Glassnode: Crypto Market Enters Later Stages of Bottoming Phase

Foresight NewsPublished on 2026-07-09Last updated on 2026-07-09

Abstract

Glassnode: Crypto Market Enters Later Stages of Bottom Formation Bitcoin has traded below the true market average and the short-term holder cost basis for five consecutive months, indicating a deep undervaluation. On-chain data reveals a significant shift in selling pressure, with long-term holders now accounting for 43% of all realized losses. Daily realized losses for this group recently peaked at $280 million, the highest level since December 2022. While this large-scale capitulation is a hallmark of bear market bottoms, a sustained decline in this metric is a prerequisite for a sustained recovery. Institutional demand remains weak. US spot Bitcoin ETFs continue to see monthly net outflows, although the pace has moderated from June's peak. Furthermore, average daily ETF trading volumes have contracted by approximately 80% from their October 2025 peak, reflecting subdued institutional participation. Derivatives markets present a mixed picture. Overall positioning has shifted to cautiously bullish, with the put/call ratio dropping to a yearly low. However, the options volatility skew remains elevated, signaling that traders are still paying a premium for downside protection. The spot price also trades below the gamma "max pain" level. In summary, multiple indicators suggest the market is in the later phases of a bottoming process, characterized by long-term holder capitulation and weak institutional inflows. However, key confirmation signals for a durable trend reversal—...


Written by: CryptoVizArt, Frederik Theissen, Glassnode

Compiled by: Luffy, Foresight News


Bitcoin price has remained below the true market average and the short-term holder cost basis for five consecutive months, placing it in a deeply undervalued range.


The proportion of realized losses by long-term holders has now risen to 43% of total on-chain realized losses. The daily peak of realized losses reached $280 million, hitting the highest level since December 2022. Spot ETF outflows have moderated but remain in a state of net monthly outflow. The daily average trading volume of ETFs fluctuates between $650 million and $950 million, roughly 80% lower than the market peak in October 2025, indicating institutional buying demand has not yet stabilized.


Derivatives positioning has shifted to a cautiously bullish bias, with the put/call ratio dropping to its lowest level in 2026. However, the options volatility surface still maintains a premium for downside protection, and the spot price remains significantly below the maximum pain point. The market has entered the later stages of bottoming, while selling pressure from long-term holders continues to narrow, forming an important precondition for a market reversal and recovery.


Macro Perspective


Crude Oil Soars, Risk Assets Face Collective Pressure


WTI crude oil has surged 7.9% over the past 7 trading sessions, with most gains concentrated recently, following market news that the US-Iran Memorandum of Understanding has expired. This shock has impacted all asset markets. Bitcoin rose as much as 9.4% this week but has since pulled back to a weekly gain of 5%; the S&P 500 and Euro Stoxx indices have turned negative, with European equities leading the decline among global risk assets. Bitcoin's current trend is highly synchronized with risk assets.



Liquidity Environment: Bull-Bear Contradictions Intensify


Amid the external shock from crude oil, the market liquidity environment presents a fragmented picture. The broad US money supply M2 has climbed to a historical high of $22.8 trillion. Historically, periods of broad money expansion tend to boost market risk appetite. However, the Federal Reserve's balance sheet continues to shrink, currently down $2 trillion from its 2023 peak. These two liquidity signals form a strong counterbalance: broad money supply continues to rise, while quantitative tightening continues, keeping real interest rates around 1% and the opportunity cost of holding non-yielding digital assets high. The macro tailwind window is not completely closed but has not yet formed clear easing support.



On-Chain Data


A Five-Month Deeply Undervalued Range


Over the past week, Bitcoin rebounded from $58,300 to $64,400, showing short-term recovery. However, the price remains significantly below the true market average of $76,600 and the short-term holder cost basis of $72,200. The market cannot exit the deeply undervalued range until the price reclaims these two key levels; otherwise, the market remains vulnerable to downside catalysts from external negative factors.


