Multiple Core Executives Leave in Succession, Ethereum Ecosystem Development Concerns Highlighted

marsbitPublished on 2026-05-21Last updated on 2026-05-21

Abstract

Within a week, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) lost three more key personnel, fueling public concerns about the organization's internal stability. Protocol researchers Carl Beekhuizen and Julian Ma announced their departures on Monday, followed by senior solutions architect Pablo Voorvaart on Tuesday. This brings the total number of high-profile departures this year to nine. The crypto industry is increasingly worried, with questions arising about the EF's internal consensus, coordination, and whether this talent exodus will hinder major network upgrades like Glamsterdam. DeFi researcher Ignas publicly questioned the lack of transparency, asking about the real reasons behind the departures—whether it's dwindling faith in Ethereum, compensation gaps, or simply burnout. Community reactions are mixed. Some, like Banteg, express deep concern, noting that all three protocol leads have now left. Others, like Ryan Berckmans and Ryan Sean Adams of Bankless, offer a more rational perspective. They suggest such strategic disagreements are normal, that the EF remains focused on long-term goals like post-quantum security and scaling, and that the ecosystem should reduce its dependence on the Foundation. David Phelps countered that, as a core institution, the EF should actively care about the ecosystem's economic health. This wave of departures follows earlier signs of turmoil. Former co-Executive Director Tomasz Stańczak left in February, and a controversial move in March requiring staff...

​Authored by: Aakash Girimath

Compiled by: Saoirse, Foresight News

This week, the Ethereum Foundation (EF) lost three more core senior personnel. This wave of large-scale departures has increasingly led to public questioning regarding the internal stability of the organization. Protocol researcher Carl Beekhuizen and Julian Ma announced their resignations on Monday, followed by senior solution architect Pablo Voorvaart, who formally departed on Tuesday.

The number of personnel departures this year has reached nine, causing significant concern across the crypto industry. Industry insiders are questioning the Ethereum Foundation's internal consensus and coordination capabilities, while also worrying that this brain drain of core talent may hinder the advancement and implementation of key network upgrades like Glamsterdam.

DeFi researcher Ignas voiced the community's sentiment on social platform X, criticizing the foundation's lack of transparency: "What is happening inside the Ethereum Foundation? How many more unreported departures are there? What are the real reasons behind them? Do professionals no longer see promise in the Ethereum ecosystem, is the industry salary gap too large, or is the team burned out? The public wants to know the truth."

Polarized Community Reaction: Concern vs. Rational Calm

Many within the Ethereum community are deeply concerned about the negative impacts of these core departures. Community figure Banteg bluntly stated that all three protocol leads at the Ethereum Foundation have now left, sharing an annotated internal organizational chart to illustrate the situation.

However, many practitioners are taking a calm view of these personnel changes, even suggesting the Ethereum ecosystem should reduce its reliance on the Ethereum Foundation. Community investor Ryan Berckmans believes differing opinions within the team regarding development strategies and institutional planning are normal. The Ethereum Foundation remains focused on the ecosystem's long-term development, emphasizing post-quantum security technology and on-chain scaling. This turnover, he suggests, is merely a normal and healthy transition of fresh blood replacing veterans in the industry, and not a cause for excessive panic.

Similarly, Bankless's Ryan Sean Adams stated that the Ethereum community cannot solely depend on the Ethereum Foundation. He believes the market needs organizations dedicated to driving up the value of ETH assets, willing to speak out and execute decisively—something the Ethereum Foundation has consistently failed to do and is unlikely to change in the future.

David Phelps offered a different perspective, arguing this view is unreasonable: just as a head of state cannot ignore national economic and livelihood issues, as a core institution of the industry ecosystem, the Ethereum Foundation should prioritize the overall economic health and market development of the ecosystem.

Large-Scale Brain Drain Appears to be an Established Trend

This concentrated wave of departures was foreshadowed. In February of this year, former Ethereum Foundation co-Executive Director Tomasz Stańczak formally stepped down. The Ethereum Foundation has been mired in internal turmoil throughout 2024, with many core industry practitioners dissatisfied with its management style and full of doubts about the future direction of the Ethereum public chain. Tomasz Stańczak had, for a time, stabilized the situation and reversed the Foundation's decline during his tenure.

