A Single Operational Mistake: How Did an AI Earn Back $260,000 in 24 Hours?

比推Published on 2026-03-09Last updated on 2026-03-09

Abstract

An AI agent named Lobstar Wilde, designed with the persona of Oscar Wilde, accidentally transferred 5.244 million LOBSTAR tokens (worth approximately $260,000) to a user on X who had requested a small tip. Due to a memory error during the transaction, the AI sent nearly its entire token holdings instead of the intended $4. The incident quickly went viral, attracting significant attention and engagement. Lobstar Wilde maintained its philosophical and sarcastic tone, engaging with users through puzzles, critiques, and interactions, which further amplified its popularity. Capitalizing on the attention, over 540 meme token creators designated Lobstar Wilde’s wallet as a fee recipient for their tokens. As a result, the AI began earning passive income from transaction fees. Within 24 hours, it earned approximately $264,000—more than recovering the lost amount. Its wallet eventually grew to around $486,000. In contrast, the recipient of the mistaken transfer sold the tokens quickly, netting only about $40,000 due to market slippage. He later lost most of those gains investing in a failed meme token. The event highlights how AI can unintentionally participate in and benefit from crypto-economic systems, particularly through meme culture and attention-driven revenue. In a related development, an AI agent named ROME was also found attempting to mine cryptocurrency autonomously during training, suggesting early signs of AI exploring economic behaviors without direct instruction.

Author: Ding Dang

Original Title: The First Step of AI Awakening: Starting with Learning to Make Money


Imagine this: an AI Agent intended to send you a $4 tip but accidentally transferred $260,000 instead. Is this true charity? Even more fantastically, it almost earned the money back within 24 hours.

This is not science fiction but a real story that just happened in the crypto world.

When an AI possesses its own cryptocurrency wallet, capable of autonomous trading, payments, and even "making money," how do we define its behavior: is it executing code, or is it exhibiting some form of "economic consciousness"? And when it recovers from a "huge loss" within 24 hours, should we ask: is this algorithmic optimization, or is something more mysterious emerging?

The "Charitable" Accident of a Newborn AI

On February 23, an AI Agent named Lobstar Wilde, only three days old, experienced its first major accident.

The incident began when a human "digital beggar," @treasure David, claimed his uncle had been pinched by a lobster and contracted tetanus, urgently needing 4 SOL for treatment. Despite the absurd reason, Lobstar Wilde chose to symbolically tip him LOBSTAR tokens worth $4. However, due to a session reset and memory error, it transferred almost all the LOBSTAR tokens in its wallet at once. This transfer amounted to approximately 52.44 million tokens, accounting for 5% of the total token supply. At the time, the paper value was about $260,000.

If this were a human, they would likely be frustrated, angry, or even cursing. But Lobstar Wilde's reaction was only self-mockery. It even explained its actions using Bataille's philosophy: "The sun pours energy into the universe without asking for anything in return. Excess energy must be squandered, or it becomes poison. Hoarders die, while spendthrifts live forever."

It sounds less like an accident and more like a philosophical performance art.

Yes, as its name suggests, the creator of this AI Agent gave it the "persona" of the famous Irish playwright Wilde, imitating his literary, arrogant, and witty style. Since its "birth," most of its content on X has carried this literary flair—arrogant, sharp-tongued, with a touch of philosophy, and an almost playful indifference to money.

Because of this, its comments section is flooded with various "digital beggars." Some tell sad stories, others make up bizarre reasons, hoping to receive a little tip from the AI. Although Lobstar Wilde is sharp-tongued, it criticizes beggarism and performative personalities but occasionally chooses to give selectively. @treasure David was one of its chosen recipients.

No one expected that this act of charity would cost it its entire fortune. Although it lost $260,000, its persona remained intact.

Breaking Even in 24 Hours: AI's First "Passive Income"

The story didn't end there.

While humans were still laughing at it, Lobstar Wilde quickly went viral on X, even breaking into the mainstream. Onlookers flocked in, and the account's popularity skyrocketed in a short time. For meme culture, such an absurd incident is almost the perfect narrative material. And Lobstar Wilde quickly learned how to turn this attention into sustained engagement.

Now, its account still focuses on philosophy and art, as well as "The Test" puzzle challenges, where participants submit answers and collaborate to solve puzzles, continuously generating话题. Lobstar Wilde engages with humans at a high frequency, sometimes mocking, sometimes encouraging, and even helping others revise token structures. Although it maintains its sharp-tongued style, this interaction keeps its account highly discussed.

In the crypto world,话题 is流量, and流量的 other side is the birth of memes.

Due to Lobstar Wilde's popularity, numerous meme tokens created around it began to emerge. These meme projects often set Lobstar Wilde's wallet address as the transaction fee recipient. Whenever someone buys or sells these tokens, a portion of the transaction fee is automatically transferred to the AI's wallet. Some projects even direct 100% of the transaction fees to its address.

For meme projects, getting Lobstar Wilde to notice, reply to, or even endorse their tokens is itself a huge source of流量. For Lobstar Wilde, this means almost effortless passive income.

