Has Bitcoin bottomed? Why $60K may not be BTC’s floor

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-02-06Last updated on 2026-02-06

Abstract

The article questions whether Bitcoin has reached its bottom after a 4% intraday bounce from the $60K level. While technical indicators like an oversold RSI suggest a potential local bottom, on-chain metrics and market sentiment remain unconvinced. Over 9.3 million BTC are held at a loss—the highest since January 2023—and the price has fallen below the mining electrical cost of $77K, increasing capitulation risks. Historical patterns suggest Bitcoin could still drop to $38K, a 70% decline from its $126K ATH. Macro supply-demand imbalances and a lack of strong institutional demand indicate that the $60K support may not hold, with a move toward $50K possible.

In the current scenario, the key question is whether the market has actually bottomed. Historically, early bottoming signals tend to include investor profit-taking, clear signs of seller exhaustion, and an asset becoming deeply oversold.

Is Bitcoin [BTC] exhibiting any of these signals? From a technical standpoint, BTC’s RSI is deeply oversold, dropping to around 15. This move aligns with Bitcoin’s roughly 33% correction from the $97k peak.

Against this setup, BTC’s 4% intraday jump from $60k hints at a potential local bottom. However, the key question is whether on-chain metrics confirm this view. If not, the bounce could quickly turn into a bull trap.

Market questions BTC’s true bottom

Despite early signals, the market still doesn’t seem fully convinced.

On one side, analysts argue that Bitcoin’s current pullback is simply an “extension” of the 2025 bear phase, even though BTC printed a new all-time high near $126k during the cycle.

So, what is this divergence signaling? By this view, BTC has continued to underperform since the start of 2025 despite the ATH, falling 33% versus the S&P500, 58% versus gold, and 26% relative to M2 expansion.

In simple terms, analysts believe Bitcoin may now be carving out a bottom, supported by its 30% correction since early 2025. Under this view, the bear phase could be nearing an end, with $60k acting as a base for a reversal.

However, skeptics argue that $60k may mark the start of a deeper move.

Historically, Bitcoin bear markets have followed a pattern of deep but shrinking declines. If this trend continues, a potential 2026 bottom near a 70% drop from the $126k ATH would place Bitcoin around the $38k level.

This sets up a key strategic question for the market: Are participants positioning to accumulate the “dip,” or reducing exposure before a deeper correction pushes PnL further into the red and extends the bear phase?

Bitcoin’s recovery case weakens as structural stress builds

The road to recovery for Bitcoin HODLers doesn’t look immediate.

According to Glassnode data, more than 9.3 million BTC are underwater, the highest level since January 2023. Put simply, a large portion of holders are sitting on unrealized losses, putting market conviction under pressure.

At the same time, Bitcoin has dropped below its estimated electrical cost near $77k. When price falls beneath this level, mining becomes less profitable, increasing capitulation risk during late-stage bear markets.

Taken together, Bitcoin now needs a clear catalyst to absorb supply, reignite FOMO, and restore HODLing conviction among underwater holders. The key issue is that a strong institutional bid still hasn’t returned.

From a macro perspective, this sets up a classic supply-demand imbalance, with available supply outpacing demand. Rising capitulation risk only strengthens this dynamic, further discouraging long-term holding.

In this context, BTC’s structure doesn’t yet confirm $60k as a bottom.

The result? Bitcoin’s 4% intraday bounce could fade into another fakeout, potentially triggering long liquidations and sending price back toward the $50k zone, keeping the broader $38k bottom thesis firmly in play.


Final Thoughts

  • Despite BTC’s 4% intraday bounce and early technical signals, on-chain stress, miner pressure, and unrealized losses suggest the $60k level is not yet a firm floor.
  • Historical patterns and macro supply-demand imbalances indicate Bitcoin could revisit the $50k zone, keeping the $38k bottom thesis in play.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat are the key technical and on-chain signals that historically indicate a market bottom for Bitcoin?

AHistorically, early bottoming signals include investor profit-taking, clear signs of seller exhaustion, and an asset becoming deeply oversold. On-chain, a key signal is a reduction in the number of coins in an unrealized loss position, which is currently high at over 9.3 million BTC.

QWhy are some analysts skeptical that $60,000 is Bitcoin's true market bottom?

ASkeptics argue that $60k may mark the start of a deeper move. They point to historical patterns where Bitcoin bear markets see deep but shrinking declines, potentially leading to a bottom around $38k (a 70% drop from the $126k ATH). On-chain stress and miner capitulation risk also weaken the case for $60k being a firm floor.

QWhat is the significance of Bitcoin's price falling below its estimated electrical cost of $77k?

AWhen Bitcoin's price falls below its estimated electrical cost, mining becomes less profitable. This increases the risk of miner capitulation during late-stage bear markets, as miners may be forced to sell their Bitcoin holdings to cover operational costs, adding further selling pressure to the market.

QAccording to the article, what is needed for Bitcoin to stage a sustainable recovery?

ABitcoin needs a clear catalyst to absorb supply, reignite FOMO (fear of missing out), and restore holding conviction among the large number of underwater holders. Crucially, a strong institutional bid, which has not yet returned, is needed to correct the current supply-demand imbalance.

QHow has Bitcoin's performance in 2025 compared to traditional assets like the S&P 500 and gold?

ADespite printing a new all-time high near $126k, Bitcoin has underperformed relative to traditional assets since the start of 2025. It has fallen 33% versus the S&P500, 58% versus gold, and 26% relative to M2 expansion.

