Second Half of U.S. Crypto Policy: The Clarity Act Aims for 60 Votes, CFTC's "One-Person Commission" Becomes Biggest Variable

marsbitPublished on 2026-06-23Last updated on 2026-06-23

Abstract

In a pivotal year for US crypto policy, the "CLARITY Act" is advancing in the Senate but faces a high hurdle, needing 60 votes to pass. Key challenges include bridging partisan divides on ethics and swaying undecided Republican senators within a tight legislative calendar of only about 40 working days. The policy "second half" involves intense negotiations on a broader framework for Web3 and DeFi, including crypto tax reforms and the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act. A significant uncertainty is the understaffed CFTC, operating with four commissioner vacancies, which complicates regulatory clarity. Meanwhile, the departure of key "crypto champions"—SEC Commissioner Hester Peirce and Senator Cynthia Lummis—will impact ongoing policy efforts. Industry experts are cautiously optimistic but realistic. Sara K. Weed notes that while progress is being made, CLARITY is unlikely to pass this Congress, pushing agencies like the SEC and CFTC to provide more guidance. Sulolit Mukherjee suggests meaningful crypto tax legislation is more likely to be attached to larger must-pass bills. Rashan Colbert discusses the jurisdictional debate over prediction markets, emphasizing the need for a regulatory framework that fosters their development as financial tools rather than treating them broadly as gambling. The clock is ticking, but opportunities remain for substantive progress through continued bipartisan dialogue and pragmatic efforts.

Original Author: Cleve Mesidor (Executive Director, Washington DC Blockchain Foundation)

Original Compilation: AididiaoJP, Foresight News

In this sports season filled with Cinderella stories, the crypto industry is also looking forward to its own moment in the spotlight – the CLARITY Act currently advancing in the U.S. Senate could be that crucial 'comeback'. However, with two quarters left before the final whistle, Republicans likely need to reach a compromise with the White House on ethical issues while also persuading a few Republican senators still on the fence to secure the 60 votes for passage.

It's only halftime; there are still six months in the year, anything is possible. Legislative victories are essentially no different from scoring points on the field—they require the precise alignment of multiple factors. Sometimes, burning a little sage for good luck doesn't hurt—just look at the New York Knicks this year.

The second half of this policy year will be a critical period for intensive bipartisan negotiations in both the Senate and the House. Zooming out, market structure legislation is just one piece of a larger script aimed at building a comprehensive policy and regulatory framework for Web3 and DeFi.

The congressional calendar is already packed, with only 40+ legislative working days remaining—even factoring in the lame-duck session and midterm elections, time is extremely tight for all sides to strategize and adjust the score.

A Crowded Policy Arena

Beyond the prospects for the CLARITY Act, can the multiple crypto tax proposals spun off from the new PARITY Act hitch a ride on a larger legislative 'vehicle' and become law this year?

Can the core language of the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act pull off a 'Hail Mary' pass to formally enshrine developer protections into law?

Furthermore, the full-court press on the GENUIS rulemaking continues, with key provisions still awaiting finalization.

For crypto enthusiasts, this is like sports fans following an entire season: rich in storylines, full of suspense, exciting yet nerve-wracking.

CFTC Lacks Its Starting Lineup

The fact that a financial regulator is missing four commissioners is a deep concern for the industry. For crypto, this directly impacts expectations for action from Washington—uncertainty remains over whether new commissioners can be nominated and confirmed this year.

More pressingly, who will win the jurisdictional battle over prediction markets? The individual states, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)? Or will it ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court?

Of course, this is not a suggestion to place a bet.

Crypto Champions Set to Retire

Regardless of the final policy outcomes, the remainder of this year is likely to be bittersweet. Two heavyweight 'crypto champions' are set to hang up their federal government jerseys, and their departure will have profound short and long-term impacts: SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis.

Peirce, a two-term commissioner and leader of the SEC's crypto task force, has been a core architect of cross-regulatory coordination efforts. Lummis, as Chair of the Senate Banking Committee's Subcommittee on Digital Assets, has been a key negotiator for bipartisan compromise and a staunch advocate for the BRCA.

