Is Ethereum cheaper in the U.S? Demand is starting to fade and…

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-03-25Last updated on 2026-03-25

Abstract

Ethereum's current stability may be misleading, as underlying demand, particularly from U.S. investors, is weakening. The Coinbase Premium Index remains negative, indicating ETH is trading cheaper on Coinbase compared to Binance due to lower buying pressure or increased selling in the U.S. This persistent discount exists even during brief price recoveries, suggesting weak sentiment among American investors. While large players (whales) remain active with consistently high average order sizes dominating spot activity, retail participation is notably absent. This one-sided market structure, reliant on whales without broader retail support, lacks staying power and makes any price upside fragile. Technically, Ethereum is holding above $2,100 but appears shaky. The RSI is neutral, while the MACD is flat, signaling a loss of momentum in its recent push. Derivatives data align with this caution: Open Interest has declined from earlier highs, indicating traders are stepping back, and Funding Rates, while positive, show a lack of aggressive long positioning.

Ethereum [ETH] may not be as strong as it seems right now. While the price might look momentarily steady, there’s more to this than what meets the eye.

Large players have continued to stay active, but will this pace hold without retail support?

Not enough demand for Ethereum

According to a recent report, Ethereum faces weaker demand from U.S investors, even with global activity. The Coinbase Premium Index, which compares ETH prices on Coinbase and Binance, was negative with a value of around -0.0149 at press time.

Source: Cryptoquant

Put simply, this means Ethereum [ETH] might be trading cheaper on Coinbase, than on Binance. That means lower buying pressure or a hike in selling in the U.S.

Here, what’s interesting is that this gap has persisted even during a recovery. No matter how brief it may be. A move back towards neutral or positive levels, however, would prove improved sentiment and stronger support from U.S investors.

The whales are here, but retail is not

Things get clear when looking at order flow. While U.S demand has been weak, large players have been active in the market.

In fact, CryptoQuant data highlighted consistently elevated average order sizes. So, whale-sized trades have been dominating Ethereum’s spot activity.

Source: Ethereum

What’s missing, however, is retail participation. There’s little indication of smaller order flows picking up alongside these larger trades. The market structure has been pretty one-sided.

Such setups may lack staying power.

Steady, but not quite powerful

Source: TradingView

On the daily chart, Ethereum [ETH] held on above the $2,100-zone. However, it looked shaky at best. Especially since while the RSI was at neutral levels, the MACD was flat. Put simply, its recent push has been losing strength.

Source: Coinalyze

Derivatives numbers appeared to be of a similar vein too. Open Interest fell lower from earlier highs – A sign that traders may be stepping back.

At the same time, Funding Rates suggested longs were still dominant… but not aggressively so.


Final Summary

  • Ethereum doesn’t have much U.S demand.
  • Whale activity has been dominant, but lack of retail support makes any upside fragile.

Related Questions

QWhat does the negative Coinbase Premium Index indicate about Ethereum demand in the U.S.?

AThe negative Coinbase Premium Index indicates that Ethereum is trading cheaper on Coinbase compared to Binance, suggesting lower buying pressure or increased selling activity from U.S. investors.

QHow has whale activity contrasted with retail participation in Ethereum's market?

AWhale activity has been consistently elevated with large order sizes dominating spot trades, but retail participation remains weak with no significant increase in smaller order flows.

QWhat technical indicators suggest Ethereum's recent price push is losing strength?

AThe RSI is at neutral levels and the MACD is flat, indicating that Ethereum's recent upward momentum is weakening despite holding above the $2,100 zone.

QWhat does the decline in Open Interest and neutral Funding Rates imply for Ethereum's derivatives market?

AThe decline in Open Interest suggests traders are stepping back, while neutral Funding Rates indicate longs are dominant but not aggressive, reflecting cautious sentiment.

QWhy might Ethereum's current market structure lack staying power according to the article?

AThe market structure lacks staying power because it relies heavily on whale activity without broader retail support, making any potential upside fragile and unsustainable.

