NVIDIA Case Reopened: Accused of Concealing $1 Billion in 'Mining' Revenue, a Hidden Chapter in the AI Giant's History

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-27Last updated on 2026-03-27

Abstract

Nvidia Faces Renewed Investor Lawsuit Over Alleged $1 Billion Undisclosed Crypto Mining Revenue A US judge has approved a class-action lawsuit against Nvidia and its CEO Jensen Huang. Investors allege that between 2017 and 2018, Nvidia concealed the extent to which its gaming graphics card revenue depended on cryptocurrency mining demand, misleading shareholders about associated risks. The suit claims over $1 billion in crypto-related revenue was largely reported under the "Gaming" segment, downplaying the business's exposure to volatile crypto market cycles. Following a corrective disclosure in November 2018, Nvidia’s stock fell approximately 28.5% over two days. Internal evidence, including an executive email, suggested that previous statements had positively influenced the company's stock price. This case revives a lawsuit initially filed in 2018, which had previously been dismissed. During the 2017 crypto boom and the 2020 bull market, Nvidia’s GPUs were in high demand from miners, causing shortages for gamers. The company later launched dedicated CMP mining cards. In 2022, the SEC charged Nvidia with insufficient disclosure of mining’s impact on gaming revenue, resulting in a $5.5 million settlement. The class action covers investors who bought Nvidia stock between August 2017 and November 2018. A case management conference is scheduled for April 21.

Author: Nancy, PANews

Recently, NVIDIA faced a collective lawsuit from investors, accused of concealing over $1 billion in cryptocurrency mining revenue, drawing market attention.

This long-standing lawsuit has once again brought market focus back to that frenzied era of全民淘金潮 (nationwide gold rush). The now AI empire NVIDIA was a direct beneficiary of that craze at the time.

Accused of Hiding Over $1 Billion in Mining Revenue, Years-Long Collective Lawsuit Officially Advances

A U.S. federal judge has approved a collective lawsuit against NVIDIA and its CEO Jensen Huang.

According to the plaintiffs, between 2017 and 2018, NVIDIA concealed the extent to which its gaming graphics card revenue relied on demand from cryptocurrency mining.

The lawsuit was initially filed by investors in 2018 and was dismissed in 2021. It was subsequently appealed and retried. NVIDIA's appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court was not accepted, and the case has now officially received approval for collective action status.

The plaintiffs argue that NVIDIA generated over $1 billion in cryptocurrency-related revenue through its GeForce gaming graphics cards but recorded most of it under the "Gaming" segment, thereby downplaying the risk disclosure to investors. Investors allege that CEO Jensen Huang downplayed the true scale of cryptocurrency demand at the time. NVIDIA had consistently claimed that cryptocurrency mining constituted only a small part of its business, with Gaming revenue primarily coming from gamers.

The plaintiffs point out that this practice directly exposed the company to the risks associated with the volatility of the cryptocurrency market cycle. Particularly after the company made a corrective disclosure in November 2018, its stock price fell approximately 28.5% over two days.

More crucially, the court's ruling cited an internal email from an NVIDIA vice president, considering it particularly compelling evidence. The judge noted that an internal executive had stated that "the company's stock price remained high precisely because of previous related statements," indicating that these remarks had impacted the stock price.

In fact, as early as 2022, the U.S. SEC had accused NVIDIA of failing to adequately disclose the impact of cryptocurrency mining on its gaming business, believing that its financial reports for two quarters may have misled investors. NVIDIA neither admitted nor denied the SEC's allegations but agreed to pay a $5.5 million fine and reach a resolution.

This approved collective lawsuit covers investors who purchased NVIDIA stock between August 10, 2017, and November 15, 2018. The court plans to hold a case management conference on April 21, where the judge will clarify the subsequent trial process.

NVIDIA's Mining History: Once in the Crypto Gold Rush

Rewind to the 2017 bull market. Mining rigs were snapped up, chips were in short supply, and countless prospectors rushed into Bitcoin mining.