Second-Half Outlook: Views from Industry Leaders

I interviewed several senior industry leaders to get their read on the current crypto policy deliberations. Here are their perspectives on CLARITY, taxation, and prediction markets:

Sara K. Weed (Partner, Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP):

"It's undeniable we are steadily moving in the right direction. However, constrained by the shortage of legislative days and election pressures, the likelihood of CLARITY passing in this Congress is low. Consequently, agencies like the SEC and CFTC will be forced to play a more active role in providing much-needed certainty for the industry. The question, of course, is how far they can go within their existing authority."

Sulolit 'Raj' Mukherjee (CEO, Bodin Advisory):

"If history is any guide, meaningful crypto tax legislation is most likely to pass not as a standalone bill, but embedded within broader tax, budget, or end-of-year omnibus legislation. The current array of proposals are relatively targeted, enjoy bipartisan consensus, and aim to address specific issues like de minimis exemptions, tax treatment of staking, wash sale rules, and information reporting requirements. Such provisions are easier to advance when attached to must-pass larger bills. Ultimately, enactment hinges on bandwidth in Congress, scoring, and whether lawmakers view crypto tax rules as technical fixes to improve compliance rather than part of a larger digital asset policy debate. The chance for at least one or two measures to become law this year is real, but likely via a vehicle, not a standalone crypto tax bill."

Rashan Colbert (U.S. Policy Director, Crypto Council for Innovation):

"I won't predict how the courts will resolve the jurisdictional dispute, but the overarching direction is becoming clear: as the prediction market category matures, the CFTC is committed to building a more durable regulatory framework for it. The recent NPRM is another step towards providing more transparency and legal certainty for market participants—in a space seeing significant growth in user base and trading volume.

The central question is: should prediction markets primarily be viewed as financial market infrastructure or broadly categorized as gambling? I believe these markets have the potential to be sophisticated tools for expressing views, hedging risk, and streamlining access to derivatives on a wide range of events and assets. An overly broad gambling framework risks stifling that potential before the markets have a chance to develop into positive-sum financial infrastructure."

The second half of crypto policy has begun. The time window is narrow, but the window of opportunity remains open. The industry needs sustained bipartisan communication and pragmatic push to achieve substantive results by 2026.

Trending Cryptos

Related Questions

QWhat is the main focus of the CLARITY Act currently being advanced in the U.S. Senate, and what is its key legislative hurdle?

AThe CLARITY Act aims to provide regulatory clarity for the crypto industry in the U.S. Its key legislative hurdle is securing the 60 votes needed for passage in the Senate, which requires bipartisan support and potentially compromises with the White House on ethical issues, as well as winning over several undecided Republican senators.

QAccording to the article, what is a major operational concern for the crypto industry regarding the CFTC (Commodity Futures Trading Commission)?

AA major operational concern is that the CFTC is currently missing four commissioners, creating a 'one-person commission' scenario. This vacancy raises uncertainty about whether new commissioners can be nominated and confirmed within the year, directly impacting the industry's expectations for regulatory action from Washington.

QWho are the two key 'crypto champions' in the U.S. federal government mentioned as leaving their posts, and what roles have they played?

AThe two key 'crypto champions' are SEC Commissioner Hester M. Peirce and U.S. Senator Cynthia Lummis. Peirce has been the architect of the SEC's crypto task force and a core coordinator across agencies. Lummis, as Chair of the Senate Banking Subcommittee on Digital Assets, has been a key bipartisan negotiator and a staunch advocate for regulatory frameworks like the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA).

QBased on expert opinion in the article, what is the most likely pathway for meaningful crypto tax legislation to pass in the current Congress?

AExperts suggest meaningful crypto tax legislation is most likely to pass not as a standalone bill but by being attached to larger, must-pass legislation such as broader tax, budget, or year-end packages. Proposals addressing specific issues like minimum exemptions, staking tax treatment, and wash sale rules have bipartisan consensus and are easier to advance when bundled with essential bills.

QWhat is the core jurisdictional debate surrounding prediction markets, and what potential risk does a broad classification pose according to one policy director interviewed?

