Bloomberg Reports Twice, Hyperliquid Re-enters Wall Street's View

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

On February 28, during U.S. market off-hours, Hyperliquid’s crude oil perpetual contracts saw significant price and volume movements in response to geopolitical tensions involving Iran, as reported by open-source intelligence. The platform’s 24/7 trading capability allows continuous price discovery, especially during weekends when traditional markets are closed—highlighted in two recent Bloomberg articles. This has drawn Wall Street attention as crypto and traditional finance increasingly intersect. Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE has decoupled from Bitcoin, gaining 13% during the event, partly due to its tokenomics: 50% of trading fees from its HIP-3 protocol are used to buy back HYPE. The platform also saw substantial activity during earlier precious metal rallies, with silver volumes reaching $1.2 billion. However, challenges remain. While Hyperliquid performs well for retail-sized orders, its depth and slippage lag behind traditional venues like COMEX, especially during high volatility. Institutional adoption requires improvements in KYC, liquidity models, and risk infrastructure. Despite this, Hyperliquid’s ability to provide real-time, off-shore risk pricing positions it as a growing force in the evolution toward always-on financial markets.

At 1:12 AM EST on February 28, during the exchange's off-hours, trading volume on Polymarket's prediction contract regarding whether the U.S. would strike Iran surged.

At 1:13 AM, the first open-source intelligence about the airstrike appeared on Twitter.

One minute later, the price and trading volume of crude oil perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid's Trade.xyz followed with unusual movements.

After the headline news developed, the crude oil perpetual contract on the Hyperliquid platform rose by 5%, with open interest (OI) climbing to $50 million. The price of HYPE increased by 13%, leading the gains among the top 25 tokens by market cap.

24/7 Trading

Of the ten high-volatility macroeconomic events over the past year, eight erupted on weekends. Hyperliquid's around-the-clock price discovery mechanism is attracting attention from traditional financial markets.

In two recent reports on Hyperliquid, Bloomberg pointed out that as the crypto market becomes increasingly intertwined with traditional finance, Wall Street has begun closely monitoring platforms like Hyperliquid. During weekends when traditional markets are closed, on-chain derivatives provide continuous risk pricing capabilities. Bloomberg cited market participants' views, stating that this全天候 pricing mechanism is a structural upgrade that enhances market efficiency. The unusual market movements over the weekend validated a trend: around-the-clock on-chain trading for all asset classes is an inevitable direction for financial market development.

Decoupling

As the HIP-3, which supports traditional market trading, grows stronger, HYPE's price performance has long begun to decouple from Bitcoin, the default benchmark of the crypto market. When the news of the attack broke, Bitcoin's price initially fell and then fluctuated. In contrast, HYPE, which caters to trading demands for precious metals and stocks, demonstrated independent momentum.

In late January, when silver broke through $100 and gold surpassed $5500, the trading volume for silver alone on the HIP-3 exchange tradexyz reached $1.2 billion, driving HYPE up by 55% over three days, while Bitcoin only rose by 3% during the same period.

Tokenomics explains the reason for HYPE's strong performance. Hyperliquid's HIP-3 protocol stipulates that 50% of all fee revenue generated by HIP-3 exchanges flows into the Hyperliquid Official Aid Fund and is used to repurchase HYPE. Macro volatility drives trading volume, increased trading volume boosts repurchase scale, bringing strong buying pressure to the HYPE token.

HYPE holders are not only betting on the growth of Hyperliquid as an offshore Perp DEX but are also going long on geopolitical uncertainty.

Hyperliquid is merely the clearest expression of this narrative so far, and the market is finally starting to reflect this.

Gap

Despite this, on-chain derivatives still have a distance to go to meet traditional institutional standards.

Hyperliquid's current advantage lies in small to medium-sized retail orders. According to research by Blockworks Research, during regular trading hours, the spread of its silver contracts is comparable to that of COMEX micro contracts. However, there is a significant gap in depth. COMEX's order book depth within a ±5 basis point range reaches $13 million, while Hyperliquid's is only around $230,000.

In extreme crash scenarios, the tail risk of on-chain liquidity degradation is greater. A 1% trade in Hyperliquid silver can experience slippage of over 50 basis points, whereas COMEX maintains better execution costs under such conditions.

Currently, Hyperliquid's liquidity and funding rate models do not yet meet the needs of large funds. To compete at the institutional level, on-chain platforms need to address KYC issues and even establish technical and cooperative frameworks that match traditional clearing institutions. Many industry participants still believe that if the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) were to launch 24/7 trading, it would have inherent hedging advantages and a foundation of trust.

Nevertheless, the traditional financial market's model of controlling risk by physically shutting down during off-hours indeed shows limitations. The ability to continuously price risk without waiting for the Monday market open is the core value of offshore exchanges like Hyperliquid.

The shift of market pricing power to on-chain will be a long-term process. But one must have dreams, what if they come true?