The duration of this discounted pricing period is noteworthy. Since early February 2026, the price has consistently traded below the cost basis of active investors and the breakeven point for recent entrants, spanning nearly five months. This is one of the longer-lasting deep discount cycles in Bitcoin's history.


Sustained turnover of coins during a prolonged period of discount, with new capital continuously accumulating below the cost basis of previous buyers and active market participants, has historically been the foundation for forming a cycle bottom. This presents long-term allocation attractiveness for value investors. Various indicators suggest the bottoming process is entering its later stages, but the possibility of a retracement to $53,000 cannot be entirely ruled out.



Concentrated Stop-Losses from Long-Term Holders with High-Cost Basis


The market is building a cycle bottom. The core current issue is identifying the main source of selling pressure. The relative indicator of profit/loss realization by long-term and short-term holders shows the distribution proportion of realized profits/losses across the entire market between these two cohorts, directly reflecting the scale of profit/loss-taking.


After the price fell below the true market average, the 30-day moving average of realized loss amounts by long-term holders has climbed from 15% in early February 2026 to the current 43%. Loss-driven selling from this group has become the core bearish force suppressing the price.


These investors mostly entered near cycle highs. After enduring months of deep drawdowns, their holding confidence has gradually depleted, leading to concentrated selling. This coin structure directly explains why each rebound faces concentrated selling from deeply trapped holders, preventing the price from firmly stabilizing above the current range's upper bound.



Stop-Loss Selling Pressure Shows No Signs of Abating Yet


With long-term holder realized losses becoming the market's primary downward pressure, the next key observation is whether this selling pressure begins to subside.


The Entity-Adjusted Long-Term Holder Realized Loss indicator (30-day smoothed average) measures the loss amount from sells by users holding for more than 155 days, excluding internal address transfers, precisely reflecting genuine stop-loss exit behavior. This indicator recently hit a new daily peak, with daily realized loss volume reaching approximately $280 million. This is the highest level since December 2022 and represents the second major wave of long-term holder stop-losses in this bear market.


The key difference is that after the first stop-loss peak, selling pressure temporarily receded. However, the current wave shows no signs of contraction in scale. A significant decline in this indicator is necessary for the market to establish a foundation for a shift towards a bull market. Its trend over the coming weeks and months will be the core signal for judging whether the market has truly cleared out selling pressure.



Off-Chain Market


ETF Outflows Slow, But Outflow Trend Not Reversed


Shifting from on-chain to off-chain markets, spot ETF fund flows provide direct insight into institutional capital behavior. The 30-day moving average of ETF net flows reflects the daily net capital outflow (or inflow) into US spot Bitcoin ETFs, smoothing out single-day volatility to reveal underlying institutional holding trends.


Since mid-May 2026, this indicator entered a state of monthly net outflow. The daily outflow peaked at $193 million in early June and has now subsided to a daily net outflow of $88.9 million. The slowdown in outflow size is a mild positive, but the market continues to experience persistent monthly capital bleeding, indicating institutional buying demand has not stabilized. Only when fund flows consistently narrow to a balanced range can we anticipate short-term price expansion to the upside.



Institutional Trading Volume Remains Sluggish


Besides net inflow data, US spot ETF trading volume helps assess the degree of institutional confidence recovery. The 30-day moving average of daily ETF trading volume currently fluctuates between $650 million and $950 million, comparable to levels seen in Q4 2024. However, this is about 80% lower than the daily peak of $4.4 billion recorded in October 2025.


The current trading volume reflects only basic institutional participation and remains extremely sluggish compared to bull market peaks, indicating that the long-term bullish confidence of ETF investors has not substantively returned. Only when daily trading volume consistently increases while net outflows continue to narrow, and these two signals appear simultaneously, can institutional demand recovery be confirmed. Until both indicators improve in tandem, off-chain data corroborates on-chain metrics, suggesting the market remains predominantly in a bearish structure.



