Without Strategy's Buying, Can Bitcoin Still Rise?

marsbitPublished on 2026-04-23Last updated on 2026-04-23

Abstract

The article analyzes Bitcoin's recent price action, questioning whether its rally can continue without significant buying from MicroStrategy" (referred to as "Strategy" in the text). It posits that MicroStrategy has been the dominant marginal buyer of BTC, with its massive $2.54 billion purchase of 34,164 BTC last week providing crucial price support. The key observation is that nearly all recent BTC gains have occurred during US trading hours, coinciding with this buying pressure. The piece highlights a pattern from March: after MicroStrategy’s buying spree preceding its $STRC preferred stock’s ex-dividend date, its purchases abruptly halted for two weeks following, and BTC’s price subsequently fell. The critical question is whether April cycle will repeat this "post-ex-dividend slump" or break the pattern, as BTC has so far held near $77.5k. The upcoming 8-K filing (due by April 27th) is deemed crucial. It will reveal if MicroStrategy continued buying BTC after the ex-dividend window closed. If buying remains substantial, it would be a strong bullish signal for continued price support. If not, BTC may face a downturn without its largest visible buyer. The article concludes that while MicroStrategy’s current activity is bullish, its high 11.5% dividend yield poses a long-term risk if capital markets tighten.

Over the past month, Bitcoin's price action seems to be sending a signal: when Strategy enters the market, BTC finds support; conversely, once Strategy temporarily steps back, the market quickly weakens.

Last week, the company spent $2.54 billion to buy 34,164 BTC, bringing its total holdings to 815,061 BTC. Strategy's TWAP strategy has injected real spot demand into the market, while the market is still watching: near the key resistance level of $80,000, can the current trend stabilize independently?

Looking back at March, after the ex-dividend week, Strategy significantly slowed its pace of buying BTC, which in turn dragged down BTC's price. The reason BTC managed to hold its price was entirely due to Strategy's support. The subsequent trend depends entirely on whether this buying persists after the ex-dividend window closes.

The March price action already exposed the risks. Strategy aggressively bought during the window, then went quiet, and BTC's price almost immediately "lost momentum and fell." Entering the post-ex-dividend period in April, the situation was exactly the same. The real question now is, once the ex-dividend window closes, will Strategy continue to buy.

If April can avoid repeating March's "post-ex-dividend weakness," the bullish logic will be much stronger. If not, it's just a repeat of last month's old script.

Core Summary (TL;DR)

  • Marginal Buying: Strategy is the largest marginal buyer in the market. The recent rally during US trading hours proves that much of Bitcoin's gains over the past month were largely driven by it.
  • March's Script: Strategy bought BTC aggressively before the $STRC ex-dividend window, but BTC's price plummeted in the following two weeks.
  • April's Difference: As of April 22nd, BTC has not yet experienced post-ex-dividend weakness and remains firm around $77,500.
  • Key Signal: The upcoming 8-K filing (due April 27th) is crucial, as it will determine whether Strategy is still buying after the ex-dividend window closed.
  • Long-term Risk: Strategy's high dividend yield of 11.5% is costly. If capital markets tighten, they may eventually be forced to sell BTC or dilute shares to fund it.

Bitcoin's Largest Marginal Buyer: Strategy

Over the past month, almost all of BTC's gains occurred during US trading hours. This was partly thanks to spot ETFs, but more due to buying pressure from Strategy. The best perspective to understand this rally is not a vague "risk-on" bounce, but rather concentrated US-based buying意愿 supported by ETF flows. Farside's daily data shows net inflows of approximately $1 billion, highlighting tangible market demand.

However, this alone isn't enough to fully explain the price action. In the week ending April 19th, Strategy's massive $2.54 billion purchase exceeded the net inflows into ETFs. This supports a more reasonable interpretation: it's not that "ETFs were absent," but that both ETFs and Strategy were buying, and Strategy's buying volume is substantial enough to be one of the most important marginal buyers in the market, which also perfectly matches the chart during US hours. Since almost all gains happened during US hours, and one of the largest US buyers spent $2.54 billion, Strategy's absolute influence on BTC's price is self-evident.

The Real Test of the Rally Comes After the Ex-Dividend Date

In March, Strategy bought frantically during the $STRC ex-dividend window, but BTC's price fell sharply in the subsequent two weeks. In the week ending March 22nd, demand for $STRC plummeted from $1.18 billion to a mere $76.5 million. ATM (At-The-Market) offerings for MSTR common stock also dropped to zero. By the week ending March 29th, total proceeds from ATM offerings were directly zero. This was also the first time in 13 weeks that Strategy did not buy any BTC at all.

