Bloomberg Reports Twice, Hyperliquid Re-enters Wall Street's View

marsbitPublished on 2026-03-04Last updated on 2026-03-04

Abstract

On February 28, during U.S. market off-hours, Hyperliquid’s crude oil perpetual contracts saw significant price and volume movements in response to geopolitical tensions involving Iran, as reported by open-source intelligence. The platform’s 24/7 trading capability allows continuous price discovery, especially during weekends when traditional markets are closed—highlighted in two recent Bloomberg articles. This has drawn Wall Street attention as crypto and traditional finance increasingly intersect. Hyperliquid’s native token HYPE has decoupled from Bitcoin, gaining 13% during the event, partly due to its tokenomics: 50% of trading fees from its HIP-3 protocol are used to buy back HYPE. The platform also saw substantial activity during earlier precious metal rallies, with silver volumes reaching $1.2 billion. However, challenges remain. While Hyperliquid performs well for retail-sized orders, its depth and slippage lag behind traditional venues like COMEX, especially during high volatility. Institutional adoption requires improvements in KYC, liquidity models, and risk infrastructure. Despite this, Hyperliquid’s ability to provide real-time, off-shore risk pricing positions it as a growing force in the evolution toward always-on financial markets.

At 1:12 AM EST on February 28, during the exchange's off-hours, trading volume on Polymarket's prediction contract regarding whether the U.S. would strike Iran surged.

At 1:13 AM, the first open-source intelligence about the airstrike appeared on Twitter.

One minute later, the price and trading volume of crude oil perpetual contracts on Hyperliquid's Trade.xyz followed with unusual movements.

After the headline news developed, the crude oil perpetual contract on the Hyperliquid platform rose by 5%, with open interest (OI) climbing to $50 million. The price of HYPE increased by 13%, leading the gains among the top 25 tokens by market cap.

24/7 Trading

Of the ten high-volatility macroeconomic events over the past year, eight erupted on weekends. Hyperliquid's around-the-clock price discovery mechanism is attracting attention from traditional financial markets.

In two recent reports on Hyperliquid, Bloomberg pointed out that as the crypto market becomes increasingly intertwined with traditional finance, Wall Street has begun closely monitoring platforms like Hyperliquid. During weekends when traditional markets are closed, on-chain derivatives provide continuous risk pricing capabilities. Bloomberg cited market participants' views, stating that this全天候 pricing mechanism is a structural upgrade that enhances market efficiency. The unusual market movements over the weekend validated a trend: around-the-clock on-chain trading for all asset classes is an inevitable direction for financial market development.

Decoupling

As the HIP-3, which supports traditional market trading, grows stronger, HYPE's price performance has long begun to decouple from Bitcoin, the default benchmark of the crypto market. When the news of the attack broke, Bitcoin's price initially fell and then fluctuated. In contrast, HYPE, which caters to trading demands for precious metals and stocks, demonstrated independent momentum.

In late January, when silver broke through $100 and gold surpassed $5500, the trading volume for silver alone on the HIP-3 exchange tradexyz reached $1.2 billion, driving HYPE up by 55% over three days, while Bitcoin only rose by 3% during the same period.

Tokenomics explains the reason for HYPE's strong performance. Hyperliquid's HIP-3 protocol stipulates that 50% of all fee revenue generated by HIP-3 exchanges flows into the Hyperliquid Official Aid Fund and is used to repurchase HYPE. Macro volatility drives trading volume, increased trading volume boosts repurchase scale, bringing strong buying pressure to the HYPE token.

HYPE holders are not only betting on the growth of Hyperliquid as an offshore Perp DEX but are also going long on geopolitical uncertainty.

Hyperliquid is merely the clearest expression of this narrative so far, and the market is finally starting to reflect this.

Gap

Despite this, on-chain derivatives still have a distance to go to meet traditional institutional standards.

Hyperliquid's current advantage lies in small to medium-sized retail orders. According to research by Blockworks Research, during regular trading hours, the spread of its silver contracts is comparable to that of COMEX micro contracts. However, there is a significant gap in depth. COMEX's order book depth within a ±5 basis point range reaches $13 million, while Hyperliquid's is only around $230,000.

In extreme crash scenarios, the tail risk of on-chain liquidity degradation is greater. A 1% trade in Hyperliquid silver can experience slippage of over 50 basis points, whereas COMEX maintains better execution costs under such conditions.

Currently, Hyperliquid's liquidity and funding rate models do not yet meet the needs of large funds. To compete at the institutional level, on-chain platforms need to address KYC issues and even establish technical and cooperative frameworks that match traditional clearing institutions. Many industry participants still believe that if the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) were to launch 24/7 trading, it would have inherent hedging advantages and a foundation of trust.

