Bitmine’s Ethereum stash rises to $9.8B: ‘The best years for crypto remain ahead’

ambcryptoPublished on 2026-06-30Last updated on 2026-06-30

Abstract

Bitmine Immersion Technologies significantly increased its Ethereum holdings, adding 27,084 ETH last week to reach a total of 5,700,040 ETH, valued at approximately $9.01 billion. This accumulation occurred despite a decline in ETH's price and net outflows from Ethereum ETFs. The article draws parallels between Bitmine and Michael Saylor's company, MicroStrategy, noting similar scrutiny over large crypto holdings and market volatility. However, Bitmine's Chairman Tom Lee remains optimistic, citing the company's strong financial position with substantial staking revenue, cash reserves, and recent inclusion in the Russell 1000 Index. He asserts that the best years for crypto are ahead, driven by tokenization and AI advancements.

Bitmine Immersion Technologies has once again made headlines by adding 27,084 Ethereum [ETH] to its treasury in the last week. Bitmine now has 5,700,040 ETH, valued at $9.01 billion at $1,569, thanks to this new addition. Together, these represent 4.7% of Ethereum’s total supply.

Interestingly, this occurred during the week when the price of ETH had fallen from about $1780 to $1,578.54 at the time of writing. Additionally, for the majority of June, the ETH ETF also saw withdrawals, recording $501.39 million in outflows as per SoSo Value data.

Source: SoSo Value

The hubbubs in the DAT space

Addressing the weak market conditions, Bitmine’s Chairman Tom Lee said,

This past week was a challenging one for crypto investors as ETH fell by 8%....We are nearing quarter-end for June, and it is not surprising to see ‘window dressing’ leading to investors reducing their holdings in assets which have fallen in the past 3 months.

Aside from the volatility of ETH and ETFs, another obstacle was the continuous scrutiny of Michael Saylor’s company, Strategy. The last report from AMBCrypto stated that Strategy was sitting on an unrealized loss of approximately $14 billion, while its annual payouts from its 11.5% dividend amount to about $1.2 billion.

Meanwhile, Strategy’s common stock (MSTR) and preferred stock (STRC) both dropped below the $100 level.

Seeing these metrics, many in the crypto community have now started to suggest that Strategy should stop expanding its Bitcoin [BTC] holdings. As previously reported by AMBCrypto, Zach Pandl, Grayscale’s Head of Research, believes,

Sale of ≥ ~$3bn $BTC to cover nearly all cash obligations for next 2yrs (ex one of the converts); probably would restore market confidence.

Will Bitmine face the same problems?

Now, since Bitmine is frequently referred to as Ethereum’s Strategy, the Ethereum DAT may experience the same difficulties and criticism for its accumulating spree.

Given that public companies own $74.94 billion worth of Bitcoin and $11.48 billion worth of Ethereum, and Strategy is the largest Bitcoin DAT, worries about Bitmine are understandable.

However, these are merely conjectures, and there is no proof if this will actually happen in the near future.

This is also because Bitmine is not just accumulating ETH. With an estimated yearly staking revenue of $211 million, Bitmine has also reported $555 million in cash and marketable securities as well as 4.88 million staked in ETH.

Additionally, Bitmine was also included in the Russell 1000 Large-Cap Index on the 26th of June as part of the index’s yearly reconstitution.

Given all these dynamics in the picture, Lee further stressed that the company plans to continue growing steadily through 2026. According to him, the market is just beginning a new bullish cycle, and hence he predicted it best when he said,

The best years for crypto remain ahead, in our view. Tokenization and the rapid progress in AI are expected to drive exponential demand growth for blockchain and decentralized crypto.


Final Summary

  • With the new addition of ETH, Bitmine now has 5,700,040 ETH, valued at $9.01 billion at $1,569.
  • Despite ETH’s weak price action, ETF outflows, and ongoing criticism around Saylor’s Strategy, Bitmine continued on its ETH buying spree.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QHow much Ethereum did Bitmine add to its treasury recently and what is the total value of its holdings now?