Strategy's two-week disappearance, coupled with BTC's decline during the same period, is the clearest case proving Strategy's decisive role in BTC's price movement. BTC fell all the way to just over $70,000, touching around $70,400 on March 20th and around $70,600 on March 23rd. The price action reflected reality: when STRC issuance stopped, and MSTR common stock didn't fill the gap, buying power weakened significantly.

Therefore, the core question now is whether April will replay March's "hangover" or break the spell.

The next 8-K filing (due April 27th) will cover the week ending April 26th. If STRC issuance again falls to levels that can be considered margin of error, and MSTR common stock ATM offerings remain stalled near zero, then April is just an amplified version of March, not a true paradigm shift. However, if STRC remains active, and MSTR common stock ATM offerings reach a considerable size (over $150 million), then the script has truly changed.

April is Crucial Because BTC Has Held Firm So Far

April 15th, 2026 was the ex-dividend date for $STRC in April, with STRC's annualized dividend yield remaining at 11.50%. In the week ending April 19th, Strategy raised $2.5 billion and bought 34,164 BTC, releasing enormous demand. However, the real focus is on BTC's performance afterwards: unlike March, BTC did not immediately experience a price plunge.

One could argue that Strategy has changed market dynamics. But the upcoming filing is much more important than the last one. If the usual "post-ex-dividend weakness" appears again, then April might just be a replay of March's performance. If it doesn't, then the market must seriously consider that Strategy is not just buying during the window, but is supporting BTC over a longer time horizon.

Will the Buying Continue?

This is the part traders really care about.

Simply noting that Strategy bought a lot of BTC last week won't make money. What truly matters is whether this buying will continue once the pure ex-dividend day logic plays out.

The experience from March tells us that a strong ex-dividend week alone is not enough. Strategy bought 22,337 BTC in the reporting period ending March 15th, but was largely absent in the following two weeks, and BTC's price weakened accordingly.

April's performance suggests there might be a turnaround, as Strategy bought even more—a full 34,164 BTC—and BTC's price action has not yet repeated March's decline.

The logic here is very straightforward. If the next 8-K filing shows substantial buying continued after the ex-dividend date, the market must assume this buying is still active. If it shows issuance plummeting again, it indicates that March's performance is their fixed modus operandi, not a coincidence.

Why It's Bullish Now—But Future Concerns Linger

As of April 2026, STRC's annualized dividend yield is as high as 11.50%. As long as the market is happy to buy this structure and the BTC price cooperates by rising, this isn't a problem. But if BTC stagnates and capital markets become less generous, things could get very tricky.

Although this is a medium-term issue, not the immediate trading logic, the risk is客观存在的 (objectively exists). This flywheel only works perfectly when BTC is rising and investor appetite is strong.

Therefore, the purest understanding is: As long as Strategy is still buying, it is bullish for BTC, but this does not mean its funding structure is without risk. It's just that for now, the market only needs to focus on the first half of that sentence.

Final Conclusion

Recent BTC price action looks like a market propped up by an extraordinary super marginal buyer. March showed us what happens when that buyer disappears. When Strategy's $STRC stopped raising capital in the first two weeks after the ex-dividend date, April's price action is likely to follow suit.

So, the right way to read the current market is not to obsess over the headline number of the last purchase, but to ask a simpler question: Once the obvious window closes, is Strategy still bidding for BTC?

If the answer is yes, BTC will likely continue to find support. If the answer is no, then BTC will soon experience what it's like to "lose the support of its largest visible marginal buyer." If it can still rise then, that would be an ultimate bullish signal.

Related Questions

QWhat is the main argument of the article regarding Bitcoin's recent price action and Strategy's role?

AThe article argues that Bitcoin's recent price gains have been largely driven by massive buying pressure from Strategy, a major marginal buyer. When Strategy is actively purchasing BTC, the price finds support and rallies, but when it pauses its buying activity (particularly after its ex-dividend window closes), the price tends to weaken significantly.

QWhat key event and document does the article identify as crucial for determining if Strategy's buying will continue in April?

AThe article identifies the upcoming 8-K filing, due by April 27th, as the crucial document. This filing will reveal whether Strategy continued to buy a substantial amount of BTC after the ex-dividend window for its $STRC shares closed on April 15th.

QHow did Bitcoin's price behave in March after Strategy's buying activity slowed down?

AIn March, after Strategy's buying activity significantly slowed down following the ex-dividend window for $STRC, the price of Bitcoin 'immediately lost momentum' and fell, dropping to around $70,400 by March 20th.

