Is Bitcoin’s top still ahead? Decoding impact of equity divergence

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-01-27Last updated on 2026-01-27

Abstract

Bitcoin is experiencing bearish pressure and a short-term downtrend, with market sentiment suggesting a local top may be forming. However, its historical correlation with U.S. equity markets like the S&P 500 presents a potential upside opportunity. Since September 2025, Bitcoin has diverged from equities, declining roughly 30% while major indices gained. This underperformance may narrow if Bitcoin catches up through upward price movement. Key challenges include persistent capital outflows, with U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs seeing $4.68 billion in net sales since November. Despite this, Bitcoin's price has held relatively stable, declining only about $2,900, supported by strong hashrate levels and miner accumulation. A significant risk is a $7 billion outflow from stablecoins, reflecting reduced risk appetite and posing a downside threat similar to the 2021 Terra-Luna collapse. Overall, Bitcoin could be poised for a rebound aligned with equities, but stablecoin outflows remain a critical near-term risk.

Bitcoin [BTC], the world’s largest cryptocurrency, continues to face bearish pressure as its short-term downtrend remains intact.

While market sentiment increasingly points to the possibility that a local top may already be forming, Bitcoin’s relationship with traditional equity markets presents a contrasting narrative, one that strengthens the case for a potential upside reversion.

Equity markets could set the stage for Bitcoin

BTC and U.S. equity indices, particularly the S&P 500, Russell 2000, and Nasdaq, have historically shown a strong correlation in price movement.

In past cycles, this alignment has often resulted in both asset classes forming market tops around the same period, a pattern that has played out across four distinct cycles.

July 2023 stands out as a unique case. While these markets appeared to top around the same time, BTC recovered quickly, leaving other assets lagging for an extended period.

This cycle, however, is unfolding differently. Since September 2025, price action has diverged. Bitcoin has trended lower, while equities have maintained their bullish momentum.

In relative terms, BTC is down roughly 30%, while the S&P 500 has gained 6.32%, the Russell 2000 has advanced 13.27%, and the Nasdaq is up 7.74%.

This divergence places Bitcoin in a position of relative underperformance. Historically, such gaps have often narrowed over time, implying that Bitcoin could attempt to close the difference through upward price movement as capital continues to build.

While not guaranteed, the setup remains notable.

Can Bitcoin close the gap?

Liquidity outflows remain Bitcoin’s primary challenge, and the market must reverse this trend to support a sustained recovery.

Capital outflows have dominated for several months. Looking at U.S. spot Bitcoin exchange-traded funds as a reference, investors have sold approximately $4.68 billion worth of Bitcoin between November and the present period, according to SoSovalue.

Despite this sustained selling, BTC’s price has held up relatively well. Since November 2025, when the asset recorded its first monthly net sales in two months, Bitcoin has declined from $91,200 to around $88,300 at the time of writing.

Market participants have absorbed much of this selling pressure, with Bitcoin’s value declining by roughly $2,900 despite the scale of outflows.

Bitcoin’s hashrate has also remained elevated during this period of price weakness. Historically, a rising hashrate reflects sustained network demand, as miners expand operations to meet participation levels.

Miner behavior further supports this view. Over recent days, miner-associated wallets have added more than 400 Bitcoin to their reserves, indicating a preference for accumulation rather than distribution. This dynamic supports Bitcoin’s short- to near-term price stability.

Stablecoin liquidity remains a key risk

A major downside risk persists in the form of declining stablecoin liquidity.

Data from CryptoQuant shows a $7 billion outflow from ERC-20-based stablecoins, with total supply falling from $162 billion to $155 billion over a short period.

The last comparable outflow occurred during the 2021 Terra-Luna collapse, a period that preceded a sharp decline in Bitcoin’s price.

Outflows of this magnitude typically reflect reduced risk appetite across the broader crypto market. With Bitcoin positioned at the center of that ecosystem, sustained stablecoin redemptions continue to place pressure on its near-term outlook.


Final Thoughts

  • Bitcoin’s historical correlation with equities indicates the asset could be positioned for a catch-up move.
  • The market continues to absorb selling pressure, though a $7 billion stablecoin outflow remains a key downside risk.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main bearish pressure currently facing Bitcoin according to the article?

