeking high-fee products (the ZEC ETF charges 2.5%). Concurrently, major mining operations by entities like Cypherpunk Technologies (backed by Winklevoss Capital) and DCG's Fortitude Mining expanded, motivated by profitability and aiming to influence the network. The article concludes with irony: to become a compliant ETF asset, ZEC must shed its core privacy feature for the fund's holdings, which will be held in transparent, auditable addresses. Wall Street is not adopting privacy technology but packaging the *concept* of privacy into a tradable, fee-generating financial product. The transformation was not a single master plan but the result of a network of aligned interests capitalizing on regulatory, governance, and market shifts over ten years.

marsbit27m ago

Zcash's ETF Gilding: How a Privacy Coin Was Packaged by Wall Street into a Compliant Asset

marsbit27m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片