Related Questions

QWhat is the core value proposition of Hyperliquid as an offshore exchange, according to the Bloomberg reports mentioned in the article?

AIts core value proposition is the ability to provide continuous, 24/7 risk pricing for assets, even when traditional markets are closed, which is seen as a structural upgrade for market efficiency.

QHow did the HYPE token's price action decouple from Bitcoin's during the recent news of the airstrike?

AWhen the airstrike news broke, Bitcoin's price initially fell and entered a period of volatility, while HYPE, which caters to trading demands for assets like precious metals and stocks, demonstrated an independent and stronger upward price movement.

QWhat mechanism in the Hyperliquid tokenomics creates buying pressure for the HYPE token during periods of high market volatility?

AThe HIP-3 protocol stipulates that 50% of all fee revenue generated on its exchanges is sent to an official aid fund to buy back and burn HYPE tokens. High volatility increases trading volume, which in turn increases the scale of these buybacks, creating significant buying pressure.

QWhat are the main limitations or gaps that Hyperliquid and other on-chain derivatives platforms currently face in competing with traditional institutions like CME?

AThe main limitations are significantly lower market depth, higher slippage (especially during extreme volatility), a liquidity model not yet suited for large funds, and the need to address KYC requirements and establish technical and cooperative architectures that match traditional clearing institutions.

QWhat specific event was cited in the article where HYPE's price significantly outperformed Bitcoin's, and what was the primary driver?

AIn late January, when silver broke above $100 and gold broke above $5500, HYPE rose 55% in three days while Bitcoin only rose 3%. The primary driver was the $1.2 billion in trading volume on the silver single-asset contract on Hyperliquid's trade.xyz, fueled by the macro volatility.

Related Reads

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

Zcash, a privacy-focused cryptocurrency, suffered a historic collapse in price, losing over 50% of its value in 24 hours and erasing billions from its market cap. The dramatic sell-off was triggered by the disclosure of a major vulnerability in the Zcash Orchard privacy pool that had remained undetected since May 2022. A security researcher, using AI, developed a proof-of-concept to generate counterfeit ZEC. While the bug was patched by June 2, Zcash's privacy design makes it impossible to verify if any fake coins were minted before the fix, fueling market panic and uncertainty. This event highlights the trade-off between privacy and transparency. In response, Shielded Labs is exploring a network upgrade to allow supply verification. Despite the crisis, proponents argue that the discovery by world-class security researchers demonstrates the network's commitment to proactive hardening and resilience.

bitcoinist2h ago

Zcash Suffers Historic Collapse As Billions Vanish From Market Value

bitcoinist2h ago

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

**Title: Has the "Digital Gold" Narrative for Bitcoin Failed?** The article argues that Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative remains valid despite a recent sharp price decline (from a peak near $126k in Oct 2025 to briefly under $61k in Feb 2026). It presents a long-term investment framework based on three core points: **1. Viewing Bitcoin as an Asset:** Bitcoin is presented as a superior potential store of value compared to gold. Key arguments are its absolute scarcity (21 million cap), superior portability, and transparent auditability via its public ledger. While acknowledging its current use in early, volatile stages (~3-4% global adoption), the author draws parallels to the early, disruptive phases of the internet and e-commerce. **2. Understanding the Recent Downturn:** The current ~50% correction is framed as a predictable, consensus-driven cycle following its post-halving peak (the 2024 halving preceded the Oct 2025 high). A crucial factor is a historic "changing of hands": the influx of new institutional buyers via ETFs allowed early, low-cost holders (miners, OG believers) to take profits. The author notes that while severe, Bitcoin's historical drawdowns (e.g., 93% in 2011, 77% in 2021-22) have been progressively smaller, suggesting maturing holder structure and decreasing volatility over time. **3. The Long-Term Perspective:** The long-term thesis hinges on Bitcoin capturing a portion of gold's market value. With Bitcoin's market cap at ~$1.4 trillion (at $70k) versus gold's ~$20 trillion, significant upside potential exists if the "digital gold" narrative is partially realized. However, the author strongly cautions that short-term risks remain, the bottom is unpredictable, and high volatility is inherent. The real risk is not Bitcoin failing but poor personal position management (over-leverage, wrong capital) and a lack of deep understanding, which can force investors out during severe downturns. The conclusion uses Amazon's 95% crash post-2000 dot-com bubble and subsequent 42x recovery as an analogy. The ultimate question is not if Bitcoin's price will rise, but if an investor's strategy and conviction can withstand the volatility to see the long-term play out. The recent divergence (gold up, Bitcoin down) is posed not as a narrative failure, but as potential evidence of this ongoing, painful transition from a speculative asset to a mainstream allocation.

marsbit2h ago

Has the 'Digital Gold' Narrative for BTC Failed?

