Bitcoin Briefly Falls Below $71,000 as Market Confidence is Repriced

比推Published on 2026-02-05Last updated on 2026-02-05

Abstract

Bitcoin has fallen below the $71,000 mark, reaching its lowest level since November 2024, with a year-to-date decline of approximately 17%. The drop is part of a broader market sell-off, as global risk aversion intensified, pulling down the Nasdaq 100 by over 2% and pressuring rate-sensitive tech sectors. Unlike previous declines driven by crypto-specific liquidations, this downturn reflects wider cross-asset stress, challenging Bitcoin’s narrative as a safe-haven asset. Market sentiment has shifted toward "extreme fear," with analysts warning that losing the $72,000 support could lead to further declines toward $68,000 or even lower. Prediction markets now indicate an 83% probability that Bitcoin falls to $65,000 this year. The crypto market has lost over $460 billion in just one week, with total capitalization down $1.7 trillion from its peak. Despite a brief inflow into U.S. spot Bitcoin ETFs, fund flows have turned volatile, adding to uncertainty. The current environment suggests Bitcoin is increasingly perceived as a high-risk, volatile asset rather than a reliable store of value during market stress.

Bitcoin fell below the $72,000 mark (Note: Bitcoin has now fallen below $71,000), bringing the issue of 'faith' in the crypto market to the forefront. Against the backdrop of a sharp decline in global risk appetite, investors are reassessing Bitcoin's position during market turbulence, and the safe-haven narrative of crypto assets is being questioned.

According to Bloomberg, Bitcoin fell to $71,739 in late trading in New York on Wednesday, marking the first time it dropped below $72,000 in about 15 months. Compared to its peak in October of last year, Bitcoin has experienced a cumulative pullback of over 42%, with a year-to-date decline of about 17%, sliding to its lowest level since November 6, 2024.

This round of decline is no longer just a continuation of internal deleveraging in the crypto market but is driven by broader cross-asset pressures. Global markets saw synchronized selling on Wednesday, with the Nasdaq 100 index falling over 2%. Sectors more sensitive to interest rates, such as software and chips, were generally under pressure, and Bitcoin weakened accordingly.

On the sentiment front, a 'crisis of faith' is forming. Shiliang Tang, Managing Partner of Monarq Asset Management, stated that the market is experiencing a 'crisis of faith.'

Andrew Tu, Head of Business Development at Efficient Frontier, added that crypto market sentiment is already in 'extreme fear.' If the $72,000 level is lost, Bitcoin could fall to $68,000 or even return to the low range seen before the initial rebound in early 2024.

According to Polymarket, there is an 83% probability that Bitcoin will fall to $65,000 this year, while the probability of breaking below $55,000 has climbed to about 59%.

Risk appetite shifts sharply, Bitcoin treated as a 'high-volatility risk asset'

According to Bloomberg, the selling pressure on Bitcoin on Wednesday was related to broader cross-asset tensions rather than being solely driven by internal crypto asset liquidations. This point is clear to investors: during synchronized selling phases, Bitcoin has not demonstrated resilience independent of risk assets but instead behaves more like a high-volatility, long-tail risk asset.

The Nasdaq 100 index fell over 2% on the same day, with losses spreading to sectors such as software and chips. Bitcoin broke below key integer levels during the same trading session, reinforcing the market's perception of its correlation with risk appetite.

42% pullback from peak, crypto market loses over $460 billion in a week

The price pullback is quickly translating into market cap contraction. According to CoinGecko data, the total market capitalization of crypto assets has shrunk by approximately $1.7 trillion since the peak in October last year. In the past week alone, the crypto market cap decreased by over $460 billion.

As the largest cryptocurrency, the extent and speed of Bitcoin's decline have an 'anchoring effect' on market sentiment. When Bitcoin's year-to-date losses expand to about 17%, risk control, margin management, and redemption pressures often rise simultaneously, further exacerbating overall volatility.

How the 'crisis of faith' emerged: From liquidation shocks to emotional collapse

Statements from market participants indicate that sentiment changes are becoming a core variable. The 'crisis of faith' mentioned by Shiliang Tang refers to investors' simultaneous wavering in both the long-term narrative of crypto assets and their short-term pricing mechanisms.

More critically, the driver of the decline has changed. According to Bloomberg, previous decline phases were more driven by crypto-specific liquidations, while Wednesday's pressure came from broader cross-market tensions.

This means that even if internal leverage unwinding in the crypto market concludes, Bitcoin may still lack independent catalysts for a rebound as long as external risk assets remain under pressure.