Nevertheless, the traditional financial market's model of controlling risk by physically shutting down during off-hours indeed shows limitations. The ability to continuously price risk without waiting for the Monday market open is the core value of offshore exchanges like Hyperliquid.

The shift of market pricing power to on-chain will be a long-term process. But one must have dreams, what if they come true?

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the core value proposition of Hyperliquid as an offshore exchange, according to the Bloomberg reports mentioned in the article?

AIts core value proposition is the ability to provide continuous, 24/7 risk pricing for assets, even when traditional markets are closed, which is seen as a structural upgrade for market efficiency.

QHow did the HYPE token's price action decouple from Bitcoin's during the recent news of the airstrike?

AWhen the airstrike news broke, Bitcoin's price initially fell and entered a period of volatility, while HYPE, which caters to trading demands for assets like precious metals and stocks, demonstrated an independent and stronger upward price movement.

QWhat mechanism in the Hyperliquid tokenomics creates buying pressure for the HYPE token during periods of high market volatility?

AThe HIP-3 protocol stipulates that 50% of all fee revenue generated on its exchanges is sent to an official aid fund to buy back and burn HYPE tokens. High volatility increases trading volume, which in turn increases the scale of these buybacks, creating significant buying pressure.

QWhat are the main limitations or gaps that Hyperliquid and other on-chain derivatives platforms currently face in competing with traditional institutions like CME?

AThe main limitations are significantly lower market depth, higher slippage (especially during extreme volatility), a liquidity model not yet suited for large funds, and the need to address KYC requirements and establish technical and cooperative architectures that match traditional clearing institutions.

QWhat specific event was cited in the article where HYPE's price significantly outperformed Bitcoin's, and what was the primary driver?

AIn late January, when silver broke above $100 and gold broke above $5500, HYPE rose 55% in three days while Bitcoin only rose 3%. The primary driver was the $1.2 billion in trading volume on the silver single-asset contract on Hyperliquid's trade.xyz, fueled by the macro volatility.

Related Reads

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

The cryptocurrency market has just concluded its worst-performing quarter since 2022, with total capitalization dropping 12.6% to $2.1 trillion. All core metrics indicate capital is leaving the sector, not just rotating within it. Bitcoin fell 14.2% and Ethereum dropped 25.4% in Q2, breaking their previous correlation with US tech stocks. A key driver is the reversal in US spot Bitcoin ETF flows, which saw a net outflow of approximately $4.67 billion in Q2, including a record monthly outflow near $4.5 billion in June. While recent data suggests long-term holders are accumulating again, sustained ETF outflows mean continued selling pressure. Market focus is now singularly on the Federal Reserve. The upcoming July FOMC meeting is seen as the most critical event for Q3. A dovish signal could support Bitcoin reclaiming a $68,000-$84,000 range, while a hawkish stance might establish a new trading band around $50,000-$56,000. Additionally, regulatory uncertainty persists, with the progress of the crucial *CLARITY Act* stalling in the Senate, reducing its perceived 2026 passage probability to 40-45%. Despite the broad downturn, a few sectors showed growth. Prediction markets saw nominal volume surge 48.7% year-over-year to $113.8 billion, and tokenized collectibles transaction volume rose 143% quarterly to $1.4 billion. The Real-World Asset (RWA) tokenization sector also continued steady growth, now representing ~$28.1 billion in on-chain value. The market's foundation for an extreme crash appears limited, with Bitcoin price hovering near its 200-week moving average. However, the trading paradigm has shifted from narrative-driven speculation to decisions based on price action, policy developments, and interest rate expectations, making a broad sentiment-driven rally unlikely in the near term.

marsbit10h ago

After Three Consecutive Quarters of Decline, Can the Crypto Market Find a Window for Stabilization in Q3?

marsbit10h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

**Crypto & Stock Market Wrap: Bitcoin Tests Resistance, Stocks Retreat After AI Surge** Bitcoin consolidates around $66,000, facing key resistance near $68,000—an area seen as a major psychological and technical hurdle where previous rallies have failed. Analysts note the cryptocurrency is caught between its 200-week moving average (~$63,333) and 200-week EMA (~$68,328). A clear break above $68k is needed to signal a stronger bullish trend, while a rejection could lead to a retest of $63k support. Market sentiment remains cautious, with low futures open interest pointing to a low-liquidity rebound rather than a full bull market. Bitcoin spot ETFs saw another $203 million inflow. US stock futures pointed lower after a strong Tuesday session led by a massive rebound in semiconductors and memory stocks. The rally was fueled by renewed optimism about AI-driven hardware demand, with Micron, SanDisk, and SK Hynix surging. However, those gains reversed in pre-market trading. Super Micro Computer (SMCI) soared over 20% after hours on strong guidance and a record backlog. Other standouts included Rocket Lab and nuclear energy plays Oklo and X-Energy. Rising oil prices (Brent above $91) and climbing Treasury yields (10-year near 4.64%), however, are reigniting inflation concerns and acting as a headwind for equities. In Asia, markets were mixed. South Korea's KOSPI pared early gains to close slightly higher as semiconductor stocks like SK Hynix gave back initial surges. Japan's Nikkei edged lower as the yen hit a fresh 38-year low against the dollar, raising fears of potential market intervention. Key events to watch include the Samsung Galaxy launch, AMD's AI event, and a slew of major tech earnings from Alphabet, Tesla, and IBM after the close on Wednesday, followed by the ECB meeting and Intel's earnings on Thursday.