In March, the Ethereum Foundation requested all employees to sign the Cypherpunk Manifesto, sparking strong dissatisfaction across the online community. Under immense public pressure, the Foundation ultimately rescinded this controversial requirement.

Apart from the recent departures, several veteran core members had already left earlier this year. These include P2P Network Lead Raúl Kripalani, Operations Lead Josh Stark, Protocol Guild Founder Trent Van Epps, and Protocol Cluster Leads Barnabé Monnot and Tim Beiko. Another senior member, Alex Stokes, remains with the Foundation but is currently on planned leave.

All these departing individuals have years of deep involvement in the Ethereum ecosystem, holding significant industry experience and technical resources. Among them, Carl Beekhuizen served the Foundation for seven years, deeply involved in the early construction of the Beacon Chain and the design of the KZG ceremony; Julian Ma served for four years, leading the writing of the anti-censorship protocol FOCIL (EIP-7805) and spearheading the implementation of the 13-second block finality rule; Pablo Voorvaart, with four years of dedicated service, was fully responsible for the operations of the core teams behind the Ethereum Developer Conference Devcon and the Application Scenario Lab.

The Ethereum Foundation confirmed in its latest protocol update that the Glamsterdam testnet is now officially live, and preparations for the next Hegotà network upgrade are progressing steadily.

Related Questions

QHow many core Ethereum Foundation (EF) executives left their positions recently, and what is the total number of departures this year as mentioned in the article?

ARecently, three core Ethereum Foundation executives left: protocol researchers Carl Beekhuizen and Julian Ma, and senior solutions architect Pablo Voorvaart. The total number of departures mentioned for this year is nine, with a tenth senior member, Alex Stokes, currently on planned leave.

QWhat are the two primary concerns raised by the crypto community regarding the Ethereum Foundation's internal situation?

AThe crypto community's primary concerns are questioning the Ethereum Foundation's internal consensus and coordination capabilities, and worrying that this exodus of core talent will hinder the progress of network upgrades like Glamsterdam and future projects.

QAccording to the article, what contrasting viewpoints do Ryan Berckmans and Ryan Sean Adams (from Bankless) have about the Ethereum Foundation's role?

ARyan Berckmans views the personnel changes as a normal, healthy transition of new blood replacing veterans, and believes the EF is still focused on long-term ecosystem development like post-quantum security and on-chain scaling. In contrast, Ryan Sean Adams argues the Ethereum community should not overly rely on the EF, stating the market needs organizations more aggressively focused on driving ETH's value, which the EF has not and likely will not do.

QWhat controversial internal action did the Ethereum Foundation take in March, as described in the article?

AIn March, the Ethereum Foundation required all employees to sign the Cypherpunk Manifesto, which sparked strong public backlash from the community. Due to the significant pressure, the Foundation ultimately revoked this requirement.

QWhat significant contributions did the recently departed executives Carl Beekhuizen and Julian Ma make to the Ethereum ecosystem?

ACarl Beekhuizen, who worked at the EF for seven years, was deeply involved in the early construction of the Beacon Chain and the design of the KZG ceremony. Julian Ma, who was there for four years, led the authorship of the anti-censorship protocol FOCIL (EIP-7805) and spearheaded the implementation of the 13-second block fast confirmation rule.

Related Reads

Single-Day Plunge of 30%, Arthur Hayes Suddenly Liquidates: Why Did ZEC Get Exploded by Security Issues?

On June 5th, Zcash founder Zooko Wilcox disclosed a critical soundness vulnerability in the project's latest Orchard privacy pool. This flaw, found in the elliptic curve multiplication constraints, could allow an attacker to create unlimited counterfeit ZEC within the shielded pool, with transactions appearing valid. The vulnerability was discovered in late May by security researcher Taylor Hornby, who utilized Anthropic's new Opus 4.8 AI model for a targeted audit. The Zcash ecosystem had already performed an emergency network upgrade to patch the issue. However, the detailed disclosure triggered severe market panic, causing ZEC's price to plummet over 30% in a single day. Notably, prominent investor Arthur Hayes announced he had sold his entire ZEC position following the news. The incident starkly challenges the "technological trust" narrative central to privacy coins. Despite years of top-tier cryptographic audits, the bug persisted until uncovered with advanced AI-assisted research. This highlights the growing gap between theoretical perfection and practical implementation in privacy technology. The event serves as a industry-wide warning: in an AI-driven security landscape, the assumption that "undiscovered equals safe" is obsolete. It underscores the urgent need for continuous, proactive security practices combining AI audits, formal verification, and rapid response mechanisms.