Related Reads

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

NVIDIA founder and CEO Jensen Huang, in a conversation with Sequoia Capital's Konstantine Buhler, argues that we are witnessing the most significant computing shift in 60 years—from retrieval-based to generative computing. Instead of just storing and retrieving data, future systems will generate highly personalized content (text, images, video) on demand, powered by massive "AI factories." Huang envisions a global "intelligence network" that will envelop the planet, following the historical patterns of energy and communication grids. He outlines a five-layer investment framework: 1) Energy, 2) Chips/Computers, 3) Infrastructure (data centers), 4) AI Models, and 5) Applications. He predicts this ecosystem will reach a scale of $20 trillion annually. Crucially, Huang pushes back against fears of AI-driven job loss. He distinguishes between specific "tasks" (e.g., typing, analyzing images) and overall "jobs" (e.g., CEO, radiologist). While AI automates tasks, it increases efficiency and demand for the higher-value problem-solving aspects of professions, thus creating more jobs and "up-leveling" careers. The real risk, he asserts, is not being replaced by AI, but being outperformed by someone who effectively leverages it. He urges everyone to embrace AI as a tool for augmented capability and innovation.

marsbit24m ago

Sequoia Dialogue with Jensen Huang: Computing Model Undergoes a 60-Year Transformation; You Won't Be Replaced by AI, But You Will Be Dimensionality-Reduced by 'Those Who Master AI'

marsbit24m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

Titled "I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": AI User Reactions on Reddit Anthropic recently released Claude Fable 5, its first publicly available 'Mythos'-tier model, achieving 80.3% on the SWE-Bench Pro benchmark and significantly outperforming its predecessor and competitors. However, a viral Reddit post titled "Claude Fable made me realize I don't need better models anymore" highlighted a growing user sentiment of "good enough." Top comments expressed "model fatigue," with users stating that earlier models like Opus 4.5/4.8 already sufficed for their workflows. High cost was a key concern, as Fable 5's API is nearly twice the price of Opus 4.8, with users questioning the return on investment and suggesting the field has hit a plateau. The most frequent complaint targeted Fable 5's stringent safety filters. Designed to intercept high-risk requests (e.g., cybersecurity), the system was perceived as overly conservative. Users reported frequent rejections for routine security-related tasks, leading to automatic fallbacks to the older Opus model. Paying users were particularly frustrated, feeling they paid a premium for a less usable product. Dissenting voices came from users with heavy, complex tasks. For workloads like high-energy physics simulations with thousands of code lines, Fable 5's improved long-context understanding and error detection represented a significant, worthwhile leap—described as moving from a "college player to an NBA starter." The debate underscores a divergence between benchmark performance and practical utility. For most users, current models meet their needs, making further advances relevant only for extreme use-cases. The discussion also raised concerns about a potential "Public AI Freeze," where the most powerful models (like the restricted Mythos 5) remain exclusive to enterprises and governments, while public offerings stagnate. The launch presents two report cards: one of technical excellence and another of user skepticism. Fable 5's ultimate reception may depend on Anthropic's ability to refine its safety filters and justify its cost for specialized, high-demand users.

marsbit31m ago

"I Don't Need a Better Model Anymore": A Panorama of AI Users Under a Reddit Hot Post

marsbit31m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

With AI-generated web traffic surpassing human activity, websites face a crisis as AI agents bypass ads, avoid clicks, and scrape data without generating revenue. This disrupts the ad-based internet economy, diverting traffic and reducing site visits. In response, sites are blocking AI crawlers and deploying traps like Cloudflare's "honeypot" pages. Traditional CAPTCHAs are now ineffective against advanced AI. The focus has shifted to behavioral biometrics—analyzing unique human patterns such as cursor movement, typing rhythm, and keystroke dynamics. Companies like IBM and BioCatch use this data to distinguish humans from bots, even detecting fraud through behavioral inconsistencies. Two competing approaches aim to verify human identity centrally. Sam Altman’s World (formerly Worldcoin) uses iris scanning to create unique credentials, though it faces privacy concerns and regulatory bans. Alternatively, cryptographic zero-knowledge proofs offer anonymous verification without revealing personal data, championed by Vitalik Buterin to avoid centralized surveillance. However, both systems have flaws. Centralized solutions risk biometric data misuse, while decentralized models may be exploited through identity rental markets in economically unequal regions. Despite challenges, the author favors cryptographic methods for preserving privacy over pervasive behavioral monitoring that permanently captures and controls personal biometric data.