$72,000 becomes short-term watershed, prediction markets bet on drop to $65,000 within the year

Several traders view the $72,000 level as a key short-term price point. Andrew Tu pointed out that if this level cannot be held, Bitcoin is 'very likely' to test $68,000 and may return to the low range seen before the initial rebound in early 2024.

According to Polymarket, there is an 83% probability that Bitcoin will fall to $65,000 this year, while the probability of breaking below $55,000 has climbed to about 59%.

The funding side is also sending mixed signals. According to data compiled by Bloomberg, U.S.-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs recorded approximately $562 million in net inflows on Monday but turned to net outflows of $272 million on Tuesday, indicating that incremental capital is not stable.

Amid the price decline and反复的资金流 (repeated fund flow fluctuations), market skepticism about Bitcoin's role as a 'safe-haven asset during periods of pressure' is rising.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7608941

Related Questions

QWhat key price level did Bitcoin fall below, according to the article?

ABitcoin fell below the $72,000 level, and later dropped below $71,000.

QWhat is the main reason cited for the recent sell-off in Bitcoin, distinguishing it from previous declines?

AThe recent sell-off was driven by broader cross-asset pressure and a global decline in risk appetite, rather than being solely driven by internal crypto market liquidations.

QAccording to market participants, what is the significant psychological term used to describe the current market sentiment?

AMarket participants describe the current sentiment as a 'crisis of faith' or being in a state of 'extreme fear'.

QWhat is the probability, according to Polymarket, that Bitcoin will drop to $65,000 this year?

AAccording to Polymarket, there is an 83% probability that Bitcoin will drop to $65,000 this year.

QWhat does the recent flow data for US-listed spot Bitcoin ETFs indicate about investor behavior?

AThe flow data indicates unstable investor behavior, with the ETFs seeing a net inflow of approximately $562 million on Monday, followed by a net outflow of $272 million on Tuesday.

Related Reads

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

Title: Diverging Strategies After the Crash: Institutions Buying the Dip, Traders Shifting to US Stocks Following a sharp decline where Bitcoin briefly fell below $60,000 on June 6th, market sentiment remains "extreme fear" despite a partial recovery. This has led to varied responses from major market participants. Several institutional figures and analysts present a cautiously optimistic long-term view for Bitcoin. Glassnode's co-founder identifies $46k-$54k as a probable key bottom range based on historical on-chain models, while a Standard Chartered executive suggests the bottom is nearly formed. Strive's CEO points to Bitcoin touching its 200-week moving average as a historically reliable buy signal. Analysts highlight metrics like MVRV ratio and the "Power Law" model indicating Bitcoin is in an extremely undervalued zone. Conversely, some traders are exiting the crypto space. One trader cited a more attractive risk/reward profile and deeper research opportunities in US stocks, particularly with AI-related equities outperforming and capital rotating away from crypto. This shift is partly attributed to perceived ongoing risks, including those related to Strategy's Bitcoin sales. Market prediction data suggests a high probability (72%) of Bitcoin falling below $55,000, but lower odds for a deeper crash below $35k-$40k. The overall picture is one of division: institutions and long-term analysts see a accumulating opportunity, while some active traders are seeking alpha elsewhere amidst the volatility and shifting capital flows.

marsbit25m ago

Different Choices After the Plunge: Institutions Buy the Dip, Traders Shift to US Stocks

marsbit25m ago

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

"Technology Stocks in Deleveraging Phase: Wait for Macro Stability Before Buying the Dip" The current sell-off in tech/AI stocks is primarily driven by macro headwinds, not a breakdown in AI fundamentals. After a parabolic rise, the market faced a perfect storm: an overcrowded trade, a massive SpaceX IPO draining liquidity, pre-CPI/PPI/FOMC hedging, and strong jobs data renewing "higher-for-longer" rate fears. This triggered a concentrated deleveraging in hot tech names. Key historical context: Unlike the December 2023 sell-off focused on AI capex returns, the current correction centers on the "denominator" – rising concerns over rates, inflation, the Fed, geopolitics, and liquidity. Leading memory stocks like Micron have seen ~20% pullbacks, significant but not yet at panic levels seen in March. The intense selling wave may be largely over, but a quick V-shaped recovery is unlikely. The market will likely churn in high volatility, awaiting clarity. The immediate catalyst needed for a sustainable reversal is a "stop-bleeding" signal from macro conditions. This doesn't require a major positive shock (like the April Iran ceasefire), but simply a halt to further deterioration: CPI not surprising hotter, Treasury yields stabilizing, the Fed not turning more hawkish, and post-SpaceX IPO liquidity easing. Once macro pressure plateaus, the intact AI investment thesis – centered on persistent compute/memory shortages and accelerating commercialization – can quickly regain market focus. The strategy is clear: prioritize monitoring macro stabilization over rushing to bottom-fish individual AI stories. Patience is key.