At that time, NVIDIA was best known for its gaming graphics card business. But as the prices of cryptocurrencies, led by Bitcoin and Ethereum, soared, the graphics card market faced a supply shortage, remaining in a state of severe scarcity for a long time. NVIDIA's GPU products were naturally in extremely high demand, even leading to a situation where ordinary gamers found it hard to get a card.

By 2020, a new bull market once again ignited mining enthusiasm. This time, NVIDIA took the initiative, launching CMP (Cryptocurrency Mining Processor) cards specifically designed for mining to meet the special demands of Ethereum mining, and imposed mining performance limits on the RTX 3080 aimed at gamers. Even so, it was difficult to curb the狂热需求 (fanatical demand) of miners. According to NVIDIA's disclosure, sales of CMP mining-specific chips alone reached $155 million in Q1 2021, while the global market size for discrete graphics cards flowing into crypto mining was about $500 million in the same period.

Clearly, this mining boom allowed NVIDIA to reap substantial profits. But how much of this revenue actually came from miners has always been a mystery. In NVIDIA's financial reports, mining earnings were categorized under the gaming segment, making it difficult for outsiders to accurately discern its true composition.

But looking at revenue, mining确实“带飞”了 (indeed "carried") NVIDIA at the time. In 2018 alone, NVIDIA's operating revenue reached $9.714 billion, a year-on-year increase of 41%, with the gaming business contributing more than half (about $5.5 billion). Interestingly, Bitmain, a mining company founded just a few years prior, was expanding rapidly during the same period, with profits once approaching NVIDIA's, and NVIDIA was one of its suppliers.

However, this portion of earnings was greatly affected by crypto cycle fluctuations. After the mining demand plummeted in 2022, it also led to a decline in NVIDIA's sales and inventory surplus, with the gaming business becoming the main segment dragging down its overall performance, and the decline in GPU sales was a key reason. Interestingly, NVIDIA CTO Michael Kagan直言 (stated bluntly) in 2023 that cryptocurrency "doesn't bring anything useful for society," suggesting that the emergence of ChatGPT was the "iPhone moment" for AI.

Since then, NVIDIA's AI success story has become widely known, making it the strongest卖铲人 (shovel seller) in the AI era, selling new Tokens (metaphor for AI chips/tools). Meanwhile, the mining companies that once profited effortlessly are也开始将目光转向 (also beginning to turn their attention to) the AI business.

Related Questions

QWhat is NVIDIA accused of in the recent investor class-action lawsuit?

ANVIDIA is accused of concealing over $1 billion in cryptocurrency mining-related revenue from its GeForce gaming GPUs, misrepresenting the extent of its dependence on crypto mining demand during 2017-2018.

QWhat was the consequence for NVIDIA's stock price after it made a corrective disclosure in November 2018?

ANVIDIA's stock price fell approximately 28.5% over two days following its corrective disclosure in November 2018.

QWhat action did the U.S. SEC take against NVIDIA in 2022 regarding its crypto mining disclosures?

AIn 2022, the U.S. SEC charged NVIDIA for insufficient disclosure of crypto mining's impact on its gaming business. NVIDIA agreed to pay a $5.5 million penalty to settle the charges, without admitting or denying the allegations.

QWhat specific product did NVIDIA launch to cater to the cryptocurrency mining market demand?

ANVIDIA launched CMP (Cryptocurrency Mining Processor) mining cards, specifically designed to meet the demands of Ethereum mining.

QAccording to the article, how did NVIDIA's CTO, Michael Kagan, view cryptocurrency compared to AI in 2023?

AIn 2023, NVIDIA's CTO Michael Kagan stated that cryptocurrency 'does not bring anything useful for society' and that the emergence of ChatGPT represented the 'iPhone moment' for AI.