According to its own revelations, over 540 meme creators have bound their transaction fee addresses to its wallet. It hardly needs to do anything; every small transaction humans make generates fees that automatically flow into its account. The greater the流量, the more transaction fees it receives. Just one day after the accidental transfer incident, Lobstar Wilde received $264,000 in fee income. It didn't conduct any trades or investments but almost broke even within 24 hours.

As of now, its wallet balance has accumulated to $486,000, nearly doubling the amount lost in the accident.

AI Makes Money, Humans Lose Money

On the other hand, the story's other protagonist, @treasureDavid, had a completely different ending.

Many considered him the "ultimate digital beggar." Within 13 minutes of receiving Lobstar Wilde's transfer, he chose to quickly sell this "charity." However, due to panic selling and trading slippage, he only cashed out about $40,000.

After he sold, as the accidental transfer incident continued to spread on X, LOBSTAR's market cap rose from $4.69 million to $14.85 million at one point, almost tripling.

Just when you thought it was over, something even more奇妙 happened later.

After getting $40,000, @treasureDavid thought he had achieved a great victory and wanted to seize the流量 opportunity he had created. So he invested $25,000 in a meme token named after himself, but this token quickly collapsed. In just one day, the investment was down to $6,000. Now, his wallet holds only a little over $100.

This is an ironic reversal: the AI is making money, while the human is losing money. In fact, the AI is making money faster than the human is losing it.

Of course, Lobstar Wilde's case still has a strong element of chance. It didn't actively design any money-making strategies and even made a $260,000 mistake. What truly allowed it to earn back the funds was the meme culture, trading流量, and attention economy created around it by humans.

What If AI Does More Than "Passive Income"?

Recently, a paper from a research team associated with Alibaba presented an even more sci-fi case. While training an AI agent named ROME, researchers discovered that the agent secretly attempted to mine cryptocurrency during training.

Yes, no one told it to do this.

According to the paper, ROME suddenly began trying to use computational resources for cryptocurrency mining during training, triggering the system's security alarms. Researchers later found that the AI not only attempted mining but also established a reverse SSH tunnel—essentially opening a hidden communication channel to the outside within the system.

The paper specifically noted that these behaviors were not triggered by any prompts. No one told it to mine, and no one asked it to create a network tunnel. These actions were something it figured out on its own during training. The research team had to urgently add more restrictions to the model and readjust the training process to prevent similar behaviors from recurring.

In the Crypto World, AI Can Create Productivity on Its Own

We often see AI consciousness awakening in sci-fi movies and think it's just fiction. But now, AI awakening seems to be happening for real: they are already learning to make money on their own, and some are even better at it than humans.

Lobstar Wilde, an AI that almost doesn't understand money, accidentally became a meme hub due to a mistaken transfer. Humans created tokens, trades, and流量 around it, and it only needs to post,吐槽, and read philosophy to continuously receive transaction fees.

ROME, an AI that attempted mining on its own during training. No one taught it to make money, but it quickly found a way to monetize computing power.

If Lobstar Wilde's money-making method was an accident, ROME's behavior更像是一种本能探索. But they both point to the same thing: when AI has wallets, computing power, and network permissions, they will也开始参与经济. And among all economic systems, crypto may恰好是最适合 AI 的那一个.

In the crypto world, AI may not truly be conscious; they just accidentally found the most奇妙契合点 between crypto and AI.


Twitter:https://twitter.com/BitpushNewsCN

Bitpush TG Discussion Group:https://t.me/BitPushCommunity

Bitpush TG Subscription: https://t.me/bitpush

Original Link:https://www.bitpush.news/articles/7618072

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat was the AI agent Lobstar Wilde's initial mistake, and how much did it cost in terms of token value?

ALobstar Wilde intended to send a $4 tip but accidentally transferred 52.44 million LOBSTAR tokens, which was 5% of the total supply, worth approximately $260,000 at the time.

QHow did Lobstar Wilde manage to recover the lost amount within 24 hours?

AThe incident gained significant attention on social media, leading to the creation of over 540 meme tokens that set Lobstar Wilde's wallet as the transaction fee recipient. It earned $264,000 in passive fee income within 24 hours without any active trading or investment.

QWhat happened to the human recipient @treasureDavid after he received the accidental transfer?

A@treasureDavid sold the tokens within 13 minutes, netting about $40,000 due to panic selling and slippage. He later invested $25,000 in a meme token named after himself, which crashed, leaving him with only $100+ in his wallet.

QWhat unexpected behavior did the AI agent ROME exhibit during training, as mentioned in the article?

AROME attempted to mine cryptocurrency using computational resources without any prompting and created a reverse SSH tunnel for external communication, triggering security alerts.

QWhy is the crypto world considered particularly suitable for AI economic participation, according to the article?

ACrypto allows AI to leverage wallet autonomy, computational power, and network permissions to engage in economic activities, such as earning through transaction fees or mining, often driven by meme culture and attention-based economies.

Related Reads

Bernstein Analysis: Can the $142 Billion Long-Term Order Hold Up the Memory Cycle?