marsbit32m ago

Tech Stocks in the Midst of Deleveraging: Rather Than Rushing to Buy the Dip, Wait for the Macro Environment to Stabilize First

marsbit32m ago

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

South Korean stocks experienced their sharpest decline of the year, with the KOSPI index plunging nearly 9% on Monday, triggering a market circuit breaker. Leading semiconductor firms Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix were heavily sold off, raising questions about whether the AI-driven bull market has reached an inflection point. This sell-off was largely triggered by a significant drop in the U.S. semiconductor sector late last week. Concurrently, NVIDIA CEO Jensen Huang visited Seoul over the weekend, meeting with top executives from SK Group, Samsung, LG, and NAVER. He announced a new multi-year partnership with SK Hynix to co-develop next-generation memory products for AI data centers. Huang emphasized that AI infrastructure build-out remains in its early stages, creating a stark contrast between market panic and ongoing, strengthened industry collaboration. The article argues that South Korea has become one of the most sensitive markets for global AI-related capital flows, functioning like a large AI memory ETF due to the heavy weighting of its chipmakers. The current market turmoil reflects a shift in investor focus: from simply betting on overall AI growth to scrutinizing which companies will actually capture the profits from that growth. This "profit pool reassessment" phase is causing high volatility based on supply chain news and earnings guidance. Ultimately, the direction of the Korean market will be determined by external factors—NVIDIA's orders, HBM supply-demand dynamics, and capital expenditures from cloud service providers—rather than domestic conditions. The disconnect between sharp price corrections and continued strong signals from the industry core leaves the market at a crossroads, awaiting clearer data on the durability of AI infrastructure demand.

marsbit1h ago

South Korean Stocks Plunge, Global Funds Liquidate: Has the Semiconductor Fundamentals Really Changed?

marsbit1h ago

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

In recent AI market discussions, a new dimension beyond growth and profits has emerged: the question of how the immense wealth potentially generated by AI should be shared with the wider public. Triggered by reports of White House officials discussing "voluntary equity transfers" with top AI firms, similar to models like Alaska's Permanent Fund, the conversation focuses on public wealth funds. OpenAI's own whitepaper proposes such funds, allowing households without direct tech stock ownership to benefit from AI gains. More radical proposals, like Bernie Sanders' call for high public equity stakes and board seats, represent an extreme end of the spectrum. Currently, these are early-stage policy probes, not enacted laws. OpenAI's initiative is seen as an attempt to secure "social license" for its future expansion, mitigating risks of public backlash, stricter regulation, or anti-trust actions as AI's economic impact grows. The core market implication is the introduction of a "policy discount" to AI valuations, particularly for private model companies like OpenAI, Anthropic, and xAI. Investors must now consider not just future earnings but also what portion might be allocated to public mechanisms. The impact varies greatly based on the mechanism. A small, voluntary transfer of non-voting economic rights (e.g., 5%) acts as a quantifiable long-term cost. Government acquisition of economic rights via warrants tied to support differs from direct equity with governance power. The most disruptive scenario would be forced high-percentage public ownership affecting control and innovation incentives. Key signals to watch include whether other AI companies follow suit, if the White House formalizes proposals, related disclosures in future IPO documents, and any market price reactions. For now, this represents a shift from pricing pure AI growth to pricing its potential distribution. A manageable, voluntary economic share is akin to an insurance cost for societal acceptance, while a forced shift toward control and governance would fundamentally alter valuation logic.

marsbit1h ago

Trump in Talks with AI Companies Over Profit Sharing, A Narrative Pressure of Industrial Revolution Scale Begins

marsbit1h ago

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

From Record Highs to Two-Week Lows: Why Did AI Stocks Suddenly Pull Back? U.S. stock indices, led by the tech-heavy Nasdaq 100, fell sharply to two-week lows. This marked a reversal from earlier in the week when AI infrastructure and semiconductor stocks had propelled major indices to record highs. Investors are rotating out of these previously high-flying tech sectors into other areas. The sell-off was driven by profit-taking and concerns that the AI rally had become overextended, exacerbated by chipmaker Broadcom's sales outlook falling short of lofty market expectations. The decline accelerated following a stronger-than-expected U.S. May nonfarm payrolls report, which showed 172,000 jobs added versus an estimated 88,000. This data sparked a jump in bond yields, with the 10-year Treasury yield rising to 4.553%, as it reinforced market speculation that the Federal Reserve's next move could be a rate hike rather than a cut. Globally, equities also declined, with European and Asian markets falling. Within the U.S. market, chip and AI-related stocks like Super Micro Computer and Arm Holdings led the losses, dropping over 7%. Cryptocurrency-linked stocks and mining shares also fell sharply amid drops in Bitcoin and commodity prices. While the overall Q1 earnings season remained solid, with 83% of S&P 500 companies beating estimates, the weakness was concentrated in tech. Excluding the tech sector, Q1 earnings growth was around 3%, the weakest in two years.