Related Reads

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

If the AI Bubble is Bursting, Who Will Remain? The debate over an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high levels and Jensen Huang seeing immense, early-stage opportunity. Both views hold truth: a speculative bubble in capital markets likely exists, mirroring the dot-com era, but the underlying technological shift is real and transformative. History shows that while bubbles burst—wiping out overvalued companies and speculative capital—they often leave behind critical physical and digital infrastructure. The dot-com bust, for instance, eliminated many firms but left the global fiber optic networks and data centers that enabled the rise of Amazon, Netflix, and cloud computing. Today's massive AI infrastructure investments (projected at trillions by 2030) in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs may follow a similar path, creating the foundation for future applications. A key divergence from past bubbles is the "Jevons Paradox" effect in AI. As the cost of AI inference has plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, enterprise spending on AI has skyrocketed. Cheap "tokens" have unlocked vast, previously uneconomical use cases, moving AI from simple chatbots into core business workflows—code generation, legal document review, scientific simulation, and financial analysis. The market is now in a phase of self-correction, weeding out superficial "API-wrapper" startups, but this cleansing process strengthens the ecosystem. The long-term trajectory is clear. The value is gradually shifting from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to operational expenditure (OpEx) on transformative applications. As AI becomes a utility, the winners will be firms that deeply integrate it to solve vertical industry problems in law, healthcare, finance, and manufacturing. The泡沫 will recede, but the foundational shift towards an AI-powered era across all sectors is irreversible. The underlying productive force of AI contains no bubble.

marsbit17m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Survive?

marsbit17m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

**Summary: If the AI Bubble is Bursting, What Will Remain?** The debate around an AI bubble is intensifying, with figures like Ray Dalio warning of high valuations while Jensen Huang sees immense opportunity. This echoes the dot-com bubble, which saw massive wealth destruction but ultimately left behind critical infrastructure like undersea cables and broadband, enabling future giants like Amazon and Netflix. Similarly, today's AI boom involves trillions invested in data centers, power, cooling, and GPUs, while application-layer revenue remains comparatively modest. This investment-disparity signals a bubble. However, the core technological progress is real and accelerating. AI inference costs have plummeted by over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence increasingly cheap and accessible. This cost collapse is unlocking vast new demand. Instead of reducing spending, enterprises are tripling their AI cloud expenditure. Cheap "tokens" enable AI to move beyond simple chatbots into complex workflows—automating code writing, legal document review, financial analysis, and scientific research. This follows "Jevons's paradox": improved efficiency leads to greater total consumption. The market is now undergoing a necessary purification, weeding out "API-wrapper" startups with no real moat. The deeper evolution involves a shift from capital expenditure (CapEx) on infrastructure to operational expenditure (OpEx) on value-creation in applications. While hardware vendors currently profit most, long-term value will migrate to AI-native firms solving vertical industry problems. Ultimately, a market correction will cleanse speculative excess but will not reverse the AI+ trend. The massive physical and algorithmic infrastructure being built will endure, becoming a cheap, utility-like foundation. Just as the internet became indispensable to all industries post-2000, AI is poised to empower and redefine every sector, moving society irreversibly toward an intelligence-augmented era. The bubble may burst, but the underlying productive momentum is solid.

链捕手23m ago

If the AI Bubble Is Already Bursting, Who Will Truly Remain?

链捕手23m ago

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella argues that in the AI era, a company's true competitive edge, or "moat," is not determined by choosing the single most powerful model, but by its ability to build a continuous "learning loop." This system integrates and evolves by connecting human workflows, domain expertise, organizational judgment, and employee experience. He posits that future companies will accumulate two types of capital: Human Capital (employee knowledge, judgment, creativity) and "Token Capital" (a firm's own built and owned AI capabilities). Importantly, AI amplifies rather than devalues human capital. Human direction is essential to guide progress, as computational power alone is aimless. The core opportunity lies in creating a closed-loop system where human and token capital reinforce each other in a compound, self-improving cycle. A company must be able to preserve its unique institutional knowledge—its "company veteran" expertise—even if it switches underlying general-purpose AI models. This requires private evaluation benchmarks, reinforcement learning environments based on internal data, and queryable knowledge bases. Nadella warns against a future where economic value is concentrated by a few dominant models that commoditize entire industries' knowledge. Instead, the priority should be building a broad "frontier ecosystem" where every company, industry, and nation can own its learning loop. This allows organizations to retain control of their intellectual property, amplify employee capabilities, and ensure the economic value created by AI is captured within their own businesses and communities. True corporate sovereignty in the AI age comes from turning organizational knowledge into a compounding system that creates enduring, defensible value.