marsbit11h ago

BIT Trading Moment: BTC Still Suppressed by Weekly 200 EMA, Rejection May Restart Decline; Storage and Semiconductors that Surged Last Night Begin Falling in Evening Trading

marsbit11h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

Former CFTC Chairman and Circle President Heath Tarbert has consistently advocated for a long-term vision in public, urging patience from investors as Circle’s stock price has fallen significantly from its peak. However, it has been revealed that since Circle’s IPO, Tarbert has continuously sold his CRCL shares through pre-arranged trading plans, cashing out approximately $30 million, without making any public market purchases. This contrast between his public messaging and personal actions has drawn criticism. Tarbert joined Circle in July 2023 as Chief Legal Officer, leveraging his regulatory experience to help guide the company through its IPO and expansion. Despite promoting stablecoins as long-term infrastructure, he established a 10b5-1 trading plan just before Circle went public, leading to substantial stock sales over the following year. In March 2026, he initiated another plan to sell more shares. His career trajectory highlights a pattern of moving between high-level regulatory roles and influential positions in the financial sector. After resigning as CFTC Chairman in early 2021, he joined Citadel Securities as Chief Legal Officer just 27 days later, during a period of intense regulatory scrutiny for the firm. He later joined Circle, aiding its efforts to navigate regulatory challenges for its public listing. While Tarbert's expertise in policy and compliance is valuable to companies like Circle, his actions—advocating long-term confidence while personally divesting—raise questions about the alignment between his public statements and his private financial decisions, leaving investors who followed his advice to bear the market risks.

marsbit11h ago

Former CFTC Chairman, Circle President Tarbert: Preaching Long-Termism While Cashing Out $30 Million Himself

marsbit11h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

The article titled "Gate Research Institute: Are Crypto Financial Products Sparking a 'Wall Street' Wave—Competition or Convergence?" explores the evolving relationship between the crypto ecosystem and traditional finance (TradFi). The piece begins by reflecting on Bitcoin's original 2009 vision of decentralization, disintermediation, and moving away from banks. It then contrasts this with the 2024 landscape, where key crypto assets like Bitcoin are increasingly held through Wall Street products like ETFs issued by giants like BlackRock. The article questions whether this signifies that TradFi is systematically taking over the rights to issue, price, custody, and distribute crypto financial assets. The core argument is that this is not a zero-sum takeover but rather a bidirectional convergence where each side addresses the other's weaknesses. Crypto offers 24/7 global markets, programmable settlement, and open access but lacks compliant channels, institutional-grade custody, deep fiat liquidity, and mainstream distribution. TradFi possesses these but is constrained by legacy systems, limited operating hours, and slow settlement. Two primary convergence paths are highlighted: * **Path A (CEX to TradFi):** Exemplified by Gate, which has progressed from offering tokenized stocks and CFDs to providing direct, real stock trading (US, Hong Kong, South Korea) within its platform, using USDT. * **Path B (TradFi to Crypto):** Exemplified by Robinhood, which has integrated crypto trading, acquired exchanges like Bitstamp, and is moving traditional assets like stocks onto the blockchain via tokenization and its own Layer 2. Both paths are ultimately competing to become the next-generation, unified financial account—a "super account" where users can seamlessly trade cryptocurrencies, stocks, ETFs, RWA (Real World Assets), and tokenized treasury products in one interface. The growth of RWA and tokenized treasuries (e.g., BlackRock's BUIDL) is presented as the asset-layer fusion, providing stable, yield-bearing assets on-chain and acting as a bridge between the two worlds. In conclusion, the "Wall Street-ization" of crypto is framed as a mutual transformation. Decentralized ideals persist in the protocol layer, while at the application layer, a more efficient, global, and accessible unified capital market is emerging from this convergence. The future competition lies not between crypto exchanges and stockbrokers, but between platforms vying to offer the most comprehensive asset coverage, liquidity, and user experience within a single account.

marsbit11h ago

Gate Research Institute: The 'Wall Street-ization' Wave of Crypto Financial Products – Competition or Integration?

marsbit11h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片