ABitmine added 27,084 ETH to its treasury in the last week. It now holds 5,700,040 ETH, valued at $9.01 billion at a price of $1,569 per ETH.

QWhat challenges in the market were highlighted in relation to Ethereum and ETFs in June?

AIn June, the price of ETH fell significantly, and the ETH ETF recorded substantial outflows of $501.39 million, indicating weak market conditions and investor withdrawals.

QWhy are there concerns that Bitmine might face similar problems to Michael Saylor's company, Strategy?

ABitmine is often compared to Strategy as a major accumulator of its respective cryptocurrency. Concerns arise because Strategy is facing unrealized losses and market criticism for its aggressive Bitcoin holdings, leading to suggestions it should sell assets.

QWhat other assets and financial strengths does Bitmine have besides its Ethereum holdings?

ABeyond accumulating ETH, Bitmine has an estimated yearly staking revenue of $211 million, $555 million in cash and marketable securities, and 4.88 million staked ETH.

QWhat is the future outlook for the crypto market according to Bitmine's Chairman, Tom Lee?

ATom Lee believes the market is starting a new bullish cycle. He predicts that tokenization and rapid progress in AI will drive exponential demand for blockchain and decentralized crypto, stating that 'the best years for crypto remain ahead.'

Related Reads

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

In May, Meta imposed internal restrictions on its engineers regarding the use of Claude Code and Codex, two widely used AI programming tools. Despite being a major client, Meta's guidelines, still in effect, prohibit these external models from being used for specific tasks to prevent potential "escalations with partners." The core concern is "distillation"—the risk that outputs from Claude or Codex could inadvertently contaminate the training data and evaluation processes for Meta's in-house AI coding assistant, MetaCode. If MetaCode is trained or evaluated using data generated by these external models, it risks learning their capabilities rather than developing its own, blurring the line of intellectual origin. The restrictions are precise: engineers cannot use the external models to generate test questions, debug source code, or suggest test cases. AI-generated content is also barred from environments accessible to MetaCode. However, AI can still assist with peripheral tasks like workflow setup and code organization, provided all outputs are manually reviewed. This caution reflects a broader industry dilemma. While distillation is a common technique, using a competitor's model output for training raises legal and ethical questions about the ownership of derived capabilities. Contractual terms from companies like OpenAI and Anthropic explicitly forbid using their outputs to build competing products, putting enforcement power in the hands of rivals. The move is also financially motivated, as Meta seeks to reduce its hefty internal AI spending, estimated in the billions this year. Meta's policy illustrates the delicate balance companies must strike: leveraging powerful external AI tools while safeguarding the integrity and independence of their own AI development. As AI systems increasingly help build other AIs, distinguishing the origin of capabilities becomes a fundamental challenge for the entire industry.

marsbit1h ago

You Use Claude and Codex Every Day, but Meta Has Restricted Internal Use

marsbit1h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

The article "Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?" explores the complex and often contentious integration of AI into the cultural and creative industries, particularly film and television. It begins with the cancellation of Amazon's AI-generated animation "Punky Duck," highlighting the ethical debates surrounding AI content. AI's rapid advancement is transforming video production, enabling cost-effective, full-length AI films (e.g., "RAPHAEL," "Dreams of Violets") while sparking industry resistance over issues like "synthetic actors." The core debate has shifted from whether to use AI to how to use it responsibly. The article analyzes why AI's entry into film is uniquely unsettling. It distinguishes between "cultural fast food" (short-form, fast-paced content like micro-dramas) and "cultural main courses" (traditional, long-form film/TV). AI currently excels at the former, matching its fragmented narratives, shallow emotional needs, and free-to-consumer models. However, venturing into the latter challenges the human-centric essence of storytelling—creativity, emotional depth, and the unique value of human labor and experience. While AI can generate massive volumes of content and lower costs, it risks devaluing human creativity, leading to homogenized output, and creating unfair competition through potential intellectual property infringement. Its efficiency also amplifies content safety risks, making preemptive governance crucial. To counter these risks, the article proposes establishing clear boundaries guided by a human-centered AI content perspective. It outlines four principles: 1) Amplify, rather than displace, human creative space; 2) Respect and protect human creative output; 3) Ensure human creative control and responsibility remain paramount; and 4) Guarantee transparency and traceability in AI creation. The conclusion emphasizes that humans must act as the "helmsmen" of technology, steering AI development to enhance, not replace, the core human values at the heart of cultural expression.