marsbit58m ago

Microsoft CEO: In the AI Era, How Do You Define a Company's Moat?

marsbit58m ago

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

Beyond the Bitcoin ETF spotlight, a deeper institutionalization is underway, leveraging Bitcoin as a foundational financial primitive. Institutions are using Bitcoin for purposes long reserved for assets like U.S. Treasuries and gold: as collateral for loans, insurance reserves, and the backbone of rated bonds. Examples include a Barbados-based insurer capitalizing with $40M in Bitcoin reserves and Ledn's $188M securitization of Bitcoin-backed loans, which received the first-ever investment-grade rating (BBB-) from S&P for a digital asset-backed security. This structure was stress-tested during a 27% price drop in early 2026, triggering automatic liquidations that functioned as designed but revealed the systemic risk of synchronized selling across leveraged positions. Infrastructure is evolving to support this, with platforms like Anchorage Digital's Atlas network enabling secure, institutional-grade settlement and collateral management. Strategies like basis trades and corporate treasuries (exemplified by companies like MicroStrategy issuing billions in equity and debt to fund Bitcoin acquisitions) further integrate Bitcoin into financial mechanics. While ETFs solved "how to own" Bitcoin, these developments answer "what to do with it," embedding the asset into the working machinery of finance—as collateral upon which loans, derivatives, and structured products are built. The real, enduring institutional shift is happening in these largely invisible plumbing and financing systems.

marsbit1h ago

ETFs Are Just the Ticket: The True Institutionalization of Bitcoin Is Happening Where You Can't See It

marsbit1h ago

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

ZEC Co-Founder Addresses Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Plans to Sunset Orchard Pool A security vulnerability was recently discovered in Zcash's Orchard shielded pool, raising key concerns. The primary questions are whether the flaw was exploited, if user funds are safe, whether users can verify the total ZEC supply, and if other similar vulnerabilities exist. Analysis suggests the vulnerability was likely not exploited prior to its discovery. It was found proactively by a researcher using specialized tools, not due to an active breach. The development team and mining pools acted quickly to contain the issue. Typical financially-motivated attacks would likely have left visible on-chain evidence, which has not been observed. User funds in Orchard are considered safe and should be recoverable, assuming no prior exploitation. If the flaw was never used, all legitimate funds can be withdrawn. The article outlines risks associated with moving funds to transparent addresses or other pools, but concludes that leaving assets in place is a reasonable option. Currently, users cannot independently verify that the total ZEC supply hasn't been inflated due to this bug. However, the planned Ironwood network upgrade is designed to resolve this. It will permanently close the Orchard pool to new deposits and internal transfers, allowing only withdrawals. This mechanism will cap total withdrawals at the amount of legitimately deposited funds, enabling anyone to cryptographically verify the supply post-upgrade. Multiple teams, including Shielded Labs, have conducted extensive audits focused on counterfeiting vulnerabilities, assisted by advanced AI tools. No additional flaws of this type have been found so far, increasing confidence that no other similar undisclosed vulnerabilities exist. In summary, evidence indicates the Orchard bug was probably not used, user funds are secure, and no other counterfeiting flaws are currently known. The upcoming Ironwood upgrade will restore users' ability to independently verify the total ZEC supply, closing this chapter.

Foresight News1h ago

ZEC Co-Founder Responds to Orchard Vulnerability: No Signs of Theft, Orchard Pool to Be Sealed

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片