AThe core debate is whether jurisdiction over prediction markets should fall to individual states, the CFTC and SEC, or ultimately be decided by the Supreme Court. The risk, as noted by Rashan Colbert, is that if prediction markets are broadly classified as gambling, it could stifle their potential to develop into positive-sum financial infrastructure before they have the chance to mature.

Related Reads

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

On June 23rd, the Ethereum ecosystem witnessed two major shifts, signaling a significant governance realignment. First, former Ethereum Foundation researchers established Ethlabs, a new independent non-profit. Backed by major ETH holders like Bitmine and SharpLink, Ethlabs aims to address practical needs for institutional adoption, including faster settlement, native asset issuance, cross-chain transactions, and mainnet scaling. Secondly, the Ethereum Foundation announced a major restructuring, laying off 54 employees (20% of its staff) to become a leaner entity focused on protocol governance and maintenance rather than being the primary builder. This move represents a pivotal correction. Criticisms had mounted over the Foundation's perceived slowness, lack of clear strategy, and over-reliance on Vitalik Buterin's influence. Ethlabs emerges as a more execution-oriented, "industrialized" layer focused on market adoption—bridging the gap between research and real-world use. Notably, Vitalik Buterin is absent from its list of supporters, interpreted as an intentional step to avoid excessive personal endorsement and allow the organization to build independent credibility. The Ethereum Foundation's downsizing and redefinition mark a retreat from its former central coordinating role. It now aims to share the "privilege of stewarding Ethereum" with other emerging groups like Ethlabs, the Ethereum Applications Guild, and The Ethereum Economic Zone. Analysts frame this dual shift as the Foundation ensuring Ethereum remains "correct" (credibly neutral), while Ethlabs must prove it remains "effective" (competitive and attractive for capital and adoption). This addresses community "shareholder-like anxiety" about ETH's market performance. While risks exist—such as concerns over shifting from Foundation centrality to large-holder influence—the consensus is that the greater risk for Ethereum was inaction, caught between technical idealism and organizational inertia. These steps aim to create a more multi-stakeholder, execution-driven future for the network.

链捕手19m ago

Foundation Steps Back, Ethlabs Steps Forward: Ethereum Undergoes Its Largest Restructuring in History

链捕手19m ago

Research Report Analysis: Morgan Stanley Details SanDisk SNDK, The Truth About Cloud Data Center Pricing Power and AI Inference Benefits

Morgan Stanley raised its price target for SanDisk (SNDK) from $1100 to $1750 on June 22, maintaining an Overweight rating. The upgrade is driven by AI inference demand reshaping the NAND market, particularly for KV Cache and context window storage in cloud data centers. These cloud clients exhibit price inelasticity and sign long-term contracts, granting SanDisk significant pricing power. SanDisk's New Business Model (NBM) agreements, covering over one-third of FY27 bit shipments with 3-5 year terms and fixed price/price collar structures, are crucial. They are projected to sustain gross margins around 80% even at floor prices, providing a buffer against cyclical downturns. Morgan Stanley forecasts gross margins to surge from 30.3% in FY25 to 86.7% in FY27e. With NAND supply expected to remain tight into 2026/2027 and cloud/data centers becoming the largest end-market, SanDisk holds supply-side pricing power. The company targets 15-19% bit growth via technology transitions, not capacity expansion. Revenue is projected to grow ~6.6x from FY25 to FY27, with EPS rising from $2.74 to $14.73, driven by high-margin cloud business. Key upside catalysts include faster enterprise SSD adoption and edge AI growth. Downside risks involve slower industry growth, competitor capex increases, market share loss, and competition from Chinese players like YMTC. The investment thesis rests on AI-driven structural demand, NBM's margin protection, and sustained supply tightness. The $1750 target implies ~28x FY27e P/E.

marsbit4h ago

Research Report Analysis: Morgan Stanley Details SanDisk SNDK, The Truth About Cloud Data Center Pricing Power and AI Inference Benefits

marsbit4h ago

Trading

Spot
Futures

Hot Articles

Discussions

Welcome to the HTX Community. Here, you can stay informed about the latest platform developments and gain access to professional market insights. Users' opinions on the price of S (S) are presented below.

活动图片