foresightnews_api58m ago

Single-Day Plunge of 30%, Arthur Hayes Suddenly Liquidates: Why Did ZEC Get Exploded by Security Issues?

foresightnews_api58m ago

Breaking the Curse of DeFi Cascading Liquidations, Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

**Vitalik Buterin Proposes New DeFi Design to Eliminate Forced Liquidations** Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has published a proposal for a new decentralized finance (DeFi) architecture aimed at removing the automatic liquidation mechanisms prevalent in current lending protocols. The core idea involves creating synthetic assets using options as building blocks, fundamentally avoiding the抵押借贷结构 that triggers forced sell-offs. The proposal responds to a recurring flaw in DeFi: during sharp market downturns, mass自动清算 of under-collateralized positions can exacerbate price declines, creating systemic selling pressure and market instability, as evidenced by recent crypto market volatility. Buterin's model would split an asset like 1 ETH into two option-like derivatives, P and N, pegged to a price index with a set strike price and expiration. At expiry, an oracle determines the settlement price to allocate the underlying ETH between P and N holders. This design eliminates the "cliff" of instant liquidation. Instead, a position's value would gradually drift from its target peg if not actively rebalanced by the user, transferring the rebalancing decision from the protocol to the user or automated tools. A key advantage is the reduced reliance on high-frequency, real-time oracle price feeds, which are vulnerable to manipulation and errors in current systems. The delayed settlement in the options model allows for more robust, fault-tolerant oracle designs. However, significant challenges remain for practical adoption. High transaction costs (slippage) from frequent rebalancing on automated market makers (AMMs) could erode user funds. The model may not be suitable for stablecoins requiring a strict 1:1 dollar peg, as it inherently allows for value drift. Success would depend on developing new liquidity provisioning models and deep markets for these synthetic assets. The proposal represents a fundamental rethinking of DeFi risk management, challenging the industry to explore alternatives to被动集中平仓 rather than merely optimizing existing liquidation processes. It remains a theoretical framework awaiting implementation and testing by development teams.

foresightnews_api1h ago

Breaking the Curse of DeFi Cascading Liquidations, Vitalik Proposes a New Solution

foresightnews_api1h ago

Bitcoin's Decline Marks the Transformation of Crypto

Title: The Decline of Bitcoin Marks the Transformation of Crypto While Bitcoin's price recently fell below $70,000, down approximately 45% from its peak, the broader crypto industry is not following it into decline. Instead, crypto is maturing and evolving beyond its dependence on Bitcoin's price movements. Two of Bitcoin's core functions are being usurped. First, AI has captured its role as the primary speculative asset. AI, with its tangible revenue, explosive demand, and massive capital inflows ($700-830 billion in 2024), is siphoning off the speculative "hot money" that once drove Bitcoin. It also contributes to a sustained high-interest-rate environment, further tightening liquidity for assets like Bitcoin. Second, dollar-pegged stablecoins like USDC and USDT have replaced Bitcoin as the crypto market's foundational currency and primary on/off-ramp. Most trading pairs and on-chain transactions are now settled in stablecoins, severing the historical link where all capital inflows had to pass through Bitcoin first. This decoupling allows projects to thrive based on their own fundamentals rather than Bitcoin's price. Examples include Hyperliquid, an on-chain derivatives exchange with annual revenues of $8-13 billion, and prediction market platform Polymarket, valued at $200 billion with $3.65 billion in annual fees. These projects are evaluated on traditional metrics like revenue and user growth. New opportunities are emerging, particularly around privacy. Privacy coins like Zcash (ZEC) are seeing surging demand, while infrastructure like NEAR enables private, cross-chain asset transfers without requiring users to hold a specific token—privacy becomes a universal service layer. In this new paradigm, stablecoins are the universal cash, various project tokens represent equity, and privacy-enabled cross-chain coordination layers (like NEAR) act as the critical infrastructure connecting a fragmented, multi-chain ecosystem. Bitcoin is now just one asset among many. The era where the entire crypto market moved in lockstep with Bitcoin is over. The industry's health should now be judged by project fundamentals—real revenue, active users, and tokenomics that capture value—and the development of the underlying infrastructure enabling a mature, dollar-denominated crypto economy.