marsbit2h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

The article discusses Bitcoin's "digital gold" narrative, its recent price drop, and long-term outlook through the perspective of "Jason". It argues the narrative is not a failure but that Bitcoin represents a superior, new asset class due to its fixed supply (21 million), portability, and auditability. The piece compares its current ~3-4% global adoption rate to early internet/e-commerce, suggesting significant growth potential. Regarding the 2025-2026 price decline (from ~$126k to briefly under $61k), the author views it as a predictable, consensus-driven sell-off within Bitcoin's ~4-year cycle post-halving, exacerbated by a major "handover" from early, low-cost holders to new institutional buyers via ETFs. A key observation is that historical peak-to-trough drawdowns have lessened over time (e.g., 93% in 2011 to ~50% in 2026), indicating maturing volatility as holder structure changes. For the long term, the author uses a simple framework: Bitcoin's total market cap (~$1.4T at $70k) is only about 7% of gold's (~$20T). Even capturing 30-50% of gold's value would imply substantial upside. However, the article strongly cautions against viewing this as investment advice, emphasizing extreme volatility and the critical importance of risk management, position sizing, and deep fundamental understanding to survive severe drawdowns. It concludes by drawing a parallel to Amazon's 95% crash in 2000 and subsequent 42x recovery, stressing that the key is surviving market cycles to realize long-term potential.

链捕手2h ago

Has BTC's 'Digital Gold' Narrative Failed?

链捕手2h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

"From Code to Cognition: The Evolution of Robot Brains" The journey of robotic intelligence has shifted dramatically from manually coded systems to AI-driven brains. For decades, robots relied on layered software stacks—perception, state estimation, planning, control—each handcrafted. While predictable, they lacked adaptability. The 2010s saw deep learning revolutionize perception (e.g., object detection) and control (via reinforcement learning), but learned skills remained narrow. The arrival of Large Language Models (LLMs) marked a turning point. LLMs acted as high-level planners, interpreting natural language instructions and generating sequences of actions for traditional robotic systems to execute. However, true integration came with Visual-Language-Action (VLA) models, which fused vision, language, and motion prediction into a single network. Pioneered by models like RT-2 and open-source projects like OpenVLA, VLAs enable robots to reason and act directly from visual input and commands. The most advanced humanoid robots now employ a "dual-brain" architecture: a slow-thinking, large VLA (System 2) for reasoning and planning, and a fast-reacting, small network (System 1) for high-frequency motion control, sometimes with an even lower-level System 0 for balance. This split balances cognition with the physics of real-time movement. Computation is split between onboard hardware (e.g., NVIDIA Jetson) for safety-critical control loops and cloud/edge servers for non-critical tasks like learning and interfaces. A crucial driver is the open-source ecosystem—models like GR00T and OpenVLA allow startups to build upon pre-trained brains and fine-tune them with their own data, accelerating development. Despite progress, current systems struggle with recovery from errors, sample inefficiency, and long-horizon tasks. This has spurred the rise of **World Models**—neural networks that predict the consequences of actions. By simulating possible futures before acting (like NVIDIA Cosmos or Meta V-JEPA), robots can plan, recover, and generalize better. This represents the next frontier: shifting intelligence from learned reactions to an internal model of physics and cause-and-effect. The field is rapidly evolving. While not yet at its "ChatGPT moment," the convergence of cheaper hardware, scalable simulation, and world models points toward robots that are increasingly capable, adaptive, and useful. The question is shifting from "what can robots do?" to "what *should* they do?"

marsbit3h ago

From Code to Cognition: A Ten-Thousand-Word Guide to the Evolution of the Robot Brain

marsbit3h ago

AI Bubble Is Bursting

The AI Bubble is Bursting: A Necessary Purge on the Path to Ubiquitous Intelligence Market volatility has reignited debates about an AI bubble, with figures like Ray Dalio pointing to high valuations. However, this parallels the dot-com bubble, which, despite its crash, laid the physical infrastructure for today's internet era. The current AI investment frenzy, with tech giants planning trillions in infrastructure spending far outstripping current AI application revenues, appears similarly imbalanced. This 'bubble' is seen as an inevitable phase for a disruptive technology, paying the "innovation tax." Critically, AI inference costs have plummeted over 99.7% since 2023, making intelligence nearly free at the margin. This hasn't reduced spending but has instead unlocked massive new demand, as seen in enterprise AI cloud expenditure tripling. This follows the Jevons Paradox: efficiency gains lead to greater total consumption. The market is now entering a cleansing phase, weeding out speculative ventures lacking real moats. The deeper shift is a move from capital expenditure (CapEx) on hardware to value creation in operational expenditure (OpEx) through AI applications that solve real industry problems. While infrastructure valuations are high, rapid earnings growth from widespread AI adoption across sectors—from manufacturing and finance to law and healthcare—may digest these valuations over time. Ultimately, this creative destruction will leave behind robust infrastructure and optimized models, cheaply powering an AI-augmented future for all industries, much as the internet became indispensable after its own bubble burst. The core productive potential remains undiminished.

链捕手3h ago

AI Bubble Is Bursting

链捕手3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片

Top Questions

Hot Categoriesright-arrow

Hot Tagsright-arrow