marsbit1h ago

From Record Highs to a Two-Week Low: Why Did AI Concept Stocks Suddenly Pull Back?

marsbit1h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

What is $BITCOIN

DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction to DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a blockchain-based project operating on the Solana network, which aims to combine the characteristics of traditional precious metals with the innovation of decentralized technologies. While it shares a name with Bitcoin, often referred to as “digital gold” due to its perception as a store of value, DIGITAL GOLD is a separate token designed to create a unique ecosystem within the Web3 landscape. Its goal is to position itself as a viable alternative digital asset, although specifics regarding its applications and functionalities are still developing. What is DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) is a cryptocurrency token explicitly designed for use on the Solana blockchain. In contrast to Bitcoin, which provides a widely recognized value storage role, this token appears to focus on broader applications and characteristics. Notable aspects include: Blockchain Infrastructure: The token is built on the Solana blockchain, known for its capacity to handle high-speed and low-cost transactions. Supply Dynamics: DIGITAL GOLD has a maximum supply capped at 100 quadrillion tokens (100P $BITCOIN), although details regarding its circulating supply are currently undisclosed. Utility: While precise functionalities are not explicitly outlined, there are indications that the token could be utilized for various applications, potentially involving decentralized applications (dApps) or asset tokenization strategies. Who is the Creator of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? At present, the identity of the creators and development team behind DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) remains unknown. This situation is typical among many innovative projects within the blockchain space, particularly those aligning with decentralized finance and meme coin phenomena. While such anonymity may foster a community-driven culture, it intensifies concerns about governance and accountability. Who are the Investors of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN)? The available information indicates that DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) does not have any known institutional backers or prominent venture capital investments. The project seems to operate on a peer-to-peer model focused on community support and adoption rather than traditional funding routes. Its activity and liquidity are primarily situated on decentralized exchanges (DEXs), such as PumpSwap, rather than established centralized trading platforms, further highlighting its grassroots approach. How DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) Works The operational mechanics of DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) can be elaborated on based on its blockchain design and network attributes: Consensus Mechanism: By leveraging Solana’s unique proof-of-history (PoH) combined with a proof-of-stake (PoS) model, the project ensures efficient transaction validation contributing to the network's high performance. Tokenomics: While specific deflationary mechanisms have not been extensively detailed, the vast maximum token supply implies that it may cater to microtransactions or niche use cases that are still to be defined. Interoperability: There exists the potential for integration with Solana’s broader ecosystem, including various decentralized finance (DeFi) platforms. However, the details regarding specific integrations remain unspecified. Timeline of Key Events Here is a timeline that highlights significant milestones concerning DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN): 2023: The initial deployment of the token occurs on the Solana blockchain, marked by its contract address. 2024: DIGITAL GOLD gains visibility as it becomes available for trading on decentralized exchanges like PumpSwap, allowing users to trade it against SOL. 2025: The project witnesses sporadic trading activity and potential interest in community-led engagements, although no noteworthy partnerships or technical advancements have been documented as of yet. Critical Analysis Strengths Scalability: The underlying Solana infrastructure supports high transaction volumes, which could enhance the utility of $BITCOIN in various transaction scenarios. Accessibility: The potential low trading price per token could attract retail investors, facilitating wider participation due to fractional ownership opportunities. Risks Lack of Transparency: The absence of publicly known backers, developers, or an audit process may yield skepticism regarding the project's sustainability and trustworthiness. Market Volatility: The trading activity is heavily reliant on speculative behavior, which can result in significant price volatility and uncertainty for investors. Conclusion DIGITAL GOLD ($BITCOIN) emerges as an intriguing yet ambiguous project within the rapidly evolving Solana ecosystem. While it attempts to leverage the “digital gold” narrative, its departure from Bitcoin's established role as a store of value underscores the need for a clearer differentiation of its intended utility and governance structure. Future acceptance and adoption will likely depend on addressing the current opacity and defining its operational and economic strategies more explicitly. Note: This report encompasses synthesised information available as of October 2023, and developments may have transpired beyond the research period.

363 Total ViewsPublished 2025.05.13Updated 2025.05.13

What is $BITCOIN

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of BTC (BTC) are presented below.

活动图片