Today, The Hong Kong Exchange Was Once Again Overwhelmed

marsbitPublished on 2026-07-09Last updated on 2026-07-09

Abstract

Hong Kong's stock exchange witnessed an exceptionally busy day on July 9, with a record seven companies conducting initial public offerings (IPOs) simultaneously. The list included major firms such as Luxshare Precision, which launched the largest Hong Kong IPO of the year, and other notable names like Tri-Ring Group and Qiyunshan Food. However, the market reception was sharply divided on the first trading day. While Qiyunshan Food's shares surged over 110%, several other newcomers, including Luxshare Precision, Dingtai High-Tech, and Rigol Technologies, opened below their issue prices, with some falling nearly 20%. This event highlights a broader, bustling IPO scene in Hong Kong for 2024, with 82 Chinese companies listing in the first half alone—more than double the figure from the same period last year. A significant portion of this activity comes from dual "A+H" listings, where mainland China-listed firms seek secondary listings in Hong Kong. These larger companies have accounted for nearly 60% of total fundraising. Despite the high volume, recent trends show a cooling market sentiment for many new listings. Several IPOs in early July, including that of Tongrentang Healthcare, debuted with significant losses, indicating increased investor caution and selectivity. The market narrative is shifting, with capital increasingly concentrating on high-growth sectors like artificial intelligence, robotics, and semiconductors, while traditional manufacturing and consumer goods fac...

Today (July 9th), seven IPOs collectively rang the opening bell at the Hong Kong Exchange (HKEX)—

Luxshare Precision, Dingtai High-tech, Puyuan Jingdian, Sanhuan Group, Qiyunshan Food, Luoshi Robot, and Dongfang Kemo, setting a record for the highest number of IPOs on a single day at the HKEX this year.

At the morning open, new shares began to break their issue price: Luxshare Precision broke issue price by 5%, Dingtai High-tech fell over 9%, Puyuan Jingdian's decline approached 20%. Sanhuan Group opened flat, Dongfang Kemo opened lower before rising slightly. On the other hand, Qiyunshan Food surged over 110%, and Luoshi Robot rose slightly, with a market capitalization of about HKD 10 billion.

At this very moment, the procession of companies seeking IPOs in Hong Kong is vast and mighty. However, amidst the bustling scene, an extreme divergence is also playing out.

The HKEX Boils Over: Seven IPOs in One Day

This includes four "A+H" new shares.

Luxshare Precision has created the largest IPO in Hong Kong stocks this year, helmed by a female leader—Wang Laichun. In her early years, she started as an assembly line worker, later founded an OEM factory from scratch, and gained fame through cooperation with Apple. Luxshare Precision was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in 2010, and its current market capitalization is nearly CNY 450 billion, making it the "Apple supply chain leader" on the A-share market.

For this Hong Kong listing, Luxshare Precision raised approximately HKD 24.3 billion, with equally astonishing subscription demand. Twenty-six cornerstone investors including Temasek, GIC, Abu Dhabi Investment Authority, Tencent, and Hillhouse collectively subscribed over HKD 11 billion.

Dingtai High-tech is also led by a female leader—Wang Xin. Venturing south at age 16, she founded Dingtai High-tech in 2005, building PCB micro tools into a company with nearly CNY 200 billion market capitalization. The public offering for its H-shares was oversubscribed 354 times, with 16 cornerstone investors including Shenghong Technology, Hillhouse, E Fund, and Barings collectively subscribing about HKD 1.991 billion.

Sanhuan Group is a global leader in electronic ceramics, with its Hong Kong listing introducing cornerstones such as Temasek, CPE Source, Alibaba, and Tencent. Puyuan Jingdian is an electronic measurement instrument company; its H-share offering was oversubscribed 78 times, attracting seven cornerstone investors including Hillhouse, Sungrow Power, and Suzhou High-tech Zone.

Luoshi Robot landed on the HKEX, becoming the "first stock of full-series intelligent robots." Its founder, Tuo Hua, is currently a Ph.D. student in Mechanics at Harbin Institute of Technology. The public offering was oversubscribed 156 times, with GF Fund, Huatai Capital, etc., acting as cornerstones.

Qiyunshan Food hails from Jiangxi, specializing in southern sour jujube cakes, dubbed the "first stock of southern sour jujube snacks." Dongfang Kemo is the world's second-largest manufacturer of electronic paper displays. Originally scheduled to list on July 7th, it was delayed until today. Unlike other companies listing on the same day, these two did not introduce cornerstone investors.

Thus, another spectacular scene was born at the HKEX—seven IPOs ringing the bell in one day.

A Warning Sign: Breaking Issue Price Begins

"The HKEX is overwhelmed"—this feeling is complex.

This year, the ringing of the bell at the HKEX has hardly ceased. Counting the five companies listed the previous day and Tongrentang Healthcare listed on July 7th, 13 new stocks have landed on the HKEX this week, with two more tomorrow. Fifteen IPOs within a single week is indeed a rare sight.

In terms of numbers, the HKEX is experiencing a bumper year for IPOs. According to a report by Zero2IPO Research Center, 82 Chinese companies listed on Hong Kong stocks in the first half of the year, a year-on-year increase of 110.3%; the total financing amount was approximately CNY 163.324 billion, a year-on-year increase of 105.8%.

Among these, the "A+H" contingent is particularly prominent. Data shows that 24 companies in Hong Kong stocks during the first half were dual-listed as "A+H," already exceeding the 19 for the whole of 2025. These 24 companies had a total financing scale of CNY 95.651 billion, accounting for nearly 60%.

In other words, the A-share "heavyweights" seeking secondary listings in Hong Kong raised the vast majority of the market's funds.

Recall the fervor for subscribing to Hong Kong new shares a few months ago. At that time, the wealth effect was evident, attracting massive capital inflows. Even companies without outstanding fundamentals could achieve decent grey market or debut performance relying on sentiment premium. An EY report shows that the average first-day return rate for Hong Kong new shares in the first half was 61%, with the highest potential profit from one lot subscription reaching HKD 33,000.

However, entering the second half of the year, the narrative of Hong Kong IPOs has undergone subtle changes. Most newly listed shares performed weakly on their debut, even falling into deep price-breaking territory.

Tongrentang Healthcare's experience was the most profound. As the fourth listed company under the Tongrentang Group, it was originally scheduled to list in Hong Kong in March this year but withdrew at the last moment. After nearly four months of preparation, it finally stepped onto the IPO stage, only to open below its issue price. On July 7th, Tongrentang Healthcare closed down nearly 40% on its debut.

Anker Innovations, with an A-share market capitalization exceeding CNY 60 billion, also failed to escape misfortune. Listing in Hong Kong on July 2nd with 11 institutions providing support, it fell over 9% intraday on its first day. The five companies listed on July 8th also showed lackluster performance: Ruiwei Technology fell over 27% early in the session; Basic Semiconductor, whose Hong Kong public offering was oversubscribed over 4800 times, saw a maximum first-day increase of only about 18%.

As more and more people line up for IPOs, investors are starting to worry quietly: "Can the Hong Kong market absorb it all?"

Scrambling for the IPO Window

The Hot Get Hotter, The Cold Get Colder

The IPO story is diverging.

The price-breaking camp is crowded with companies from traditional manufacturing, food & beverage, non-ferrous metals, hardware equipment, and other industries. Some have issue P/E ratios significantly higher than the industry median, facing rapid corrections upon listing. Among them, small and medium-sized enterprises with relatively small market capitalization and fragile liquidity are predominant; a small amount of selling pressure can trigger a flash crash.

As the AI wave surges, Hong Kong's stock narrative is being reconstructed. Terms like AI large models, computing power chips, and robots have replaced past themes like consumption, real estate, and finance, becoming the new focus in Hong Kong's IPO market. Capital is clearly concentrating on such high-growth innovative tech companies, and only flowing towards large, leading targets.

Stock performance is the most direct indicator. Since Zhixuan listed in Hong Kong in January at an issue price of HKD 116.2, its peak stock price once rose to HKD 2980, with market capitalization surpassing HKD 1.2 trillion. Even after a pullback, its latest cumulative increase still exceeds 15 times. Similarly, MiniMax rose from an issue price of HKD 165 to a peak of HKD 1330.

The much-feared share lock-up expiration wave also shows different trends. On July 8th, Zhixuan faced its first large-scale lock-up expiration after listing. Surprisingly, its share price surged over HKD 100 billion on the first day of expiration, with nearly 70% of cornerstone investors expressing their intention to hold long-term. MiniMax also saw capital inflows before its lock-up expiration, with intraday gains exceeding 20%.

But for most companies, the curse of "expiration leads to a drop" remains unavoidable. The example is right before our eyes—on the one-year anniversary of "Hong Kong's first AGI stock" Yunzhisheng's listing, the day its lock-up shares were unlocked, its intraday maximum decline approached 50%.

The contrast between these two scenarios is stark. Similar scripts continue to replay in Hong Kong stocks: without sustained, realized commercial performance as support, even the most glamorous industry stories cannot withstand the selling pressure from concentrated selling.

Looking ahead, the number of IPO applications (including confidential submissions) on the Hong Kong exchange has exceeded 500, a record high. The queue is long and mighty, with the palpable anticipation of companies waiting to go public. But listing is not the finish line; a successful listing is the real win.

The hot get hotter, the cold get colder. The dividing line has never been so stark.

This article is from the WeChat public account "投资界" (Touzijie), by Zhou Jiali.

Related Questions

QWhat was the record set by the Hong Kong Stock Exchange (HKEX) on July 9th, as mentioned in the article?

AThe Hong Kong Stock Exchange witnessed a record-setting event with 7 IPOs launching simultaneously, which was the highest number in a single day for the year.

QWhich company had the largest IPO on the HKEX that day, and who is its founder?

ALuxshare Precision had the largest IPO, raising approximately HKD 24.3 billion. Its founder is Wang Laichun, who started as a factory assembly line worker.

QWhat trend did the article highlight regarding the performance of new listings in the Hong Kong IPO market recently?

AThe article highlighted a trend of divergence and differentiation. While some AI and high-growth tech companies saw strong performance, many new listings, particularly in traditional sectors or smaller companies, began to experience significant price drops or 'breaking issue price' shortly after listing.

QWhat is the term used in the article to describe companies listed on both the A-share and H-share markets, and what was their significance in H1 fundraising?

AThe term is 'A+H' dual listing. These companies were significant, as 24 such listings in H1 accounted for nearly 60% of the total funds raised on the HKEX during that period.

QHow did the market react to the share lock-up expiration for the AI company 'Zhipu' compared to a company like 'Yunzhisheng'?

AThe market reactions were starkly different. Zhipu's shares surged by over HKD 100 billion on its lock-up expiration day, with many cornerstone investors indicating long-term holding. In contrast, Yunzhisheng's shares plummeted by nearly 50% on its lock-up expiration day.

Related Reads

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Following the collapse of Huione Pay—dubbed the "Alipay of Southeast Asia"—seven months ago, the region's underground financial guarantee platform sector is undergoing a significant reshuffle. This power vacuum has been swiftly filled by emerging platforms such as XinBi, Tiger/Navigator, JinBei (renamed JinBo), Dali/Tiancheng, and FullyLight. These platforms, operating largely via Telegram and offering services like escrow for illicit transactions, have absorbed the vast user base and markets left behind by Huione. While positioning themselves as "trust intermediaries," their primary clientele consists of networks involved in online scams, money laundering, illegal gambling, and even human trafficking. For instance, the Tiger/Navigator platform explicitly provides "escrow" services for kidnapping-for-ransom operations ("强押车交易"). Data underscores the immense scale: Huione alone processed over $103 billion in cryptocurrency payments and facilitated over $31 billion through its escrow market before its downfall, linking it to Cambodia's notorious Prince Group. Since its collapse, competitors have seen explosive growth. For example, the XinBi platform has accumulated over $1.6 billion in total USDT revenue, while platforms like NewPay, OkPay (under Dali), and FullyLight Wallet collectively processed over $4.8 billion in USDT in a single year. This ecosystem thrives in regions like Cambodia and Myanmar, where regulatory gaps allow these platforms to act as critical financial infrastructure for sprawling cybercrime industries, from scam compounds to online casinos. The article concludes that the moniker "Southeast Asian Alipay" is a misnomer, obscuring the platforms' fundamental role in enabling serious criminal enterprises rather than representing legitimate financial innovation.

Odaily星球日报19m ago

7 Months After the Collapse of Huiwang, Southeast Asia's Escrow Platforms Undergo a Major Reshuffle

Odaily星球日报19m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Title: The Shifting Landscape of Crypto Venture Capital The era of dedicated crypto venture capital funds is undergoing a significant transformation. Once essential for navigating the sector's complexity and high risk, these specialized funds are now facing an identity crisis as the market matures. This shift mirrors historical patterns in other specialized investment classes like cleantech and SPACs, where initial information advantages dissipate as technologies become mainstream and integrated into existing industry frameworks. The article argues that crypto is reaching a critical inflection point, transitioning from a "building phase" to an "integration phase." Major players like Stripe, BlackRock, and Visa now engage with crypto not for its novel mechanics but as a foundational financial infrastructure. Their needs—regulatory compliance, banking partnerships, distribution channels—align with traditional fintech, a domain easily understood by large, generalist funds like Sequoia and Founders Fund. This evolution creates a "barbell effect" within the VC landscape. On one end are massive, diversified platforms that can incorporate crypto as one vertical among many. On the other are small, nimble funds focused on niche, experimental projects. The middle ground—medium-sized dedicated crypto funds—is being squeezed out. Their typical fund size makes it impossible to generate sufficient returns solely from early-stage crypto bets, yet they cannot compete with giants for later-stage deals. Consequently, leading crypto-native firms like Paradigm and Framework Ventures are expanding into AI, robotics, and other sectors, driven partly by LP pressure for better returns amid a broader VC DPI crisis. Others, like Dragonfly and a16z, have narrowed their crypto focus predominantly to financial infrastructure like stablecoins, reframing the sector's core narrative. For crypto entrepreneurs, this consolidation presents challenges. While generalist funds offer larger checks and broader resources, crypto projects now compete fiercely with AI for attention and capital within these firms. Furthermore, the long-term, non-commercial foundational work that built the ecosystem—funded by dedicated crypto VCs—is less likely to attract generalist capital focused on direct returns. The conclusion is that "crypto investor" as a standalone category is becoming obsolete, akin to "internet investor." Crypto is becoming a baseline infrastructure layer. The future will see a barbell structure: large-scale growth financing handled by generalist funds, while pioneering, speculative projects are funded by small, specialized vehicles. The dedicated crypto funds of the 2017-2021 boom, which incubated core infrastructure, are giving way to this new, bifurcated reality.

Foresight News36m ago

The Changing Landscape: What Are Crypto VCs Experiencing?

Foresight News36m ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

Title: As Consensus Forms Faster, What Are Young Investors Betting On? In the rapid evolution of tech investment, a new generation of young investors is navigating a landscape where AI, robotics, commercial aerospace, and quantum computing are advancing simultaneously. Traditional investment logic based on financial models is giving way to a need for deep technical understanding and the ability to act before industry consensus forms. An analysis of trends from the "WAIC FUTURE TECH" list of young investment leaders reveals key shifts in focus. The first major trend is the movement of AI from the digital screen into the physical world. Investment is shifting from large language models and chatbots towards embodied AI, robotics, AI hardware, and edge computing. While demonstrations generate excitement, the real challenge lies in achieving scalable, reliable, and cost-effective delivery in complex real-world environments like factories and logistics. Success depends not just on algorithms but on the integration of sensors, actuators, and control systems. Second, the competitive focus for large models is moving beyond raw capability toward building an "intelligence flywheel." The goal is to create self-reinforcing systems where user interaction generates data, improving the model, which in turn enhances the user experience and attracts more engagement. Companies that successfully embed AI into workflows to create these closed-loop systems can build lasting value that isn't easily erased by the next model upgrade. Third, facing a potential bottleneck in high-quality human-generated data, investors are looking at new underlying technologies. Reinforcement learning and self-play, as demonstrated by AlphaGo Zero, offer paths for AI to generate its own experience. Scientific foundation models, which aim to build general AI capabilities for fields like life sciences and materials discovery, represent a non-consensus direction that could unlock new frontiers of knowledge and data. Finally, in deep-tech areas like quantum computing, commercial aerospace, and space-based infrastructure, patient capital is essential. These fields have long, uncertain development and validation cycles involving complex engineering, supply chains, and regulations. Investment here requires a long-term view, focusing on foundational team capabilities and the eventual emergence of market demand, even if commercial returns are distant. Collectively, these trends illustrate how young investors are adapting to a new era. They are learning to make earlier, technically-informed judgments, balance hype with real-world viability, and provide the patient capital needed to build the deep-tech foundations of the future.

marsbit1h ago

As Consensus Accelerates, What Are Young Investors Betting On?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
活动图片