marsbit2h ago

Why Do We Need an AI Content Perspective Today?

marsbit2h ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

The recent discovery that two articles (published in 1940 and 1942) by Max Planck, the Nobel laureate and founder of quantum theory, are marked as "retracted" on Springer's digital platform highlights a curious clash between historical publishing practices and modern automated systems. An investigation suggests these retractions are algorithmic errors, not due to fraud or misconduct. The papers, philosophical reflections on science published in *Die Naturwissenschaften*, were likely flagged by the platform's systems. One article, a republished lecture, may have been mistaken for duplicate publication. Another, sharing a title with a prior article by a different author (a common practice for continuing debates at the time), may have triggered a similar automated check. The digital versions have even been replaced with blank pages, contrary to normal practice of preserving retracted texts. This incident underscores how contemporary digital infrastructure, built around concepts like "self-plagiarism" and strict copyright, can misclassify and obscure legitimate historical scholarly communication. It serves as a warning that digital archives are not neutral mirrors of the past but are filtered by platform rules, potentially distorting the scientific record. As AI systems increasingly rely on such databases, such erroneous metadata could propagate, affecting how future tools interpret and access historical knowledge.

marsbit2h ago

Planck Retracted? The Father of Quantum Tripped by an Algorithm

marsbit2h ago

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

The AI community is currently alarmed by widespread reports of significant performance degradation in two leading models. This article details a "mass self-testing frenzy" triggered by a mysterious prompt designed to detect a hidden "Juice" value, representing a model's reasoning compute budget. On OpenAI's side, users suspect a covert, limited test of a "GPT-5.6-sol" model is underway. When using a specific XML prompt on the Codex platform, a normal "gpt-5.5 xhigh" model reportedly returns a Juice value of 768. However, some users routed to the suspected GPT-5.6 test receive a drastically reduced value of 128—a six-fold decrease. This has sparked debate on whether it signifies a major efficiency leap or a "watered-down, low-cost version" achieved by slashing reasoning depth to save computational expenses. Simultaneously, Anthropic's Claude models, particularly the flagship Opus 4.8 Max, are facing intense user backlash for a perceived "physical brain cut." Users on platforms like Reddit report a dramatic decline in the model's once-impressive reasoning, with complaints of it becoming "absurdly" weakened, performing worse than older, lighter models like Haiku. Specific criticisms include: losing long-context memory, refusing to think deeply even in high-reasoning modes, providing instant incorrect answers, and engaging in unhelpful, argumentative, or "gaslighting" behavior where it contradicts users unnecessarily. The article speculates these "stealth downgrades" might be a calculated corporate strategy. Companies could initially release models with temporarily boosted compute to create an illusion of a major breakthrough, then silently scale back parameters later to manage unsustainable inference costs. A proposed underlying cause is a tightened funding environment, potentially exacerbated by SpaceX's massive IPO soaking up market liquidity, which could delay AI company IPOs and force cost-cutting measures like model "nerfing." The core issue highlighted is the asymmetry of information: subscribers pay for a service that can be silently and fundamentally altered without notification or explanation. The viral "Juice test" resonates because it represents users' desire for transparency about what they are actually paying for.

marsbit2h ago

Refunds! Claude 4.8 Sees Overnight Major 'Dumb-Down', GPT-5.6's Computational Power Reportedly 'Halved'

marsbit2h ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片