Derivatives Market


Short Covering, Positioning Shifts to Cautiously Bullish


Despite weak risk sentiment, derivative positioning has shown a contrarian shift. The Options Open Interest Put/Call Ratio has dropped to 0.56, the lowest level in 2026. The market currently has approximately two call options for every put option. Option flow confirms this trend: two weeks ago, when Bitcoin revisited lows, the market frantically bought puts for hedging, causing the Put/Call Volume Ratio to spike. With sustained buying of calls, this ratio has rapidly declined, even though the spot price has only recovered part of its losses.


Perpetual swap funding rates also support this positioning shift. The average perpetual funding rate has remained below the 0.01% bull-bear equilibrium line for a long time, far from levels indicating crowded long positioning. The derivatives market has cleared out short-side risk and has shifted to a cautiously bullish stance overall amid external bearish shocks, which is the opposite of the crowded short positioning seen before the previous major decline.



Options Surface Continues to Price Downside Risk


While overall positioning leans bullish, the options volatility surface provides a contrary signal. The 25-delta volatility skew (premium for downside protection relative to upside exposure) remains in positive territory across all tenors. Every sell-off this year has pushed this premium higher, peaking at 24% in late June. This represents the strongest defensive sentiment in front-month contracts since the February plunge. Even with a market bias towards longs, traders are still willing to pay a premium to purchase downside hedging instruments.



Spot Price Deviates from Max Pain Point


Besides positioning and volatility skew, the relative position of the spot price to the options market structure offers further insight. The current Bitcoin spot price is approximately 6% below the aggregate Max Pain point of $66,000. The Max Pain point is the strike price at which the maximum number of open contracts expire worthless upon option expiration, and prices tend to gravitate toward this level before expiry.


This week's decline widened the spread between the spot price and Max Pain, but the deviation is far less extreme than during the February plunge and sits near the middle of the 2026 trading range. Throughout the year, the Max Pain level has consistently acted as a gravitational center for price action, with the spot price oscillating around it, rarely experiencing sustained significant deviations. A sustained price above $66,000 would turn short-term signals optimistic. Further widening of the spread would reinforce the overall defensive sentiment reflected in options positioning.



Cost of Crash Hedging Continues to Decline


While volatility skew and positioning signals show divergence, the absolute cost of hedging downside risk presents a clearer trend. Following the market's modest rebound, the pricing across the bearish end of the 1-month volatility curve has shifted lower. The implied volatility for put options 5% below the spot price has declined significantly. The lowest pricing points on the volatility curve are concentrated in far-out-of-the-money call options.



While overall defensive sentiment persists, the absolute cost traders pay to hedge against declines has decreased noticeably. This trend becomes clearer over a longer timeframe: the volatility premium driven by extreme put buying during the February and June sell-offs has gradually faded since July. The DVOL volatility index has fallen to a 12-month low, indicating the market has entered a low-volatility regime. Cautious sentiment still dominates, but hedging demand is gradually receding.



Summary


A comprehensive assessment of data from three dimensions—on-chain, off-chain, and derivatives—clearly shows characteristics of a late-stage bear market.


On-chain data reveals a persistent, nearly five-month period of deep undervaluation. Long-term holders' daily stop-loss realization peaked at $280 million, indicating large-scale coin redistribution is underway. However, a sustained decline in this stop-loss indicator is a prerequisite for an effective market reversal.


In off-chain data, ETF outflow size has moderated from its June peak, but monthly net outflows persist. Daily average trading volume is down 80% from the October 2025 peak, reflecting weak institutional bullish confidence.


In derivatives, market positioning has shifted to cautiously bullish, with the put/call ratio hitting a yearly low. However, volatility skew and the options surface continue to price in downside risk.


Overall, the fundamental conditions for a market bottom are largely in place, but the key confirming signals have not yet materialized. A subsequent market recovery requires meeting three conditions: a sustained cooling of long-term holder stop-loss selling pressure, stabilization of institutional fund flows, and price stabilization above the true market average. Only under these conditions would the probability of a transition to a bull market cycle significantly increase.

Related Questions

QAccording to the Glassnode report, what are the three core signals that need to appear to confirm the market has truly bottomed and a bull cycle is likely to begin?