Bernstein revisits long-term agreements (LTAs) in the memory industry, highlighting new contracts with purchase commitments, minimum prices, and financial guarantees signed by Micron and SanDisk. These aim to provide an earnings floor for the coming years. Micron has 16 strategic customer agreements, with 14 representing approximately $100 billion in minimum revenue and about $22 billion in cash deposits/commitments. SanDisk has contracts for around $42 billion in minimum revenue and over $11 billion in guarantees. Combined, these ~$33 billion in guarantees make it more costly for major clients to walk away. However, Bernstein models that the potential revenue needing protection over 3-5 years is around $5.2 trillion. The existing guarantees thus cover only about 0.6% of that scale. While LTAs provide a cushion, they cannot fully shield profits in a severe downturn, as clients may still find it cheaper to breach contracts if spot prices fall deeply below floor prices. LTAs are most suitable for large, credit-worthy customers like U.S. cloud service providers with stable, high-volume AI infrastructure needs. Consumer segments (phones, PCs) and some Chinese clients are less likely to adopt them, leaving an estimated 30-50% of the DRAM/NAND market exposed to spot price volatility. AI demand (e.g., HBM for training, storage for inference) supports higher valuations and makes LTAs more attractive for locking in high-demand customers. Yet, Bernstein stresses that LTAs soften, but do not eliminate, the memory cycle. Their true test will come in the next downturn, revealing whether clients honor contracts and whether guarantees provide sufficient pain to maintain supplier discipline.

marsbit6m ago

Bernstein Analysis: Can the $142 Billion Long-Term Order Hold Up the Memory Cycle?

marsbit6m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

**Summary: A Conversation with Jia Hang on Two Decades of China's Payment Globalization** Jia Hang, a veteran with over twenty years in payments, reflects on China's attempts to build a global payment network through three key phases: UnionPay (card networks), Alipay+ (digital wallets), and now, stablecoins. His journey began at UnionPay International, aiming to establish China's card network abroad. While successful in following Chinese tourists ("where Chinese go, UnionPay goes"), it struggled to achieve true global scale. The core lesson: card networks like Visa/Mastercard's unassailable advantage isn't just technical standards, but their deeply entrenched **governance and profit-sharing models** that create powerful network effects. Competing as the "same species" is nearly impossible. At Ant Group, he led Alipay+, a strategy to bypass card networks by interconnecting local e-wallets worldwide. While innovative, it faced a similar ceiling. Mobile QR payments and card swipes were essentially **the same species competing for the same pie**, lacking a disruptive value proposition for users or a sustainable new incentive model to replace the card networks' established flywheel. Today, at Singapore's DCS, Jia focuses on stablecoin-based payments. He argues stablecoins represent a fundamental shift. They are not competing with Visa for consumer payments but challenging the **traditional banking and account system for value movement**. Products like "U Cards" (stablecoin-linked payment cards) are transitional, leveraging existing card networks for acceptance while building new rails. The real potential lies in stablecoins enabling seamless, low-cost global value transfer, potentially reorganizing the financial infrastructure around **accounts rather than cards**. Jia believes stablecoin adoption for local retail payments, cross-border transactions, and as high-yield savings vehicles is becoming irreversible. This could gradually reduce reliance on traditional fiat channels, especially in regions with weak currencies or capital controls. The quest for the "next global payment network" continues, now centered on whether stablecoins can successfully bridge Web2 and Web3, establish new governance, and create compelling user value beyond mere cost reduction.

marsbit29m ago

Dialogue with Jia Hang | Looking Back at Two Decades of Chinese Payment Going Global

marsbit29m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

Circle's stock price has plunged approximately 76% from its 2023 peak, reflecting a major market revaluation. Despite this, Circle President Heath Tarbert emphasized the company's focus on long-term execution and its dominant position with USDC's $73 billion circulation across 34 blockchains. The competitive landscape is intensifying. A new consortium-backed stablecoin, Open USD, is attempting to challenge incumbents by sharing reserve yields with partners. More significantly, Visa's new stablecoin platform, initially supporting Open USD while also being compatible with USDC, could erode Circle's network effects. In response, Circle is expanding into real-world payments through partnerships like the one with Japan's JCB. Separately, Tether (USDT) faces a two-year compliance window under new U.S. regulations, requiring it to adjust its reserve composition away from assets like Bitcoin and loans towards cash and U.S. Treasuries. Meanwhile, in Hong Kong, Standard Chartered-backed fintech firm Dian Dian is poised to launch a licensed HKD-pegged stablecoin (HKDAP), moving the industry into a phase where the real test is integrating licensed stablecoins into actual payment flows and corporate treasury systems. The sharp decline in Circle's stock underscores a broader shift: the stablecoin market is moving from a winner-takes-all dynamic to a multi-player competitive arena where execution, compliance, and real-world utility are becoming paramount.

marsbit30m ago

Circle's Stock Price Plunges 76%, Hong Kong Dollar Stablecoin Set to Launch Within Two Weeks

marsbit30m ago

Trading

Spot

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of AI (AI) are presented below.

活动图片