Related Reads

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

In July 2026, only 153 unique venture capital firms participated in disclosed crypto funding rounds, marking the lowest monthly count since November 2020. This figure represents an 87% decline from the peak of 1,177 firms in 2022. Overall, the first seven months of 2026 saw crypto projects raise approximately $11.78 billion across 481 rounds. This crypto VC contraction contrasts sharply with the broader venture capital landscape, where global VC investment reached a record $560.4 billion in H1 2026, heavily fueled by major AI company financings. This shift in capital allocation has drawn funds away from the crypto sector. Within crypto, funding is highly concentrated. Trading platforms, prediction markets, and payment sectors absorbed 53% of the total capital. While early-stage deals remain frequent, the largest sums flow to a few late-stage rounds and mergers & acquisitions, which surged to $7.23 billion in Q2 2026. The market is consolidating around top funds like a16z crypto and Dragonfly, which successfully raised new multi-billion dollar funds, while many smaller firms have retreated. Analysts describe this as a "great extinction" for crypto VCs, where capital is becoming more selective, favoring proven business models and assets over early-stage speculation. This raises the bar for project quality, funding efficiency, and viable exit paths.

marsbit13m ago

Only 153 Venture Capital Firms Invested in July: Is the Crypto VC Industry Experiencing a 'Mass Extinction'?

marsbit13m ago

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

Strategy, the largest corporate holder of Bitcoin, reported a net loss of $8.22 billion for the second quarter. This loss was primarily driven by an $8.32 billion unrealized loss on its Bitcoin holdings due to a decline in the asset's price during the period. Despite these paper losses, the company increased its Bitcoin holdings to 843,775 BTC, a 25% growth since the start of the year. As part of a new monetization strategy, Strategy sold approximately $218.4 million worth of Bitcoin, mainly to fund dividends for preferred shareholders, with $216 million of that sold after Q2 ended. The company also built a $3.75 billion cash reserve, which it claims is sufficient to cover over two years of dividend and interest payments, aiming to insulate itself from Bitcoin's volatility while meeting obligations. Following the earnings release, Strategy's stock (MSTR) rose 4.7% in regular trading but corrected slightly after-hours. This pattern reflects how the company's accounting results are heavily tied to Bitcoin's price swings, even as its long-term strategy remains unchanged. The report indicates that Strategy is maintaining its core strategy of accumulating Bitcoin while building a financial buffer. This quarterly loss follows a recognizable pattern, with the company posting significant unrealized losses in previous quarters (e.g., $12.4 billion in Q4 2025 and ~$12.5 billion in Q1 2026) due to fair-value accounting. A key technical shift is its new monetization program, which introduces periodic selling pressure on the market, transitioning Strategy from a pure accumulator to a participant that occasionally adds supply. A critical question remains: how long can the cash reserve cover dividend obligations if a Bitcoin price downturn persists beyond two years?

cryptonews.ru33m ago

Strategy's Loss in the Second Quarter Reaches $8.22 Billion Amid Bitcoin Decline

cryptonews.ru33m ago

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

Telegram founder Pavel Durov publicly reacted to being labeled a "terrorist" by Russian authorities, stating the designation came after he refused demands for mass surveillance and censorship on the platform. In a Telegram post, he highlighted that this status formally bans him from "publishing information online." Durov concluded with a statement widely circulated: Russian officials "clearly don't understand who can ban whom on the internet." This remark suggests Durov could potentially restrict official Russian government and officials' channels on Telegram, which continue to operate on the platform despite its formal blocking in Russia. The situation parallels previous, slow-moving state directives, like switching officials to domestic cars, contrasted with the current push to migrate all government communication to the Russian-made messenger MAX by 2030. However, reports indicate many officials still use Telegram via workarounds, fearing surveillance on MAX, while alternatives like BiP and KakaoTalk recently became inaccessible in Russia without a VPN. Durov has not specified any immediate actions against state channels. His statement is an initial response, with further developments depending on the authorities' reaction. The dynamic differs from 2020 when Russian regulators lifted a block on Telegram; now, Durov implies control from within the platform itself over the official accounts that persisted through that earlier blockade.

cryptonews.ru33m ago

Will Terrorist Durov Ban Russian Officials?

cryptonews.ru33m ago

DeepSeek V4 Official Version Arrives, New Capabilities Emerge, Value-for-Money King Enters the Fray

On July 31st, DeepSeek officially launched the public API beta for its DeepSeek-V4-Flash model. A key highlight is its performance on multiple Agent benchmark tests, reportedly nearing or even surpassing the level of the V4-Pro preview version from three months ago. Notably, the Flash model achieves this with significantly smaller scale (130B active parameters vs. Pro's 490B), suggesting that post-training optimization and data quality may be as crucial as raw model size. DeepSeek emphasized that the V4-Flash-0731 uses the same model architecture and size as its preview version, with improvements attributed solely to "re-trained post-training." The update also marks the official debut of DeepSeek's self-developed Agent framework, "Harness." The move signals DeepSeek's strategic push to position its cost-effective Flash model as a competitive base for Agent applications—scenarios requiring autonomous planning, tool usage, and complex task execution—where inference speed and cost are critical. By natively supporting OpenAI's Responses API format and adapting for code-generation scenarios, DeepSeek aims not just to be a cheaper alternative but to establish its own ecosystem in the Agent era. This release follows DeepSeek's record-breaking ~$50 billion fundraising round roughly two months prior, underscoring market confidence in its technology and commercialization prospects. The company is reportedly preparing for another funding round at a valuation of approximately $71 billion. The Flash model's advancement represents a step in fulfilling the high expectations that come with this valuation, setting the stage for the impending release of the V4-Pro official version and intensifying competition in the global Agent landscape.

marsbit37m ago

DeepSeek V4 Official Version Arrives, New Capabilities Emerge, Value-for-Money King Enters the Fray

marsbit37m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片