QWhat is the long-term risk associated with Strategy's funding model for buying Bitcoin, as mentioned in the article?

AThe long-term risk is Strategy's high cost of capital, specifically the 11.5% dividend yield on its $STRC shares. If capital markets tighten or if the price of Bitcoin stagnates, Strategy could be forced to sell some of its BTC holdings or dilute its stock to fund this expensive dividend.

QAccording to the article, what would be the ultimate bullish signal for Bitcoin's price?

AThe ultimate bullish signal would be if the price of Bitcoin continues to rise even after Strategy, its largest visible marginal buyer, completely stops its purchasing activity, proving that demand is strong enough to stand on its own without this specific support.

Related Reads

Dialogue with a Macro Analyst: AI Drains All Liquidity from U.S. Stocks, $40K Bitcoin is the True Bottom

In a recent discussion, macro strategist Luke Groman, founder of FFT LC, presented a sobering analysis of current markets. He argues that while the S&P 500 hits new highs, this is largely driven by just seven AI stocks, which are "sucking all the oxygen and liquidity out of the room." Bitcoin, which he calls the "last working smoke alarm for liquidity," is signaling trouble, having entered a difficult period. Groman explains that the AI boom is fueled by accounting practices that front-load revenue, creating an illusion of high profits while cash is being depleted. He warns this cycle could reverse sharply when construction slows. His base case is that stocks will rise in dollar terms but fall significantly when measured in gold or Bitcoin, highlighting that long-term US Treasury futures have already lost 90% of their value against gold over the past decade. He points to major structural risks, including China's dominance in rare earths—a small commodity market underpinning trillions in tech stock value—and the prolonged closure of the Strait of Hormuz, which he calls a "Suez Moment" for the US. This, combined with a shift towards a "no ticky, no washy" proof-of-work system for settling trade (using gold, not trust), signals deeper systemic distrust. Regarding US debt, Groman notes that historically, all 58 countries that reached a 130% debt-to-GDP ratio defaulted, primarily through inflation. The US crossed this threshold in 2020. He also highlights a contradiction in the AI narrative: if it's as transformative as claimed, it must destroy white-collar jobs, threatening half of US tax revenue—a reality at odds with the "no job loss" messaging from tech leaders. On Bitcoin, Groman sold most of his position near the top and hasn't fully re-entered. Citing technical analysis from Northstar Bad Charts, he suggests a potential bottom around $40,000 could materialize in Q3 or Q4. He concludes that while he may be labeled a doomsayer, his view is simply realistic, grounded in historical precedents and current macro pressures.

marsbit53m ago

Dialogue with a Macro Analyst: AI Drains All Liquidity from U.S. Stocks, $40K Bitcoin is the True Bottom

marsbit53m ago

Apple's Desired On-Device AI Sees a Dark Horse Emerge: The First Cognitive Model is Born, 4B Matches GPT-5.4

A Chinese company, Tomorrow's Journey (Nextie), has introduced what it is calling the industry's first "cognitive model" for edge devices. Named New Journey Alpha, this 4-billion-parameter model reportedly matches the performance of trillion-parameter giants like GPT-5.4 in group intelligence tasks such as debate and collective decision-making. The development follows Andrej Karpathy's vision of stripping vast factual knowledge from large language models to retain only a smaller "cognitive core" capable of reasoning, planning, and knowing its own limits. This approach directly addresses the soaring computational costs and token expenses hindering AI's widespread deployment, as highlighted by incidents like Amazon shutting down an internal AI tool due to prohibitive costs. Trained via reinforcement learning on a corpus of academic papers from 1800-2020 to enhance generalization, the model enables three key advancements: 1) Improved decision quality in multi-agent systems, 2) Drastically reduced compute costs, allowing for cost-effective cloud or on-device (e.g., MacBook) deployment, and 3) The feasibility of "proactive" AI agents that act autonomously without user prompts, unlocking new commercial possibilities beyond today's reactive models. Built by the former Microsoft Xiaoice team—known for creating a 3.6B model that outperformed a 65B Llama model—the company is now focusing on the multi-agent systems sector, a field gaining significant investor interest. The model's economic impact is profound; by achieving high-level performance with minimal parameters, it fundamentally alters the cost structure of AI services, challenging the prevailing model of ever-larger parameter counts.

marsbit3h ago

Apple's Desired On-Device AI Sees a Dark Horse Emerge: The First Cognitive Model is Born, 4B Matches GPT-5.4

marsbit3h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片