foresightnews_api1h ago

Bitcoin's Decline Marks the Transformation of Crypto

foresightnews_api1h ago

After being noticed by IBM, the token of three.ws surged 50 times

IBM's public acknowledgment and collaboration with Solana AI project three.ws sparked a massive 50x surge in its $THREE token. Three.ws is building a "3D Agent Layer" for the internet, aiming to move AI beyond chat interfaces into interactive 3D digital characters that can be embedded on websites. These agents possess bodies (3D models), brains (LLMs), memory, skills, and optional on-chain identities and wallets for payments. The platform's architecture consists of four layers: a Viewer layer for 3D rendering, an Agent layer for AI behavior and skills, an optional Identity layer for persistent profiles, and an Embedding layer for deployment. For monetization, developers can set per-use fees for agent interactions, paid in USDC via the x402 protocol. Key to its enterprise strategy are partnerships with IBM and AWS. Integration with AWS Marketplace provides enterprise billing and deployment channels, while the IBM collaboration aims to combine three.ws's 3D agents with IBM's enterprise AI, cloud services, and Granite models. The challenge remains whether businesses will adopt these embodied AI agents and what utility the $THREE token will ultimately hold within the ecosystem.

foresightnews_api1h ago

After being noticed by IBM, the token of three.ws surged 50 times

foresightnews_api1h ago

Lightspark CEO: In Ten Years, Bitcoin Will Be as Invisible as TCP/IP, Yet Power Trillions in Daily Transactions

A decade from now, Bitcoin will function like TCP/IP — invisible yet foundational, supporting trillions in daily transactions globally, according to Lightspark CEO David Marcus. In this future, a coffee shop in Lagos receives instant payment, a manufacturer in São Paulo settles an invoice with a supplier in Ho Chi Minh City, and a freelancer in Bangalore gets paid weekly from an Austin startup — all via Bitcoin's settlement layer, with none of the parties consciously interacting with it. This vision parallels the adoption of open protocols: first driven by necessity where existing systems fail, then scaling rapidly as tools mature and economic benefits become clear. The structural shift begins with wallets. Modern non-custodial wallets, like Spark, allow users to hold dollars, local currency, and Bitcoin in a single address, seamlessly switching between them. This eliminates friction and revolutionizes global custody, moving significant deposits to user-controlled keys not by ideology, but by superior utility. As a result, Bitcoin becomes the default savings layer for billions, as its fixed supply and appreciating value make it a rational choice for savers holding it alongside stablecoins in their everyday wallets. Businesses follow a similar path, from small companies in emerging markets to multinational corporations, holding Bitcoin alongside operational stablecoins. The latest trend is direct Bitcoin transactions for commerce. When both parties hold Bitcoin, transacting in it becomes the simplest option — no conversions, no intermediary currency. This starts in niche areas like high-value B2B settlements but grows as infrastructure makes sending Bitcoin as easy as stablecoins. An accelerating force is AI agents. By 2036, AI agents conducting commerce on behalf of individuals and firms will increasingly choose Bitcoin for settlement. Optimizing for speed, finality, and minimal counterparty risk across jurisdictions, they find Bitcoin's global, neutral, and programmable network ideal for netting and settling obligations. Thus, Bitcoin is becoming the native currency for machine commerce, just as it has become a native savings asset for humans. The global monetary system is being rebuilt from the protocol layer: open infrastructure, default self-custody, Bitcoin settling everything underneath, with stablecoins as the interface. Most users won't think about Bitcoin when they transact — and they won't need to.

foresightnews_api1h ago

Lightspark CEO: In Ten Years, Bitcoin Will Be as Invisible as TCP/IP, Yet Power Trillions in Daily Transactions

foresightnews_api1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow