Did the U.S. Marshals Service Violate Trump's Executive Order by Selling Confiscated Bitcoin?

marsbitPublished on 2026-01-06Last updated on 2026-01-06

Abstract

In a potential violation of Executive Order 14233, the U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) appears to have sold 57.5 Bitcoin, valued at $6.36 million, seized from Samourai Wallet developers Keonne Rodriguez and William Lonergan Hill as part of their plea agreement. The Bitcoin was transferred to a Coinbase Prime wallet on November 3, 2025, and the address has since been emptied, indicating a sale. The executive order, signed by President Trump, mandates that Bitcoin obtained through criminal forfeiture must be held in the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and not sold. Legal analysis confirms the seized assets fall under the order's definition of "government bitcoin," and no statute requires such assets to be liquidated. This action by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (SDNY) continues a pattern of defying federal directives, including a Justice Department memo to end prosecutions against developers of non-custodial crypto tools. The article questions whether the Trump administration is truly ending the "war on crypto," suggesting that pardoning Rodriguez and investigating this sale would affirm its pro-crypto stance.

Written by: Frank Corva

Compiled by: Chopper, Foresight News

The U.S. Marshals Service (USMS) appears to have liquidated the Bitcoin paid by Samourai wallet developers Keonne Rodriguez and William Lonergan Hill as part of their plea agreement, with the Bitcoin valued at $6.3 million.

This action is suspected of violating Executive Order 14233. The order stipulates that Bitcoin obtained by the government through criminal or civil asset forfeiture procedures should be held in the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve, not liquidated.

If the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, which is handling the Samourai case, did indeed violate Executive Order 14233, this would not be the first time its staff has defied federal government directives.

Where Did This Bitcoin Go?

Bitcoin Magazine obtained a previously undisclosed Asset Liquidation Agreement document. The document indicates that the Bitcoin confiscated from Rodriguez and Hill is either about to be sold or has already been liquidated.

According to the agreement, the two defendants agreed to transfer 57.5 Bitcoin to the U.S. Marshals Service. On the final signing date of the agreement, November 3, 2025, this Bitcoin was worth approximately $6.36 million.

On November 3, 2025, this Bitcoin was transferred from the address bc1q4pntkz06z7xxvdcers09cyjqz5gf8ut4pua22r. However, it does not appear to have gone into a direct custodial account of the U.S. Marshals Service but was directly transferred to a Coinbase Prime wallet address, 3Lz5ULL7nG7vv6nwc8kNnbjDmSnawKS3n8, presumably for liquidation.

The balance of this Coinbase Prime address is now zero, meaning this Bitcoin has most likely been sold.

Violation of Executive Order 14233

If the U.S. Marshals Service confirms the sale of this confiscated Bitcoin, it constitutes a violation of Executive Order 14233. This order explicitly states that Bitcoin obtained by the government through criminal forfeiture procedures "shall not be sold" and must be incorporated into the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

The USMS's decision to sell the Bitcoin was based on its own discretion, not a legal requirement. This suggests that some personnel within the Department of Justice may still view Bitcoin as a "taboo asset" to be quickly liquidated, rather than a strategic asset that President Trump has mandated government agencies to hold.

It is worth noting that the investigation and prosecution of Samourai began during the previous administration, which held strong hostility towards non-custodial cryptocurrency tools and their developers. Therefore, the DOJ's decision to ignore Executive Order 14233 and insist on selling the Bitcoin continues the previous administration's practice of treating Bitcoin as an asset that should be removed from the government's balance sheet as soon as possible.

Legal Details Related to Forfeiture and Liquidation

According to a legal source familiar with the matter, the Bitcoin from the Samourai developers was forfeited under Title 18, Section 982(a)(1) of the U.S. Code. This section stipulates that any property involved in a violation of Title 18, Section 1960, which prohibits operating an unlicensed money transmitting business, must be forfeited to the U.S. government.

Combining Title 18, Section 982 with its reference to Title 21, Section 853(c) (a criminal forfeiture statute stating that "property transferred to a person other than the defendant may be subject to a special forfeiture order and subsequently ordered to be forfeited to the U.S. government"), the Bitcoin forfeited from Rodriguez and Hill fully meets the definition of "Government Bitcoin" under Executive Order 14233.

Neither Title 18, Section 982 nor the referenced Title 21, Section 853 mandates the liquidation of criminally forfeited property. Furthermore, the two forfeiture fund management statutes cited in Section 3 of Executive Order 14233—Title 31, Section 9705 and Title 28, Section 524(c)—only regulate the deposit accounts and usage of forfeited funds and do not require converting forfeited Bitcoin into fiat currency.

The executive order also clearly states that "Government Bitcoin" falls under the category of "Government Digital Asset" and mandates that "the head of each agency shall not sell or otherwise dispose of any Government Digital Asset," except under specific circumstances. The Rodriguez and Hill case does not meet any of these exceptions; and in all exceptional cases, the U.S. Attorney General must participate in the decision-making process regarding the disposition of forfeited digital assets.

The 'Sovereign District' of SDNY

Considering Executive Order 14233 and the various statutes cited in this article, the actions of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York clearly violate the core requirement of the executive order to "transfer criminally forfeited Bitcoin to the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve."

And this is not the first time this court has exhibited such defiant behavior.

This judicial district, often jokingly called the "Sovereign District Court of New York," is notorious for its independent and arbitrary actions, often operating outside control even within the federal judicial system.

The court's insistence on proceeding with the cases against Rodriguez, Hill, and Tornado Cash developer Roman Storm is further proof of its willfulness.

On April 7, 2025, U.S. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche issued a memorandum titled "Ending Regulation by Enforcement,"明确指出 (clearly stating) "the Department of Justice will no longer bring charges against developers of virtual currency exchanges, mixing services, and offline wallets based on the actions of end-users..."

However, the Southern District of New York ignored this core spirit of the memorandum and continued to forcefully advance the trials related to Samourai Wallet and Tornado Cash.

More notably, Hill and Rodriguez's defense team, based on the Brady rule (which requires prosecutors to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense), obtained documents showing that two senior officials from the U.S. Treasury's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) had explicitly stated that, given Samourai Wallet's non-custodial nature, it did not constitute a money transmitting business. Despite this, the prosecution insisted on proceeding with the indictment.

In criminal cases tried in the U.S. federal court system, over 90% of defendants are ultimately convicted, with acquittal rates in some years as low as 0.4%. The prosecution team in the Southern District of New York is particularly famous for its conviction rate, which far exceeds the federal average.

Rodriguez was well aware of such data, and he also knew that Judge Denise Cote, presiding over his and Hill's case, is known for her harsh sentencing.

Just the morning before he pleaded guilty to "conspiracy to operate an unlicensed money transmitting business," Rodriguez confided all this to the author.

Is the Crypto War Really Over?

In the 2024 election, many Bitcoin and cryptocurrency supporters voted for President Trump, and the cryptocurrency industry also strongly supported his re-election campaign. Now, these supporters and industry figures are questioning: Does President Trump truly intend to end the war on cryptocurrency?

To achieve this, the Department of Justice under the Trump administration must strictly adhere to the requirements of Executive Order 14233 and follow the guidelines of Deputy Attorney General Blanche by stopping the prosecution of non-custodial cryptocurrency technology developers. Regarding the latter, President Trump recently stated that he is considering a pardon for Rodriguez.

Pardoning Rodriguez and ordering the DOJ to thoroughly investigate the sale of the confiscated Bitcoin from the Samourai developers would send a strong signal that the President is serious and committed to his pro-Bitcoin and cryptocurrency stance.

Related Questions

QWhat is the US Marshals Service accused of doing with the confiscated Bitcoin from the Samourai wallet developers?

AThe US Marshals Service is accused of selling the confiscated Bitcoin, which is alleged to violate Executive Order 14233 that requires such assets to be held in the US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve.

QWhich specific executive order did the USMS's actions potentially violate?

AThe actions potentially violate Executive Order No. 14233, which mandates that Bitcoin obtained through criminal or civil asset forfeiture proceedings be held in the US Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and not sold.

QTo which platform was the confiscated Bitcoin transferred for the suspected purpose of liquidation?

AThe confiscated Bitcoin was transferred to a Coinbase Prime wallet address (3Lz5ULL7nG7vv6nwc8kNnbjDmSnawKS3n8) for the suspected purpose of liquidation.

QWhat is the reputation of the US District Court for the Southern District of New York in this context?

AThe court has a reputation for acting independently and defiantly, often operating outside of federal control, and is sometimes jokingly referred to as the 'Sovereign District Court of New York'.

QWhat did a memo from Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche state regarding the prosecution of developers?

AThe memo, titled 'Ending the Regulation by Enforcement Model,' stated that the DOJ would no longer bring charges against developers of virtual currency exchanges, mixing services, and non-custodial wallets based on end-user conduct.

Related Reads

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

In today's TechFlow Intelligence Briefing, several major tech stories highlight a growing theme of trust and credibility gaps across AI, crypto, and finance. AI company Anthropic has publicly called for a global pause in AI development, citing risks from Claude's "recursive self-improvement." Ironically, this coincides with reports the company is preparing for a massive IPO targeting a near $1 trillion valuation. This perceived hypocrisy, coupled with widespread user complaints about Claude's declining performance, is sparking debate over whether the safety warning is genuine or a competitive tactic. Meanwhile, in a substantive security move, Anthropic open-sourced a framework for AI-powered vulnerability discovery. In the crypto market, Bitcoin's price drop below $61,000 triggered over $1.16 billion in liquidations, flipping the market into a state where more BTC is held at a loss than at a profit, a historical bearish signal. On the corporate front, SpaceX's highly anticipated IPO is generating immense Wall Street excitement, with Goldman Sachs projecting 100x revenue growth by 2030. However, the S&P 500 has refused to fast-track the company's inclusion post-IPO, potentially limiting immediate institutional demand. Separately, ByteDance's AI app Doubao lost over 6 million monthly active users after introducing a subscription model, highlighting the challenges of AI monetization. Other notable developments include Nvidia certifying HBM4 memory from Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron; Cloudflare's acquisition of front-end tooling company VoidZero; and its CEO warning that bot traffic now exceeds human traffic online. The underlying narrative connects these events: a trust crisis. From AI firms' contradictory actions and crypto volatility to the clash between SpaceX's hyped narrative and institutional rules, a pattern is emerging where stated intentions and actual practices are increasingly misaligned.

marsbit10m ago

TechFlow Intelligence Agency: Anthropic Calls for Global Pause in AI Development While Preparing for Trillion-Dollar IPO; SpaceX IPO Roadshow Heats Up, But S&P 500 Rejects Fast-Track Inclusion

marsbit10m ago

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

Ray Dalio, founder of Bridgewater Associates, warns that the current artificial intelligence investment boom shows classic signs of a bubble, which he expects will eventually burst. In a Bloomberg Television interview, he noted that great technological revolutions often lead to capital inflows that create bubbles, making it difficult for investors and companies to calibrate their spending accurately—either overspending to capture market share or underspending and losing their competitive position. This caution comes amid significant rallies in AI-related assets, particularly chipmakers, driven by soaring demand for data centers and high-bandwidth chips, raising debates about overheating valuations. In contrast, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang recently asserted that investors embracing the AI wave would see "crazy" returns and dismissed concerns over return on investment for data center spending as outdated. Dalio, however, focuses on the risks in the profit realization phase. He argues that bubbles tend to show signs of破裂 when markets transition from investment to the need for tangible returns, describing the burst as a process of converting paper wealth into cash. While acknowledging AI's intrinsic value, he expressed concern over the future profitability of some AI companies, suggesting the market is repeating a familiar pattern. The 76-year-old billionaire, who fully exited Bridgewater in 2025, has a net worth estimated at $21.5 billion according to the Bloomberg Billionaires Index.

marsbit44m ago

Dalio Warns: AI Boom Shows Signs of a Bubble, Day of Reckoning Will Be the Time of Burst

marsbit44m ago

Privacy Coin Crisis of Confidence! ZEC Plunges Over 56% in a Single Day

Zcash (ZEC), a leading privacy-focused cryptocurrency, experienced a severe crash on June 5th, plummeting over 56% in a single day and erasing nearly two months of gains. The flash crash was triggered by the disclosure of a critical zero-knowledge proof vulnerability within Zcash's Orchard privacy pool, which had existed since the pool's launch in May 2022. The flaw theoretically allowed an attacker to forge unlimited ZEC undetectably due to the pool's privacy features. The vulnerability was discovered on May 29th by independent security researcher Taylor Hornby during a proactive audit commissioned by Shielded Labs, utilizing AI-assisted analysis. The Zcash development team responded swiftly, implementing an emergency soft fork to disable Orchard transactions on June 2nd and executing a permanent hard fork fix (NU6.2) on June 3rd. Despite the technical fix, a major crisis of confidence emerged. The core issue is that Orchard's privacy design makes it cryptographically impossible to prove whether the vulnerability was exploited over the past four years, casting permanent doubt on the historical supply integrity of ZEC. While Shielded Labs argues exploitation was unlikely, the inability to provide definitive proof has severely damaged market trust. This sentiment was exacerbated when BitMEX co-founder Arthur Hayes, a prominent ZEC supporter, announced he was selling his entire position. He stated that privacy assets require "perfect security" rather than "probable safety." The combined effect of the disclosure and Hayes's exit ignited widespread panic selling, leading to massive liquidations and significant price decline. Analysts note the event highlights a fundamental tension within privacy coins: the conflict between verifiable supply and cryptographic privacy.

链捕手46m ago

Privacy Coin Crisis of Confidence! ZEC Plunges Over 56% in a Single Day

链捕手46m ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片