marsbit40m ago

When AI Traffic Surpasses Humans, How Do You Prove You're Human?

marsbit40m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

**The 2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why Blockchain is the "Cure" AI Cannot Ignore** Decentralized AI addresses fundamental bottlenecks of centralized AI: scarce and expensive computational resources, excessive control concentration, unverifiable model outputs, and increasing difficulty in acquiring training data due to privacy and regulation. Blockchain offers a path to make intelligence open, verifiable, and economically accessible. The technical stack comprises three layers: 1. **Applications & Services**: The main crypto use cases are "Agentic Finance" (converting natural language into on-chain actions) and "Agentic Payments" for machine-to-machine commerce. Projects like Giza, Infinity Labs, Coinvest AI, and x402 (handling 173M+ transactions) are key players. 2. **Middleware**: This coordination layer enables agents to discover, identify, and transact. Notable projects include Gokite AI (specialized L1), Virtuals (an OS for the agent economy), and especially Bittensor—a network of specialized subnets forming competitive AI micro-economies. 3. **Infrastructure**: The capital-intensive layer providing raw resources. It includes decentralized compute (Akash, Render, Aethir), verifiable inference (Venice AI, OpenGradient), distributed training (Prime Intellect, Templar AI), decentralized storage (Filecoin, Walrus), and privacy/verification layers (Nillion, Arcium, Phala Network) using technologies like ZKPs, MPC, and TEEs. The outlook for 2026-2027 indicates AI demand outpacing infrastructure, with AI agents as a primary growth engine. Computation is becoming an asset class, with on-chain markets as its financial layer. Tokenomics is emerging as a structural advantage for coordinating capital, compute, and data in decentralized AI networks. While still early—with adoption uneven and revenue often trailing token incentives—projects like Bittensor, NEAR, and Virtuals demonstrate a shift from speculative narrative to a new model for coordinating intelligence.

marsbit43m ago

2026 Landscape of Decentralized AI: Why is Blockchain the Inevitable "Antidote" for AI?

marsbit43m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

Cash Flow as the Moat: A Playbook for Crypto Founders Historically, the most enduring businesses have been built by positioning themselves within the "flow of funds"—facilitating the creation and transfer of value in a network and extracting a portion of it. Cryptocurrency is the first modern technology natively built for this purpose. For startups, failing to architect products and businesses to leverage these principles means missing a major opportunity. Blockchains are inherently network businesses. Each transaction settles on a shared ledger, and every new participant strengthens the underlying network for all. Well-designed network tokens amplify this by aligning users, developers, and validators around growing the network, with value flowing back to contributors in a transparent feedback loop. This model is not new; companies from railroads and Standard Oil to Google, Meta, and AWS have thrived by inserting themselves into critical flows of value (goods, attention, compute). Financial markets make it even clearer: firms like Visa and major market makers generate immense revenue not by predicting markets but by being in the path of transactions. The combination of fund flow and network effects creates one of the most durable business structures. The high margins in traditional finance (payments, custody, lending, FX) represent prime targets. Crypto founders have the opportunity to build the next version—programmable, instant, global, and natively in the flow of funds. The frontier extends beyond finance to areas like computing/GPUs, AI training data, energy, robotics, and space—markets without entrenched intermediaries, ripe for building new, efficient value rails on programmable infrastructure. Founders should ask: Are you in the flow of funds today? Does your revenue scale 10x with the value of activity on your platform? Where in your target market are profit margins highest relative to value created? The opportunity is clear: embed your startup into the new flows of value and let the network effects accumulate.

marsbit45m ago

a16z Crypto Partner: Cash Flow is the Moat

marsbit45m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of ETH (ETH) are presented below.

活动图片