AThe report states that the three core signals are: 1) Long-term holder loss realization pressure must cool down sustainably. 2) Institutional fund flows (specifically via ETFs) must stabilize. 3) The price must effectively stand above the Realized Price (true market mean).

QWhat is the primary source of selling pressure in the market according to the on-chain data analysis?

AThe primary source of selling pressure is from long-term holders who are realizing losses. Their share of total on-chain realized losses has risen to 43%, and the daily peak of their loss realization recently hit $280 million, the highest level since December 2022.

QHow do the US spot Bitcoin ETF flow and volume trends reflect institutional sentiment?

AETF data reflects weak institutional sentiment. While the pace of outflows has slowed from its June peak, monthly net outflows continue. Furthermore, the average daily trading volume has remained low, around $650-950 million, which is about 80% lower than the peak volume of $4.4 billion in October 2025, indicating a lack of strong institutional buying demand.

QWhat contradictory signals are presented by the derivatives market data?

AThe derivatives market shows contradictory signals: On one hand, the overall positioning has turned cautiously bullish, with the Put/Call Open Interest ratio dropping to a yearly low of 0.56. On the other hand, the options volatility skew remains in contango (defensive premium), and traders are still paying a premium for downside protection, indicating persistent fear of further declines.

QWhat is the current relationship between the spot Bitcoin price and the "Max Pain" strike price for options, and what does it imply?

AThe current spot Bitcoin price is about 6% below the aggregate Max Pain strike price of $66,000. Throughout the year, the Max Pain price has acted as a gravitational center. If the price sustainably holds above $66,000, it would be a short-term bullish signal. A widening gap would reinforce defensive sentiment in the options market.

Related Reads

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

Podcast Summary: Dialogue with GSR's Head of Asset Management: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Check Lending Rates on Aave Andy Baehr, Managing Director of Asset Management at GSR, discusses the current crypto market, characterizing it as stuck in a state of "ambivalence" with short-lived, unsustainable rallies. He outlines a simple framework: the market moves between "ambivalence" and "conviction" (sustained upward momentum). Currently, every rally resembles a single-stage rocket booster that quickly fizzles out. Baehr identifies three key signals to watch: 1) DeFi lending rates, 2) the potential passage of the CLARITY Act, and 3) the market forming a consensus on the "Fed hawkish peak." He emphasizes that the most immediate indicator for the sustainability of the recent CPI-triggered rally is the USDC borrowing rate on Aave, currently around 3.75%—close to U.S. Treasury yields. The absence of a credit spread indicates low leverage demand and a lack of market energy. He explains that a healthy, sustained rally requires layered buying pressure. Last year's rally progressed from an ETH short squeeze to crypto-native trader influx and finally to ETF inflows. Currently, this structure is missing. Other potential structural buyers like Digital Asset Treasury (DAT) companies are absent, and ETF flows have proven transient. Baehr notes that while small-cap crypto tokens outperformed large caps in Q2—a potential sign of capitation in major assets—capital is also flowing to more exciting opportunities like AI stocks and tech IPOs, leaving crypto sidelined. Regarding DeFi, he highlights that platforms like Aave provide a clear, real-time signal of leverage demand through their supply/demand-driven interest rates. A significant, sustained rate increase would signal genuine market conviction. He also observes the quiet emergence of fixed-income-like products and vaults in DeFi. On regulation, the probability of the CLARITY Act passing before the August 7th deadline has dropped linearly from 75% to below 40% on Polymarket. Baehr suggests its passage would be treated as a bullish surprise, a potent driver for price movement. However, political hurdles, including ethical clause debates and disclosures about the First Family's crypto profits, remain significant obstacles. Ultimately, the market awaits clarity on the Fed's terminal rate under Chair Warsh. Until the "Fed Solstice"—the point where the market collectively understands the peak of hawkish policy—sustained conviction will be difficult to achieve.

marsbit13m ago

Podcast Notes | Conversation with GSR Asset Management Head: To Determine if This Crypto Rally is Real, Just Watch the Lending Rates on Aave

marsbit13m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报1h ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News1h ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片