ABitcoin continues to face bearish pressure as its short-term downtrend remains intact.

QHow has Bitcoin's price performance diverged from major U.S. equity indices since September 2025?

ABitcoin has trended lower (down roughly 30%), while the S&P 500 has gained 6.32%, the Russell 2000 advanced 13.27%, and the Nasdaq is up 7.74%.

QWhat is identified as Bitcoin's primary challenge for achieving a sustained recovery?

ALiquidity outflows remain Bitcoin’s primary challenge, and the market must reverse this trend to support a sustained recovery.

QWhat positive on-chain metric is mentioned that supports Bitcoin's network demand despite price weakness?

ABitcoin’s hashrate has remained elevated during this period of price weakness, reflecting sustained network demand as miners expand operations.

QWhat major downside risk, comparable to the 2021 Terra-Luna collapse, is highlighted in the article?

AA major downside risk is the declining stablecoin liquidity, with a $7 billion outflow from ERC-20-based stablecoins, which typically reflects reduced risk appetite and places pressure on Bitcoin's price.

Related Reads

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

Why do you always lose money on Polymarket? Because you bet on news, while the pros study the rules. This article explains how top traders ("che tou") profit by meticulously analyzing market rules, not just predicting events. Polymarket, a prediction market platform, often sees disputes over event outcomes due to ambiguous rule wording. For instance, a market asking "Who will be the leader of Venezuela by the end of 2026?" was misinterpreted by many who bet on Delcy Rodríguez, assuming she held power. However, the rules specified "officially holds" as the formally appointed, sworn-in individual. Since Nicolás Maduro was still recognized as president officially, he won the market—even being in prison. To resolve such disputes, Polymarket uses a decentralized arbitration system via UMA protocol. The process involves: 1. Proposal: Anyone can propose a market outcome by staking 750 USDC, earning 5 USDC if unchallenged. 2. Dispute: A 2-hour window allows challenges with a 750 USDC stake; successful challengers earn 250 USDC. 3. Discussion: A 48-hour period on UMA Discord for evidence and debate. 4. Voting: UMA token holders vote in two 24-hour phases (blind then public). Outcomes require >65% consensus and 5M tokens voted; otherwise, four re-votes occur before Polymarket intervention. 5. Settlement: Results are final and automatic. Unlike traditional courts, Polymarket’s system lacks separation between arbitrators and stakeholders—voters often hold market positions, creating conflicts of interest. This leads to herd mentality in discussions and non-transparent outcomes without explanatory rulings, preventing precedent formation. Thus, success on Polymarket hinges on deep rule interpretation, not just event prediction, exploiting gaps between reality and contractual wording.

marsbit1h ago

Why Do You Always Lose Money on Polymarket? Because You're Betting on News, While the Pros Read the Rules

marsbit1h ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

DeepSeek, a leading Chinese AI company, has initiated its first external funding round, aiming to raise at least $300 million at a valuation of no less than $10 billion. This move marks a significant shift from its founder Liang Wenfeng’s previous idealistic stance of rejecting external capital to maintain independence. Despite strong financial backing from its parent company, quantitative trading firm幻方量化 (Huanfang Quant), which provided an estimated $700 million in revenue in 2025 alone, DeepSeek faces mounting challenges. Key issues include a 15-month gap in major model updates, delays in its flagship V4 release, and the loss of several core researchers to competitors offering significantly higher compensation. The company is also undergoing a strategic pivot by migrating its infrastructure from NVIDIA’s CUDA to Huawei’s Ascend platform, a move aligned with China’s push for technological self-reliance amid U.S. export controls. However, DeepSeek lags behind rivals like智谱AI and MiniMax—both now publicly listed—in areas such as product ecosystem, multimodal capabilities, and commercialization. The funding round, though relatively small in scale, is seen as a way to establish a market-validated valuation anchor, making employee stock options more competitive and facilitating talent retention. It also signals DeepSeek’s transition from a pure research-oriented organization to a commercially-driven player in the global AI ecosystem.

marsbit2h ago

DeepSeek Funding: Liang Wenfeng's 'Realist' Pivot

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片